Essential items to consider when starting a new site in terms of SEO?
-
I've just launched a new site and have undertaken the following:
- Keyword friendly page titles
- Meta description
- Not a great deal of content on the site yet - but have a blog which we're trying to update as much as we can
- Analytics and Webmaster tools set up
- Dmoz submission
- Facebook, Twitter and Google+ page
- Google places set-up - waiting for postal pin
I've signed up to here to help me to start building a link profile.
However, would like to hear any more hints, tips or help on items I should be doing for a new site looking to move up rankings.
Thanks
-
Agreed, agreed, agreed.
Best
-
this is why I love this community - we have each offered information that helps - and the combination of information is excellent!
-
You have some great points already from Alan, Robert and Phillip. I would identify your competition as well as understand your customer. See where your target audience is and where they are. Look at how your competition is presenting themselves and getting in the face of your customer. All that you need to do is to do a better job then them. It's easier said then done, but it's possible. Think how Startup companies get to become well known. They provide a better service then somebody else.
-
"What does the client wish to accomplish with this site?" and "The meta description MUST answer the query."
Excellent advice. But, as they say, common sense is not common practice. I hope your badgering (Oops... I mean encouraging) will change that
-
Savageseo
Alan has given you an excellent list and rather comprehensive as well. I will take another tact. When I look at a new site, I look at it from the POV of "What does the client wish to accomplish with this site?" Without answering that question, you may rank but not well for converting whatever you wish to convert.
Once that question is asked along with how much can they spend, etc. I want to know what are the queries around what they are wanting to accomplish. Notice I did not say Keywords, I said queries. What question(s) does the site purport to answer in order to give value? Let's take a drug store and an Ace bandage. What is the person asking about them? Maybe, how to wrap an ankle or what size tape to use, what size elastic bandage, etc.
Then, well armed, you have to do keyword analysis to determine what is going on around those queries. If the site is a local business, you must use whatever geolocation methodology you possess around keywords along with non geo located searches.
Then, the most overlooked item I see on sites we take over is this: The meta description. Most just want to stuff keywords or city names, etc. and that, IMO, is what makes my clients get more conversions. The meta description MUST answer the query. Seems so simple, most typically a total fail for people because "Google doesn't look at the meta description." (I've heard that a few times.)
So, once there, all the rest that you and Alan have are all over it. Remember content must be great and fresh and relevant to the query as well. Only then, will your client's customer have the greatest opportunity to buy from your client.
Hope this helps,
Robert
Quick Edit: Remember to insure they are optimized locally.
-
Breadcrumb navigation is always a good idea to have. It reinforces topical focus, and content relationships.
For a blog, Google authorship is good. As is either the "All-In-One SEO" plug-in or the Yoast SEO plug-in.
Sitemap.xml file and robots.txt file as well.
Then you can learn about canonical tags and get those set up on the site and in the blog.
Really anything in the SEOmoz "Learn SEO" section is worth learning.
Also, a handy reference is the "periodic table of SEO".
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Worthwhile for SEO to buy a website with great links which is inactive for 30days and revive it with all its content and after a while transfer it to my core site?
When moving the content after a while to a subdirectory of my core website I would copy the full content and later further improve it. Would the external links that I redirect via 301 be counting similar to links I had earned in the first place? I understand that 301 redirect normally just implies minimal loss of link power. Topic of the site I consider to acquire is loosely related to my core site.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | lcourse0 -
Help, no organic traffic recovery after new site launch (it's been 6 months)!
I worked with a team of developers to launch a new site back in March. I was (and still am) in charge of SEO for the site, including combining 4 sites into 1. I made sure 301 redirects were in place to combine the sites and pretty much every SEO tactic I can think of to make sure the site would maintain rankings following launch. However, here we are 6 months later and YoY numbers are down -70% on average for organic traffic. Anyone mind taking a look at http://www.guestguidepublications.com and seeing if there's a glaring mistake I'm missing?!?!?! Thanks ahead of time!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Annapurna-Digital1 -
Is it bad for SEO to have a page that is not linked to anywhere on your site?
