.edu campaign
-
I have an idea for a very scale-able way to acquire .edu links with actual page authority (ie. not forum spam or student profiles ect...). I will be hiring someone to do in house outreach so the links will be obtained by people talking to people.
My question is would Google see this as spam if my link building campaign mainly targets a large number or .edu's and all of a sudden I am receiving a high number of one type of backlink? What worries me is that while I have other types of links, this campaign would dilute a high percentage of my link profile with .edu links from unique domains. I hear that diversity is key but its hard to ignore the high value .edu targets especially when the linking pages are higher in authority than my own.
Also the pages that these .edu links are coming from would not necessarily be relevant to my website however the content I am hosting to obtain the links is relevant to the pages the links are coming from. Does this make a difference.
Sorry I am being vague. I do not want to give away the strategy. Thank you for any assistance.
-
Why do schools And students alike want your referral traffic?
" While the math example was exactly that, an example, yes the links are highly valuable to the students. I know they provide value to the students because the links are bringing in referral traffic (these links actually take up 3 of the top 5 sources of referral traffic). "
Explain to me how that helps the student? They're not in search engine optimization the kids going to school you're talking about something that benefits yourself sir
With 200 EDU links you will be manually audited and I guarantee most likely penalized unfortunately. Not saying this because I want to be that way soon because Google wants it to be that way it's so clear that if you at all try to abuse any of these things such as a high-profile EDU not only will you most likely be banned from Google you will be made to case study. You came to this form for advice. And you seem to be taking the advice that while I'm not saying anything negative about goes with what you want it to do with what you want to hear and that's not really beneficial to you so I'm going to tell you exactly what I know from researching .edu use and what is going to most likely happen considering that your Telling us your site is not relevant to what you will be publishing. Thus it is a business to make money off of kids who are in school is it not?
I personally am not putting on trial I'm not trying to make it sound as bad as I might've made it sound but I don't care I'm just trying to prevent you from getting a whole Lotta trouble
Just an update. Please Google link schemes or may I add links to benefit myself in any way using dot EDU & .Gov I believe you'll find a long list of people that felt similarly to the way you felt unfortunately Google does not like people benefiting off of other people like schools government institutions.
Ask yourself this question
Will you be creating content that will not be required to be linked to for any such reason whatsoever in order to access it?
Does your content benefit you in any way shape way or form?
Why do you believe that you should have the right to benefit from this content and cools private search index where they a private corporation get to choose who benefits and who doesn't mean at the end of the day why would it be best for them to go to you instead of you releasing it directly to the school?
Lastly if you are going to be releasing content and it would benefit people in school today. You should be working hand-in-hand with the school itself and releasing the content with the administers approvals not talking to us about how you can get link juice from the dot EDU which by the way will not give you anymore Link juice then a.com.org.net domain but for the fact that.EDU use DOT com guys are regarded so highly they're given a lot of authority meaning they make wise decisions into who and why they link to somebody to if you were to make links from authorities as highs the Edus you do use you would get the same thing so if this content is that valuable ask you again and unless it is as relevant you don't Benefit at all from thinking from it.
Another thing that alarms me you seem to think that because.ED use might not lose their link power or link juice. Over time and I might be inclined to agree with you on that however Google doesn't care about that they care about your site they can take away the links pointing to your site that are dot EDU's and give you know power from them I want you to understand that take Your site and eliminate it from Google if they want to do that doesn't hurt the dot EDU links but it will hurt your business because it will not exist on the web.
I just want this to be clear. And I think you know as well as everyone else that from what you've said that you're worried about putting this out there if it was 100% legitimate you would not be worried about it and you would post it so I think you've answered your own questions again sir and I urge you to either ask with your last private question to SEOmoz for advice That would be the wisest thing to do. This is the last month and you have into the 15th ask for free do it and you will know the answer. My honest belief is you will not do very well creating a company that is creating content for schools so that you can get link juice from the content you make targeted to get benefit off of edus
-
if all conditions are right for "trusted" (content, sources of links, etc.) there should be no reason these become a problem.
