For Service Sites, having a phone number in meta description ALWAYS a good idea?
-
If you have a site that offers a same day service, e.g. plumbing, electrical, computer support: do you think it would always be a good idea to stick the phone # in the meta description?
-
Always keep the phone number there. It's not going to give any SEO help, however it's good practise for marketing
-
Sure, say what you want. People say lots of things. You are talking about marketing which is NOT SEO. My original post did state that yes, it would not harm the site, which was your question. But to say that clicking a link in a SERP is conversion is not technically correct. Now if they call your number in your description, then yes, you converted them.
My ONLY issue was to that was the fact that you might reduce CTR as there is no need to click through, as I have the information I want and was converted.
That was all. People are mixing terms here and calling it all SEO. Which is incorrect as the acronym stand for Search Engine Optimization.
I am closing this out on my end,
Best of luck
-
Richard
That assumes that 'wanting to buy' is an off or on state inside a person's mind; there are stages in the buying process. A person is nudged along in the process by various techniques in each stage. In the service searches, most of the initial steps have been done for you; the need has been created, the customer NEEDS your service, the question is will they choose you or your competitors; That's where committment and consistency come into play. Get the customer to commit to your brand even a little bit and they're more likely to buy. Every step that you get the customer to take towards you is a step towards a sale, which is why clicking on your site is DEFINITELY a step towards that. So I would say yes CTR is a BIG part of Conversion Rate Optimization.
-
No, that is not a conversion. You converted them to nothing they are still visiting. To convert is to change.
the act or an instance of converting or the process of being converted
Converting someone is the intent to make tangible contact. Purchase a product, sign up for an email list, get them to watch a video, contact the company. Something besides a static visitor. There has to be an interaction stronger than clicking on a pages within a website.
CTR is just that. Optimizing so you get the person onto the site. Once there, you try to convert them to [enter your goal for that visitor]
-
Click through rate is part of conversion....you've successfully converted a visitor who is picking between 10 websites to click on yours.....by having a better meta description tag.......that's conversion.....
-
ok, conversion is not click through rate, but converting to an sale, sign up, or other process. An SEO would actually do all of these things including probably SEM, SMM, and more which is NOT SEO!
Although David, I think you were talking about CTR and not CRO.
-
An SEO who does not optimize for conversions should be fired. That is their job. What good is a ranking if half the people do not click it because the SEO failed to use text that would convert. Getting rankings is only part of the battle. SEO's cannot be 1-dimensional, this industry is not meant for 1-dimensional people.
-
No, SEO is Search Engine Optimization which is to optimize for Search Engines. CRO is Conversion Rate Optimization, and that is different.
SEOs might work on both disciplines, but they are different.
-
Just to add though that I think having your phone number in the SERPS would result in less click throughs, so if CTR is or becomes an important factor (I don't think it is or Google wouldn't be trying to show more and more in the SERPS) but you're still going to get less visitors.
So if you rely on showing traffic to prove SEO is working go with David's idea of a trackable number.
-
Richard, I disagree that SEO is just all about 'rankings'. Conversion is also a big part of SEO and in fact may be an indirect factor to rankings, since more visitors equates more natural links.......so yes, a higher conversion would be an seo WIN.
-
A a user yes, I'll often use a phone number from the SERPS rather than click a page and David's idea to make it a trackable number is brilliant for justifing SEO efforts.
Also check out this post from Patrick Altoft on numbers showing up in rich snippets - http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/google-testing-phone-numbers-h1-tags-in-rich-snippets/
I've not seen it out in the wild yet but I'd say it's definitely worth doing.
-
Hi David,
I said nothing about adding to the Title tag. I do all the time, more for the geotagging and in the about us or contact us pages.
Higher rankings through CTR is speculative at best, although I also believe this is probable. However, as I pointed out, this could make them call instead of click and that would GREATLY reduce your CTR and therefore your rankings if that metric were strong.
Is it a good idea, sure, why not. Will it helps rankings, I doubt it.
-
I've never seen a phone number in the title tag hurt rankings at all. In fact, there is a chance it adds relevancy to the query and could increase your rankings, possibly.
Beyond that, while the meta description is not used for rankings directly, I am of the personal belief that it does influence rankings using CTR.
Since we do not know every piece of the algo, I would venture to guess that Google uses CTR as a determining factor for rankings. So by providing a piece of content that could increase CTR, it could increase ranking.
