Google Local Listing Verification - Is there a way to skip this?
-
Hi,
We are running 2 types of service in our company.
1.) Dry Cleaning
2.) Laundry Services
The problem is we have 2 website but only 1 office address.
It is not recommended to put same address for the both websites
both doing laundry & dry cleaning services.Is there any tip on how we can get listed on Google place without using the same address for both website?
-
Thanks for the help. Much appreciated.
-
Hi Daniel,
That's a question to consider carefully. If you change the business name on an existent Google+ Local page, you will likely lose all reviews accrued, etc. Google would probably prefer that you close the old page and start a new one. Your team might want to hire a Local SEO for a strategy session on this so you're making smart moves. Here's a good post from NGS marketing that's a Who's Who of Local SEOs. You might find someone who is a good match for the project on this list:
http://www.ngsmarketing.com/who-is-who-in-local-seo/
I know just about everyone on that green linked list, and any of them would be worthy of consideration. What I know for certain is that it is really easy to take the wrong steps in a situation like this in Local, so expert advice would be advisable in a scenario in which you're disclosing all pertinent details to the expert. Hope this advice helps!
-
Appreciate your help!
-
It **is **complicated. So thanks for your help.
Your understanding is basically correct, though there are even more twists and turns.
At this point, does it make sense to try to switch the name from the online to the offline business in the listings and citations. Or would this muddy the waters even more?
-
Hi Daniel,
You write:
"The online business sells widgets and related services. Let's say it's called Acme Widget People. We have already built listings and citations for it."
If this is a virtual business (no face-to-face contact), then a Google+ Local listing and citations for its locale really should never have been built. Google wants face-to-face business only in their local index. So, if I'm understanding this correctly, something was built that should not have been.
I may be missing some of the nuances of this, but it sounds to me like a single business that sells widgets and services and has 2 physical locations. It sounds like multiple websites/multiple business names have complicated the issue. Without being able to review the case one-on-one with the business owner, my advice needs to be seen as general here.
If the business owner needs to maintain his virtual business separately from his brick-and-mortar locations then:
-
He should not be publishing an address or local phone number on the virtual business website.
-
The virtual business should not have a Google Places/Google+ Local listing and building citations for the NAP (name, address, phone number) is actually going to hurt rather than help him because:
-
What he should have Google Places listings and citation campaigns for is the 2 brick and mortar locations. But if Google is finding this other business (the virtual one) out there sharing the address or phone number, the ability to rank the physical businesses will be hampered severely.
Hope this makes sense, Daniel. You are right...the situation sounds complicated.
-
-
Hi Elvin,
Thanks for providing such complete answers. This may not be what you're hoping to hear, but my best advice is to ditch the second website. You're running a single business with a variety of services under one roof, despite the separate phone numbers. I would advise you to have
-
One website that fully describes all the offerings of your company and prominently displays your address and one local phone number.
-
A single Google+ Local listing for the business that adheres to the guidelines in every way.
Having read your answers, I'm 99% certain that any other approach will be problematic for the business and could lead to penalties.
Invest in good copywriting for your website so that you've got great content covering all of your services rather than investing time in attempting to build out the services as if they belong to two different companies. That is my best advice.
-
-
Super reply Miriam,
- Do you have 2 totally distinct business names for the business? In other words, is one business called Laundry To You and the other called Rosita's Dry Cleaning, or are the business names similar, like Rosita's Laundry Service and Rosita's Dry Cleaning?
They are the same company with 2 different website with related services.
- Are there 2 different physical entrances to the building? In other words, do dry cleaning clients go through door 1 and laundry clients go through door 2? Or, are they both entering through the same door?
They can enter by the same door.
- Have you always had 2 different local phone numbers for the 2 services or do they share a phone number?
They have 2 different numbers.
- Please thoroughly describe what the 2 services do as separate entities. How are the services different?
To be honest, both business laundry and dry cleaning are closely related but the websites are different and it would be great to get them both listed on Google listing.
This 2 websites has loads of information on laundry and dry cleaning but it is certainly unfair to get 2 listing in Google place for our competitors but we always believed that whoever can deliver the best service and also content should be listed on top
I appreciate your help on this Miriam
-
Thanks for the response. It't a bit complicated. There are two businesses with a common owner.
