301 a purchased domain
-
I've purchased a competitor. They rank well organically for keywords that I target, and I want to optimize the way I get value from their current rankings and traffic (and customers -- we will obviously market to their email/customer list). Which is better:
(1) use a 301 redirect for any access to their domain and point it to my home page. I think this would force Google to de-index all of their pages, right?
(2) put up a stub page as their homepage that announces the site has been bought, and have a do-follow link to my home page (which maybe is auto-redirected after 10 seconds or something)? Maybe this is better to keep their home page in Google's index for a while?
As for option (1), I thought I read somewhere recently that 301'ing a domain to the home page of another domain would no longer pass link juice (?). Maybe I should 301 the newly purchased domain to a sub-page on my site that explains the acquisition and asks them to sign up on my site?
Both sites are legit. No spamming happening here; just industry consolidation as one competitor acquires another. Thanks in advance...!
-
Hi Mike,
Before we go any further, I highly encourage you to read this blog post I wrote about 301 redirects:
http://moz.com/blog/save-your-website-with-redirects
Even more important than the raw "link juice" passed from a 301, you need to consider the relevance of the pages. If your goal is to preserve link equity, then 301'ing everything to the homepage is likely to not to pass much value, and render those redirected pages to a state of little value.
Does the purchased site have any content worth saving? Is it worth it to re-purpose this for your own means and keep the content live? This might make the most sense, but if not, does it feel right redirecting individual pages to the most relevant page on a one-to-one basis on your own site?
You also suggested another possibility: "Maybe I should 301 the newly purchased domain to a sub-page on my site that explains the acquisition and asks them to sign up on my site?" From a user perspective this makes sense, but be warned that it might not pass much link equity.
If it were me, I'd probably put a message on the site with an explanation that the site has been purchased, and offer a link to the new site. That said, be careful with repetitive, site-wide links. Then, after a time, redirect everything to the most appropriate pages on your own site.
Hope this helps. Cheers.
-
Thanks, everyone! Based on your suggestions, I'm going to try and keep the competitor's site structure (to keep his ranking pages in G's index) and some of his content (don't want to tweak his on-page content too much or those pages might lose their rank). I will add links to each of the competitor's page pointing to the relevant internal page on my site. For smaller pages (that don't rank) I will 301 them to the closest matching page on my site.
I have looked at the 'landing pages' report in Analytics for the competitor's site and will manually adjust (ie explain the merger and add a link to relevant internal page on my site) any landing page that gets more than a little traffic.
His home page is the trickiest and most important. I want to post an announcement about the merger and get people to my site (the acquiring site) asap. I guess I'll do it with an announcement and a link to my site, as opposed to a 301, so that his visitors know what's going on. I will need to leave some of his content on his home page (and his title tag and meta-description tag) so that it still ranks for keywords I care about.
He and I had competing products and I intend to sunset his products after the merger, but keep his ranking content.
Any other suggestions regarding buying a rival, established site, are welcome.
-
I think you are right about this Adam I should have looked what I wrote I didn't mean just point www.competitor.com to www.yoursite.com and have done I meant do a 301 over a single link from homepage that auto-redirects after 10 secs - you should always redirect at a page by page level as it helps the user find the content they are looking for. I think that redirecting at a blanket level like this can actually hinder rather than help you - see http://moz.com/blog/save-your-website-with-redirects
so thumbs up
Quick note as Cyrus says in the above linked post you won't see much benefit in terms of SEO by doing a blanket redirect to your homepage!! So don't waste your purchase take your time and make your redirects relevant Mike
Oh yeah one more quick thing I would have a glance at this thread on webmasterworld - http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4348449.htm
I have never personally bought a competitor and implemented a 301 redirect - what adam and myself speak of would be best practice for this in terms of pass authority from the site you have bought in terms of its link profile. However this is all done around the pretext of boosting your ranking and Google knows this goes on and isn't daft!
Have you done this in the same situation Adam - buying a rivals site? I would be very interested to hear yours or anyone else's first hand experience on this and I think it will help Mike as well. As you are redirecting between two sites that are well established in Google's index rather than between an established site and a new one or new structure, which I have done and think is more commonly the case for 301 use.
-
Alternately you could place canonicals across the newly bought site to the most relevant pages on your site and put up a message stating that Website X is now Website Y (with a link to your site) so everyone should change their bookmarks and start going to the other site. After a couple months, switch the canonicals to 301 to those pages. That way you don't wind up with bounces from people who wanted Website X but were confused/annoyed/perplexed/etc. from immediately going to a site they didn't want (even if its the site they need).
-
I agree with you that a 301 is better than a single on site link, but 301'ing the entire site at the homepage level will result in all his competitors pages being deindexed and only passing the value of the domain not the internal pages.
While that may have made sense previously he stands not only to get more SEO value from redirecting internal pages to their equivalent on his site but FAR more inbound marketing value as even if people find his competitors site (which will still be indexed) the internal services pages are redirected to his pages.
