New more "helpful" internal linking causing SERP & traffic drop?
-
Still dealing with the weird traffic drop on my website.
I have removed a bunch of old links from a defunct blog, 301 thin pages, added text to remaining pages.
I'm still stumped.
So awhile ago I freshened up my website and thought I was "helping people" by making sure they could CONTACT the studio more easily... I added more links to the "contact page" I thought this would help conversions...This changed the number of links to my entire site....Would this be the problem with my ranking/traffic drop?
-
I saw that video, yes it is a good one.
Interesting theory about the new "spam search queries" I can see that might be an issue with some sites, I'm not sure it is with mine.
There is something called "pink filter" that I have heard of that if google determines your website to be porn, it will not allow it when safesearch is on.
According to theory if I have not been hit by the "pink filter" I am not labeled porn and should not have my rankings dropped. It does look like Google is changing, I'll keep this in mind.
-
Well said! That's exactly what I was thinking and hoping... That if my idea is not the problem, maybe a real geek with chime in and fix it. Anyway, here goes...
There has been some new additions to Google's algo announced just a few days ago. Emphasis on "Announced", who know but Matt Cutts on how long it has actually been active, right?
They (Google) have started targeting anything that "they consider" bad, misused, search terms. Two such terms are "PayDay Loans" and anything that "They Consider" to be of a Pornographic nature.
Although your site is a classy photo studio for private "Intimate" photography and not a porn site, it does have semantic terms on the site that "They May Consider" worth lowering just a little.
Below is a link from which I got this info and formed this theory. This is probably not the problem since I'm not a big-shot and no big-shots have mentioned it, or they "have" mentioned it but found out to not be the issue. But I'm having fun with the exchange and hope to learn more myself... Just like you said above.
Here's the link (I hope)
-Gary.
Oops! I meant to add this quote from the page,
Google has officially launched a new search update to target “spammy queries” such as [payday loan], pornographic and other heavily spammed queries
-
Geek away....
If this was a simple problem with one simple answer I would have fixed it 4 months ago
I've had lots of suggestions and lots of bits of help.
I'm always glad for more, if your suggestion does not work, someone will pipe in and we all learn from it.
Here is another thread that has more data too to help you out.
http://moz.com/community/q/web-traffic-tanked-not-penguin-nor-panda-i-am-stumped
What do you see?
-
Sorry to see your rankings going down. It's obviously not the "shake down" thing I was referring to. However...
I looked at your site after looking at your graph and think I may have found something that could possibly be a contributing factor to your rankings issue.
In my home town I'm a seo big-fish, but here on "The Moz", I'm just a wee lil minnow, so I do not claim to be an SEO Jeenyus outside my physical area. That being said,
Do you mind if I share with you what I think I see to be a possible issue? I don't want to offend you or anyone by coming across as a self proclaimed super-geek, this is why I'm asking.
-Gary.
-
Fascinating theory, but this has been a slow steady decline since March.
Not an instant drop.
Here is an awesome graph of Jan to now.
http://www.bayareaboudoir.com/capture2.jpg
I erased all my stats Jan 1st from previous years.
But they had been slowly climbing.
-
I admit that I don't know your whole situation. But based on my own experience with Local SEO I can say this...
I can very often count on Google to Severely Drop the ranking of the site and or the individual site-page shortly after I do a medium to large amount of SEO Tweaking on the given client site.
Personally I call this "The Google SEO Shake Down" (not sure where I got that term). I don't know if they do this on purpose, but it is predictable like clock-work, so I can only assume there really is something to this "Google SEO Shake Down" idea.
This DROP In Ranking only lasts a few days to a week or so (for me so far).
If your ranking problem has been less than two or three weeks, I would suggest to just stop all your activity and play the waiting game with Google for 5 days to as much as 3 weeks (usually 4 to 7 days, but does vary). If this is the "SEO Shake Down", your site will pop right back up. However, if this has been going on for over 3 weeks, I'd think there is a more serious problem.
Parting Thought:
I frame this "SEO Shake Down" in my own mind like this... Google does this in order to see if there is an SEO spammer that may panic and throw a bunch of spammy SEO tactics at the site. This has worked well for me so far without fail! When I see a big dip in ranking just after doing some SEO tweaking I WILL always stop and wait... So far, the rankings have always came back.
I hope this helps to shine just a little more light on your situation. No one has taught me this, I'm only speaking from my own personal experience alone. But since this so far has been absolutely 100% predictable, I figured it wouldn't hurt to share.
-Gary.
Up Date: I forgot to mention that the "SEO Tweaking" mentioned above is "On-Page" SEO only. OFF-SITE back linking may be a different beast all together! Cool?
-
Update:
I just went through and fixed the last of the 404 errors with 301.
I also changed the internal linking structure to have more links going to the home page and not to the contact page.
I hope this helps.
I'd love some more input on this issue.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What does it mean that "too many links" show up in my report - but I'm not seeing them?
I've noticed that on the crawl report for my site, www.imageworkscreative.com, "too many links" is showing up as a chronic problem. Reviewing the pages cited as having this issue, I don't see more than 100 links. I've read that sometimes, websites are unintentionally cloaking their links, and I am concerned that this is what might be happening on my site. Some example pages from my crawl report are: http://www.imageworkscreative.com/blog/, http://www.imageworkscreative.com/blog/10-steps-seo-and-sem-success/index.html, and http://www.imageworkscreative.com/blog/business-objectives-vs-user-experience/index.html. Am I having a cloaking issue or is something else going on here? Any insight is appreciated!
