Pdfs for SEO - benefits, downfalls and promotional methods
-
Hi fellow Mozzers,
We're just in the middle of relaunching our website (a design agency), and I had a few questions re: SEO of our service keywords.
The designers want the site to seem light on content, despite my advice that this would reduce the terms we can rank for. With that in mind, I was going to include advice pages that can be found via the site map, site search or text links but aren't promoted via the top level or second level nav. Another alternative I was going to explore was using pdfs for design case studies, so the site would feature a light case study, but with a more in-depth pdf available if wanted.
I have located numerous articles highlighting how best to optimise pdfs, but I have a few queries aside from the technical standpoint.
So:
-
is this the best way to getting round the issue of keeping the site 'light' on content?
-
are there stats that show CTRs on pdf pages over HTML?
-
as well as optimising the pdf content and promoting them on our social media channel, is there a benefit from including them on the likes of Scribd, Edocr and so on (from either an SEO or simply from a promotional viewpoint, or both)
Hopefully that's all clear!
Nick
-
-
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your response. Definitely some good food for thought here - especially about ensuring the pdfs are optimised.
It may be that we can put all the content on the site as HTML, but just not have it as part of the navigation (which we are doing with certain pages, like FAQs.
Unfortunately, when they say light on content they mean just that. As we are a design agency, the designers tend to think people are only picture led and the words distract from that. I tend to think that, while people will decide if we are the agency or them based on previous work, they also like to see stats on results, client feedback and so on.
So I'll try to persuade them to go the HTML route, but at least you've pointed out some things to bear in mind if going the PDF avenue.
Thanks!
Nick
-
Hi Nick,
-
My personal suggestion would be to give the illusion that your site is "light" on content through the use of whitespace. Take a look at SquareSpace.com and Desk.com - both of these sites, in my opinion, give the illusion that there isn't a lot of content, because of the whitespace and large images; however, both of these pages have OVER 1000 WORDS on their homepage... which is a decent amount. My guess is this is the idea your designers had in mind when they said "light" on content - but I could be wrong.
-
I am not aware of any studies on the subject off hand; however, I am sure there are some out there. As a side note, I do know that Google Analytics cannot track PDF CTRs out of the box, but supposedly you can add some code to the PDF's link that will allow you to track it. I suppose you could do some A/B testing on the subject.
-
If you want your PDF to rank well, promoting it anywhere would be great.
Personally, I think you should try to convince your designers to let you put the PDF content in an HTML page. It doesn't have to be at a navigational level, but within a page called Case Studies or whatever. My reasoning behind it is that I would assume for most keywords, people would rather view a webpage vs a PDF. Some people may think that if they click on a PDF that is all of the information your website would have on the particular topic, whereas if you click on a website, your assumption might be the entire website would be about a topic.
Also a personal side note - one of our PDFs ranks on page one for a keyword. We have not optimized this PDF or attempted to get it to page one... it just happened because so many people linked to it. The problem is that we didn't do a good job of optimizing the PDF, so that is where our traffic stops... people can open the PDF, but they do not have any links to lead them back to our website (which is our fault for not doing something about this). Point being - you may not get the traffic you want coming back to your site if they just open the PDF from a Google SERP.
Long story short - it depends on the purpose of your PDF. Is it strictly for users to read and be done with it? Is it something you want to rank well for and drive traffic to your website? If it is the latter, make sure you optimize the PDF so that users can get back to your website.
Personally I would rather have people linking to my website than a PDF on my website.
I hope this helps and I hope I was able to answer your question.
Mike
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
PDFs With No Index Contribute To Page Ranks?
I have a question I'm hoping you can help me with. If I upload a PDF and add a no index under the meta robots index so that the PDF doesn't appear in search results when I send people the link to this PDF, does it still contribute to my site traffic/ranking etc? Basically we are deciding whether to put some PDFs with pricing options etc onto our website or on a google drive. We will be sending the links to potential clients. If visitors clicking on the link would still help with increasing traffic and increasing our google rank (without that PDF showing in results) we thought this might be the best solution.
Algorithm Updates | | whiterabbitnz0 -
On page vs Off page vs Technical SEO: Priority, easy to handle, easy to measure.
