How to Explain Admin Access To Client Who Denies It to Anyone Inside or Outside?
-
Hi ,
I am on a new project for a great prospective client. After a company split the IT dept says, "Our IT Infrastructure team doesn’t provide admin access to anyone (internal or external) to any of our servers/sites for security, maintainability, and quality reasons. We would be more than happy to install and configure any software you would like and provide you read access to any output you might need."
I am not aware of any such software. Or what help "read only access" is to getting tasks accomplished. Tomorrow am I meet with four others on the project that I am to assign SEO tasks to. Everyone wonders how to accomplish marketing tasks, web redesign and SEO tasks efficiently? They are told to drop by new content on a backupn CD.
My contact has asked that I am permitted access... what can one do when IT says "no?"
-
Nice work! It's always great to hear success stories and gives us a little more inspiration to keep up the communication until we get what we want;-)
-
For a quick follow -up. After several meetings, I have been able to explain my efforts and how it will move their project forward. We seem to have built a new level of trust and the admin access has been granted. Lots of extra hours to get here, though. Thanks for all of your great advice.
-
Thanks! All your thoughts prepared me for a meeting with the business owner today and the head of IT. They have determined to set up a Dev site and give me access to it. Then they will move updates to the live site. Has anyone worked this way? Tips on how to best manage it?
-
Wow, that is really a bad situation and sounds like you are going to be very limited. When I mentioned limitation, I was referring to things such as Google Analytics Admin. Some of the platform sites have their Google Analytics account Admin, but will not give Admin and GWMT access to 3rd parties (marketing agencies). They package in Analytics with their platform monthly rates and set Analytics to mail a report to the client each month. I have had developers refuse to add a video sitemap. I have had some that gave me access to their site backend, but it was hosted on an IIS server and required them to do the manual 301 redirects, and they refused to do this. These are just a few examples of "limitations" I have seen.
Having said that, I really feel your pain here. In your initial question, you called this a "great prospective client," but it is not a great situation as there seems to be a bad breakup with residual bad internal politics. Without knowing your entire situation, here are my recommendations based on what you have mentioned so far:
Option 1 is to not accept the project as it might be too draining and time consuming because of the company politics.
Option 2 is to start by placing proper expectations with the person hiring you - sounds like you have established a good relationship with them. You have to let them know how important on-site optimization is and how the IT dept seem to be unreasonable. Without onsite optimization, your entire campaign is going to be inefficient - it will take a ton more work offsite in order to get results and it is not ideal. Even blogging sounds like a serious pain in that it has to go to a test server first, then you have to wait for an IT person who doesn't "get it" to approve. You should also consider raising your rates because of the situation. This is not typical, so your typical rates that you may have quoted may no longer apply now that you know the whole story.
Anyway, good luck with this. I hope it works. I would love to hear how it plays out.
-
It is good to learn that some of you work in this manners as my experience has been largely with having full admin access. Tim, what "are some limitations" you have found this way?
I have offered to train those with access by walking them through what they need to do verbally, including meeting with them initially in person as needed to ensure they understand how to complete the steps successfully. However, as I understand it after this new three-way company split, all the higher level and "cutting edge" IT are gone. The remaining staff is working hard to learn those positions and has no or little bandwidth for such training.
They use one path for all internal and external help who blog, add photos, redesign pages or any form of updates: all are done on a test site till approved by the IT staff, then placed on a CD, driven or mailed to their physical address, and IT uploads the new content into a "rolled back" version of Joomla (Joomla-253-released.html).
Therefore, unfortunately, I will be unable to use schema metadata, just one downside.
They seem unsure of time or budget for follow-up communication or documentation from IT. As I understand this is where the "installing software to give me read only access" is meant to give "output". I can audit already through many SEOmoz and other tools. Is there such a software? Would it work as a communicative documentation of completed tasks?
I agree with your "just work through it" and "no point in doing all the work". My concern is the project manager/my contact's take that IT in this case is like an "unnecessary barricade" and is asking me to proceed by way of "software solution discussions". They seem to be seeing SEO conclusively as something similar to a WordPress Yoast install for an old Joomla platform.
How do you suggest building trust with a "barricaded team"? They seem worn and now face competing with their former peers/lead staff who are all well ahead according to Site Explorer's comparison tools.
-
Yes, as Cesar stated, this is not uncommon, and you can push the tasks to them. Over half of our clients' sites are on platform based sites and their developers do not give us access. While there are some limitations, we provide them with a nice zip file with paint by numbers documentation of what we need them to do.
Just put together your strategy exactly the way you would if you were going in there to do it yourself. Spell each item out so that it cannot be misinterpreted. I always include a READ ME FIRST file that explains the content of the zip folder. Once you send the file, schedule at time to verbally go over it and confirm that they completely understand your instructions for them. A lot of the times, you will get a grumpy response as they just don't get why these things are so important to you. Just work through it. Find out what they may not be able to do and problem solve to find the work-around. Have them send you documentation once they have completed the tasks. Do an audit and make sure everything meets your satisfaction. Keep the paper trail (email trail) of everything saved, just in case...
-
Are you referring to making edits to their website for SEO purposes?
If so most companies will outline in a Doc what they need to do and you leave it up to them to get those tasks done.
No point in doing all the work
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Anyone have a good process for Schema.org auditing?