Press releases have their absolutely valid place in the mix and if done properly, are good for the mix. Read my article on the myths and realities of their use in regard to SEO.
Outreach is also a perfectly valid marketing process even in regard to SEO. What matters is how you go about it, what you ask for and that no compensation be offered in an "exchange".
-
I'm saying you may call them stupid if they got you in trouble down the road.
Anyway, penalties aside, there's no guarantee that this will help your site rank better for the keywords you would want your site to rank better for--and in the end, that's what all this is about, right. The content you are "hosting to obtain the links" may rank well for terms related to it and other pages may even get a PR boost from it but that's not going to necessarily translate into rankings on your other pages for their keywords.
-
Stupid links???? maybe it doesn't help that I am not willing to reveal the strategy but the links I am getting are high quality, human edited, editorial, and legitimate. I highly doubt unless Google decides to devalue educational institutions that these links will ever lose value.
Let me rephrase my situation. Lets say I do something news worthy and every single news site in the nation decides they want to write a story about me and link to my website. Can a large amount of news column (lets say in content and contextual) links either lose effectiveness after a while because of lack of diversity or have a negative effect because it is all one type of link even though they are all from individual reputable sources.
-
Even if the links are "natural" (in all the many meanings of that word) if it's over-done--and it sounds like that's your plan-- you'll risk losing what ever benefit they're providing your site at some future algorithm update. If that were to happen, you might look at yourself in the mirror at that time and wonder why, as a smart business person, you bothered to spend the money to hire someone to get all those stupid links for you. That is, of course, if the site you're doing this for is a legitimate business site with long-term goals. If it's a spamin' & jamin' type of site and all about the short-term, then what the heck--go for it. Just wondering--have you ever experienced waking up in the morning to find 90% of your organic traffic has disappeared?
If it's a legit business site, a wiser option may be to settle for getting just of few of the best links possible with this plan of yours and then move on to some other plan. Alternatively, you could create a site that was directly relevant to the types of links this plot will acquire and you'd possibly have a lot less to worry about upon waking up each morning.
-
Thank you Alan this is the type of response I was looking for. While the math example was exactly that, an example, yes the links are highly valuable to the students. I know they provide value to the students because the links are bringing in referral traffic (these links actually take up 3 of the top 5 sources of referral traffic).
Also I am not paying for these links and I have no control over the anchor text although I am getting a lot of branded :).
The thing I don't understand though is this content would never be found or build links naturally unless I put the content in front of the right people. I don't understand how me marketing and promoting the content would have any negative affect. Don't SEO's even have the term outreach?
I have been thinking about a press release for the project but I have read some negative things about them and am quite reluctant.
All the guidelines for quality you posted above check out for this campaign. Will it be ok if I am getting about 50-100 .edu links pointing to this piece of content?
-
There is no one simple answer.
Is the specific information you are providing truly highly valuable for students at the schools where these links would be acquired from?
Are you paying for these links or offering compensation of some sort?
These are the kind of questions needing to be answered to expand on the concept GKLA referred to about someone looking over your shoulder - it's about trust and valid reasoning for the links.
If the answers to those are yes, this is valid, and if the link placement is done in a way that allows the individual edu page editors the freedom to uniquely describe what they're going to be linking to, and you leave it to them to decide what anchor text they will use (with no manipulation from you), that is the scenario where you are most likely going to be okay with the links.
This is true even if there are a high volume of links all of a sudden from .edu sites. Because in this scenario, this is the only way such links would ever come about if you took SEO out of the equation. Anything else would smell like an unnatural process designed to manipulate rankings in an artificially forced way.
I would also suggest you do support work around this. If the content is that good, and you believe worthy of people on edu sites writing about it and in turn linking to it, then you should promote the great information you've created not just within .edu staff circles.
Blog about it. Tweet about it. Post info about it to LinkedIn and Facebook and Google+. Consider a press release announcing it. See if you can get journalists in the educational arena or the math world to review it and ask them if they like it or like what you're offering, if they would be willing to write about it on their sites.
If you do those things, that will reinforce the true concept of "create content people want to link to" without crossing into "just for the SEO".