-
I personally would look at doing a 301 redirect from their website to yours. This will give you the most benefit as it will pass authority to your site from links that they have gained. Increased authority equals better ranks in general so this will be a good thing! Much better than having a single link from their homepage effectively passing the benefit of a single link from their site rather than the multiple links they have gained. Have a look at this video about the passing of pagerank through 301 redirects from Googles Matt Cutts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Filv4pP-1nw
-
Sometimes there is absolute nonsense when it comes to topics surrounding "the passing of link juice". You need to remember that:
A) Link juice isn't one set thing but rather a quick name given to the overall sphere of influence from an external website
and
B) Link Juice isn't on or off like a switch but rather in varying degrees.
Personally I would 301 any page that ranks for a keyword to your internal page that you wish to rank for that same keyword. One of the most important things for Google is deliverable intent. For example in the mobile search market plenty of websites redirect users on mobile to the mobile version of their site. But if the clicked moz.com/article.html rather than get directed to m.moz.com/article.html they are just redirected to m.moz.com and fail to hit their intent. This causes a devaluation and an increase in bounce rates.
You want people searching for keywords to still find your solutions. So 301ing the entire site to your homepage is a bad idea. However, if you 301 a page that ranks for "LinkedIn SEO" to your page on linkedin SEO you are keeping the value in the same intent and niche and delivering the user to what they want.
While on the main page of your competitor you should leave it up and put a note of the acquisition/merger but still keep the site structure and links to the pages you have 301'd so if a spider or person comes to your competitor site and clicks "services" they are 301'd to your services.
While this is a lot more work it's going to ensure you maintain their old value, increase your value and keep a flow of new customers coming your way from search results. It's well worth it!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Domain has been redirected our site; but many incoming links from sub domain. Will this hurts?
Hi all, This is the scenario: Our website is newwebsite.com. Our old website is oldwebsite.com which has been redirected to newwebsite.com (years back). But one of the old website's sub domain has a lot of back links to our current website like: seo.oldwebsite.com to newwebsite.com. Will this scenario hurts with any wrong linking? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Redirecting acquired website: DNS or 301?
Hi all, We have taken down some infringing websites and acquired them, so far we made around 40 websites. We are using DNS to land on our website from the acquired. But I've see that recently that DNS is not a redirect and we must 301 redirect from the old site to the new site. Also there is a potential harm in employing DNS method due to the duplicate content that will harm SERP performance severely. Which is the best way? DNS or 301 redirect? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
When sub domains take away the traffic from search; will this helps or hurts main website rankings?
Hi all, We have some of the landing pages on our sub domains which are getting ranked for our brand related queries and taking away the traffic as we don't have pages to rank for those search queries. I would like to know if this scenario hurts or helps our main website ranking as the traffic to the main website is getting diverted to sub domain. Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Domain Migration Question
Lets say there is a brand that has one primary product type at different optional tiers. (Think something like SMB/Enterprise/Individual) Lets also say that 1 year ago this brand migrated from having everything under 1 domain (Domain A) to moving 2 of their product tiers to another domain (Domain B), a new domain. They have done some initial SEO work on this domain and had a pretty successful migration but it has also been decided that they are going to no longer offer one of these product tiers and they intend to eventually migrate everything back under the 1 domain (Domain A) They just are not sure whether they should do this now or later.
Algorithm Updates | | DRSearchEngOpt
During this next year or so there is also going to be some likely re-branding/design, etc...stemming from this decision, on the domain, meaning content changes and all that fun that goes into a migration/re-design/re-branding strategy. The timing of this has not been fully decided on. Here is the question: Should they a) Migrate back to Domain A first and then do the re-design or b) Keep 2 separate domains for now, figure out the re-design/re-branding, make content changes and then migrate Site A over in a year or so after all changes have been made? My concern with option a) is that they migrated a little less than 1 year ago and will be migrating back which I feel could have a negative impact on the content and the domain. The positive side I see here is that this impact could be just as large even if we waited so doing this now might be a better, more efficient use of our time if we can migrate and make content changes fairly close together or concurrently.
My concern with option b) is that the tier they no longer offer makes up the majority of that sites business and traffic, leaving us with not much in terms of content that ranks well and garners much traffic. Trying to optimize for the remaining product tier by itself on it's own domain could be quite hard and then having to migrate it in a year or so back to Domain A could negatively impact any small organic impact I can make on applicable pages/domain. Does anybody have any input here? I am leaning towards Option A and but wanted to get some other opinions. Thanks Everybody! Edit: So far, this has received a lot of views but no input. I am hoping to have a bit of a dialog on this so any ideas or input is welcome.0 -
301-Redirects, PageRank, Matt Cutts, Eric Enge & Barry Schwartz - Fact or Myth?
