Is SeoMOZ Crawl Diagnostics wrong here?
-
We've been getting a ton of critical errors (about 80,000) in SeoMoz' Crawl Diagnostics saying we have duplicate content in our client's E-commerce site. Some of the errors are correct, but a lot of the pages are variations like:
www.example.com/productlist?page=1
www.example.com/productlist?page=2
However, in our source code we have used rel="prev" and rel="next" so in my opinion we should be alright.
Would love to hear from you if we have made a mistake or if it is an error in SeoMoz.
Here's a full paste of the script:
-
Just a minor clarification - you can use both rel=prev/next and rel=canonical, IF you have something like search filters. Then, the canonical would point to the unfiltered current page and the rel=prev/next would point to the filtered paginated pages. Yeah, I know, that made a lot of sense. Let's say your page is:
http://example.com/stuff?page=2&sort=price
...then you might have
It's more than a little confusing.
Definitely check out that JavaScript issue, though - it might be that bots aren't seeing what people are seeing, and that could be very dangerous.
-
Hi,
In regards the rel=next you are absolutely right, I must have overlooked it or just searched for the prev tag. So yes as far as proper implementation of the prev/next in that respect it is correct and please ignore that last part of my first post!
Turning of javascript is instructive to see all those tags on their individual page and helps clarify what exactly is being outputted and when without the dynamic loading, providing you don't miss a rel=next tag that is really there
-
Hi Lynn,
Thank you very much for your answer / analysis! As you said "It is a bit confusing" and I will just read your answer a couple of times...
I will grant your answer "Good answer" for you thorough analysis! I think it is spot on with the double "next/prev" and "rel=can" tags. I do have one remark. You said: When I turn off javescript, I get this:
In my opinion this is alright, because it shouldn't have a "prev" as this is the initial page.
-
Hi,
I had a look at what I assume is the site and I think you have a combination of things going on that is likely causing confusion (to you, to the moz bot, probably to google too!)
Firstly, it is not recommended to use rel prev/next and rel canonical on the same page. With that what you are effectively doing is only indexing the first page of the results since all the other pages rel canonical back to the first one. If you have a 'view all' type page then you could rel canonical all of the paginated pages back to this one and you would not need to use the prev/next tags at all. It is also possible that your use of relative canonical links in combination with the above is also causing confusion, usually best to use absolute urls if possible.
Beyond that, the site dynamically loads more products as you scroll down the page which also results in the url changing to hoeretelefon/? for ALL the pages. If that is a problem or not depends on how it is coded and how the google and seomoz bots are deciding to parse the page, but it certainly adds another potential area of complexity to the issue.
Lastly, if you browse the site with javascript turned off you can see something odd in that the initial page /elektronik/baerbar-lyd/hoeretelefon has no prev/next OR canonical tag but has a link to /elektronik/baerbar-lyd/hoeretelefon?page=1 on which you find prev/next and canonicals back to the non paginated version. So you are basically skipping the pagination setup that goes from the original to the page=1 (but also giving a canonical back to the original page).
Phew! It is a bit confusing. I would recommend deciding on if you want to go with prev/next or canonical in the first place and take it from there. I would think that if you have the ability to canonical to a 'see all products page' then this might be the best way to go since it should theoretically take care of any issues the dynamic loading is causing also.
Hope that helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Shopify crawl issues
Hi Moz'ers, I am a total newcomer to this level of seo. Recently I transitioned to Shopify and I'm puzzled by why I'm getting 803 errors - incomplete crawl attempts due to server timing out. Wouldn't this have to do with Shopify? How would I go about fixing it? I'm also getting 804 - SSL issues, but I assume that will go away. Any advice? Thanks! Sharon
Moz Pro | | Sharon2016
www.ZeldasSong.com0 -
Has the Crawl Test gone?
Just checked the new Moz, am I right in thinking the super useful crawl test functionality has gone? I use it for existing sites to download all the title tags and meta name descriptions, is there more to come??
Moz Pro | | Karen_Dauncey0 -
SEOMoz Langage ?
Hello, Is there any way to change the lagage of the interface ? Especially for reporting tool ? Thanks in advance for your answer, Alex
Moz Pro | | ACORED0 -
Crawl Diagnostics returning duplicate content based on session id
I'm just starting to dig into crawl diagnostics and it is returning quite a few errors. Primarily, the crawl is indicating duplicate content (page titles, meta tags, etc), because of a session id in the URL. I have set-up a URL parameter in Google Webmaster Tools to help Google recognize the existence of this session id. Is there any way to tell the SEOMoz spider the same thing? I'd like to get rid of these errors since I've already handled them for the most part.
Moz Pro | | csingsaas0 -
SEOMoz Q&A having some issues?
Apologies if this has been asked. I was browsing Q&A and got a Ruby error page, reloaded and everything was fine. However a bunch of the topics are kind of messed up, and it looks like a chunk of them are missing now. For example my 'questions I've answered' section of My Q&A only has the newest question and the oldest question, and when I sort the SEOMoz Tools category by newest I get one recent post and then the next one is from November of last year. You guys having database problems?
Moz Pro | | icecarats0 -
SEOMOZ reports the statistics.
SEOMOZ reports the Statistics, but where do i manage & improve??? Simply Statistics is all about SEOMOZ??
Moz Pro | | webicers0 -
SEOmoz Toolbar vs. Opensiteexplorer
Dumb question, why is the SEOmoz Toolbar reporting vastly different data than opensitexplorer? I had assumed they pulled from the same data set. False assumption? Am I misinterpreting the metrics? The discrepancies with which I am most confused are differences in number of root linking domains between OSE and Toolbar. Please enlighten me.
Moz Pro | | Gyi0 -
Seomoz Spider/Bot Details
Hi All Our website identifies a list of search engine spiders so that it does not show them the session ID's when they come to crawl, preventing the search engines thinking there is duplicate content all over the place. The Seomoz has bought a over 20k crawl errors on the dashboard due to session ID's. Could someone please give the details for the Seomoz bot so that we can add it to the list on the website so when it does come to crawl it won't show it session ID's and give all these crawl errors. Thanks
Moz Pro | | blagger1