-
Yes I would do my campaign because I'm getting high quality editorial links my concern is to many of the same types of links from the same type of domains.
-
If a member of a search engine web spam team were sitting over your shoulder, would you still embark on your campaign?
Since you are specifically targeting .edu domains, to gain higher rankings - that in itself seems like manipulation on some level. That's just my opinion.
-
I think you answered your own question.
"
"Also the pages that these .edu links are coming from would not necessarily be relevant to my website however the content I am hosting to obtain the links is relevant to the pages the links are coming from. Does this make a difference."
Yes it makes a huge difference if you are getting links from places that are not relevant to you. You are essentially gathering links for no reason but to up ranking and Google will see that especially with .edu
I believe Amazon recently had to deal with Google when they offered kits discounts if they signed up or gave testimonies and gave testimonials using .edu links
I could be wrong on the name of the company might not Amazon on but I know someone tried to do it. They were penalized, and they stopped doing it you should in my opinion not start doing it's fine to get a couple , of .edu's to use but if your plan is to use a high percentage of thought .edu's and you're not at all related to the subject matter they are linking from Google will come down on you hard.
I wouldn't even begin to do it. It's a scam right? Don't try to manipulate Google it's not worth it really isn't just spend your effort trying to build quality content that people will enjoy and engage them when they do when you do build it.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
EDU Backlinks wrapped in Wiki worthwhile?
I asked below question yesterday and got some answers, but am still looking for more justification whether such links are worthwhile getting or not. Here is the question: An SEO expert offers my site backlinks from .edu's wrapped in wiki. Structure as follows "wiki.xxx.UNINAME.edu/etc..etc" - the pages have authority of 1 (domain obviously high with the dot edu) but there is no relevant info on the pages and obviously wiki links are no follow. This does not sound right to me, but can anyone share some insight since it is wiki + edu combined it sounds on surface like credibility, but with page having no relevant content I feel it isn't right.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | knielsen0 -
What is a good, structured link building campaign?
I feel like I've tried everything up to this point. I also survived all of the recent Google updates, including the recent EMD update (my site is an EMD). Also I am in the financial sector. I blog every day, I've made some great infographics. I have a very nice website (much better than the competition's), I've done my on-page SEO. I've done the basic link building too. I've hit good business directories, good blog directories (like Technorati), and infographic directories. I've done a bit of comment linkbuilding but I don't see that being very fruitful. I also have a large twitter following + a twitter tribe that shares all of my blog posts. I can't say I've managed to build any sort of community however. My traffic has grown from 0 to anywhere from 80 to 160 visitors every day in just 3 months, and I am happy with that progress but it seems like I have plateaued. Sure I will continue creating content, but what can I do about link building? That's where the results are probably going to come from. I've read all the articles about it, took advice from LinkBuildingSchool.com... but at this point, I'm not sure how to continue. I dont want to continue going after blog comment links, I want quality. Any advice?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MangoMan160 -
High Pr Edu and forum Link is still powerful ?
Hai guys my blog is abt Health related so if i took the backlink from High Pr edu and high pr forum which r not related to health so is it help full or not? No relevance link from above 6pr is good or harmful for site??? Thanks and waiting for your reply.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Brayvez0 -
.com and .edu difference
Hello, Can anyone tell me how big is the difference between a PR5 .com and a PR5 .edu Double, triple? How big? Cornel
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Cornel_Ilea0 -
Geo-Domain Centralization - Helps or Hurts a Long-Term Campaign?
I have a client with nearly 100 geo-specific domains (example: serviceincity.com). The content is mostly duplicate, however they weren't affected by Panda or Penguin, and most of the domains have a PR2-PR4. Doesn't mean they won't eventually (I know). My strategy is to centralize all the city domains and 301 them to their main website (example: brandname.com/locations/city/). However, their IBL profile shows at least 50% of their IBLs coming from the geo-specific domains, which makes centralizing quite a scary thing for short-term ranking. Having these domains is obviously not scalable from a social media or video SEO perspective, and we all know that in the long-term brand rules and domaining drools. Before I suggest they that they 301 these domains, I thought I'd get feedback from the community. Will all that 301 redirecting give more weight to the primary domain's visibility and sustain the ranking at a page-level, or will it send a flag to Google that the site might have been using it's own network of websites to game results? (which wasn't the case, the owner was just hyper with dominating in each city). Thanks in advance for your feedback.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | stevewiideman0 -
Planning a Link Building Campaign: Which keywords to focus on?