I've been trying to wrap my head around this for the last hour or so and thought it might make a good discussion. There's been a ton about this in the Q & A here, Eric Enge's interview with Matt Cutts from 2010 (http://www.stonetemple.com/articles/interview-matt-cutts-012510.shtml) said one thing and Barry Schwartz seemed to say another: http://searchengineland.com/google-pagerank-dilution-through-a-301-redirect-is-a-myth-149656 Is this all just semantics? Are all of these people really saying the same thing and have they been saying the same thing ever since 2010? Cyrus Shepherd shed a little light on things in this post when he said that it seemed people were confusing links and 301-redirects and viewing them as being the same things, when they really aren't. He wrote "here's a huge difference between redirecting a page and linking to a page." I think he is the only writer who is getting down to the heart of the matter. But I'm still in a fog. In this video from April, 2011, Matt Cutts states very clearly that "There is a little bit of pagerank that doesn't pass through a 301-redirect." continuing on to say that if this wasn't the case, then there would be a temptation to 301-redirect from one page to another instead of just linking. VIDEO - http://youtu.be/zW5UL3lzBOA So it seems to me, it is not a myth that 301-redirects result in loss of pagerank. In this video from February 2013, Matt Cutts states that "The amount of pagerank that dissipates through a 301 is currently identical to the amount of pagerank that dissipates through a link." VIDEO - http://youtu.be/Filv4pP-1nw Again, Matt Cutts is clearly stating that yes, a 301-redirect dissipates pagerank. Now for the "myth" part. Apparently the "myth" was about how much pagerank dissipates via a 301-redirect versus a link. Here's where my head starts to hurt: Does this mean that when Page A links to Page B it looks like this: A -----> ( reduces pagerank by about 15%)-------> B (inherits about 85% of Page A's pagerank if no other links are on the page But say the "link" that exists on Page A is no longer good, but it's still the original URL, which, when clicked, now redirects to Page B via a URL rewrite (301 redirect)....based on what Matt Cutts said, does the pagerank scenario now look like this: A (with an old URL to Page B) ----- ( reduces pagerank by about 15%) -------> URL rewrite (301 redirect) - Reduces pagerank by another 15% --------> B (inherits about 72% of Page A's pagerank if no other links are on the page) Forgive me, I'm not a mathematician, so not sure if that 72% is right? It seems to me, from what Matt is saying, the only way to avoid this scenario would be to make sure that Page A was updated with the new URL, thereby avoiding the 301 rewrite? I recently had to re-write 18 product page URLs on a site and do 301 redirects. This was brought about by our hosting company initiating rules in the back end that broke all of our custom URLs. The redirects were to exactly the same product pages (so, highly relevant). PageRank tanked on all 18 of them, hard. Perhaps this is why I am diving into this question more deeply. I am really interested to hear your point of view
Algorithm Updates | | danatanseo0 -
Phantom Indexed: 301 Redirected Old URL Shows in Google Search Result!
Today, I have read about Phantom Indexed in Google search result. Because, I was searching about 301 redirect due to indexing of 301 redirected old URLs in Google search result rather than new landing pages. I've added my comment on jennita's blog post about 301 redirect. I would like to paste similar question over here! I have 301 redirected following 3 domains to new website... http://www.lampslightingandmore.com/ To http://www.vistastores.com/table-lamps http://www.vistapatioumbrellas.com/ To http://www.vistastores.com/patio-umbrellas http://www.spiderofficechairs.com/ To http://www.vistastores.com/office-chairs I have done it before 3 months but, Google still shows me home page URL in search result rather than new landing page. You can check following search results to know more about it. For LampsLightingandMore ~ On second or third page::: For VistaPatioUmbrellas ~ On second or third page::: For SpiderOfficeChairs ~ On Second or third page::: I come to know about Phantom Indexed after raised my comment over there. So, why should not start discussion on it. Because, It's all about branding and who'll love to hang old address in front of new home.
Algorithm Updates | | CommercePundit0 -
Value of a sub-domain compared to a domain
Hello, I have a client that has a blog with a domain of www.domain-a.com and a website www.domain-b.com. I told him that instead of trying to promote and rank with two different sites for the same thing that he should have his blog on www.domain-b.com so that any links, notices, visits, social mentions, etc. all point to one domain name and he was in agreement. But he uses a CMS (content management system) for his website and his hosting/design companey said it would be easier to set up his blog as a sub-domain of his site. www.blog.domain-b.com. My question is will the blog on a sub domain (www.blog.domain-b.com) help out link juice, ranking, etc. for the domain name www.domain-b.com just as must as a blog at www.domain-b.com/blog would help out the domain name www.domain-b.com? I know that Google used to treat links form sub domains as external but recently changed the treatment of these links to internal. P.S. The current blog at www.domain-a.com holds very little value currently.
Algorithm Updates | | Michael_Rock0 -
Are multiple domains for my website hurting my Google ranking?
Hello, I currently have two domains showing up in google search: shwoodshop.com shop.shwoodshop.com These domains are currently ranked in the #2 and #3 spot, however my page is much more trafficked than the current #1 ranking. I am wondering if the fact that I have two domains competing for the #1 spot is hurting my search ranking. If so, what is the best way to remedy this issue and get back my #1 spot? I'm rather new to SEO and teaching myself as I go, so I appreciate the feedback!
Algorithm Updates | | shwoodshop0