Has anyone else gotten strange WMT errors recently?
-
Yesterday, one of my sites got this message from WMT:
"Over the last 24 hours, Googlebot encountered 1 errors while attempting to retrieve DNS information for your site. The overall error rate for DNS queries for your site is 100.0%."
I did a fetch as Googlebot and everything seems fine. Also, the site is not seeing a decrease in traffic.
This morning, a client for which I am doing some unnatural links work emailed me about a site of his that got this message:
"Over the last 24 hours, Googlebot encountered 1130 errors while attempting to access your robots.txt. To ensure that we didn't crawl any pages listed in that file, we postponed our crawl. Your site's overall robots.txt error rate is 100.0%."
His robots.txt looks fine to me.
Is anyone else getting messages like this? Could it be a WMT bug?
-
DNS servers are just like any other server, Marie - they can have outages, downtime and configuration problems.If the Googlebot visited while your DNS server was burping, it might have received no response, hence the error warning. When you checked, the server may have settled down.
There are a number of best practices for good DNS hygiene, but my primary one is to monitor the uptime of your DNS the same way you do the uptime of your website. I use my paid subscription to Pingdom Tools to do this as one of my checks, but I'm sure many other uptime monitoring tools can do it as well.
The reason I monitor is that it can be a really helpful early warning system for potential upcoming severe problems (and can help explain otherwise unexplained site outages). With one client, we saw a steadily increasing number of errors over a few days (over 40 outages on the last day), leading us to change DNS hosting before things could fail completely and leave us in the lurch.
In addition, I always recommend against having the DNS hosted on the same server as the website, as would happen with cPanel DNS hosting, for example. Reason being, if you have severe prolonged server issues, you can't get at your DNS to change it quickly to somewhere else temporarily (even if just to host an explanatory error message)
I also like to ensure the DNS is hosted somewhere with good geographic redundancy so even if one nameserver goes out, there are still multiple backups to keep things rolling. No matter how good your website's uptime is, if your DNS dies, you're still off line.
My guess is the DNS server was having temporary issues that resolved by the time you checked it. I'd want to be sure that wasn't happening on a regular basis. (relying on Google to report issues isn't nearly accurate or timely enough),
As far as the robots.txt - do you have uptime monitoring on that site? I can't count the number of new clients who thought things were fine with their website, when in fact they were having constant short outages that went unnoticed as they weren't on their own site constantly enough to catch it. I always recommend a system that checks at 1-minute intervals for just this reason. If you don't have independent verification that the site was fully up, you can't really discount the WMT warnings safely.
Lemme know if you want more info on uptime monitoring services & methods.
Paul
-
Yikes. That would not be good!
-
Wait until they tell you that they are taking your adsense account down in 72 hours... and you know that they have an algo problem... when you tell them that a noob employee who doesn't know the rules that you display ads under tells you that you are down to 48 hours.
-
Thx. All checks out well on the dns check. I'm calling this a bug.
-
I know it I've had much higher traffic spikes than anything I've seen recently and still they sent this message. It's bizarre! But definitely not one that worries me. I'm like you, I do not get excited when I see a message in that inbox...
Anyway just thought it fit because it was so strange and seemingly unnecessary.
-
If you checked and all is fine, it maybe a be a temporary bug, it happens from time to time.
The 100% rate could be that it was only one crawl, hence 100% error rate (1 of 1), just wait for the next crawl.Anyway, in the meantime, check your domain with a DNS checker, you can use www.dnsstuff.com, www.intodns.com or dnscheck.pingdom.com/ to make sure everything is working correctly or to see if there's anything you need to take to your hosting provider.
-
Haha Jesse! I'd rather have that message. That is a weird one. I have had things go super viral and I've never had a message telling me of an INCREASE in traffic. Some of them have been increased Google searches too...not just direct or Facebook visits.
I have had a message that there was a decrease in traffic for my top URL once. This was when one of my sites had a slight Panda hit.
I think the messages are very random.
Whenever I see a (1) next to messages in WMT my heart races a little. It's usually a good thing because I am waiting to hear back from a reconsideration request for a client though.
-
Well I got this message recently:
Search results clicks for http://www.---------- have increased significantly.
This message is not indicative of any problem in your site. It is simply to inform you that the number of clicks that one of your pages receives has increased recently. If you have just added new content, this may indicate that it has become more popular on Google. The number of clicks that your site receives from Google can change from day to day for a variety of factors, including automatic algorithm updates.I found it strange because everything looks about normal. Sure we had a bit better of a day than usual but just barely.. Nothing I'd even blink twice at.