The online business sells widgets and related services. Let's say it's called Acme Widget People. We have already built listings and citations for it.
The bricks and mortar business (with two locations) also sells widgets and related services. It's called Superior Ideal. The phone number is also different. It has no listings or citations yet. One of the locations has the same address as the online business but a diffferent name and phone number.
So here's how the NAPs look:
Online Business:
Acme Widget People
123 Main Street
Suite 102
Anytown, Texas
75362
888-753-9876
Bricks and Mortar Locations
Location #1
Superior Ideal
57 Elm Street
Another Town, Texas
85378
660-987-8976
Location #2
Superior Ideal
123 Main Street
Suite 102
Anytown, Texas
75362
518-765-8754
-
Hi Daniel,
This is really a separate question, but quickly, are the brick-and-mortar store and the virtual business the same business, or 2 different businesses?
If the same business, you should have no problem.
If 2 different businesses, then you do have a problem. Only 1 business should be located and publicized as being at the same address.
-
Hi Elvin,
This question actually has some tricky nuances to it, due to a recent change in Google's Places Quality Guidelines. The two categories you have mentioned (dry cleaning and laundry services) are so closely related and are being run out of the same location, so a couple of weeks ago, I would securely recommended the following:
-
One website
-
One Google+ Local listing
But, things have become less certain in this area, due to the guideline update.
Previously, the language in the guidelines read:
Businesses with multiple specializations, such as law firms and doctors, should not create multiple listings to cover all of their specialties. You may create one listing per practitioner, and one listing for the hospital or clinic at large.
Now, the language reads:
Departments within businesses, universities, hospitals, and government buildings may be listed separately. These departments must be publicly distinct as entities or groups within their parent organization, and ideally will have separate phone numbers and/or customer entrances.
It is up to you and me and every other local business owner to interpret what Google means by this change. I believe that what Google is attempting to resolve here is a situation such as that of a hospital which is now allowed to have a separate listing for the ER with a different phone number than that of their Radiology Department. Does this apply to your business? I am less secure, because there have historically been problems with Google's handling of similar businesses located within the same building. For example, even when 2 doctors have had different suite addresses within the same building, Google has sometimes conflated their 2 listings.
In the past, the old guideline language seemed to refer pretty clearing to situations like an HVAC guy who might abuse the system by creating 1 listing for his heater repair and a second listing for his air conditioning repair. Google clearly didn't want him to do this, and frankly, my gut feeling is that Google still doesn't want him to do this. I think the new language is really geared toward things like hospitals and colleges.
So, as I said, this is a bit tricky. I have some further questions for you:
-
Do you have 2 totally distinct business names for the business? In other words, is one business called Laundry To You and the other called Rosita's Dry Cleaning, or are the business names similar, like Rosita's Laundry Service and Rosita's Dry Cleaning?
-
Are there 2 different physical entrances to the building? In other words, do dry cleaning clients go through door 1 and laundry clients go through door 2? Or, are they both entering through the same door?
-
Have you always had 2 different local phone numbers for the 2 services or do they share a phone number?
-
Please thoroughly describe what the 2 services do as separate entities. How are the services different?
Please, provide as much detail as you can and I will do my best to continue hashing this out with you. My concern here is that the shared address may have always been causing you major NAP consistency issues, but I need to know more, and as I've said, the new guidelines are open to anyone's interpretation, in terms of applicability.
-
-
Not sure of the answer, but let me add a question of my own -- which is a variation on this theme.
My client has two bricks and mortar stores in two different cities, with one website. It also has an online business with a completely different name and website.
I have been working only on the online business.
However, my mandate has just expanded to the bricks and mortar stores.
I have a Google+ listing, other listings, and a bunch of local citations for the online business at an address in the format:
Alpha Company, 123 Main Street, Suite 102, Anytown, TX, 12345
The issue is: one of bricks and mortar stores has the same address as the online business.
i now need to get listings and citations for the bricks and mortar stores.
What should I do?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why do these links violate Google's Quality Guideline?
