Google Places: Multiple company listings. How to rank the HQ page over a branch location.
-
Hi Moz experts! I have a client with Google Place listings for multiple branch locations and for some reason the fully SEO optimized Head Office listing is being beaten by an un-optimized branch listing.
The HQ listing gets a tonne of traffic where as the ranking and unoptimized branch location doesn't and is the main listing when searching through Google.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
-
Jon, I took a look at this(the screencast was helpful). I would go to this blog and read about the local directory ecosystem: https://getlisted.org/static/resources/local-search-data-providers.html One of my suspicions is that the other office has more local citations than your head office. The other things is that your site and many of the references on the site do not really differentiate between the locations. For example on Careers each address directs to the same page. You may want to consider modifying you map so that there is a mini site under the main site for each location. This would help signal multiple locations and a hierarchy to the different search engines. Ron
-
Thank you for the links, Freddy.
Looking now at your bit.ly URL, I see you have a large number of locations, making this problem more complex. I was under the impression that you only had two. I am a bit confused by what I am seeing in the examples vs. your notes.
Is this your HQ? In Bathurst?
https://plus.google.com/113521293483420343122/about?gl=au&hl=en
When I access the bit.ly URL for Google Maps, I am seeing a South Guilford in the A position and Bathurst in the B position, but your screencast is highlighting a Kewdale location as the one appearing for your branded search in the organic results. So, not sure what is up with this discrepancy. I am in the USA, so I may be seeing results in a different order in Maps, even with your link.
One thing that immediately jumps out at me is a violation of the Google Places Quality Guidelines. Many of your listings have 'City Branch' in the business title and this is not allowed. For example: Westrac - Bathurst Branch. This is not allowed, per these guidelines:
Do not attempt to manipulate search results by adding extraneous keywords or a description of your business in the business name field.
This needs to be cleaned up.
Because I am confused about which of your branches is HQ, I'm not sure which Google+ Local page to look at. Can you please provide a link to the HQ listing? The Bathurst one I looked at in G Maps Position B looks completely unoptimized.
Something else I've noted is that it appears you are linking all of your +Local pages to the homepage of your website. Have considered building a landing page for each branch and linking to that instead of the homepage?
Do any of these locations share a phone number? Have you gone through all of this listings to see if the phone number of one of them is ending up live on another one of the listings?
Here is a similar thread on the Google And Your Business Forum:
http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!searchin/business/branch/business/WPptzqIgcj8/OKWaMlCtxQsJ
Thought you might like to take a glance at that.
This is as far as I've been able to dig. I'll stop back by if you can provide further clarification, Freddy.
-
HI Everyone,
Thanks you for your responses everyone, sorry for my late reply.
Please see the search with the keyword 'westrac' via google.com.au. The results are in this screenshot http://screencast.com/t/rgUpDppIx15B. This is the smaller branch showing.
You can see the locations here: http://bit.ly/18J6eYa
HQ location is location B (hidden under C and D) and location A is the smaller branch.
We have tested the keyword 'westrac' from location B and also from another location near map marker F, approx 25 mins drive away.
We have suspended the google place listing for location A, the smaller branch some time ago and added a new listing for the same location without a website url to try and overcome the problem but I think the original listing for the branch is still showing as the url is present.
Hope this helps and thank you again for everyone's help!
Freddy
-
Jon,
I am willing to help as well but I need the data. One other thing that I thought about based on Miriam's comments is you may want to use open site explorer to look at the relative in bound links, specifically local directories on the HQ vs the branch. One thing that might have happened is whomever set up your directory listings gave a URL for HQ rather than the URL for the branch.
Ron
-
Hi Jon,
Unfortunately, what you are experiencing is one of the potential issues with having multiple listings, whether this is for multiple practitioners within a single location or multiple locations within a region. It is up to Google to decide which of your listings they consider to be most authoritative.
I will repeat a question asked by Ron. How far apart are your different locations? Are you searching from a single location or are you going to the devices at different offices and searching for the respective locations from them? Google will typically localize the results either to your device, or to keyword indicators you provide in the search term, such as a city name. Would you like to provide more specifics as to what you are searching for and from where you are searching for it?
I will be happy to stop back by this thread if you can provide some further details.
-
Not really sure about this but try to get more citations from different quality locations under the HQ address and keywords and add links that points to your HQ address listing, thin might help!
-
Jon,
Where are their relative locations? Where are you when you do the search relative to each location? How many inbound links on the HQ VS branch ? Have you looked at the localized content ?
Ron
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does you page need to be unique to rank
What I mean by unique is : Let's imagine I want to rank one "seo ranking factors." In order to compete do I need to have (in terms of design) that is totally different than everything out there or can I rank with a page that is presented in a very similar way than everything out there but with different content. Thank you,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics0 -
Conditional Noindex for Dynamic Listing Pages?
