Hit by Google updates; Some good advice needed
-
Hi,
Here`s my domain http://www.kent-website-designer.co.uk/. Registered in 2007.
We have took a big hit from the updates in the last 6 months and its really affecting revenue.
I know when you look at the site you may well think WOW this is 2007 SEO and youre right it hasnt been updated in some time as of last year we ranked very highly and it gave us enough business to concentrate on. However up until last year many of my competitors were using same onpage and offpage strategies....and probably a few of you were too!
So now the inquiries and income is drying up. However, I provided myself with an income from my efforts, rather than be unemployed, so I want to get it back on track.
I visited the Google webmaster forums to query a couple of webmaster account queries and basically got beat up by the rude and arrogant google forum admins. Basically they said I was a spam site who shouldnt be in business. How very nice!
1. I have EMD - but domain age should mean something?
2. I lost a few links from https://www.getsafeonline.org/partners-and-supporters/ in the last year which hasnt helped when they reorganised their content. Same with other trusted sites we lost links. We are left with low quality links.
3. Some CMS sites have replicated our footer links on a large scale, which wasnt intentional but may look as link spam, plus they arent no followed as G prefers.
4. Google seems to have become intelligent? Apparently it can detect content which is negative in outdated seo advice. How, can it understand context and meaning so older seo advice isdetected as spam content?
5. No pages are de indexed just a rank drop to 30 - 60 positions.
6. Over optimised H1`s?
7. Is Pipe command in titles now negative?
So its sink or swim time I guess. The siteand domain is honest but neglected and probably should re align the business with what we can offer. We got away with that SEO but clearly things have changed. However with no grey or black hat at least we arent overly worried by removing links.
Also looking for an SEO company who we can outsource with a white label solution in order to offer SEO.
I dont need beating up, short and to the point critiques please. Pros and Cons
Many thanks.
-
Thanks Cyrus,
Well domain age is very important and the link clean up for up to 90% can be achieved by me.
There could be a correlation between the huge rise in footer links by the CMS`s and the period of the ranking fall, that just coincides with the Penguin update, then got noticed.
I really think that this could be the major cause of the problem. 13,000 footer links optimised for anchor texts in 6 months? Not a good sign. WMT is by far the most valuable tool for me as all is listed. Analytics show a 68% average drop in organic traffic...ouwch!
In meant time I can boost my adwords budget and hope.
Removing comment links? Just a case of contacting blog admins?
*Shall I keep the highest page authority links and make real effort on the blog comments and less quality domain authority first? I surely must be able to have anchor text links....I see lots of sites still ranking well from text link pages only and very thin content.
Cetainly no WMT messages from Google.
I just dont have the time to build thousands of manual links.....and if I do for SERPs its surely for trying to improve ranking. We all know that good SEO is really about improving ranking, else why do it. ....its a bit of a contradiction by Google.
NB. Have removed over 19,000 Links with unnatural anchor texts so thats a start!
-
Howdy,
Thanks for stopping in Q&A and letting us take a look at your site. Sorry to hear about the dip in traffic. It's blows when that happens.
Looking at your backlink profile in Open Site Explorer, it's pretty easy to see why you were hit. When I look at a backlink profile, usually the first report I go to is the anchor text report:
Unfortunately, this is exactly the type of link profile targeted by Penguin and other over-optimization updates by Google. Not going to beat you up... you admitted this was like SEO in 2007 - and these tactics worked then! So we're not here to lay any blame. Tens of 1000's of webmasters around the globe face similar issues.
Specifically, there's 2 things in your link profile that jump out at me:
- Over-optimized anchor text - Variations of "Web Design Kent" seem to comprise 90% of the backlinks.
- A high, high amount of comment links
- Tons of exact match footer links, as you noted
All of these together is a recipe for trouble. But you likely already know that. So the real question is, how to fix it?
You realistically have two choices: Ditch the site and start over, or do a thorough link cleanup and file a reconsideration request.
