Website Drops Some Traffic after Redesign. What's Happening?
-
What it is NOT:
- No Link was broken. I have used Moz, Screaming Frog, Excel, etc - there are not broken links.
- We have not added spammy links.
- We kept the same amount of links and content on the homepage - with an exception of 1 or 2.
- All the pages remained canonical. Our blog uses rel=prev rel=next, and each page is canonicalized to itself.
- We do not index duplicated content. Our tags are content="noindex,follow"
- We are using the Genesis Framework (we were not before.)
- Load time is quicker - we now have a dedicated server.
- Webmaster tools has not reported any crawl report problems.
What we did that should have improved our rankings and traffic:
- Implemented schema.org
- Responsive design
- Our bounce rate is down - Average visit length is up.
Any ideas?
-
Even if you get everything right when undertaking a re-design, you can't get away from the fact that some things have changed and your search performance is likely to impacted. It can take weeks or months for the site to regain the lost traffic. From the analytics screenshot, it looks like you've done a pretty good job.
As Jeff mentioned, you do need to take into account seasonal traffic fluctuation as well as any other external activity. One site I manage has experienced a significant change in traffic since the end of British Summer Time. Can you compare you traffic with the same period last year.
Can you see any similar fluctuation when you look at Google Trends for some of your keywords?
Have your rankings changed? What keywords and what was the landing page for each keyword. How has the landing page changed in the re-design.
The problem with aggregate/average analytics metrics is that they don't provide you with much of an insight into what's happening.
Can you segment your non-paid search traffic, and your direct traffic and see if both segments are affected in a similar way. If your non-search traffic is also affected then it might suggest an external factor.
Take a look at your landing pages for your search traffic and compare them to the previous higher traffic period. Are all pages similarly affected or are there significant differences on particular pages. If there are you can compare the content of these pages to the previous incarnation of the site and see if you can explain why there might have been a drop.
Of course, I'm assuming that the main goal of the re-design wasn't to "get more visitors", but to get more leads or sales. You say that the bounce rate is much lower and the time on site is better. What about conversions?
Again, segment your non-paid search traffic and compare the number of conversions and the conversion rate before and after the update. It's perfectly possible to have less traffic and improve your conversions if the traffic is more relevant and with the right commercial intent.
Hope this help.
-
Eli -
I took a look at the site, as well as a view of the site through the Wayback Machine. If you did keep all of the links intact on the site, then there are two possibilities:
1. Your traffic is down by 20% because of the redesign to a responsive WordPress theme or some other factor that caused Google to dislike your site. Usually Google likes responsive themes, but perhaps something changed in ranking due to other competitors in the space?
It could also be due to seasonal traffic fluctuations. Can you measure the traffic not from month-to-month, but from year-to-year? Perhaps counseling and life coaching interest is strong as kids go back to school each year in September (people might want a fresh start), but wanes as the challenges of life grind on with homework, job stuff, etc?
2. Your traffic is really the same as before (and not down 20%), but the way in which the traffic is gathered has changed, due to the responsive theme on your WordPress site. The site tracking code for the new version of the site might be positioned in a different part of the page, and, due to the responsive design layout, might not be working like it did before. The javascript calls might be happening well after the site "responds" using other javascript.
If you still have a way to view the older version of the site, a waterfall test that shows how everything is called from the page might be a way to eliminate this second possibility.
Hope this helps…
-- JeffAre overall conversions down
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Seperating Different Parts Of The Website
Hi There, I have a client with two parts to his business both for different types of customer with different language and copy needed. At the moment they have one website and I am trying to figure out the most search engine friendly way to present these different types. So for example if a client came in looking for service A, he would see the home page for service A and if he came in looking for service B he would come across the home page for service B. I know I could have seperate service pages for each service he provides, but I think it would be off putting to come to a home page of a site and see completely unrelated services on one page. I hope I am explaining myself here. As far as I can see the options are:- subdomains for servicea.examplesite.com, serviceb.examplesite.com and a split page (see attachement) where you click which you are interested in (don't like this idea) seperate websites a home page which shows all the services (too confusing) Any advice would be most grateful. Regards Neil MpYSKqN
Web Design | | nezona0 -
Site is getting crushed by spam traffic and Google Webmaster Tools giving crawl warnings. Also...
Currently hosting a site I'm planning on moving to a new server ASAP, 301 redirecting and have a domain that has nice authority and very old. On the current site I need to clean up the blog. I have a few questions actually.... 1. I'd like to remove most of the blog articles as I want the new site to be very high quality, but isn't it dangerous to do a 301 redirect to the same page for all these articles? 2. I want to focus on the new site as the current site has too many issues but still managing to hang in their. is highly outdated yet I don't want to spend a ton of time on the site before the 301 redirect. With the Pigeon and Panda 4.0 rumors being released soon, I want to get the new site completed ASAP. Do you think it's better if I fix the 3. Would removing cloudflare make things better or worse with the crashing of my site due to high traffic (mainly spam on the blog.) 4. My best article by far is outdated, but should I waste time updating it before redirecting or should I just get the new site going? I did way too many guest posts thinking content is king, but at least checked the outgoing links Domain Auth, Page Auth, and MozTrust in OSE, but first off I'm going to remove a page that mentions I'm looking for guest bloggers. I tried to keep the posts relevant but at the time you could get away with 5. Anything I can do to slow down these spammers on Wordpress? I noticed most of them are checking for vulnerabilities but I'm keeping it up to date, have caching setup. Thanks!
