Should I check Use noindex for Tag Archives?
-
I have a page indexed > (http://mysite.com/mypost) and also http://mysite.com/tag/mypost The same post shows up twice, one with /tag/ one without when I search site:http://mysite.com
Is this a duplicate content?? Can I get penalized for this?In the All in one plugin should I check Use noindex for Tag Archives to avoid this or doesn't matter.
Thanks -
very good and well thought out answer.
-
thanks bemcapaz & Marcus for expert advice. wht u think if we control how much content to be shown on tag pages .. like this http://www.lancelhoff.com/change-the-excerpt-length-wordpress/. is it ok? actually i m getting traffic from TAG pages too... .
-
Most of my sites uses Wordpress, what I did to never have any duplicate content is the following:
First, I have the following plugins installed
- .html on PAGES
- All in ONe SEO Pack
- cbnet Ping Optimizer
- Google XML Sitemaps
Then, added the following text to the robots.txt
User-agent: *
Disallow: /wp-adminDisallow: /wp-includes
Disallow: /wp-content/plugins
Disallow: /wp-content/cache
Disallow: /wp-content/themes
Disallow: /trackbackDisallow: /comment
Disallow: /categoria//
Disallow: */trackback
Disallow: */comments
Disallow: /sem-categoria
Disallow: /pollsarchive
Disallow: /category
Disallow: /?
Disallow: /*?
Disallow: /*.php$
Disallow: /*.js$
Disallow: /*.inc$
Disallow: /*.css$
Disallow: /*.gz$
Disallow: /*.wmv$
Disallow: /*.cgi$
Disallow: /*.xhtml$
Allow: /wp-content/uploads
Google ImageUser-agent: Googlebot-ImageDisallow:Allow: /* # Google AdSenseUser-agent: Mediapartners-GoogleDisallow:Allow: / # digg mirrorUser-agent: duggmirrorDisallow: / Sitemap: http://www.YOURSITE.com.br/sitemap.xml
On the admin in the PERMALINK config tab, in the COMMON SETTINGS i choose
- Custom Structure -> /%postname%.html
In SETTINGS > cbnet Ping Optimizer I inserted
http://blogsearch.google.com/ping/RPC2
http://ping.weblogalot.com/rpc.php
http://ping.syndic8.com/xmlrpc.php
http://rpc.technorati.com/rpc/ping
http://rpc.reader.livedoor.com/ping
http://www.blogpeople.net/servlet/weblogUpdates
http://audiorpc.weblogs.com/RPC2
I use this plugin to make sure that wordpress will not ping those services everytime I change or update something on the page,actually I seted the plugin to ping only after 30 min after the last ping.
So If you just posted something on Wordpress it will ping all those services for a fast index, however, if for some reason you have to edit the post when you save this plugin will make sure the services will not get pingged again in such a short space of time.
In the All in One Seo config I have the following config
UNCHECKED
- Use noindex for Categories
- Use noindex for Tag Archives
- Autogenerate Description
I also set Exlcude Pages, Additional Post Headers, Additional Page Headers and Additional Home Headers all blank
With all this configuration if someone access any post of my blogs they get a page with http://domain/post permalink structure, doesnt matter if the access came from a TAG, Categorie or normal Search.
Aditionally the main Tag page and Categorie page are indexed, so i ended up using my tags for some sort of relevance to the posts that belongs to that Tag. In google search the same post could appear by many related TAGs filter but the content of the post appears in an unique page.
Hope that helps
PS.: Suggestions to improve this config are welcome
-
Hey, I am guessing this is a wordpress site?
You could solve this a couple of ways
- 301 redirect the duplicate page - not recommended as it is a valid page but it may work
- canonical link on both pages showing the main version of this content
- noindex the tag page
Alternatively, you can use options 2 & 3 and it will resolve it.
If it's wordpress, happy to take a look at the actual page if it helps? I spend a lot of time tinkering with wordpress so there maybe another way & this answer is based on some assumption without real links.
Marcus
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
MOZ is showing that I have non- indexed blog tag posts are they supposed to be nonindexed. My articles are indexed just not the blog tags that take you to other similar articles do I need to fix this or is it ok?
MOZ is showing that my blog post tags are not indexed my question is should they be indexed? my articles are indexed just not the tags that take you to posts that are similar. Do I need to fix this or not? Thank you
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Tyler58910 -
Original Source Tag or Canonical Tag for News Publishers?
