New Website Redesign: Any Design Comments or SEO Suggestions?
-
Hi!
We recently launched our new website after MONTHS of work. Now that it is live, we are looking to fine tune the design and SEO efforts.
This is our new website.
And for reference, this is our old website.
Any and all comments on design and SEO would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your help!
Mike
-
Hi Ron,
We did the design in house. Our graphic designer and I sat down and just started critiquing all of our competitors. We found things we liked about sites and things we didn't. Then we took a hard left turn... we started looking at web design websites, hip and trendy consumer product pages (we do B2B), we actually even looked at a really cool ice cream distributor's website to get some inspiration.
BlueGlass posted this article last June on 21 Tools to Unlock Your Creative Genius which definitely does get your mind working in a different way.
And here is an AWESOME site that has "the best designs" - which is pretty true to its name.
Once we had our inspiration, we started wireframing and drafting things. When we had the basic idea of what we wanted the pages to look like, we paused and made sure that it would be able to accommodate our SEO plan as well. We made some changes for SEO purposes... then just went with it.
Hope this brief information gives you an idea of how we were able to come up with our design.
Mike
PS our graphic designer and his brother do some freelance webdesign work. PM me and I can get you his contact information.
-
Do you mind if I ask who designed the site for you. Did you do it in house or through an agency? So hard to find a good designer these days.
-
You're welcome Mike!
Yep, getting a bit obsessed with GTMetrix at the moment. Great resource though and your score on there already is good.
Great job again!
-
Thank you for your response Tom!
Spot on about the H1s. I noticed this in my on page report card and that is definitely something I am going to look into fixing ASAP!
You recommended GTMetrix in another post and I ran that test a few days ago. We are looking into leveraging browser caching. I just need to sit down with our webmaster and explain the benefits of it to our site and our visitors.
Thanks for the awesome and prompt feedback Tom!
Mike
-
Hi Mike
Visually I think that looks fantastic, while still offering a great amount of readable content for a crawler. Think you've done an excellent job with design.
Couple of things off the bat that I can see. Your meta description exceeds 155 characters on the homepage - which means that it might be truncated in the search engine results. With your call to action at the end of that description ("Request a free demonstration today."), it's at risk of being ignored and not shown by Google, which would be a great shame.
I see you're using 5 H1 tags but 0 H2s - now the H1 tag definitely has lost its strength that it used to have in the rankings, but to have 5 is sending a somewhat conflicting message to Google about what the site might be about. Would it be possible to have one H1 and the other 4 as H2? It might not be ideal, as I don't think you'd want to interfere with the design too much as I think it looks great. If the H2 is not that different from the H1 I think it might be an idea to do that - it gives a nice sort of hierarchy for the crawler in that way.
Here's a link to a GTMetrix speed report for your site. The scores are pretty good, but there's a key priority fix there that could make a key difference for your site and that's leveraging browser caching. If you click on it, click on the "What's this mean?" button in the top right and then the "read more" link that pops up, you'll get a guide on how to do it. It's quite an easy and quick fix, so I'd recommend it.
Other than that, the design looks great, it's a nice clear text, the site architecture looks good and interlinks to your pages well, title tags look good - I've not done keyword research for those terms, but they look good ones to target - all in all I think it's a great looking site with a solid SEO foundation, that with a few tweaks can be really strong.
Think you have an awful lot to be proud of here Mike, great job!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
SEO Problem With My Pages ?
Hi everyone, I created a self-hosted custom PHP website the page is ( custom cosmetic boxes ), but it doesn't show up on Google. I tried to follow tutorials on the HubSpot, but even my site sucks. Please help me where I am wrong. Maybe the little thing is left unattended, which makes it void.
Web Design | | fbowable
Please help me.0 -
Why is google still crawling my old website pages?
Why is google still looking at my old indexed pages and not my new index. ? Why are they crawling my old website links when none of them are available? How do I overcome these problems?
Web Design | | optimalspaces0 -
HTML and XML sitemaps for one website.