Hi, We had a content manager request to delete a page from our site. Looking at the traffic to the page, I noticed there were a lot of inbound links from credible sites. Rather than deleting the page, we simply removed it from the navigation, so that a user could still access the page by clicking on a link to it from an external site. Questions: Is it bad for SEO to have a page that is not directly accessible from your site? If no: do we keep this page in our Sitemap, or remove it? If yes: what is a better strategy to ensure the inbound links aren't considered "broken links" and also to minimize any negative impact to our SEO? Should we delete the page and 301 redirect users to the parent page for the page we had previously hidden?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jnew9290 -
Does having small ticket items (say under $1) available for customers to find & buy help or hurt our site?
I feel really silly asking this question to begin with, but... as a music store, we have a lot of "smalls" for products, like a guitar pick. We sell picks for $0.50 each, or a single clarinet reed at $0.79. Some believe this is too small, finicky, and cumbersome to have listed for sale on our site. To me, I wholeheartedly disagree with the notiion of excluding "smalls" for a plethera of SEO, customer service, & online SALES reasons... Also we offer USPS shipping to offer low shipping costs on small goods. Can I really be wrong about this? Thanks, Kevin
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kevin_McLeish1 -
Why is this site not ranking?
http://www.petstoreunlimited.com They get good grades from the on-page tool. The links are not amazing, but are not super spammy. Yet it ranks for nothing they target Any reason why?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Atomicx0 -
Creating a new site for each department of your business. Thoughts?
What is everyone's thoughts on creating several websites for your business for each department. For example.. say you owned a car dealership. You create a different site for: New cars for sale Used cars for sale Service department -mechanical repairs Parts & accessories department Financing department Positives: Having separate sites for each department would probably make it easier to rank on the specific search terms. Since a whole site on one topic Ie. Used cars would rank over just a page with the same information on a dealership website. Negatives: You would have to maintain 5 sites Link building Social Media Analytics ETC. Since they are all new domains & sites it will take longer for each site to rank. Google will see them as small lower authority sites since they are only a few pages & not larger sites. What is everyone's thoughts on this? Would you create several small sites? Or would you continue working on one big main authority site & continue link earning to the specific department pages, blogging on the topics etc. Thanks for any help & opinions!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DCochrane0 -
Migrating a site from a standalone site to a subdivision of large .gov.uk site
The scenario We’ve been asked by a client, a Non-Government Organisation who are being absorbed by a larger government ministry, for help with the SEO of their site. They will be going from a reasonably large standalone site to a small sub-directory on a high authority government site and they want some input on how best to maintain their rankings. They will be going from the Number 1 ranked site in their niche (current site domainRank 59) to being a sub directory on a domainRank 100 site). The current site will remain, but as a members only resource, behind a paywall. I’ve been checking to see the impact that it had on a related site, but that one has put a catch all 302 redirect on it’s pages so is losing the benefit of a it’s historical authority. My thoughts Robust 301 redirect set up to pass as much benefit as possible to the new pages. Focus on rewriting content to promote most effective keywords – would suggest testing of titles, meta descriptions etc but not sure how often they will be able to edit the new site. ‘We have moved’ messaging going out to webmasters of existing linking sites to try to encourage as much revision of linking as possible. Development of link-bait to try and get the new pages seen. Am I going about this the right way? Thanks in advance. Phil
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | smrs-digital0 -
WWW vs Non-WWW/Moving a site to a new CMS/Redirect all of the previous URLs
We are working on a new design for a website, which is currently on a CMS that has non-seo-friendly URLs. There is no redirection of 'www' to non-www or vice versa, or handling of homepage redirection so there is only one instance of 'home'. To move the site in the future, all of these URLs will have to be redirected to their new, and I hope, seo-friendly counterparts. Is it prudent now to redirect the four home page links so there is only one? and to redirect all non-www to 'www' so there is only one instance of each page? Or should I leave it and redirect all of them when the time comes?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | haan_seo0