My reconsideration request was declined by Google. Google said that some of the links to my site (www.pianomother.com) are still outside its quality guidelines. We provide piano lessons and sheet music on the site. Three samples are given. 1. http://www.willbeavis.com/links.htm 2. http://vivienzone.blogspot.com/2009/06/learning-how-to-play-piano.html 3. http://interiorpianoservice.com/links/ The first one is obvious because it is a link exchange page. I don't understand why the 2nd and 3rd ones are considered "inorganic links" by Google. The 2nd link is a blog that covers various topics including music, health, computer, etc. The 3rd one is a page of the site that provides piano related services. Other resources related to piano including my website are listed on the page. Please help. Thanks. John
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | pianomother0 -
Unnatural inbound links message from Google Webmaster Tools!
Hi Everyone, I just got this message from GWT(image below) This is probably a penguin Penalty. What is clear is I have to find the best and most efficient way to tackle this issue. We will probably lose tons of traffic in the next couple of weeks so I would like to get the best suggestions and maybe a guideline on how to do this in the most effective way! Thank you! 1a0X2M2a1h0A
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Ideas-Money-Art0 -
Google Disavow and Penalty lifted please help?
We disavowed 80% of our backlink profile due to our last SEO building cheap nasty links and filed a reconsideration requested (we had the Google Webmaster Tools notice of detected unnatural links to http://www.xxx.co.uk penalty for a year from the 24<sup>th</sup> march 2012 but thought it best to clean up before round 2 – even though we had no real penalty and we dd some decent link building that moved us up). We then received a successful penalty lifted note (on the 22<sup>nd</sup> of May 2013) but our rankings dropped (due to the crap links propping us up) since then we have built a fair few high quality links but our rankings do not seem to be moving much if at all (7 weeks clear now). has anyone had any experience with the above (are we in a sandbox type situation). Thank you for your time Thanks Bob
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | BobAnderson0 -
Is it outside of Google's search quality guidelines to use rel=author on the homepage?
I have recently seen a few competitors using rel=author to markup their homepage. I don't want to follow suit if it is outside of Google's search quality guidelines. But I've seen very little on this topic, so any advice would be helpful. Thanks!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | smilingbunny0 -
I've done some link building on my website... why is google showing this?
Hi guys, it seems Google is going crazy as always, basically sometimes i'm ranked first page sometimes i'm not there, not sure if it's because of my link building and Google is indexing the links. At the moment in IE i'm top 3-4 for this keyword however the Title tag is not what I set it to be it's basically taking the product name then adding something after it. (I know google sometimes changes to what they want if they feel its more relevant but it isn't in this case) Not sure if this is normal for my keyword to keep appearing then dissapearing in Google. I noticed in FF my keyword isn't there but in IE it is. I've logged out of my Google account deleted all history/cookies etc. Even checked on my friends computer. Hope this makes sense and i'm not going crazy!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | InkCartridgesFast0 -
Redirecting doesn't rank on google
We are redirecting our artist's official website to copenhagenbeta.dk. We have two artists (Nik & Jay and Burhan G) that top ranks on Google (first on page 1), but one of them (Lukas Graham) doesn't rank at all. We use the same procedure with all artists. http://copenhagenbeta.dk/index.php?option=com_artistdetail&task=biography&type=overview&id=49 Doesn't rank but the old artist page still does. Is it the old page that tricks Google to think that this is the active page for the artist?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Morten_Hjort0 -
Is Google stupid?
Why does buying links still work? I don't mean approaching an individual webmaster and cutting a deal, that seems to be nearly impossible to detect. But the huge link brokers, like Text Link Ads, Build my Rank or Linkvine, Google has to be aware of them, right? Can't they just create accounts to see the whole network, and ban the sites? Why wouldn't they just do that?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | menachemp0 -
Why is Google not punishing paid links as it says it will?
I've recently started working with a travel company - and finding the general link building side of the business quite difficult. I had a call from an SEO firm the other day offering their services, and stating that they had worked with a competitor of ours and delivered some very good results. I checked the competitors rankings, PR, link profile, and indeed, the results were quite impressive. However, the link profile pointed to one thing, that was incredibly obvious. They had purchased a large amount of sidebar text links from powerful blogs in the travel sector. Its painfully obvious what has happened, yet they still rank very highly for a lot of key terms. Why don't Google do something about this? They aren't the only company in this sector doing this, but it just seems pointless for white hats trying to do things properly, then those with the dollar in their pockets just buy success in the SERPS. Thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | neilpage1230