Aren't domain.com/page and domain.com/page/ the same thing?
-
Hi All,
A recent Moz scan has turned up quite a few duplicate content notifications, all of which have the same issue. For instance: domain.com/page and domain.com/page/ are listed as duplicates, but I was under the impression that these pages would, in fact, be the same page.
Is this even something to bother fixing or a fluke scan? If I should fix it does anyone know of an .htaccess modification that might be used?
Thanks!
-
Wow, thanks guys! This is indeed an enterprise level site, so especially thanks to CleverPhD for the breakdown on trailing slash v. no trailing slash. Redirecting as we speak.
-
You bet Jesse - thank you. I do work at the enterprise level and so it would make sense that this would become a bigger issue on larger sites. I would still say it could become an issue on smaller sites as people do tend to add the slash at the end and so you end up with a duplicate issue.
Full disclosure, I run sites due to legacy issues do not end with the slash. They run just fine. The key is to be consistent.
P
-
Interesting Clever, thanks for posting that. To be honest your points all make perfect sense. I've just never had that situation come up. To Frank's point, organization with or without slash doesn't matter much for smaller sites but as you said I can see how using the slash could make your analytics tracking much easier.
Perhaps it depends on the size of the site, but either way I hadn't thought of it in that detailed-a-manner and am glad you posted it.
Thanks as always !
-
As others have already mentioned, it is typically considered a separate page. Whether you choose with the slash or without is your preference. If a site is small I will typically opt for with/without the slash, but if a site is large and there are many different pages and the structure gets quite large I default to using the slash.
Not sure if the site you are mentioning is Wordpress based or not, if so there there are plugins that can help with this issue as well.
-
They are different and you need to setup 301s to correct, also check all your menus etc to make sure that you use them consistently - this includes in emails etc - consistency is the key.
You can go with slashes or no slashes, as long as you are consistent, I have run sites both ways.
I will disagree with Jesse one thing - I would strongly recommend using the ending slash. I have several reasons why.
-
The url ending in a slash traditionally represents a folder with pages/documents/images inside that folder. Used to be that we would use a URL like /folder/index.htm with index.htm being the default page. It used to be that if you did not designate any file as an index file, assuming the permissions on the folder were set correctly, you would see all the content in that folder. Later, you could designate a default index file and so when you left it blank by ending in a slash it would show the content of the default page without needing the index.htm to be included. Now this issue can cause duplicate content problems (but that is another story).
-
Knowing all that above, many of your web analytic and other reporting software would create reports using a given folder Google Analytics is a good one. If you use the conent drilldown tool, it automatically organizes your reports by looking at the slashes and then grouping pageviews and visits according to the folder structure.
3) Separately, you had development code that used the folder system in the url as a way to parse what the user wants and then deliver a page. This is why you can now have a url like /article/file and you do not need a .htm or .php or .html at the end as the server knows what to do with it without seeing the final extensions.
What happens then is that you end up with URLs like this
/toys/age6-8
/toys/age6-8/redball
/toys/age6-8/blueball
/toys/age9-10
/toys/age9-10/remote-car
/toys/age9-10/remote-control-train
You can see this is a toy store and they are grouping toys by age. Balls are better for younger children vs remote vehicles for older children. In your GA reporting, if you assume that a slash indicates a new folder
/toys/age6-8 would not be included in the report with the products as it would be seen as a page within the /toys/ folder. Same thing with /toys/age9-10
You have your most important page not grouped with all the products it contains.
This is one of the reasons that I prefer ending with the slash. Can you do it the other way, sure, but it just adds more hassle. The folder ending in a slash is a convention that most people follow and frankly, you will find that users also tend to end in a slash when they put in a url. You end up with links to your site where they have a slash and one is needed.
Old habits are hard to break and so this is why I recommend going with the ending slash.
-
-
As for the htaccess fix, a simple 301 redirect from one to the other will do it. I recommend going with the no-slash format.
-
Technically they are different URLs.
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/to-slash-or-not-to-slash.html
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why does moz give different page authority to the same page if a visit comes from adwords vs organic search?
