Moz Crawl Test: Referrer is sitemap.gz?
-
Hi,
I'm looking at a crawl test report, and I'm seeing that most of the pages have the sitemamp.gz file listed as the referrer. As I recall in my other reports the referrer is usually the root domain - unless of course there's a redirect.Does having sitemap.gz as the referrer indicate a problem? If so, what problem does it indicate?
Thanks!
-
Hi,
No I don't think it indicates a problem. Your sitemap.gz is just the gzipped version of your sitemaps and it's a good sign that they link back to all your pages.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Site Crawl 1-page 301 status error but httpstatus.io says its 403
I am trying to run a site crawl for my website and MOZ is only resulting in 1 page crawled with the home page URL Status Code of 301. However when I run it in httpstatus.io it is giving me a 403 status error. Im curious as to why MOZ is saying its a 301 and httpstatus.io is saying 403. Is there anything I can do in MOZ first to get the site crawled before asking my developers to look into the 403 error?
Moz Bar | | JohnConover0 -
Moz not updating the spam score metrics
Hi Experts, I have done everything to come over the following metrics flagged as spam on my website by Moz, few months ago. But, Moz has not updated the spam score yet. ✓Low MozTrust or MozRank Score - improved from 2 to 4.5
Moz Bar | | jamesh.rich01
✓Large Site with Few Links - My website have more than 6K backlinks
✓Small Proportion of Branded Links - My website have a good amount of branded backlinks
✓Thin Content - Every webpage on website has more than 500 words content
✓External Links in Navigation - There is no external link in navigation other than social media links
✓No Contact Info - The proper address has alreay been placed on website footer
✓Low Number of Pages Found - I am wondering if there are any standard score or number of links to reach to remove these flag?
Also, please suggest some ways that will help me improve moz spam score at faster rate. Thanks for your help in advance!"0 -
Moz crawler
I have a site which is in a non production status. Crawlers are blocked vis robot txt. User-agent: *
Moz Bar | | Emanuele_Ricci
Disallow: / I WANT TO MAKE A CRAWLING TEST WITH MOZ CRAWLER (RogerBot) ,
how can I allow your crawler to get in and prevent other crawlers from indexing the site? Thanks memok0 -
Crawling password protected sites such as dev or staging areas to look at sites b4 going live ?
Hi Ive instructed clients to password protect dev areas so dont get crawled and indexed but how do we set up Moz crawl software so we can crawl theses sites for final check of any issues before going live ? Is there an option i havnt seen to add logins/passwords for crawl software to access ? cheers dan
Moz Bar | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Moz Local | Empty page "Categories"
Dear Moz, Another error, the following url loads an empty page https://moz.com/local/categories Please review Thanks!
Moz Bar | | Bio-RadAbs0 -
New moz analytics...will it have reporting?
Loving the new Moz Analytics...very shiny. Just wondering if it will have reporting tied to it at some point? Thanks..Jeannie x.
Moz Bar | | Jeannie.0 -
Is there a problem with New Campaign crawls being slow?
Hi I've created 3 new campaigns but results not showing as usual. I know the full results take up to 7 days but I usually see some basic info in a few minutes of creating the campaign. This problem happened a while ago and the campaign was never quite right in SEOMoz. Thanks for your help Steve
Moz Bar | | stevecounsell0 -
Moz reporting reliable?
I have been working with our MIS department on addressing our errors on duplicate content and titles caused by parameter URLs. MIS insists that they have solved the problem with canonical tags, which are in place. They said they were getting warnings from Google and Bing, but that after they put the canonical tags in place, those went away. They are questioning the Moz reports, suggesting that I instead rely on SEO Toolit by Microsoft. (As an aside, we are using SharePoint 2010, crossing our fingers for an upgrade to 2013, which presumably will make a lot of the issues we’re having go away). So my questions are: 1) Why are these Moz reports reporting all of these errors that have supposedly been rectified (in 2011)? Do I disregard the duplicate content/title errors on the Moz report and defer to SEO Toolkit, as MIS suggests?
Moz Bar | | SSFCU0