Site as one page - SEO implications
-
We may be inheriting a site and will be asked to do SEO for it. We will have control over the development of the site, so this structure is what it is. My question is - how significant of an impact do you think this is going to have and can you think of any workarounds that may help?
Basically, the user experience of the site will feel similar to multiple pages. However, this site will, in essence be one page and pull various content through javascript from different locations. I have not seen the site yet (and believe it is still in development), but this is how it has been explained to me. Any thoughts?
My first thought was to add a blog to add page depth to the site and expand the content. Any other thoughts are welcome and appreciated. Thanks.
(I know this is limited information, I'm sorry. It's just about all I have to work with right now, and I was a little concerned and was hoping for a second opinion)
-
Wow, thanks so much everyone. Sorry, emails didn't come through indicating that there were responses or I would have gotten back sooner.
I do not have a URL yet - site is still in development by another agency. The structure is pretty set, but I do want to be able to manage expectations. We will work on creating a blog that we can use for additional pages (possibly part blog, part full pages to target keywords).
So, it looks like it's not going to kill us, but it's not going to do us any favors either. thanks so much for your help.
-
I'd suggest to create several landing pages that are optimized for particular keywords, this way each page has a real focus.
-
So that video from Matt Cutts really just says the 1 page solution isn't optimal. At least that's my interpretation.
Google is having trouble keeping up with the new design paradigm of single page with dynamic content reveal using css and javascript.
Still too much reliance on meta title and URL keyword inclusions rather than ranking the content of a site and working out the relevance and usefulness for a particular search term.
-
Unfortunately, to successfully do decent SEO on a one-page site you will need to make alternate landing pages for the keywords you are targeting as you will only be able to really target a couple of keywords on that page.
This has a number of benefits, as you can usually put more information on the site that you cannot fit onto the "one-page" homepage. I have successfully done this on a "one page" parrallax site, and even linked back from the front page content to the keyword pages.
On a negative side, the whole point of the "one-page" is to wow the user and maximise conversion. If 90% of your search traffic bypasses that page... well it may well defeat the purpose of it to an extent, and you may want to consider an alternative.
-
Do a site:examplesite.com to see if Google is able to identify individual sections of content on the site. If not, you need to create pages to have something to work with.
-
Hey Adam
There are a lot of these one page sites around at the moment - I guess they are kind of cool! I am too old to get cool but... we have to work with what we have eh.
Well, I have seen a few ways these sites can work and Google handling them in different ways so let me give you my take.
- This kind of approach is not ideal
- You have to get everything else right
- You are losing out on some of the SEO easy wins
It's pretty much impossible to comment in detail without a link but here is some food for thought:
- No page titles
- No meta descriptions
- No breadcrumbs
- No page names / directories
So, you are losing much of what gives a site it's shape and context.
Now, Google do have a go at this and they seem to be indexing page anchors for many of these pages so we need to ensure each section has really well structured code so we are working with what we do have.
- H1 tags
- Text Navigation
- Copy / images etc
You are likely looking at something that works something like this:
http://uat.itrelateservices.com/Matt Cutts did a webmaster video on this a while back which is worth a watch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mibrj2bOFCUThe answer, as ever is it depends. You need to see the site, talk to the developers and ideally crawl it to see what it looks like. Google will do their best but the results may not be optimal.
Pretty vague answer but I hope that helps in some way!
Marcus
-
With only one landing page you can really only target a couple keywords. I think you should definitely focus on building out landing pages for the content, rather than having it all display at one URL. Without landing pages you really can't target a variety of keywords.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
AMP vs Responsive Design? Mobile SEO
Hello !! We are developing a new website with responsive design. As is recommended, the idea would be to have a unique site for mobile and desktop, with same content and same url for both devices, using responsive design to adapt the layout depending on the device. My doubt in here is about the AMP pages? If my website has responsive design, perfectly optimized for mobile do I need somehow AMP pages? As far as I understand, these amp pages would be useful if I had different pages for mobile, but this is not the case. Am I correct or am I missing something? Thanks for your help :
Web Design | | AutoEurope1 -
Will keyword optimization for a landing page impact SEO for subsequent pages?