I am looking to do a Schema.org audit across a large number of websites that all run on the same platform. I'm not really sure where to start and what format to use for a deliverable. I suppose starting by checking for errors on the current schema and documenting them and then moving on to additional schema that could be added to the JSON+LD? My last structured data audit I just used a spreadsheet and it didn't come out as neat as I would have liked. Anyone who has some experience in this, your input would be much appreciated!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MJTrevens0 -
Can I know which keywords lost their top rankings on google a year ago if the client didn't checked the keyword rankings in his website?
Hi, Can I know which keywords lost their top rankings on google a year ago if the client didn't checked the keyword rankings in his website? Thanks Roy
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | kadut1 -
In our reports we get alt tag errors for our banner images. We are unable to add alt tags to the banner images as they live inside CSS. We can add a title tag on the div title for the banner. Does that help with SEO and accessibility?
We are unable to add alt tags to the banner images as they live inside CSS. We can add a title tag on the div title for the banner. Does that help with SEO and accessibility?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Shirley.Fenlason0 -
How to Handle a Soft 404 error to an admin page in WordPress
I'm seeing this error on Google Webmaster Console: | URL: | http://www.awlwildlife.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php | | | Error details | Linked from | | |
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | aj613
| Last crawled: 11/15/16First detected: 11/15/16 The target URL doesn't exist, but your server is not returning a 404 (file not found) error. Learn more Your server returns a code other than 404 or 410 for a non-existent page (or redirecting users to another page, such as the homepage, instead of returning a 404). This creates a poor experience for searchers and search engines. More information about "soft 404" errors | Any ideas what I should do about it? Thanks!0 -
Client has moved to secured https webpages but non secured http pages are still being indexed in Google. Is this an issue
We are currently working with a client that relaunched their website two months ago to have hypertext transfer protocol secure pages (https) across their entire site architecture. The problem is that their non secure (http) pages are still accessible and being indexed in Google. Here are our concerns: 1. Are co-existing non secure and secure webpages (http and https) considered duplicate content?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | VanguardCommunications
2. If these pages are duplicate content should we use 301 redirects or rel canonicals?
3. If we go with rel canonicals, is it okay for a non secure page to have rel canonical to the secure version? Thanks for the advice.0 -
Https Homepage Redirect & Issue with Googlebot Access
Hi All, I have a question about Google correctly accessing a site that has a 301 redirect to https on the homepage. Here’s an overview of the situation and I’d really appreciate any insight from the community on what the issue might be: Background Info:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | G.Anderson
My homepage is set up as a 301 redirect to a https version of the homepage (some users log in so we need the SSL). Only 2 pages on the site are under SSL and the rest of the site is http. We switched to the SSL in July but have not seen any change in our rankings despite efforts increasing backlinks and out put of content. Even though Google has indexed the SSL page of the site, it appears that it is not linking up the SSL page with the rest of the site in its search and tracking. Why do we think this is the case? The Diagnosis: 1) When we do a Google Fetch on our http homepage, it appears that Google is only reading the 301 redirect instructions (as shown below) and is not finding its way over to the SSL page which has all the correct Page Title and meta information. <code>HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:26:24 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.16 (Debian) Location: https://mysite.com/ Vary: Accept-Encoding Content-Encoding: gzip Content-Length: 242 Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=100 Connection: Keep-Alive Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 <title>301 Moved Permanently</title> # Moved Permanently The document has moved [here](https://mysite.com/). * * * <address>Apache/2.2.16 (Debian) Server at mysite.com</address></code> 2) When we view a list of external backlinks to our homepage, it appears that the backlinks that have been built after we switched to the SSL homepage have been separated from the backlinks built before the SSL. Even on Open Site, we are only seeing the backlinks that were achieved before we switched to the SSL and not getting to track any backlinks that have been added after the SSL switch. This leads up to believe that the new links are not adding any value to our search rankings. 3) When viewing Google Webmaster, we are receiving no information about our homepage, only all the non-https pages. I added a https account to Google Webmaster and in that version we ONLY receive the information about our homepage (and the other ssl page on the site) What Is The Problem? My concern is that we need to do something specific with our sitemap or with the 301 redirect itself in order for Google to read the whole site as one entity and receive the reporting/backlinks as one site. Again, google is indexing all of our pages but it seems to be doing so in a disjointed way that is breaking down link juice and value being built up by our SSL homepage. Can anybody help? Thank you for any advice input you might be able to offer. -Greg0 -
Does anyone have tips for optimzing a daily deals site?
I'm looking into ways to optimize a daily deals website. Any best practices or tips out there other than promoting on social sites?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BostonWright0 -
RSS feeds- What are the secrets to getting them, and the links inside then, indexed and counted for SEO purposes?
RSS feeds, at least on paper, should be a great way to build backlinks and boost rankings. They are also very seductive from a link-builder's point of view- free, easy to create, allows you to specifiy anchor text, etc. There are even several SEO articles, anda few products, extolling the virtues of RSS for SEO puposes. However, I hear anecdotedly that they are extremely ineffective in getting their internal links indexed. And my success rate has been abysmal- perhaps 15% have ever been indexed,and so far, I havenever seem Google show an RSS feed as a source for a backlink. I have even thrown some token backlinks against RSS feeds to see if that helped in getting them indexed, but even that has a very low success rate. I recently read a blog post saying that Google "hates aRSS feeds" and "rarely spiders perhaps the first link or two." Yet there are many SEO advocates who claim that RSS feeds are a great untapped resource for SEO. I am rather befuddled. Has anyone "crackedthe code" onhow to get them,and the links that they contain, indexed and helping rankings?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | tclendaniel0