I have been sourcing content from a news publisher who is my partner for publishing content online. My website deals with sourcing content from a couple of websites. I did use a canonical tag pointing towards the respective syndicated source but I have not seen traffic for those articles. I did some research and found out that Google does have a tag for news publishers which is the "original-source" tag which helps news publishers to give proper credit for their work. Here's a link to the official word by Google" https://news.googleblog.com/2010/11/credit-where-credit-is-due.html Although Google has officially stated that the "syndication-source" tag has been replaced by the "canonical" tag. However, there is no mention about the "original-source" tag.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Starcom_Search
Can I still use the "original-source" tag to syndicate content from my partner site instead of the "canonical" tag? P.S.: The reason why I am not convinced with the use of the canonical tag is because:
1. As per what Google says, duplicate content won't harm my website unless it is spam. (And since we are rightfully content from our partner'website and showcasing it to a larger audience by hosting it on our website as well, we are thereby not indulging in any unethical practices) 2. The canonical tag could possibly hamper my crawl bandwidth issues as it would essentially need the crawler to crawl the whole page to figure out that the canonical is present, post which any possible valuation that my site could have garnered gets lost.3. Moreover, since I am from the news, media and publication industry, content republication is a widely accepted practice and in such cases simply including a link to the original source of the article or using the original source tag should suffice, That being mentioned, I do not want to go ahead without taking a second opinion about this. Kindly help me to resolve this issue.0 -
Are ALL CAPS construed as spamming if they are used in a meta description tag call to action?
I know this seems like an old school question. As a long time SEO I would never use ALL CAPS in a title tag (unless a brand name is capitalized). However I recently came across a Moz video about creating better calls to action in the meta description tags. Some of the examples had CTAs that were using all caps (i.e. CALL NOW! or LOWEST QUOTES!) I realize there is a debate about the user experience implications. However I'm more concerned about search engines penalizing websites that are using ALL CAPS CTAs in their meta description tags. Any feedback/advice would be appreciated. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RosemaryB0 -
Has anyone used Wildshark?
Just stumbled across a company called Wildshark SEO (http://www.wildshark.co.uk). Has anyone used them? Any feedback? Please and thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoman100 -
Ranking in SERPs but not using terms on website.
As far as I know, it's not normally possible for a website to rank for a keyword that is not mentioned on the website. I have seen a website that ranks very well for key terms and yet they are not mentioned anywhere on the website, I have run advanced search & checked using tools including cloak checker on my findings. How can this be?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | lee-murphy0 -
NoIndex Purchase Page
We ran a ScreamingFrog report of one of our websites and found that there are thousands of instances of a single page with a different URL parameter, for example: purchase.cfm?id=1234
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ErnieB
purchase.cfm?id=1235
purchase.cfm?id=1236
purchase.cfm?id=1237 and we do not need purchase.cfm to be indexed for any reason as there is practically no content on that page to begin with, but it's just part of the purchase steps in our website. What is the best way to deal with this for Google & SEO? Should we do a Meta NoIndex of this purchase.cfm page? Thank you.0 -
What happen if a canonical tag points to a noindex page?
Hello,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | fablau
I have question. We have hundreds of affiliates that have implemented our datafeed on their websites, and to avoid duplicate content issues we are requiring them to put a canonical tag on their own product pages pointing to our own original product page. So, for example, if an affiliate has a page about our Product 101, they will have to add a canonical tag pointing to the corresponding product page on our own website: www.ourwebsite.com/products/product101 Now, since many of our product pages have defined a "noindex" tag (due to Panda issues), may that be a problem? In other words: what kind of problems could cause having our affiliates defining a canonical tag on their own product pages pointing to the original product page on our website which have a "noindex" met tag defined? Maybe it is a stupid question we shouldn't worry about, but any thoughts about this scenario are very welcome! Thank you in advance.0 -
Canonical Tag and Affiliate Links
Hi! I am not very familiar with the canonical tag. The thing is that we are getting traffic and links from affiliates. The affiliates links add something like this to the code of our URL: www.mydomain.com/category/product-page?afl=XXXXXX At this moment we have almost 2,000 pages indexed with that code at the end of the URL. So they are all duplicated. My other concern is that I don't know if those affilate links are giving us some link juice or not. I mean, if an original product page has 30 links and the affiliates copies have 15 more... are all those links being counted together by Google? Or are we losing all the juice from the affiliates? Can I fix all this with the canonical tag? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jorgediaz0