-
Well, not for SEO purposes but for marketing yes. SEs do not count descriptions as a metric for rankings. However, for marketing, when someone sees your phone number, it may give them a higher level of confidence to click. Or they might just call instead of clicking?
-
YES!!!
This is critical and a common mistake many SEO's overlook. Make sure you use a number that is trackable so you can see the kind of return it generates and go from there.
You can even put it in the title, depending upon the circumstances. I have specific experience utilizing both of these methods and they both worked well for generating leads for my clients!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Title Tags & Meta descriptions do not update
Hi, I have a question about the title tags and meta descriptions of my domain b-buildingbusiness.com. I've updated them about 5 days ago but the new versions don't show in the search engines. However it does show when you check with the facebook developers tool https://developers.facebook.com/tools/debug/sharing/?q=http%3A%2F%2Fb-buildingbusiness.com%2F . Does anyone have an idea why they're not updated in the search engines and how I can resolve this? Best, Rik
On-Page Optimization | | bbuildingbusiness0 -
Page Title (Meta descriptions) length... how strict are you?
I have just had a conversation with a client... the gist was this... Is it more important to stay under the 55-60 characters OR go over a bit and have the page title make sense and include the clients company name. The same argument for meta description. I have a client insisting on 55-60 length but the keywords are long and if we use the primary keyword phrase the length is 44 if we use the keyword phrase and add the company name it becomes 64. This is with us trimming it a bit. Anyone else discussed this before?
On-Page Optimization | | JohnW-UK1 -
Meta descriptions for subpages in the SERPs
Hey Mozzers! Something occurred to me the other day was that, while we can write title tags and meta descriptions to be within the character count and therefore appear nice and neatly in the SERPs, when Google et al decide to pull subpages out as further site links, it seems to still pull the normal meta description but with a far lower character count. As this looks untidy and could potentially impact CTR, is there a way I can amend the preferred text for the shortened version, via Webmaster Tools, for example? Thanks in advance for your help! Nick.
On-Page Optimization | | themegroup0 -
Positioning one site in two languages
Hi all, I have used the plugin wpml in order to have one site in different languages (Spanish and English). The problem is that this plugin doesn't work with all in one SEO plugin so that the spanish home and the english home have the same title. Google has positionated in the first position the english one in google.es. How can I revert the situation if I fix the problem with other plugin? Thanks.
On-Page Optimization | | juanmiguelcr0 -
Flickr v. On-Site Images
My apologies in that I have searched for this, have seen discussions on it and haven't seen a definitive answer on the question of hosting & displaying on-domain images v. using a source like flickr to host all of your images. I have a client that is mostly a local search play in a very tourism heavy area. I'm investigating this option for a few reasons. 1. Ease of use. The new flickr app is brilliant. So if he's out giving a tour, takes a picture, it can be seamlessly integrated to his account & then shot off to all of his portals (website, facebook, twitter, etc.). It's a small client & he's not tech savvy, so this option suits him very well. 2. SEO. With all of the tagging, geo components, and it playing nice with Google Images search, I thought this was a viable option in hosting the majority of his on-site images. I've seen opinions on this before. But I was wondering if there any further opinions on the subject. Not sure if there's anything 'definitive', but any help or insight would be appreciated.
On-Page Optimization | | BrianWhitaker0 -
Is it a good idea to rel=canonical dozens of old outdated pages?
we have dozens old outdated manual pages that still need to be up, but have terrible code issues (they're exported from word) and no image tagging, etc. there are new pages in place, so should i rel=canonical to the new pages? will this transfer any link juice to the newer, more seo-friendly ones?
On-Page Optimization | | DerekM880 -
Pinging Service?
Hi I'm considering using this pinging service http://www.pingler.com I would just like people opinions on this? They will ping 25urls for me each month on regular basis. I can choose either to get my urls pinged daily or every 10 days for only $3 a month. Does any have experience with pining services & will this benefit my seo, thanks.
On-Page Optimization | | Socialdude0 -
It has been recommended that we remove the number of links in our footer, should we?
We have a pretty user friendly footer with almost an entire site-map on it. It's similar to many e-commerce company footers, and I think it's useful to the user. SEO professionals have recommended that to reduce the number of links on any given page on our site we should compress our footer and only show the headers, thus removing many links. This in my opinion is a disservice to the user and makes the site not look as good, but maybe it's a good idea for SEO to get rid of so many links per page? What do you think? (pic attached) Screen_shot_2011-08-05_at_3.54.53_PM.png
On-Page Optimization | | aran0881