800,000 pages blocked by robots...
-
We made some mods to our robots.txt file. Added in many php and html pages that should not have been indexed.
Well, not sure what happened or if there was some type of dynamic conflict with our CMS and one of these pages, but in a few weeks we checked webmaster tools and to our great surprise and dismay, the number of blocked pages we had by robots.txt was up to about 800,000 pages out of the 900,000 or so we have indexed.
1. So, first question is, has anyone experienced this before? I removed the files from robots.txt and the number of blocked files has still been climbing. Changed the robots.txt file on the 27th. It is the 29th and the new robots.txt file has been downloaded, but the blocked pages count has been rising in spite of it.
2. I understand that even if a page is blocked by robots.txt, it still shows up in the index, but does anyone know how the blocked page affects the ranking? i.e. while it might still show up even though it has been blocked will google show it at a lower rank because it was blocked by robots.txt?
Our current robots.txt just says:
User-agent: *
Disallow:Sitemap: oursitemap
Any thoughts?
Thanks!
Craig
-
Hey Matt,
Thanks for taking the time to answer!
Well, the good news is, this caused us to find some issues with our sitemaps that we have now fixed and we might not have found them if this hadn't happened.
According to wmtools, however, we are still at 937,000 pages blocked... I don't know if they are actually blocked or not... Now that we have re-submitted our sitemap, hopefully we will start to see this change soon.
Thanks for the load time info. Yeah, we are aware that we could speed things up. We are always trying to do that more and more.
Hopefully we will start seeing that number go down very soon...
Thanks!
Craig
-
Hi Craig
Sorry for taking a while to come back to you but I have been very busy, however I have a couple a question -
When you first noticed the blocked pages had you made any changes to the site at that time and if so what were they?
Have you done anything that could have slowed your site down - running your homepage through a speed of load test I notice that it took over 4 secs which isn't very quick.
I once had an issue of lots of pages being de-indexed when we made an update to our sites template and the load time increased drastically. Even if this isn't the cause of the issue looking at optimizing your load time will help increase the speed at which your site is re-crawled. Google will be able to get through more in the time it allocates to crawl your site each time it visits if it is smaller and loads quicker hence speeding up your recovery.
There are lots of tools and information on optimizing load times - here is just one - http://www.webpagetest.org
-
Hey Matt,
Just sent you a PM with our site details.
Yeah, we are on SEOMoz, but nothing standing out there.
We are up to 941,364 pages blocked today. I thought I saw that it had gone down a tiny bit yesterday, but was mistaken.
Thanks for taking a look!
Craig
-
Hi Craig - you are right that the directive without a slash means allow everything - I was just trying to figure out how you could have caused this issue because Google doesn't appear to be following your directive to crawl everything hence why I asked about the layout. Have you tested your robots.txt in Google Webmaster Tools?
What is the location of your robots.txt?
What does your index status say in Google Webmaster Tools?
You can also just create an empty robots.txt file which will allow all as well or
User-agent: *
Allow:/I take it that you have this website setup as a campaign in SEOMoz - has this identified any relevant issues in the latest crawl?
Would you share your web address with us or even private message me with it so I can have a look for clues as this is very interesting!
-
Hi Matt,
Sorry for the confusion, I should have pasted that text using plain text so it wouldn't be on the same line.
I edited it as seen above. The user agent and disallow are on separate lines.
Today we are up to 940,000 blocked URLs in webmaster tools.
The reason I didn't delete robots is I read some suggestion that if you delete it, Google will think that there was a problem accessing it and continue relying on the former version for a period of time. Not sure how much truth is in that, but seemed to make enough sense not to delete it, but just correctly modify it.
Are you saying that my command above is disallowing all? From the research I have done, you have to have a slash at the end to disallow all, i.e. Disallow: /. Having Disallow: with nothing after it, is supposed to allow all, which is the goal.
From robots.txt.org:
To allow all robots complete access
User-agent: *
Disallow:Strangely, we haven't noticed an enormous traffic drop. However, this happened right at the time that we fixed some other issues that should have caused a significant improvement, so it could just be that no positive impact has been felt and things just remained the same.
Ultimately, the fact that the blocked pages keeps rising is worrisome, or says that there is a bug in Google's system.
Thanks!
