Google ranks our competitor above us on 1000's of branded queires!!!
-
Hi all,
I have noticed a very bizarre phenomenon in Google SERPs. When I search for a branded keyworks [Product + our brand].
Amazon.fr appear above us on thousands of results. Google even ranks Amazon above us for queries like [ PriceMinister google plus].I have tried to ask Google about it but I can’t seem to get an answer. Here is the topic I posted on Google’s forum:
This seems like a mistake on Google’s side, some kind of semantic association with our two brands! Basically they are sending our customers to our main competitor even though they specifically searched for our brand (PriceMinister).
I find the phenomenon quite interesting for the SEO community and frustrating for our company.
Does anyone have ideas on this one?
Do you think it's a bug from Google?
Cheers
Oliver
-
Hi Oliver,
Looks like this issue is now fixed? I searched for "24 hour people Priceminister" and "priceminister google plus" on google.fr and your site is showing up as the first result. Interestingly, we are also seeing the same issue for our brand queries on Google since last few months. For us Google is infact even showing the other brand for autocomplete search suggestions as well! See details here: http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!mydiscussions/webmasters/ESDluD9Q0-A
Can you please let me know if there was something you did that rectified the issue or did it get fixed automatically? Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks!
-
Thanks a lot for your time and ideas Lynn!
-
Hi Oliver,
So if I understand right it is happening mainly in cases where the search string has quite a few words + priceminister brand and also when the brand is tagged onto the end of the search query rather than the beginning. Still no great ideas on how to approach but at least the scale and dynamics of the problem is more defined.
You say that it is a minority of the searches and that is obviously a good thing! I am wondering with the analytics data you have how much volume you are seeing in regards the brand at the front or at the end of the search query? Granted if it is at the end and users are clicking through to amazon you will not have a complete picture, but if they are actively searching for your brand then you should still see a pretty good chunk of the traffic. I guess what I am saying is, although obviously frustrating, maybe this is an issue you are noticing a lot more in comparison with 'normal' users and while annoying is not having a huge impact on the bottom line?
Not being much help! Be interesting to hear how this case plays out over time though. Perhaps google is messing with results and your branded terms will start surfacing more in the (hopefully near) future.
-
It seems to be the case with Books, CDs, Video Games & DVDs. Thank heavens these SERP results are still a minority.
This case is interesting:
[La vie est belle Priceminister]
Amazon is N°1
[PriceMinister La vie est belle]
http://goo.gl/RySHQ
We occupy the first 6 results and Amazon is nowhere to be seen.Thanks for your help. : )
-
Hi Oliver,
I'm sure it must be driving you mad!
I don't have any great ideas on what to do about it, but my gut says that it is algorithmic (for whatever that is worth) so I am not sure google would look at it as an error. A quick thought before (hopefully) one of the algorithm aces chimes in...
Is this trend more pronounced in books (for example) or specific product categories? I did a search for priceminister and then clicked on a couple of suggested searches (priceminister iphone4 and that kind of thing) and you were all over the place and amazon was not to be seen. I am just wondering if the specifics of a book title or something else like that is triggering this kind of serp result.
Wish I could be more help, it is an interesting case.
-
Hi Lynn,
Thanks for taking the time to look into our problem, it’s much appreciated.
You are right when you say that we are very similar site to Amazon.fr and that we are often linked to jointly in the same articles. But we are an established e-commerce pure player in France and it seems insane that Google would rank an Amazon page higher than ours on a branded query. : /To answer your question regarding branded queries, they’re in the millions monthly.
Frustration aside, As an SEO I find that these results really bad for the end users who want to buy a product on our site.
I wonder what Google think of this issue...
-
Hi Oliver,
Interesting and frustrating indeed.
I don't think it is a bug, but my thoughts would be that it is some sort of association as you suspect between the two sites in Google's eyes. I didn't look a lot but your site does seem quite similar to amazon in terms of product offerings and I am wondering if in all the data available on click throughs etc that google has maybe a significant percentage of searchers end up at both sites quite often and therefore the link has been made. I would think perhaps the two brands are also mentioned quite a lot together and even linked to together quite often? Its not I guess that unreasonable if that is the case that google would choose to show these results, and amazon is amazon with the associated domain authority etc that goes along with it so might often get pushed to the top.