Hi community, I am just trying to figure out which can be priority in on page, off page and technical SEO. Which one you prefer to go first? Which one is easy to handle? Which one is easy to measure? Your opinions and suggestions please. Expecting more realistic answers rather than usual check list. Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Rerouting and SEO
I have the urls urlA.com (est 2010) and urlB.com (est 2015). The newest (siteB.com) is currently redirected to urlA.com. For branding purposes, I think it is important to market and direct traffic to urlB.com (the newest). What effect will it have on SEO if I make a change to switch those...and have urlA.com (which older site - 2015) redirected to urlB.com?.
Algorithm Updates | | Michelle08210 -
Parallax Scrolling when used with “hash bang” technique is good for SEO or not?
Hello friends, One of my client’s website http://chakracentral.com/ is using Parallax scrolling with most of the URLs containing hash “#” tag. Please see few sample URLs below: http://chakracentral.com/#panelBlock4 (service page)
Algorithm Updates | | chakraseo
http://chakracentral.com/#panelBlock3 (about-us page) I am planning to use “hash bang” technique on this website so that Google can read all the internal pages (containing hash “#” tag) with the current site architecture as the client is not comfortable in changing it. Reference: https://developers.google.com/webmasters/ajax-crawling/docs/getting-started#2-set-up-your-server-to-handle-requests-for-urls-that-contain-escaped_fragment But the problem that I am facing is that, lots of industry experts do not consider parallax websites (even with hash bang technique) good for SEO especially for mobile devices. See some references below: http://searchengineland.com/the-perils-of-parallax-design-for-seo-164919
https://moz.com/blog/parallax-scrolling-websites-and-seo-a-collection-of-solutions-and-examples So please find my queries below for which I need help: 1. Will it be good to use the “hash bang” technique on this website and perform SEO to improve the rankings on desktop as well as mobile devices?
2. Is using “hash bang” technique for a parallax scrolling website good for only desktop and not recommended for mobile devices and that we should have a separate mobile version (without parallax scrolling) of the website for mobile SEO?
3. Parallax scrolling technique (even with "hash bang") is not at all good for SEO for both desktop as well as mobile devices and should be avoided if we want to have a good SEO friendly website?
4. Any issue with Google Analytics tracking for the same website? Regards,
Sarmad Javed0 -
Google Panda - large domain benefits
Hi, A bit of a general question, but has anyone noticed a improvement in rankings for large domains - ie well known, large sites such as Tesco, Amazon? From what I've seen, the latest Panda update seems to favour the larger sites, as opposed to smaller, niche sites. Just wondered if anyone else has noticed this too?Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | Digirank0 -
SEO for a starter
Hi I operate in a rather competitive market (IT and project management related training), and my focus is the UK market. I've recently started focussing on SEO. I have been creating content, albeit slowly. I have completed writing a book on my target subject, which is due to go out in a couple of weeks (I've received very positive feedback so far). And I have a decent PPC campaign. To get to decent ranking on Google etc., my plan is 1. Focussing on quality content and publishing on my site (I have about 15-20 articles in the pipeline). Reaching out for guess posts is next, but creating this much content is hard. 2. Get external SEO help for link building and off-page SEO. This is somewhat confusing for me, as I've got offers ranging from blog posts, BMR etc. I have some budget for this, but don't exactly know what to target. 3. Gradual focus on on-page optimisation. I haven't done anything on social front, on FB, Twritter. I do have a solid LinkedIn profile (personal). I have one full time resource available to help me out. What should I focus on? What am I missing? Cheers.
Algorithm Updates | | feneris0 -
Which is better for SEO. 1 big site or a number of smaller sites.
Hello , I am about to create a website with product reviews for a certain niche. What i want to know: Is it better for me to have a site with all reviews , like nicheproductsreviews.com and then have nicheproductsreviews.com/product-one-review.html and nicheproductsreviews.com/product-two-review.html or buy multiple domains to have product name in the domain name, like product-one-review.com and product-two-review.com As far as I understand, first approach consolidates all pages on the same site , consolidating all the link juice to it. However, second approach lets me have the product name in the main domain URL. Which way is better for SEO and why?
Algorithm Updates | | voitenkos0