Web Design | | eugenecomputergeeks0 -
New Website launch, asking for feedback
Hey Guys, I just launched my new website. I just asking around for feedback. Please check it out if you have time and let me know www.benjaminmarc.com
Web Design | | benjaminmarcinc1 -
Examples of B2B websites offering services (not products)
Hi there, I need some help - I am looking for some examples of SEO and inbound marketing websites in the B2B service sector. Thanks in advance!
Web Design | | Hughescov0 -
Homepage and Category pages rank for article/post titles after HTML5 Redesign
My site's URL (web address) is: http://bit.ly/g2fhhC Timeline:
Web Design | | mcluna
At the end of March we released a site redesign in HTML5
As part of the redesign we used multiple H1s (for nested articles on the homepage) and for content sections other than articles on a page. In summary, our pages have many many, I mean lots of H1's compared to other sites notable sites that use HTML5 and only one H1 (some of these are the biggest sites on the web) - yet I don't want to say this is the culprit because the HTML5 document outline (page sections) create the equivalent of H1 - H6 tags. We have also have been having Google cache snapshot issues due to Modernzr which we are working to apply the patch. https://github.com/h5bp/html5-boilerplate/issues/1086 - Not sure if this would driving our indexing issues as below. Situation:
Since the redesign when we query our article title then Google will list the homepage, category page or tag page that the article resides on. Most of the time it ranks for the homepage for the article query.
If we link directly to the article pages from a relevant internal page it does not help Google index the correct page. If we link to an article from an external site it does not help Google index the correct page. Here are some images of some example query results for our article titles: Homepage ranks for article title aged 5 hours
http://imgur.com/yNVU2 Homepage ranks for article title aged 36 min.
http://imgur.com/5RZgB Homepage at uncategorized page listed instead of article for exact match article query
http://imgur.com/MddcE Article aged over 10 day indexing correctly. Yes it's possible for Google index our article pages but again.
http://imgur.com/mZhmd What we have done so far:
-Removed the H1 tag from the site wide domain link
-Made the article title a link. How it was on the old version so replicating
-Applying the Modernizr patch today to correct blank caching issue. We are hoping you can assess the number H1s we are using on our homepage (i think over 40) and on our article pages (i believe over 25 H1s) and let us know if this may be sending a confusing signal to Google. Or if you see something else we're missing. All HTML5 and Google documentation makes clear that Google can parse multiple H1s & understand header, sub & that multiple H1s are okay etc... but it seems possible that algorythmic weighting may not have caught up with HTML5. Look forward to your thoughts. Thanks0 -
Best Website Builder - Help Me Choose
I need to built a multi language site (to built a Pilates, Yoga site) and I will use a site builder. After posting questions on wix.com I came to the fact I should continue my research because there are not SEO friendly. Do you have a suggestions? Limited to html knowledge, using a website builder is my only option. Here are some of the features I need: Multilanguage Web Site Mobile version SEO Friendly Nice Template Selections( this is important) HTML customization Twitter, Facebook, Blog... I'm not looking at free website builder, when you want good features, there is a price to paid. Thank you for your help and suggestions, BigBlaze
Web Design | | BigBlaze2050 -
Website using javascript to serve up content - SEO Friendly?
I'm checking out a dentist website http://www.sagedentalnj.com/ I was referred by a friend so just taking a little peek at it. When you click on the menu items, the url at the top doesn't change. When you view source, the page titles are all the same. when I do site:http://www.sagedentalnj.com/ none of his pages are indexed by google. What can be done with his site so that google sees his pages? Maybe submit sitemap?
Web Design | | Czubmeister0 -
Flat vs. Silo Site Architecture, What's Better
I'm in the midst of converting a fairly large website (500+ pages) into WordPress as a content management system. I know that there are two schools of thought regarding site architecture: Those who believe that everything should be categorized, I.E.- website.com/shoes/reebok/running People who believe that the less clicks it takes from the homepage the better. As it stands, our current site has a completely flat architecture, with landing pages being added randomly to the root, I.E.- website.com/affordable-shoes-in-louisville-ky I'm beginning to think that there is a gray area with this. I spoke to someone who says that you should never have a page more than 2 categories/subfolders deep. But if we plan on adding a lot of content doesn't it make sense to set the site up into many categories so we can set a good foundation for adding massive amounts of content. Also, will 301 redirecting to the new structure cause us to lose rankings for certain terms? Any help here is appreciated.
Web Design | | C-Style0