Craig
-
I have experienced something similar after a site redesign the test version was put live with the robots.txt disallowing all. My site was deindexed quickly as when you block pages with a robots.txt their page content wont be indexed so won't appear in the search results. Google may index urls that are disallowed if they are linked from another page online however the rank will be lower due to the page content being ignored. Remove your robots.txt above as it is disallowing all It would appear although that command should allow all but there is no point in having robot file allowing all as this happens without. Though you would usually have disallow: / - to stop all!! Then I would resubmit an updated site map in Google Webmaster Tools and you should see your pages start to be indexed again. If you don't have a site map you can just wait for Google to start to re crawl your site. I would also check your homepage source code to make sure there isn't a robots meta tag turned on by accident saying no index no follow as I have seen this done by accident with CMS before.
have a look here on exactly how google handles robots.txt - http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=156449
One quick question - have you laid out your file exactly as above with the user agent and disallow on the same line as this might be what is causing the issue? I haven't tested it but the standard is to have them on separate lines.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Any idea why this page is an absolute magnet for bots?
This page on our client's website seems to be an absolute magnet for bots, and it's skewing our Google Analytics stats: https://cbisonline.com/us/catholic-socially-responsible-esg-investing/proxy-voting/ We already filter out lots of bots in GA, primarily through a segment we created several years ago and continue to build upon, but plenty of spam traffic still manages to slip through – mostly to the page above. Last quarter, almost all of it came from two random cities in Europe, so we're going to filter out traffic from those places. (At least for now – not an ideal solution, I know.) But I'm really wondering what drives so many bots to that page in particular. Any insights would be greatly appreciated!
Reporting & Analytics | | matt-145670 -
Page Performance
Not long ago, I had a couple of peers asking why I was using sessions to evaluate page performance. They said it wasn't a good metric for evaluating a single page because it only looked at how many site visitors began their journey through you site form that page. They were trying to convert me over to pageviews, which they said was a superior metric because it show you every time that page had been loaded and therefore provided better insight. Moz uses sessions on their landing page report. Is this because it's an SEO tool, so all they are concerned with is how individual URLs attract site traffic? Signed, Confused in California
Reporting & Analytics | | PGD20110 -
Is there a way to map your on-page SEO changes with the organic growth?
Hi Mozzers, I was just wondering if there's a way we can map our on-page SEO changes with the increase/decrease in organic traffic. For instance, I introduced brand pages' link the product page breadcrumbs and suddenly organic traffic for my brand pages increase from X to 2X in 1 couple of weeks. Now, this can be because of this breadcrumb change purely or because of some algorithm update or may be, bots started finding the content interesting and hence, started ranking them up (in case the brand pages were launched recently). So, you can't say which change should be mapped to what increase/decrease in organic traffic. Or, is there a way to map this?
Reporting & Analytics | | _nitman0 -
Looking for a GA developer to block internal traffic and integrate with Snipcart JS API - paid
Hi There, We're looking for someone to help us setup: Blocking internal traffic using a custom dimension/query URL as described here: http://www.simoahava.com/analytics/block-internal-traffic-gtm/ Integrate Google Analytics ecommerce tracking with the Snipcart API as described here: https://snipcart.com/blog/integrating-snipcart-with-google-analytics-ecommerce-tracking Discuss Kiss Metrics and possibly integrate with Snipcart We're a small, 2 person startup so are ideally looking for a freelancer or small firm to help - Any recommendations or pointers in the right direction would be much appreciated. Cheers Ben
Reporting & Analytics | | cmscss0 -
Moz analytics showing joomla tag feature as duplicate page content
Moz Analytics is showing Joomla 3 tag pages as Duplicate Page Content because many articles are tagged with multiple words and therefore show up on the same tag-pages. example URL: www.domain.com/tag/tagID-tagname I already added "tag" as a URL parameter with Crawl=No URLs. Is there anything else I should do?
Reporting & Analytics | | modernmagic0 -
Not many pages being indexed on google
Hi I am putting in to Google: site:www.mysite.com to see the pages listed on Google - the figure Google is coming back with is much lower than the actual pages, I have no crawer warning etc... What could the problem be? Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | acumenadagency0 -
Calculating page visit duration for bounced visits?
IS there any way on Google Analytics to calculate page visit duration for bounced visits? if so, what would need to be done?
Reporting & Analytics | | offthemaptravels0 -
Page Rank Decline in Webmaster Tools
Hello Forum, My team and I just got through completely redoing an eCommerce website for a yoga company and I noticed that in Google Webmaster Tools our site's average daily position changed from ~25 to ~40 in the last 5-6 days (during this time period we submitted our sitemap). I exported the Webmaster Tools results and found a high number of new keywords (which weren't there pre-launch) related to yoga. However, these keywords are not related to the products we sell. Several of these keywords have positions of 240 or higher and are skewing our avg page rank. These terms include words like "cricket logo," "animal yoga," "dog pose," "cat yoga," We did move our blog into our domain name now and there are some articles related to animal poses. Any thoughts as to what may be going on? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | pano0