Rankings and search traffic fell off a cliff
-
Hi Moz community,
One of my clients has a beast of a website built in ASP.NET (which causes me problems cos I don't have much experience in that)
It is a job-site that aggregates job opportunities from other job-sites and provides a job matching service by email etc.
They used to have great presence on Google naturally for thousands of job searches.
Since Penguin and Penguin 2.0 (I think) their traffic has fallen off a cliff.
I have been doing some "off-page" experimentation, seeing if we can fix a lot of issues by re-sculpting their backlink profile (seeing as it was after penguin). but what I have found is that some pages respond to this off page work but some just do not at all, despite how we approach it, such as disavowing previous links building fresh new top quality content links with natural anchor text etc....
Which has lead me to the conclusion that the wider issue is on-page and potentially site structure. Unfortunately as it is ASP.NET I am not so comfortable diagnosing the issues.
I think also some issues will be related to dupe content etc.... but I would LOVE to get some input from my learned Moz colleagues.
The website is http://www.allthetopbananas.com/ - any tips on how to recover from this dramatic loss of traffic would be massively appreciated.
Kind regards
-
Hi Marcus,
Your help has been invaluable. Thank you so much for taking the time to do this for me.
Kind regards
Mark
-
Hey Mark, given the Panda correlation I would look at content issues first and see what we can dig up there.
So, the 60 second SEO audit:
1. I grabbed a chunk of content from one page:
"Female PE Teacher, Permanent - Bath - Pay to Scale Full time role paid to scale depending on relevant teaching experience Required for September 2013 Full time as in accordance with the Teachers"
Run that through Google and what do we see.....
Lots of listings for that exact piece of content - approx 40 reported. But, we hit the third page and we see:
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 21 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.No sign of your clients site though!
So, we open it up and look at the omitted results and there are now over a hundred results and your clients site is in something like 95th position.
Conclusions?
The client site is basically a conduit to other sites like totaljobs.co.uk and re-purposes content available in several other locations. Therefore, they are being filtered as they are not the originator of the content and they bring nothing new to the table.
Pros & Cons
Pro - It's content so can be sorted easily enough by creating unique content.
Con - there seems to be a lot of it
Your client needs to do a content audit and create descriptions of the jobs that add some value and uniqueness. Given how many other folks there are pumping out these same descriptions there is likely some opportunity there but the old model is broken and they have to bring some value.
Caveat - this was the quickest of quick looks but certainly, it seems there are no real mysteries here so just dig in and do some deeper analysis. I imagine the site might give copyscape.com a heart attack!
Hope that helps!
Marcus -
Hi Marcus,
Many thanks for your response. I have found the tools you recommended (Barracuda Panguin Tool and Link detox) extremely useful.
I have attached the barracuda results for allthetopbananas.com. It looks like Panda is the culprit.
Their link profile returned a result of "Low Risk" in Link Detox as expected, so I don't think Penguin is an issue.
If you have any further suggestions or direction from here, I would be most grateful. I am thinking that sites like this one, that have relied on basic on-page keyword optimisation and backlinks to attain their Google rankings in the past are now suffering because since Panda Google is putting more value on a wider set of signals such as social, authority, freshness, authorRank, mentions etc.. Would you concur with that?
I look forward to your reply.
kind regards
Mark
[Panguin Tool - Barracuda Digital-year.png](http://www.websearchseo.co.uk/dloads/Panguin Tool - Barracuda Digital-year.png) [Panguin Tool - Barracuda Digital.png](http://www.websearchseo.co.uk/dloads/Panguin Tool - Barracuda Digital.png)
-
Penguin can and often does have page specific problems. In fact, most often it seems the homepages of many sites are most affected and seemingly Penguin 2.0 does a better job of targeting inner pages.
I have worked with several companies who are still struggling to rank their homepage after Penguin yet can generate traffic to their inner pages.
Firstly, I would not jump to assume there are lots of problems with the site, perform an audit if you are unsure but don't make this as an assumption. Use known penalty dates to review traffic and anoint the analytics so you can get a clear picture of which updates caused the traffic drops for a quick and easy way to get more intel.
More often than not I am now advising people to just start over on a new domain and redirecting the old (not with a 301) to the new. This is painful, and many folks are holding onto domains but if clean up is not working and is not practical to continue down this route then a clean domain gives you a fresh start.
I have just had a quick look at the backlink profile in OSE and it does not look like your standard penguinised site though. Are you sure about the cause of the loss of traffic? Do the drops coincide with known penguin dates?