For example, if I optimize keyword “pleurx” really well on our landing page, I'd like to know if subsequent
Web Design | | Todd_Kendrick
pages linking back to that landing page will rank higher than before for “pleurx”
even if “pleurx” wasn't optimized on the subsequent pages. Thanks! -Andrew0 -
We believe we accomplished an SEO Parallax site with a nice balance. Can the MOZ community critique this site from an SEO perspective?
Our goal was to accomplish a site that has parallax scrolling and great onsite optimization. We noticed that most Awwward winning sites www.awwwards.com have great parallax scrolling but no SEO. Can the MOZ community critique this site from an SEO perspective? (Note this site was optimized for Chrome or Firefox. If you are using IE, you will be redirected to the old site.) www.posicionamientowebenbuscadores.com Note the site is in BETA still. It has the following technologies CSS3 HTML5 REsponsive Wordpress Parallax Scrolling Onsite Optimization (SEO) No mobile (ran out of funds...)
Web Design | | Carla_Dawson0 -
Changing design for a client. SEO concerns.
Hi there! A client requested me to change the look of his website entirely. It currently ranks #16 on Google with one of their main keywords. My problem is: The current site was made in a CMS I'm not familiar with and all of its pages urls are not SEO friendly (EX: http://www.mysite.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=49&Itemid=95). It is the first time I have come up with this situation so I would appreciate any tips or links to useful information. I tried searching in SEOmoz and came up with nothing. I'm sure this is a common problem though. Since they want a static website, for starters their page extensions will change from .php to .html I'm not 100% sure but I think this will be a problem for their current ranking in Google. Any ideas? Edit: I forgot to mention that all of the backlinks this site has points to their hompage as www.mysite.com, I guess this is good.
Web Design | | Eblan0 -
Drupal SEO - Concerns about cloaking
It appears that core Drupal includes a CSS style that automatically generates an tag for any* or > ## Main menu This uses the CSS to create a 1px1px header with that text that is absolutely positioned in the top left hand corner. Essentially, hidden and unreadable to humans and presumably also useless to even screen readers. There is some discussion of the reasoning for including this functionality as standard here: [http://drupal.org/node/1392510](http://drupal.org/node/1392510 "http://drupal.org/node/1392510") I'm not convinced of its use/validity/helpfulness from an SEO perspective so there's a few questions that arise out of this. 1. Is there a valid non-SEO reason for leaving this as the default rather than giving ourselves full control over our ## tags? 2. Could this be seen as cloaking by creating hidden/invisible elements that are used by the search engines as ranking factors? Update: http://www.seobythesea.com/2013/03/google-invisible-text-hidden-links/ Google's latest patent appears to deal with this topic. The patent document even makes explicit reference to the practice of hiding text in ## tags that are invisible to users and are not proper headings. Anyone have any thoughts on what SEOs using Drupal should be doing about this?
Web Design | | Tinhat1 -
Link Pages/Directory
Hello, What is best practise for dealing with alot of links. I was thinking of breaking them download to alphabet pages i.e. all A on one page etc... BUT should I then make the links clickable on this list OR that they load to a sub company page which has a clickable link to there website.
Web Design | | JohnW-UK0 -
Local SEO - Title Tag?
For www.bluedotlandscaping.com/fencing.htm in which we mostly only care about Greenvile and Spartanburg counties in SC. Is <title>Patio designs - Water features - Brick patio by Blue Dot Landscaping</title>
Web Design | | SCyardman
good... or or do you prefer... <title>Patio designs - Water features - Brick patio - Greenville, Spartanburg, Simpsonville</title> Thanks for your help, Rich0 -
Dynamic pages and code within content
Hi all, I'm considering creating a dynamic table on my site that highlights rows / columns and cells depending on buttons that users can click. Each cell in the table links to a separate page that is created dynamically pulling information from a database. Now I'm aware of the google guidelines: "If you decide to use dynamic pages (i.e., the URL contains a "?" character), be aware that not every search engine spider crawls dynamic pages as well as static pages. It helps to keep the parameters short and the number of them few." So we wondered whether we could put the dynamic pages in our sitemap so that google could index them - the pages can be seen with javascript off which is how the pages are manipulated to make them dynamic. Could anyone give us a overview of the dangers here? I also wondered if you still need to separate content from code on a page? My developer still seems very keen to use inline CSS and javascript! Thanks a bundle.
Web Design | | tgraham0