Hi, We have dynamic listing pages that are sometimes populated and sometimes not populated. They are clinical trial results pages for disease types, some of which don't always have trials open. This means that sometimes the CMS produces a blank page -- pages that are then flagged as thin content. We're considering implementing a conditional noindex -- where the page is indexed only if there are results. However, I'm concerned that this will be confusing to Google and send a negative ranking signal. Any advice would be super helpful. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | yaelslater0 -
Inner pages not ranking well
Hi Guys I'm currently working on a website and scratching my head. It seems certain pages of the website rank absolutely fine. The homepage, certain pages on footer and the primary navigation pages are ranking fine. Pages, however, that sit on the inner navigation (e.g 3rd level navigational pages) - do not rank well at all. Looking in webmaster, it is apparent these are fluctuating in and out of the Google index - sometimes they are there - sometimes not. I fully understand issues with Google penalties but I don't believe this is case as other pages are ranking fine. Link building has been done to these pages but to no effect. We have also increased internal links e.g by putting the pages on the footer - but still nothing. One thing that may impact the ranking is possibly the URL structure The website URLs are all www.Example.com/widgets - even if they sit on the 3rd level of the user navigation. Could this be a reason why? Would it help if 3rd level pages had the URL structure www.Example.com/services/widgets ? If anyone can provide help that would be great!!! thanks, Duncan
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CayenneRed890 -
Google still listing old domain
Hi We moved to a new domain back in March 2014 and redirected most pages with a 301 and submitted change of domain request through Google Webmaster tools. A couple of pages were left as 302 redirect as they had rubbish links pointing to them and we had previously had a penalty. Google was still indexing the old domain and our rankings hadn't recovered. Last month we took away the 302 redirects and just did a blanket 301 approach from old domain to new in the the thinking that as the penalty had been lifted from the old domain there was no harm in sending everything to new domain. Again, we submitted the change of domain in webmaster tools as the option was available to us but its been a couple of weeks now and the old domain is still indexed Am I missing something? I realise that the rankings may not have recovered partly due to the disavowing / disregarding of several links but am concerned this may be contributing
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ham19790 -
Optimized pages ranking lower than homepage with keywords
Ok, I know this question has been out there before, but i don't know how fo search for it specifically enough. I have several keywords that rank higher on my home page. As you know MOZ assigns keywords to whichever page on your site popping up in search first. So even though i have A-grade optimized pages for a particular keyword, that page may not pop up BEFORE the homepage for instance, on searches. In many cases, the homepage is grade "F" for a particular keyword, yet its pulling up first for most of my keywords. I know that my homepage has more rank because it gets the most visits and i'm sure we can't really optimize the homepage for EVERY keyword. What is the best thing to do in this situation? Do i just need to wait for my optimized page to catch up in rank, or is there a trick to optimizing homepage to ALL key words at grade "A" level? Do i need to keep back-linking to my optimized page directly to get the juice up? I created all these great optimized pages for specific keywords, but my homepage which shows "F" grade is the one pulling up 4th or 5th on searches Help??
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DrMcCoy0 -
Can a home page penalty cause a drop in rankings for all pages?
All my main keywords have dropped out of the SERPS. Could it be that the home page (the strongest) page has been devalued and therefore 'link juice' that used to spread throughout the site is no longer doing so. Would this cause all other pages to drop? I just can't understand how all my pages have lost rankings. The site is still indexed so there's no problem there.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SamCUK0 -
Adding Orphaned Pages to the Google Index
Hey folks, How do you think Google will treat adding 300K orphaned pages to a 4.5 million page site. The URLs would resolve but there would be no on site navigation to those pages, Google would only know about them through sitemap.xmls. These pages are super low competition. The plot thickens, what we are really after is to get 150k real pages back on the site, these pages do have crawlable paths on the site but in order to do that (for technical reasons) we need to push these other 300k orphaned pages live (it's an all or nothing deal) a) Do you think Google will have a problem with this or just decide to not index some or most these pages since they are orphaned. b) If these pages will just fall out of the index or not get included, and have no chance of ever accumulating PR anyway since they are not linked to, would it make sense to just noindex them? c) Should we not submit sitemap.xml files at all, and take our 150k and just ignore these 300k and hope Google ignores them as well since they are orhpaned? d) If Google is OK with this maybe we should submit the sitemap.xmls and keep an eye on the pages, maybe they will rank and bring us a bit of traffic, but we don't want to do that if it could be an issue with Google. Thanks for your opinions and if you have any hard evidence either way especially thanks for that info. 😉
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | irvingw0 -
What to do if the wrong page is ranking?
What to do if the wrong page of your website is ranking and you cannot 301 it? Apparently an outsourced company the previous manager hired build anchor text links to the homepage, when those links should have been pointing to a deeper page. As a result, the hompage is now ranking for that term. But I think we can convert a lot more of the visitors if the deeper page is there instead. Obviously, I can't 301 the homepage. What would you do?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | andrep0