Really, the analytics should be your first port of call here and tools like this will help you easily map algorithm change dates to traffic changes: http://www.barracuda-digital.co.uk/panguin-tool/
Then, investigate further from there on in. If links do seem to be an issue link detox is a quick and easy way to get a good grasp on what kind of links your client has.
Ultimately, it needs investigation but start with analytics, form your hypothesis and try to prove it and then feed back here.
Hope that helps
Marcus
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Related searches volume
Hello, The related searches we see at the bottom of google search results. Is this what people also search for ? If it is why does the keyword so no volume for those related searches ? Thank you,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics0 -
Search engine keyword rank - easiest way to check the keywords that rank across website
What is the best keyword ranking tool you have used? I have used various tools by which I am expected to identify and input the keyword I want to track... However, recently I was introduced to Searchmetrics, which I think automatically pulls in the keywords a website ranks for, without the need for manual input from the SEO (I haven't used this tool yet, so apologies if I am incorrect!). Do any other rank trackers work like this? Thanks, Luke
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | McTaggart1 -
Bing Ranking Factors
Question... I have a few clients that rank well for Google (first page) but are not ranking as well on Bing (page 5). Any suggestions on what to do to increase Bing ranking? I understand that Google and Bing use different algorithms, but just curious how you can increase ranking. Appreciate your input. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kdruckenbrod0 -
Keyword ranking verse all other data
Hi there I have just joined Moz so I am not sure if i am doing a good job of analysing all the data, but from what i can see i have a few questions: 1. I seem to have a fairly high visibility compared to a few other competitors 2. All the other competitors i am looking at have a much lower domain authority 3. I win the link metrics in all categories compared to my competitors 4. I have a page optimisation score of 94 5. I dont have any crawl issues (except that i just changed to https and i believe there is a synching issue with Moz and cloud flare..) YET I barely rank for any of the main keyword in my industry.... Kitchen, New Kitchen, Kitchen Renovation etc. I also have a page optimisation score of 94 for related keywords. I feel like i am really missing a big point and was hoping I could get your expert thoughts on this 🙂 Thanks so much! PS my domain is www.bluetea.com.au
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bluetea0 -
Only ranking well when "UK" is added to search term
Hi, what does it mean when a lot of our keyword phrases rank only when "UK" is typed in the search term? For example:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Solid_Web
"boxes" (not in top 50)
"boxes UK" (38) "big storage boxes" (45)
"big storage boxes UK" (33) We haven't attempted to SEO the pages for search terms with "UK" appended to them. Our domain is a co.uk domain. So, what reasons could there be that are we ranking in such a way?0 -
SEOMoz and Facebook Graph Search
Are SEOMoz looking to integrate Facebook Graph Search (the web search section) into the product? At the moment we can measure and track rankings for Google, Bing/Yahoo, but not Facebook graph search. What are the general thoughts among the community? Do you think it will be adopted as a real search engine? I'm not overly concerned - I reckon it will take a lot to change people behaviour and have them moving away from the other search engines. It's throwing up some interesting results though in searches!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | littlesthobo0 -
The Site: search and Flow of PageRank
It is my understanding that if I do a search for site:mydomain.com the results are like every other SERP in that the most authoritative pages are ranked higher. So obviously I would expect my homepage to be first (in most cases), then followed by main category pages, etc. My question is has anybody ever seen disturbing results when doing this (i.e. pages that should have no authority outranking main category pages)? Is this always an issue with site structure or can you think of other factors that may cause this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | purch0 -
Website Ranking Issue
Hey All My question is specfic to a particular website. The category of the website is Kitchen Appliances. The keyword is extremely competitive. The website I am currently optimizing has loads of products and many pages as well. I am constantly building links from industry specific websites for the website as well as composing articles and leading the users back to the website with keyword rich anchor text. I have been doing this for around 3 months and I do not see the website in the first 30 pages of the SERP (for the keyword kitchen appliances - the site is a page rank 2 BTW). No bugs reported as well in Webmaster tools. My next step is to add these articles to the website (www.example.com/KitchenAppliances ) with keyword rich metatags as well as content with internal links to my product pages. I also plan on sending traffic to these pages to build the pages link popularity. Do you think I can expect better results for the article pages than my original website product pages or do you think I should continue with the link building activity I was performing originally for the website. regards Ryan
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SEO5Team2