It's strange because this is only the second time I've ever received a message in GWT. But hey, I'm not complaining about this one.
Probably unrelated to what you're describing but just thought I'd share.
Good luck!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
500 - server error
Hi All, A site crawl reveals several server errors (status code 500) about a clients wordpress website. My question: what are the most common causes for server errors and what advice can I give about how to fix them? Thanks in advance,
Technical SEO | | WeAreDigital_BE
Jens0 -
Error: The URL you entered does not appear to be returning a page successfully
I keep getting the above error when I'm trying to look at the page optimization for a new blog page we have uploaded. It was posted over a week ago, so I assumed it would be indexed by now. Any thoughts on why it isn't working? The page is: http://www.esg.co.uk/blog/blog/2015/why-is-air-quality-testing-so-important/#.VmlBmLiLRpg Thanks
Technical SEO | | Charley_Tangerine0 -
Does anyone have experience using Attracta with a Miva Merchant website?
I am looking for more information on Attracta, which is now a certified app for Plesk and Parallels Automation. You can apparently install Attracta for Parallels from the Apps Catalog.
Technical SEO | | djlittman0 -
Is anyone able to check this 301 redirect for errors please?
Hi, I had a developer write a 301 wildcard for redirecting old hosted site to a new domain. Old URLS looked like /b/2039566/1/akai.html
Technical SEO | | Paul_MC
With varying letters & numbers. I have 26,000 crawl errors in GWT and I can only imagine it's because this is looping?
Can anyone advise if this would be causing grief? Thanks
Paul RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^vacuumdirect.com.au$ [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.vacuumdirect.com.au$
RewriteRule ^/?$ "http://www.vacuumbag.net.au/vacuum-cleaners.html" [R=301,L] <ifmodule mod_rewrite.c="">RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /
RewriteRule ^p/([0-9]+)/(.*) default/$2 [R=301,L]</ifmodule> <ifmodule mod_rewrite.c="">RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /
RewriteRule ^c/([0-9]+)/1/(.*) default/vacuum-bags/vacuum-cleaner-bags-$2 [R=301,L]</ifmodule> <ifmodule mod_rewrite.c="">RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /
RewriteRule ^p/([0-9]+)/(.*) $2 [R=301,L]</ifmodule> <ifmodule mod_rewrite.c="">RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /
RewriteRule ^c/([0-9]+)/(.*) default/$2 [R=301,L]</ifmodule>0 -
Can anyone tell me why the bot has only picked up one page?
www.namebadgesinternational.co.nz After the 2nd week, I changed the robots.txt file to allow ALL robots on the website, but it still hasn't gone through any pages after another crawl Any help would be hugely appreciated.
Technical SEO | | designsecrets0 -
Why do I get duplicate page title errors.
I keep getting duplicate page title errors on www.etraxc.com/ and www.etraxc.com/default.asp, which are both pointing to the same page. How do i resolve this and how bad is it hurting my SEO.
Technical SEO | | bobbabuoy0 -
Help with bing redirection error
Can somebody help me figure out this bing redirect error. The link to "http://w******/flea-control" has resulted in HTTP redirection to "http://w******/feas/flea-control/".Search engines can only pass page rankings and other relevant data through a single redirection hop. Using unnecessary redirects can have a negative impact on page ranking. I am using wordpress. I am actually linking to the /feas/flea-control/ version. I have looked every where for help. I got this error using bings seo toftware
Technical SEO | | OxzenMedia0 -
Crawl Errors for duplicate titles/content when canonicalised or noindexed
Hi there, I run an ecommerce store and we've recently started changing the way we handle pagination links and canonical links. We run Magento, so each category eg /shoes has a number of parameters and pages depending on the number of products in the category. For example /shoes?mode=grid will display products in grid view, /shoes?mode=grid&p=2 is page 2 in grid mode. Previously, all URL variations per category were canonicalised to /shoes. Now, we've been advised to paginate the base URLs with page number only. So /shoes has a pagination next link to /shoes?p=2, page 2 has a prev link to /shoes and a next link to /shoes?p=3. When any other parameter is introduced (such as mode=grid) we canonicalise that back to the main category URL of /shoes and put a noindex meta tag on the page. However, SEOMoz is picking up duplicate title warnings for urls like /shoes?p=2 and /shoes?mode=grid&p=2 despite the latter being canonicalised and having a noindex tag. Presumably search engines will look at the canonical and the noindex tag so this shouldn't be an issue. Is that correct, or should I be concerned by these errors? Thanks.
Technical SEO | | Fergus_Macdonald0