Web Design | | ScottImageWorks0 -
Duplicate page title caused by Shopify CMS
Hi, We have an ecommerce site set up at devlinsonline.com.au using Shopify and the MOZ crawl is returning a huge number (hundreds!) of Duplicate Page Title errors. The issue seems to be the way that Shopify uses tagging to sort products. So, using the 'Riedel' collection as an example, the urls devlinsonline.com.au/collections/riedel-glasses/ devlinsonline.com.au/collections/riedel-glasses/decanters devlinsonline.com.au/collections/riedel-glasses/vinum all have the exact same page title. We are also having the same issue with the blog and other sections of our site. Is this something that is actually a serious issue or, perhaps, is Google's algorithm intelligent enough to recognise that this is part of Shopify's layout so it will not negatively affect our rankings and can, essentially, be ignored? Thanks.
Web Design | | SimonDevlin0 -
Duplicate Content & Canonicals
I am a bit confused about canonicals and whether they are "working" properly on my site. In Webmaster Tools, I'm showing about 13,000 pages flagged for duplicate content, but nearly all of them are showing two pages, one URL as the root and a second with parameters. Case in point, these two are showing as duplicate content: http://www.gallerydirect.com/art/product/vincent-van-gogh/starry-night http://www.gallerydirect.com/art/product/vincent-van-gogh/starry-night?substrate_id=3&product_style_id=8&frame_id=63&size=25x20 We have a canonical tag on each of the pages pointing to the one without the parameters. Pages with other parameters don't show as duplicates, just one root and one dupe per listing, So, am I not using the canonical tag properly? It is clearly listed as:Is the tag perhaps not formatted properly (I saw someone somewhere state that there needs to be a /> after the URL, but that seems rather picky for Google)?Suggestions?
Web Design | | sbaylor0 -
Is the 'too many links' caused by the tags?
Hello Just got my seomoz report and decided I better start takiling things. Got a lot of 'too many links' on the report. I don't have control over website design and before I talk to designer I thought I should have a bit of an handle on what I am talking about. I've taken one page that has 483 links. Is this caused by the tags box and would it be a good idea to have it removed? http://commonwealthcontractors.com/uk-visas/tier-2-general-visas-formerly-uk-work-permits/ Regards Niamh
Web Design | | Niamh20 -
Which Content Causes Duplicate Content Errors
My Duplicate Content list starts off with this URL: http://www.nebraskamed.com/about-us/branding/bellevue-medical-center-logo Then it lists the five below as Duplicate Content: http://www.nebraskamed.com/about-us/branding/fonts http://www.nebraskamed.com/about-us/branding/clear-zone http://www.nebraskamed.com/about-us/social-media http://www.nebraskamed.com/about-us/branding/order-stationery http://www.nebraskamed.com/about-us/branding/logo I do notice that most of these pages have images and/or little or no content outside of our sites template. Is this causing SEOmoz to see it as duplicate? Should I use noindex, follows to fix this? This error is happening with branding pages so noindex is an option. What should I do if that's not an option? Should I change our mega menus to be ajax driven to so the links aren't showing up in the code of every page?
Web Design | | Patrick_at_Nebraska_Medicine0 -
Linking to an image with the keyword in the title and alt tags.
Hi guys, Just thought I'd ask for opinions about an ecommerce catalog I'm working on. I don't know if it's even worth worrying about, but here's the scenario. Let's say I'm linking to a category called 'Sale' using an image, I have the title tag of the link as 'Sale', the image title is also 'Sale' as well as the alt tag. The HTML looks like this: Sale The page itself is: http://www.fashionbasicsonline.com/catDisplay So my question is, do you think I'm stuffing the keyword in too many times there? It's CMS driven so I could have the alt tag as 'Sale Products' or one of the titles as 'Sale Catalog' perhaps, do you think there would be a benefit in doing that? Maybe it's microoptimisation and I should be looking at other low hanging fruit, but I'm just trying to come up with the best scenario. Would love to hear what you think. Cheers, Bruce p.s. Looking forward to meeting as many people as possible at MozCon next week 🙂
Web Design | | bruce_werdschinski0 -
What is the new Google SERP highlighting?
My question is with the new Google SERP. I posted a pic of it at http://www.hortonwebdesign.com/images/new-google-page.gif. If you mouse over the arrows to the right of a result on the SERP, it pops up a preview of the page. On some results it also highlights a section of the page with a red box. What does this represent? Does it represent a key area that they are looking at in determining the positioning? I have some clients that are asking me and it doesn't make a lot of sense. In my example above I searched for "seo expert in georgia" and on my result (I'm #2), it shows a preview, but the part it has chosen to highlight with a red box is just, um, ...useless. It's highlighting a Recent Post sidebar on the right halfway down the page. Surely this can't be what they're looking at as what they view as "useful" to that search. This simply can't be what they're using to determine positioning. Or is it? Just please explain what I'm seeing here. new-google-page.gif.
Web Design | | GeorgiaSEOServices0 -
Will opening in a New Window pass all link juice?
Hey guys, We're in the middle of designing our core navigation for our new site, which will feature a blog. I want to make sure the blog is linked to from the main navigation to pass all of the link juice to it, but since it isn't the core feature of the site we want people to view, I don't want it to take attention away from other things. Due to this I am thinking about giving it a main navigation link that opens in a new window. It would still be reachable from every page on the site, but it would allow users to view the blog in a new window rather than leaving the main site. The blog will still be on the same domain in a domain.com/blog subfolder. My question is... is this good practice? Will this pass the necessary link juice from our root domain to our blog, or will opening it in a new window detract from the value of the link? Any other comments / issues with designing the navigation like this that I'm not thinking of would be appreciated! Thanks
Web Design | | CodyWheeler0