In regards the search queries you mention, do you think people do a lot of searches for the name of a book + the brand priceminister? It does not seem that intuitive that they would, although I might be wrong! If the searches are not happening that often, and since amazon is ranking highly anyway for the titles of many books, then maybe the book title phrases are simply out weighing the added brand keyword if you see what I mean. The google plus example is indeed a bit odd, but that being said if you search for 'priceminister google+' which I seem to recall is the 'official' way to search for g+ pages then you are front and center.
Not that much help in terms of what to do about it, maybe someone else will have a good idea!
-
Hi Kyle,
Sure our domain is priceminister.com
-
In order to help track down some options are you comfortable with sharing your website's domain?
Thanks - Kyle
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Acquisition & Audience Segmentation
Hi. I'm trying to figure out a solution to two questions one of my current clients has asked me in regards to Google Analytics tagging, and I'm unsure how to respond. Can anyone help? See below the questions, 1. In Google Acquisition > Overview, their paid media is reporting as "Other". They do not run any Google paid ads. They only run Facebook paid ads. Is there a way to update the source so that it says "Paid" versus "Other" within the default channel? The current solution was advised to create a channel group that the client has to then tick on overtime they want to see this data with the correct labeling. They would prefer to see it in the default. Is it just a matter of going into the *default channel, choosing the "Paid" option, and then specifying the source/medium that contains Facebook, CPC, or referral to be categorized under this channel? Or is it something else? *Aware that changes to the Default Channel are permanent changes and will change how new traffic is classified. 2. Audience segmentation > The client wants to be able to define it's audience by shopping intent and informational intent. Is there a clear way to do this, for example, by keywords used, e.g. buy, product name, entry (shopping intent), versus e.g. non-purchase intent, entry to the blog, length of time on site (info intent). Would be happy to have a conversation about the last question, since I'm conscious that there are probably multiple ways to define this - thanks. To the group, thank you for readying my questions and helping me with these solutions - your time is appreciated and valued. Sincerely, Amanda
Search Behavior | | AmandaValle.Digital0 -
Google Analytics Tagging
Hi. I'm trying to figure out a solution to three questions one of my current clients has asked me in regards to Google Analytics tagging, and I'm unsure how to respond. Can anyone help? See below the questions, 1. In Google Acquisition > Overview, their paid media is reporting as "Other". They do not run any Google paid ads. They only run Facebook paid ads. Is there a way to update the source so that it says "Paid" versus "Other" within the default channel? The current solution was advised to create a channel group that the client has to then tick on overtime they want to see this data with the correct labeling. They would prefer to see it in the default. Is it just a matter of going into the *default channel, choosing the "Paid" option, and then specifying the source/medium that contains Facebook, CPC, or referral to be categorized under this channel? Or is it something else? *Aware that changes to the Default Channel are permanent changes and will change how new traffic is classified. 2. In Google Acquisition > Overview > Referral, the clients website is showing up as a referring domain, both the TLD and the subdomain. My understanding is that it should actually be reporting under the "Direct" channel. How do I correct this? Is it just a matter of updating the Direct channel to include those domains? Or do I need to update the settings? The domain's www. http: all 301 redirect to their https://domain.com and https://subdomain.domain.com. Within settings it has been specified as www.domain.com and URL is http:// - also noticed that Bot Filtering has not been checked, assuming this could mess up the analytic data if not define? Do you know? 3. Audience segmentation > The client wants to be able to define it's audience by shopping intent and informational intent. Is there a clear way to do this, for example, by keywords used, e.g. buy, product name, entry (shopping intent), versus e.g. non-purchase intent, entry to the blog, length of time on site (info intent). Would be happy to have a conversation about the last question, since I'm conscious that there are probably multiple ways to define this - thanks. To the group, thank you for readying my questions and helping me with these solutions - your time is appreciated and valued. Sincerely, Amanda
Search Behavior | | AmandaValle.Digital0 -
Google web master tool - stats
Hello everyone! I have 2 questions : 1. does anyone come across this behavior ? (image 1). In the last week Page crawled per day behavior was quite wild and it wasn't affect directly on Time spent downloading a page. 2. I'm getting site map warning for high response time (image 2) i have 29M pages so I aware that 4 warning for 4 pages is almost negligible but still ? Thanks to all helpers 8OkgXp7 q3txRAb q3txRAb
Search Behavior | | Roi_Bar1 -
Google site: search showing twice amount of indexed pages. why?