You probably want to try to save the site. I'd start by doing a complete site audit for low quality links. Our friend Paddy Moogan wrote a great post about this: http://www.stateofsearch.com/step-by-step-guide-finding-low-quality-links/
The big question is if you need to file a reconsideration request. Did you receive any messages in Google Webmaster Tools? If not, you may want to file a request just to see Google's response. Often they will verify this way if a site has received a manual penalty or not.
Also a good post by Ryan Kent on identifying penalties: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/identifying-link-penalties-in-2012
Understand that Google's reconsideration process can be a several month process. It's best to try to remove as many links as you can - (and show a serious effort to do so) and use the disavow tool as a measure of last resort.
Finally, and I can't stress this enough, the number one thing that helps after you've cleaned up bad links, is building good links.
Keep us up to date on your progress. With some work and due diligence, your site may come out of this fine.
-
Thank you Brian and Highway5.
Well on analysis I havent got any messages from G in webmasters account for my site or any of my clients.
Looking at Rands flowchart...site pages arent de indexed which I knew, ranks #1 for domain name and relative unique title pages are still ranking page 1, 2 or 3 . So in the words of sherlock holmes, after deduction the only left remaining factor must be the truth! So it must be an algo based change. Which lets face it, is the nicest option!
There must be some kind of memory effect with google because we had a high trust link to one page which we asked to be moved and link to my index page but the former page ranked highly for quite some time (years) although it only had the internal site links to it after.
Plan of action
1. Webmaster tools show 13000 footer links from various clients ecommerce websites as they have made a huge push in products......its a cms tech issue I can deal with immediately. These are ALL anchor text. I can edit all my sites for url based link rather than anchor text and add nofollow.
2. Ive put my money into the business this year with a series of pr web releases ($4000) and those releases have a mixture of url, main keywords and subpage keywords. This is a trusted site, so i am thinking that these pages are worthy enough and dont need amending. If im going to keep any keyword anchor texts it might as well be on those sites.
3. There has to be a point of where i still need concise anchor text over url or non keyword inbound links. Lets assume I find a 450 highly relevent sites, 250 non relevant sites and 150 directories to link from, is there a ratio of mixing these up?
4. OSE doesnt show all my links, only around 1800. I can remove about 18,000 links in a very short period.I think they class as over optimised spam links.
5. Not sure weather i should just ask for removal of links from the less relevant sites rather than adjust anchor text. If they are no value, why have links there anyway?
6. Again not sure when just to use the short anchor text or the anchor text in much longer sentances / paragraphs
7. Rewrite / remove of some content, ammend the H1`s to simplified version of the title.
8. Im battling with analytics (god thats is awfully difficult to use now) to find the traffic drop or ranking drop. I recall I lost web design in kent middle of last year but im sure even in November i still ranked 1 or 2 for website designers kent.
It could tie in with a certain algo update but i think we have identified enough reasons to start with and be getting on with.
9. Thank god for Adwords! Which is just about keeping me going.
NB. Looking at the analytics, its difficult to pin down exactly . Year on year there is a big dip in April 24 2012 onwards (and to date) which coincides the Penguin. I cant measure from October and backwards in WMT but the rankings are blown by then. My pageviews arent easy to use a guidesas my PR releases for this year skew the averages. Graph on graph is down April 12 onwards. Enquiries I got were probably Adwords so didnt notice rankings drop.
-
Hi Chris,
Can you time the drops in traffic and rankings? There are a number of places you can check the dates of the major Google updates. SEOmoz have a cool page here with the dates in by year although nothing yet for 2013
http://www.seomoz.org/google-algorithm-change
As Brian mentioned if its done to an algorithmic change then clean up your links (anchor key is key) and then wait for the refresh.
If is an unnatural link warning then you need to clean up your links and then ask Google nicely to remove the penalty.
There are lots of guides about reinclusion requests.