Okay, so looking at my ranking tab for my campaign. It shows the increase in traffic from my keywords, ranks, etc. My goal is to increase traffic, thereby sales. I am trying to plan a link building campaign (aside from the onpage optimization) and get as many keywords within the top 10 as possible: Do I start focusing on a certain number of keywords that are on page 2 (lets say 10) and try to build links to get them within the top 10. Then pick another 10 keywords? Do I pick a variety of keywords from various pages? What is the smartest way of trying to optimize campaign keywords as far as linkbuilding?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | inhouseseo0 -
Global/international SEO campaign strategy with a single TLD
Hi All, Have 3 seperate questions all relating to global/international SEO from a domain strategy point of view so will try to make them all short and 'to the point'. The current URL is www.example.com. The site's content strategy and all marketing activity has always been for the UK. We're now launching in US with also long term plans to launch in other countries. Each country will have their own webmaster/conternt strategy/marketing team. 1st question Which is better and why? www.example.com/us verses www.us.example.com The US team are leaning towards (and rightly so) the folder approach as it will help the US section of the site benefit from existing domain authority, link profile and off-page SEO work already carried out to a route domain level. This will also not be regarded as a new site as it's www.example.com/us On the flip side however the sub domain option although has no short term SEO benefits; will have a more sustainable SEO campaign for each country as they can be treated as individual sites/SEO campaigns. This also reduces some risk elements involved as each geo-specific team will only be concerned about their own sub-domain and not have route domain level control. I'm also aware that sub-domains will be treated as individual sites and therefore certain updates (such as Panda) will treat each sub-domain individually. So a possible negative impact on uk.example.com would not necessarily have an impact on us.example.com unless content strategy was the same. 2nd question Assuming we decide to go for www.example.com/us (folder option). The site's current geo target market is currently set to UK on Google Webmaster Tools to route domain level. If www.example.com was set to UK and www.example.com/us was set to US on GWT, would there be a conflict? We want to ensure that the route domain level settings does NOT override any settings on folder level within the same domain. Based on an answer from a top contributer of Google Webmaster Central, setting www.example.com/us to US would not be in conflict with settings within route domain level but I would love to hear/read from somebody that had actually gone through the process. 3rd question We're considering implementing geo DNS so a US visitor accessing www.example.com will be redirected to www.example.com/us (or www.us.example.com) based on their location from their IP address. Reason being is we're trying to avoid a splash page with a choice of countries (UK or US) on route level (homepage) which is very commonly used by most sites with multiple geo specific target markets. We would be assuming that somebody from North America would be looking for the US site and therefore redirecting the visitor automatically to www.example.com/us. The SEO implications are however that a 302 redirect will be used and therefore redirects used based on the visitors location will not pass link value from the homepage towards landing pages. The homepage currently has very strong link juice and the site's general navigational structure is pretty good allowing the link juice to flow through from the homepage.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MoRaja1 -
Duplicate Content, Campaign Explorer & Rel Canonical
Google Advises to use Rel Canonical URL's to advise them which page with similiar information is more relevant. You are supposed to put a rel canonical on the non-preferred pages to point back to the desired page. How do you handle this with a product catalog using ajax, where the additional pages do not exist? An example would be: <colgroup><col width="470"></colgroup>
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | eric_since1910.com
| .com/productcategory.aspx?page=1 /productcategory.aspx?page=2 /productcategory.aspx?page=3 /productcategory.aspx?page=4 The page=1,2,3 and 4 do not physically exist, they are simply referencing additional products I have rel canonical urls' on the main page www.examplesite.com/productcategory.aspx, but I am not 100% sure this is correct or how else it could be handled. Any Ideas Pro mozzers? |0