I have around 50k pages indexed on my site but when I do a google site: of my site it shows around 100k pages indexed. Why is it showing so much more? It is also only showing around 700 pages indexed in my web masters account for the site. Background: We have a custom site map being generated automatically. Let me know if you would like more info, Thanks.
Search Behavior | | Nicktaylor10 -
How come this one google places listing is the only one to show up google maps?
Hi there, I found a really weird thing about google places. I'm working on a google places listing optimization for a locksmith company in Houston, TX. When I was searching google maps for "locksmith houston" only one listing came up. However, when searching for "locksmith near houston" 880 results came up. This changes from time to time, but most of the time this one competitor is the only listing that shows up which is really really weird. Anybody has an idea what this competitor did to get rid of the other 879 results and show up alone on google maps??
Search Behavior | | activechase1 -
Looking for something better than Googles in page analytics
Buongiorno from 12 degrees C wetherby UK 🙂 I'm interested in measuring content engagagement, things like what gets clicked on mouse tracking beahaviour etc. Google Analytics in page analytics does a good job but is there another product able to guage user interactive behaviour with content (Yes ive added event tracking). Thanks in advance,
Search Behavior | | Nightwing
David1 -
Google Instant Search? REALLY?! Why is this the result???
First, this is one I thought I would never ask, but: Could this be true? I had noticed my MacBook Pro was eating some power and wanted to see if I could optimize my settings so to take advantage what battery life was available. (I swear that is the truth). So, I am at a Starbucks on someone and typed into Google search bar the following query - Best way to conserve - and, received the following instant search results before I could type - power on a macbook pro I am not putting it here as I want you to ask yourself what came up. I have attached a screenshot. My colleague arrived and without prompting she retried and got the same. So I am curious: Do you get the same result and why do you think that result is so predominant? This is funny. efuts.png
Search Behavior | | RobertFisher2 -
Google Penalisation - Any help would be appreciated!
Hi,
Search Behavior | | ChrisHolgate
We’ve recently received a Google notification of unnatural linking along with a confirmation that we're being penalised. There were a few other sites that we owned that perhaps had too many links pointing to our main domain so we trimmed them down and submitted a reconsideration request and got the following back: "Dear site owner or webmaster of http://www.refreshcartridges.co.uk/,
We received a request from a site owner to reconsider http://www.refreshcartridges.co.uk/ for compliance with Google's Webmaster Guidelines.
We've reviewed your site and we still see links to your site that violate our quality guidelines.
Specifically, look for possibly artificial or unnatural links pointing to your site that could be intended to manipulate PageRank. Examples of unnatural linking could include buying links to pass PageRank or participating in link schemes.
We encourage you to make changes to comply with our quality guidelines. Once you've made these changes, please submit your site for reconsideration in Google's search results.
If you find unnatural links to your site that you are unable to control or remove, please provide the details in your reconsideration request.
If you have additional questions about how to resolve this issue, please see our Webmaster Help Forum for support.
Sincerely,
Google Search Quality Team" I want to stress that we have never in the past and do not currently buy any backlinks. The problem that we face now is that our site has been online for best part of a decade, there are thousands of people linking to us and I have absolutely no idea where to start. We don’t use an SEO Company but in the past few months have been using SEOmoz to improve our on-page optimisation. I know it’s a massive ask but if could a member of the SEOmoz community or a staff member quickly take a gander and let us know if anything in particular sticks out like a sore thumb it would mean a great deal to me. Of course, if needed we’ll employ the services of an SEO company but I’m hoping one of you guys will see something immediately obvious that could really help us out! Thanks in advance. Kind regards Chris0