There is flow chart
Hope it helps
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Call for Help. Hit Badly with "Medic" and another 30% Loss with Sept 28th Update
Hi Everyone, I am not sure how this is all happening. We have been online for about 15 years, and now we are at our lowest amount of traffic in about 10 years. Our sites are www.bestpricenutrition.com and www.mysupplementstore.com. We sell commodity items, but I have focused on unique product descriptions, tons of UGC, blog posts and guides for awhile now and it has always done us well. Until as of late. This is what I feel led up to this, but I am hoping there is something I missed. May 1st, 2018: Migrated www.bestpricenutrition.com and www.mysupplementstore.com from Shopify. Similar sites, but almost all unique content. We purchased www.mysupplementstore.com about 8 years ago. A ton of traffic and sales, which is why we didn't just redirect it. Around May 25th: www.mysupplementstore.com took a big hit and lost almost 40% of its traffic. Nothing happened to www.bestpricenutrition.com, we actually increased traffic. Aug 1st Update: www.mysupplementstore.com lost another 25% of its traffic. www.bestpricenutrition.com lost about 40% of it's traffic. Sept 28th: Nothing happened to www.mysupplementstore.com, but www.bestpricenutrition.com lost another 30% of it's traffic. So I have been trying to figure out if there is anything technically wrong, but doesn't seem so. These are issues we discovered in August. During the migration, the reviews from each site were syndicated to both websites. There were 1000's. This was resolved in mid August. During the migration, the company doing the migration pushed our blog posts to both websites. 100's of blog posts duplicated to each website. This was resolved mid August. We found that a disgruntled employee instead writing unique content for our product pages, she was copying them one from another. This was about 100 product pages, which we have since resolved. What's Left I noticed on www.bestpricenutrition.com that we have 100's of blog posts that are getting hardly any traffic. I had trimmed www.mysupplementstore.com of this low traffic content. I am working on www.bestpricenutrition.com still. I have been in this industry since 2003, survived 2012, but have exhausted everything I know to figure this out. It's another sob story I know, but trying to keep everyone's job alive here, but it doesn't look like it's going to happen. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | vetofunk0 -
Sitemap Migration - Google Guidelines
Hi all. I saw in support.google.com the following text: Create and save the Sitemap and lists of links A Sitemap file containing the new URL mapping A Sitemap file containing the old URLs to map A list of sites with link to your current content I would like to better understand about a "A list of sites with bond link to current content" Question 1: have I need tree sitemaps simultaneously ?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mobic
Question 2: If yes, should I put this sitemap on the Search Console of the new website?
Question 3: or just Google gave a about context how do we make the migration? And I'll need really have sitemaps about the new site only..? What about is Google talking? Thanks for any advice.0 -
Google + and Schema
I've noticed with a few of the restaurant clients I work with that Schema isn't contributing at all to their SERP -- their Google + page is. Is there any way to have more control over what Google is pulling to help make UX better? I.e. showing photos of the restaurant without a logo, etc.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Anti-Alex0 -
Google Seeing 301 as 404
Hi all, We recently migrated a few small sites into one larger site and generally we had no problems. We read a lot of blogs before hand, 301'd the old links etc and we've been keeping an eye on any 404s. What we have found is that Webmaster is picking up quite a few 404s, yet when we investigate these 404s they are 301'd and work fine. This isn't for every url, but Google is finding more and I just want to catch any problems before they get out of hand. Is there any reason why Google would count a 301 as a 404? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | HB170 -
Are these good backlinks?
