What would be considered a bad ratio to determine Index Bloat?
-
I am using Annie Cushing's most excellent site audit checklist from Google Docs. My question concerns Index Bloat because it is mentioned in her "Index" tab.
We have 6,595 indexed pages and only 4,226 of those pages have received 1 or more visits since January 1 2013.
Is this an acceptable ratio? If not, why not and what would be an acceptable ratio? I understand the basic concept that "dissipation of link juice and constrained crawl budget can have a significant impact on SEO traffic." [Thanks to Reid Bandremer http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2013/04/08/fifteen-minute-seo-health-check/#sr=g&m=o&cp=or&ct=-tmc&st=(opu%20qspwjefe)&ts=1385081787]
If we make this an action item I'd like to have some idea how to prioritize it compared to other things that must be done. Thanks all!
-
Hi EGOL,
Wow, thank you so very much. This is one of the best answers I've ever received, probably the best, here in Q & A. Your thoughtful comments and suggestions are so appreciated. Honestly, you gave me a check list of things that have potential to be pure gold for us if we act on them.
Yes, you are correct, this is the site that had many issues with content being under tabs. It's also got a tremendous amount of duplicate and thin content issues, in addition to orphaned pages. Progress has been coming along, slowly and surely, but having your comments, and having them be so specific, pointed and concise are something I can take to my team and say "Here's an awesome check list of things that we can actually address right now, without re-platforming the site [you know, there are always people who think that the root of all a site's problems is the platform that it's on...pure mythology]."
I hope many others find your check list useful. Combined with Annie's audit spreadsheet in Google docs, I feel like I have the tools I need to go to battle and help this site fulfill its potential. Nearly every point you mentioned struck a chord. Better yet, now that I know my way around the "guts" of this homegrown CMS, I feel like I can actually make the necessary changes.
Egol, I really can't thank you enough.
-
I totally agree Keri. Every word Egol wrote , to me, is worth its weight in gold. I think this may be the best response I have ever received here in Q & A.
-
If only people realized how much good information members drop in Q&A...
Once again, thanks for this EGOL!
-
From my experience, that is a frightening number of pages that have not received a visit. I would definitely be taking some type of action. This hits to me like a site in very bad health. I have lots of little pages on a weak little site that get a lot more traffic than none since January. This would be high on my priority list of things to solve. Solving this could bring major income so this is potential opportunity as much as it is a problem.
To diagnose, I would check.... I know you and suspect that you have looked at all of these but just making a list, just in case.
A) Duplicate content problem? Does this site have lots of pages with very similar other pages on the same site. Does the company have another site that is running the same product descriptions? Does the site run product descriptions that are used from a datafeed supplied to vendors? Are affiliates using the same content? Have other websites stolen the content?
B) Have you been scraped and republished by a strong website? Just one is all it would take. A strong site was once scraping and republishing some of my short content pages and that killed the traffic into a section of my site. As soon as I asked them to stop traffic was back within days. One site can hurt you like that or numerous small sites - even minor sites in Asia can do this.
C) Lots of thin content? Do you have a lot of pages that might only have two or three unique sentences? Google could be disrespecting your entire site because of this.
D) Technical problem? I would be looking at robots.txt and .htaccess, noindex, badly coded links, content management system causing duplicated title tags or other problems? Faulty analyitics that make it look like these pages are not getting traffic when really they are.
E) Content cannibalization? Lots of separate pages for red widgets that are being filtered from the SERPs.
F) Inadequate linkjuice? This is not a huge site but not a small one. Does it have a nice amount of linkjuice coming in?
G) Does this site have pages that are really deeeeep down in the linkstructure? Many clicks down? Fix that either with a new linkstructure or some kickass powerful links that hit nodes deep in the site to force spiders down. I would solve with linkstructure.
H) This isn't the site that had all of the content behind tabs that I remember from a while ago? (My memory is really bad so it might not even be your site.) If you have pages like that I would get rid of those tabs immediately. I have a personal opinion that Google does not treat content hidden behind tabs as well as content that is out in the open.
