Forward slash on URL on Duplicate Content Report
-
Hi
I'm new to this whole Moz thing, so needing help from some kind people!
I've just looked at my Duplicate Page Content report and there are loads of URLs in there which are the same but are just differentiated by adding / at the end of the URL, e.g.
http://youngepilepsy.org.uk/news-and-events/events
http://youngepilepsy.org.uk/news-and-events/events/
Is this be a canonical issue? I can't understand why though as these aren't at the root. However when we add inline text links within the page HTML, there are some URLs with / and some without, could that be the reason?
Thanks for your help!
Jackie
-
Two parts
1) If you link to two different URLs
http://youngepilepsy.org.uk/news-and-events/events
http://youngepilepsy.org.uk/news-and-events/events/
the two above would classify as that (with and without the slash are two different URLs)
and
2) if your server shows a 200 response on both of those URLs and shows the same content for those URLs
Then yes, you have a duplicate issue.
You need to
1) Make sure you keep consistent with how you link to URLs (with or without the slashes).
Decide on a standard, I personally like ending in slashes if this is an index page as this helps with reporting in places like Google Analytics where they are looking at your directory structure for reports.
If you never end in a slash
http://youngepilepsy.org.uk/news-and-events/events
and
http://youngepilepsy.org.uk/news-and-events/events/article-xyz
these two pages would be put into two different "folders" in your report for Google Analytics. I went round and round with the developers on this and had to show them the reports in GA to show why.
I also think we have had the standard that / being the index page for years now and then you have all the pages within it. I know with modern CMSs there may not be any folders and these are all actually "routes", but as a mental organizational construct (and in the reporting example above) I think most people (who are not programmers) think that way.
That said, I currently help run a site that has no trailing slashes, and I am living with it, again, being consistent is the most important. You will see many wall known SEO sites go sans slashes, so either way will work.
and
2) Then 301 redirect the "non standard" to the "standard" version (say the non slashed version to the slash version) so that you can clean up any other confusion that may be out there.
Cheers!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
URL Length Issue
MOZ is telling me the URLs are too long. I did a little research and I found out that the length of the URLs is not really a serious problem. In fact, others recommend ignoring the situation. Even on their blog I found this explanation: "Shorter URLs are generally preferable. You do not need to take this to the extreme, and if your URL is already less than 50-60 characters, do not worry about it at all. But if you have URLs pushing 100+ characters, there's probably an opportunity to rewrite them and gain value. This is not a direct problem with Google or Bing - the search engines can process long URLs without much trouble. The issue, instead, lies with usability and user experience. Shorter URLs are easier to parse, copy and paste, share on social media, and embed, and while these may all add up to a fractional improvement in sharing or amplification, every tweet, like, share, pin, email, and link matters (either directly or, often, indirectly)." And yet, I have these questions: In this case, why do I get this error telling me that the urls are too long, and what are the best practices to get this out? Thank You
Moz Pro | | Cart_generation1 -
Why do I see a duplicate content errors when rel="canonical" tag is present
I was reviewing my first Moz crawler report and noticed the crawler returned a bunch of duplicate page content errors. The recommendations to correct this issue are to either put a 301 redirect on the duplicate URL or use the rel="canonical" tag so Google knows which URL I view as the most important and the one that should appear in the search results. However, after poking around the source code I noticed all of the pages that are returning duplicate content in the eyes of the Moz crawler already have the rel="canonical" tag. Does the Moz crawler simply not catch whether that tag is being used? If I have that tag in place, is there anything else I need to do in order to get that error to stop showing up in the Moz crawler report?
Moz Pro | | shinolamoz0 -
Duplicate Titles Shown in Moz Analytics
Hello, My Moz analytics show over 50 duplicate titles. This because my website title is shown on each page (eg About us | Social Engagement, Contact us | Social Engagement, etc.) Is this really an error to be fixed, that otherwise will impact rankings? Or can I leave it as it is? I don't mind having my website title on each page, but if its worth removing it due to duplicate issues impacting ranking, I will remove 🙂 In this case, does someone have any suggestion on how to do this? Which files should I modify? (Im using Wordpress CMS, and I dont see each page code) Thanks in advance.
Moz Pro | | socialengaged
Regards, Eugenio | Social Engagement (http://socialengagement.it)0 -
Can you highlight a list of keywords in reports?
Hello all, My client recently asked me if there was a way to highlight a specific list of keywords to put on the first page of every report. These would be the highest priority keywords that we would always want to know the status of for his site. In the reports section, I am only seeing options for organizing the keywords by rankings improved/declined and comparing to competitors. Would anyone know how to label/categorize this list of keywords and then produce them as part of the monthly reports? Thank you,
Moz Pro | | Level2Designs
Daniel0 -
URL, Subdomain and Root Domain Structure
Various URL Structure
Moz Pro | | Mark_Ch
mydomain.co.uk
www.mydomain.co.uk
http://www.mydomain.co.uk
http://mydomain.co.uk
mydomain.co.uk/index.html
www.mydomain.co.uk/index.html
http://www.mydomain.co.uk/index.html
http://mydomain.co.uk/index.html HTACCESS File Index Rewrite RewriteRule ^index.(htm|html|php) http://www.mydomain.co.uk/ [R=301,L]
RewriteRule ^(.)/index.(htm|html|php) http://www.mydomain.co.uk/$1/ [R=301,L]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^mydomain.co.uk
RewriteRule ^(.)$ http://www.mydomain.co.uk/$1 [R=301,L] Google WMT Setting: Configuration | Settings
Preferred domain: radio check on "don't set a preferred domain" SEOMoz Open Site Explorer
mydomain.co.uk - (301 Redirect) [No Data] PA38 DA30
http://www.mydomain.co.uk/index.html - (301 Redirect) [No Data] PA23 DA30 Majestic Site Explorer
Number of Referring Domains & External Backlinks vary between the following instances:
URL: http://www.mydomain.co.uk
SUBDOMAIN: www.mydomain.co.uk
ROOT DOMAIN: mydomain.co.uk
Question
I have set up my htaccess file to rewrite "Various URL Structure" to www.mydomain.co.uk. However when i view metrics in Majestic SEO, the url / Subdomain / Root Domain all differ. Why is this happening?
Is this harming my site?
What is common practice when defining URL Structure? Any other quality advise and implementation structure would be much appreciated. Regards Mark0 -
CSV reports in SEOmoz
Hello, I would like to export the reports from SEOmoz to an Excel sheet. However when I downoad the report and open it, all the information is random and is hard to work on it. Since Im not an excel expert, I have to ask if there is an Excel sheet ready to receive the SEOmoz reports. Tks for the help, Regards, PP
Moz Pro | | PedroM0 -
Duplicate page error from SEOmoz
SEOmoz's Crawl Diagnostics is complaining about a duplicate page error. I'm trying to use a rel=canonical but maybe I'm not doing it right. This page is the original, definitive version of the content: https://www.borntosell.com/covered-call-newsletter/sent-2011-10-01 This page is an alias that points to it (each month the alias is changed to point to the then current issue): https://www.borntosell.com/covered-call-newsletter/latest-issue The alias page above contains this tag (which is also updated each month when a new issue comes out) in the section: Is that not correct? Is the https (vs http) messing something up? Thanks!
Moz Pro | | scanlin0 -
How do folks present the SEOmoz reports to clients?
Hi, How are people presenting the SEOmoz reports to clients? Do you just export to PDF and email it? Cut and paste items inside some other kind of personalized format? Add adobe style sticky notes to explain things on top of the reports? Or something else that is wonderful and endearing to your clients? Thank you.
Moz Pro | | Ken_Jansen0