When clicking on an adwords ad the page the landing page has a page authority of 26. When clicking on organic search to the same exact landing page the page authority is 37. Why is this. Does moz or, more importantly Google see these as the same or separate pages? Thanks Tom
Moz Pro | | ffctas1 -
High Page Authority / Low Domain Authority
I have been building links to the home page of my web site. At this point, the site has a DA of 22 and the home page has a PA of 35. I am a bit puzzled as to how the PA can be so much higher than DA. I suppose it might have something to do with the fact that most of the inbound links are going to the home page. Are there any other factors that might be contributing to this situation? Does it point to a weakness in our backlink profile?
Moz Pro | | NathanSchlink1230 -
Links don't show in MOZ
Hi, Im have started some weeks ago with some standard linkbuilding from websites to my domain www.eppinga.nl . These links don't show in Moz. Does this take some time? How long does it take? Thanks in advance for all replies! Tymen
Moz Pro | | Tymen0 -
Solving 'duplicate content' for page 2 of X for 1 blog post
Hi to all SEO wizards, For my Dutch blog google-plus-marketing.nl I'm using WordPress Genesis framework 2.0 with news theme pro 2.0 responsive theme. I love the out of the box SEO friendliness and features. One of those features is that it allows for a blog post or page to be divided into several pages. This results in MOZ signaling duplicate titles for all pages after the 1st page. Now I was thinking that a canonical url set to the first page should do the trick for me as I reason that the rank will go the the first page and the rest will not be seen as duplicates. Genesis does some good stuff on it's own and places the following meta tags in the header for the first page. All looks well and my question is about the same meta tags for the 2nd page and higher that I pasted below this one for the 1st page. Meta tags page 1 of X for blog post Meta tags page 2 of X for the same blog post Would it not be better to point the canonical url for page 2 till X to always point to the first page? In this case:
Moz Pro | | DanielMulderNL0 -
Why aren't canonical tags reducing duplicate page title/content?
We have canonical tags set up for a feature page on one of our sites. This site has an image gallery controlled by javascript. To aid the user experience the image can also be specified by a URL parameter (the javascript also uses this URL to fetch the images). The SEOMoz report complains that the links to these images have duplicate page titles and content. To try and combat this we set canonical tags to point only to the original page, without the slideshow parameter. e.g. http://www.example.com/feature-page/ http://www.example.com/feature-page/?slideshow=1 -> canonical tag set to http://www.example.com/feature-page/ http://www.example.com/feature-page/?slideshow=2 -> canonical tag set to http://www.example.com/feature-page/ The latest SEOMoz report has come back and the errors still exist. What can we do to remove these error messages? Thanks
Moz Pro | | TJSSEO1 -
If my keywords aren't driving any traffic to my site, why am I still ranking for them?
In several of our campaigns we have watched our keywords steadily climb the rankings without ever registering so much as a blip in the traffic data column. If these keywords aren't driving any traffic to our site, how are we still ranking for them?
Moz Pro | | MackenzieFogelson0 -
Page and Domain Authority and other bits
Hi, I am in the process of finding blogs to have a few articles published with a couple of links in each. Articles will all be unique and relevant to the link I drop in and relevant in someway to the reader However I have a few questions. My site is a designer menswear site, so I have picked fashion and sports sites first and foremost to have the articles published. Now, I have a guy who owns about 30 different websites. 2 of them are sports based and about 10 are fashion based. Around $10-$15 an article. I have ran them all through the Open Site Explorer Tool and picked out the best ranked ones. Now my problem is, how do I know if its a good site to not only list an article on, but to pay for it as well. The sites page ranks are around the 30-45 range, the domains are around the 35-45 range. What is a good range to have? I know the higher the better but is 30-45 good enough to pay for? (I don't mind paying the $10 each (£7 my money) for each one) Also as he is quoted me in dollars, I assume there all USA based, so majority of users are USA based. Well I am UK based and only ship to the UK. Will this matter as much if I am trying to gain backlinks? Obviously a UK based site, would be ideal, but is it a case of getting more external links on the web for Google to find, as long as they are relevant to the user? Any help would be great. Thanks Will
Moz Pro | | WillBlackburn0