I) Are there a lot of other sites - strong ones - publlishing very similar pages - like product description pages - competing for the same keywords. If that is the case you could be crowded out of the SERPs and receiving no traffic on these pages.
J) Does this site have a bad history? Does it have something that might be causing a penalty or filtering?
After doing all of that you might have something that is really worth fixing. If you can't identify the problem I would be slashing, hatcheting those pages from the site right away.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
URL Indexed But Not Submitted to Sitemap
Hi guys, In Google's webmaster tool it says that the URL has been indexed but not submitted to the sitemap. Is it necessary that the URL be submitted to the sitemap if it has already been indexed? Appreciate your help with this. Mark
Technical SEO | | marktheshark100 -
All of my pages are indexed except for 1\. How could that be?
Yesterday we were ranking #4 for our main keyword and today we're not even indexed. Not robots.txt issue, we've just added a rel canonical to page and submitted our sitemap again. What else could we do?
Technical SEO | | paulb.credible0 -
No Index PDFs
Our products have about 4 PDFs a piece, which really inflates our indexed pages. I was wondering if I could add REL=No Index to the PDF's URL? All of the files are on a file server, so they are embedded with links on our product pages. I know I could add a No Follow attribute, but I was wondering if any one knew if the No Index would work the same or if that is even possible. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | MonicaOConnor0 -
Is it bad to have same templates for all of my EMDs
I have been working on EMDs and they are more than 40 EMDs. All 2 KW EMDs with DA around 35 Now they all have same templates. Can it be a problem in future ? (though they don't have similar content)
Technical SEO | | Personnel_Concept0 -
Would this be considered "thin content?"
I share a lot of images via twitter and over the last year I've used several different tools to do this; mainly twitpic, and now instagram. Last year I wanted to try to find a way to host those images on my site so I could get the viewers of the picture back to my site instead a 3rd party (twitpic, etc.) I found a few plugins that worked "sort of" well, and so I used that for a while. (I have since stopped doing that in favor of using instagram.) But my question is do all of these image posts hurt my site you think? I had all of these images under a category called "twitter" but have since moved them to an uncategorized category until I figure out what I want to do with them. I wanted to see if anyone could chime in and give me some advice. Since the posts are just images with no content (other than the image) and the title isn't really "optimized" for anything do these posts do me more harm than good. Do I delete them all? Leave them as is? Or do something else? Also in hindsight I'm assuming this was a bad idea since the bounce rate for people clicking on a link just to see an image was probably very high, and may have caused the opposite result of what I was looking for. If I knew than what I know now I would have tracked the bounce rate of those links, how many people who viewed one of those images actually went to another page on the site, etc. But hindsight's 20/20. 🙂
Technical SEO | | NoahsDad0 -
Remove Bad Links Or Build New
Hello, After deeply assessing our back links we have come to the conclusion that we have too many links that have been devalued and also some spammy looking links.... Our next question is do we remove these bad links and start a fresh or do we just build new white hat links?? Thanks, Scott
Technical SEO | | ScottBaxterWW0 -
No index directory pages?
All, I have a site built on WordPress with directory software (edirectory) on the backend that houses a directory of members. The Wordpress portion of the site is full of content and drives traffic through to the directory. Like most directories, the results pages are thin on content and mainly contain links to member profiles. Is it best to simply no index the search results for the directory portion of the site?
Technical SEO | | JSOC0 -
/index.php in sitemap? take it out?
Hi Everyone, The following was automatically generated at xml-sitemaps.com Should I get rid of the index.php url from my sitemap? If so, how do I go about redirecting it in my htaccess ? <url><loc>http://www.mydomain.ca/</loc></url>
Technical SEO | | RogersSEO
<url><loc>http://www.mydomain.ca/index.php</loc></url> thank you in advance, Martin0