I am trying to understand how to build good backlinks. I've read or been told that anchor text is bad (understood), websites with unrelated subjects is bad (understood), paid-for links are bad (?), "submitted" and article to get the link is bad (?), or it is a link/farm directory are bad (?). This is actually really confusing to me! Please bear with my silly questions, I am an engineer with an MBA, stay-at-home/homeschooling mom that helps run my husbands business. My brain gets full fast! Ha! I thought maybe if I post some of the links we have built, someone could look at them and tell me if they are good or bad. This way I can go forward understanding better. Articles... I thought that writing articles was a GOOD thing! Now I see that submitting articles isn't? So what about these two articles where my husband, as an expert in his field, wrote an article for a popular mag/blog. http://coastalanglermag.com/red-snapper-season/ (they did the hyperlink wrong and I am trying to get the publisher to fix it) http://www.bdoutdoors.com/article/shark-encounter-capt.-gregg-rapp/ (this is a pretty funny story if you read it) Blog stories... what about when someone copies your blog post as a story on their website? Or someone scrapes your content? http://jeremyrymill.tumblr.com/ http://www.bdoutdoors.com/article/heart-pressure/ http://www.sportfishermen.com/board/showthread.php?t=2627767&p=3294972 (we post fishing reports and they get copied) Un-related Directories... http://www.mobileresources.net/mobi/Glowing_Deep_Sea_Fish/ (I didn't create this!!! I guess they just crawl and link?) Related "farm" Directories http://www.sportsmansresource.com/ffishtarpon.htm Other directories/citations such as yellow pages, city search, etc. These are okay right? Local hotels and what not... concierge's link to me, I don't even ask them to http://laquintacocoabeach.com/things-to-do/index.cfm Paid - I pay for MOZ Local! Isn't that paying??? AND, I paid for a whois listing on enom... is that bad too? NOW FOR THE BAD.... these are bad right? http://darman.niniyoo.com/Sea-Leveler-Sport-Fishing-Charters-Inc-FL.html (I have no idea how this got there) http://teensnow.comwww.whoisbusinesslistings.com/Other/10/23490/Sea-Leveler-Sport-Fishing-Charters.html (what the heck is this??? how can they even append a website on a website?) http://forums.gq.com.au/member.php?u=1813973 (I think this was created on my behalf by my part-time SEO) If you have read all the way down to here, my sincerest thanks! Thank you for your time!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CalicoKitty20000 -
Does Google see this as duplicate content?
I'm working on a site that has too many pages in Google's index as shown in a simple count via a site search (example): site:http://www.mozquestionexample.com I ended up getting a full list of these pages and it shows pages that have been supposedly excluded from the index via GWT url parameters and/or canonicalization For instance, the list of indexed pages shows: 1. http://www.mozquestionexample.com/cool-stuff 2. http://www.mozquestionexample.com/cool-stuff?page=2 3. http://www.mozquestionexample.com?page=3 4. http://www.mozquestionexample.com?mq_source=q-and-a 5. http://www.mozquestionexample.com?type=productss&sort=1date Example #1 above is the one true page for search and the one that all the canonicals reference. Examples #2 and #3 shouldn't be in the index because the canonical points to url #1. Example #4 shouldn't be in the index, because it's just a source code that, again doesn't change the page and the canonical points to #1. Example #5 shouldn't be in the index because it's excluded in parameters as not affecting page content and the canonical is in place. Should I worry about these multiple urls for the same page and if so, what should I do about it? Thanks... Darcy
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945010 -
Google and private networks?
I have one or two competitors (in the UK) in my field who buy expired 1 - 8 year old domains on random subjects (SEO, travel, health you name it) and they are in the printing business and they stick 1 - 2 articles (unrelated to what was on there before) on these and that's it. I think they stick with PA and DA above 30 and most have 10 – 100 links so well used expired domains, hosted in the USA and most have different Ip’s although they now have that many (over 70% of their backlink profile) that some have the same ip. On further investigation none of the blogs have any contact details but it does look like they have been a little smart here and added content to the about us (similar to I use to run xxx but now do xxx) also they have one or two tabs with content on (article length) that is on the same subject they use to do and the titles are all the same content. So basically they are finding expired 1 – 10 year old domains that have only been expired (from what I can see) 6 months max and putting 1 – 2 articles on the home page in relation with print (maybe adding a third on the subject the blog use to cover), add 1 – 3 articles via tabs at the top on subjects the sites use to cover, registering the details via xbybssgcf@whoisprivacyprotect.com and that’s it. They have been ranking via this method for the last couple of years (through all the Google updates) and still do extremely well. Does Google not have any way to combat link networks other than the stupid stuff such as public link networks, it just seems that if you know what you are doing you get away, if your big enough you get away with it but the middle of the ground (mum and pop sites) get F*** over with spam pointing to there site that no spammer would dream of doing anyway?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BobAnderson0 -
What is next from Google Panda and Google Penguin?
Does anyone know what we can expect next from Google Panda/Penguin? We did prepare for this latest update and so far so good.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jjgonza0