Hi all, First, we have created a HTML sitemap for our wordpress website. Then we again generated XML sitemap and submitted same in search console. It's been more than a week and still new XML sitemap has not been indexed yet. I can still only see HTML sitemap for search results "company sitemap". Also search console do have only XML sitemap. Both sitemaps are accessible but only HTML has been indexed. Is there anything wrong having 2 sitemaps? Why XML sitemap not been indexed? Thanks
Web Design | | vtmoz0 -
Comparing the site structure/design of my live site to my new design
Hi SEOmoz team, for the last few months I've been working on a new design for my website, the old, live design can be viewed at http://www.concerthotels.com - it is primarily focused on helping users find hotels close to concert venues throughout North America. The old structure was built in such a way that each concert venue had a number of different pages associated with it (all connected via tabs) - a page with information about the venue, a page with nearby hotels to the venue, a page of upcoming events, a page of venue reviews. An example of these pages can be seen at: http://www.concerthotels.com/venue/madison-square-garden/304484 http://www.concerthotels.com/venue-hotels/madison-square-garden-hotels/304484 http://www.concerthotels.com/venue-events/madison-square-garden-events/304484 http://www.concerthotels.com/venue-reviews/madison-square-garden-reviews/304484 The /venue-hotels/ pages are the most important pages on my website - and there is one of these pages for each concert venue - they are the landing pages for about 90% of the traffic on the website. I decided that having four pages for each venue was probably a poor design, since many of the pages ended up having little or no useful, unique content. So my new design attempts to bring a lot of the venue information together into fewer pages. My new website redesign is temporarily situated at: (not currently launched to the public) http://www.concerthotels.com/frontend The equivalent pages for Madison Square Garden are now: http://www.concerthotels.com/frontend/venue/madison-square-garden/304484 (the page above contains venue information, events and reviews) and http://www.concerthotels.com/frontend/venue-hotels/madison-square-garden-hotels/304484 I would really appreciate any feedback from you guys, based on what you think of the new site design compared to the old design from an SEO point of view. Of course, any feedback on site speed, easy of use etc compared to the old design would also be greatly appreciated. 🙂 My main fear is that when I launch the new design (the new URLs will be identical to the old ones), Google will take a dislike to it - I currently receive a large percentage of my traffic through Google organic search, so I don't want to launch a design that might damage that traffic. My gut instinct tells me that Google should prefer the new design - vastly reduced number of pages, each page now contains more unique content, and it's very much designed for users, so I'm hoping bounce rate, conversion etc will improve too. But my gut has been wrong in the past! 🙂 But I'd love to hear your thoughts, and thanks in advance for any feedback, Cheers Mike
Web Design | | mjk260 -
VPS Suggestions?
Few questions: 1. When do you know if you have out grown shared hosting? 2. Who do you suggest for shared hosting for a med sized blog? (At least I think I'd define our stie as. Any ideas what sort of traffic qualifies as small-traffic / med-traffic blog? ) 🙂
Web Design | | NoahsDad0 -
Any discussions on the actual web page design and how it might affect SEO?
Are there any links to previous discussions or tips, techniques for how creative design has any impact on seo??
Web Design | | theideapeople1 -
How do you deal with lack of understanding about SEO?
Since I subcontract out to web design people or work doing SEO for small businesses, I am wondering how others (and if others) deal with non-compliance with good SEO practices. For instance, I had a web designer change a few of the terms for a website because the client wanted another term they thought was better instead of sticking to the SEO they contracted for and she diluted the site architecture in the process. A former small business client called for some changes and I discovered she had made some changes she "thought were good terms." Do you encounter such issues, and if so, how do you deal with them--or do you just oblige the request? Also, I've been getting requests to do "partial" seo instead of entire sites. Is that ever a good idea and if so, how would you handle it? If not, how do you successfully dissuade a client from doing so? (Both small biz and web design peeps)
Web Design | | TheARKlady0