Help with Roger finding phantom links
-
It Monday and Roger has done another crawl and now I have a couple of issues:
- I have two pages showing 404->302 or 500 because these links do not exist. I have to fix the 500 but the 404 is trapped correctly.
http://www.oznappies.com/nappies.faq & http://www.oznappies.com/store/value-packs/\
The issue is when I do a site scan there is no anchor text that contains these links. So, what I would like to find out is where is Roger finding them. I cannot see any where in the Crawl Report that tells me where the origin of these links is.
- I also created a blog on Tumblr and now every tag and rss feed entry is producing a duplicate content error in the crawl stats. I cannot see anywhere in Tumblr to fix this issue.
Any Ideas?
-
Thanks again Ryan, you have been very helpful answering al lot of my questions.
-
Someone else asked the same question regarding tag pages yesterday. I would suggest asking a separate Q&A on that topic.
Tag pages & forum category pages are both often used as containers. They don't have any content except links to articles. I would ask for feedback as to the best practice. I suspect noindex, following those pages would be best, but I don't have the experience to feel comfortable offering that advice.
-
I have been looking at the data that Roger is reporting for the duplicate content and in ALL cases there is either a 301 or a NoIndex. So now I do not know why Roger is reporting them as a duplicate, robots should not see the second entry.
-
I did not think of looking at the csv report. I see it now thanks Ryan. There should be a soft 404 handler in place to process the bad urls, I will have to see why it is not working.
With tumblr, I was looking for an easy way to add a blog to the site.
The RSS is coming from tumblr as is all the content.
When we specify Tags in tumblr it creates urls e.g. mypage.com/article/tag1 mypage.com/article/tag2 mypage.com/article/tag3 which all contain the content of mypage.com/article with out a canonical to the original. It is a really strange non-seo friendly approach, and so I wondered if anyone had similar problems.
-
The crawl report offers a "referrer" field. That field offers where Roger found the offending link. In my experience that field has always been accurate.
When I try to access www.oznappies.com/faq I receive a 302 redirect and a 500 error. I would recommend adjusting non-existant pages to a soft 404 page. Still provide a 404 response to browsers, but offer users a friendly way to find information (i.e. links / search) and stay on your site.
A great example of a soft 404 page is http://www.orangecoat.com/a-404-page.html
For the Tumblr issue, I am not clear on the problem. Are you writing content and publishing on both the oznappies.com site and your tumblr site? Then this content is being published again on your site via a RSS import?
-
I removed the links and just left the text so these will cut and paste now. It confuses me where Roger found the links.
Thanks for running the Xenu scan. I have tried other site scanner and come up blank.
-
That second link is anchored to the wrong place.
Regardless I also cannot find the .faq page. I just ran Xenu over it to see what it could find, but no broken links showed up.
Afraid I don't use Tumblr either, so eh, pretty useless post. Sorry.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does a subdomain hurt/help a domain?
My organization's website currently hosts research databases on a subdomain. We're relatively new to MOZ and when I ran a crawl of my site, it came back with 30K issues.... 98% of which are on this subdomain. I wish I could just remove it and call it a day, however, real and active researchers use it regularly. My question is: Does a subdomain hurt/help a domain? I'm seeing mixed results via Google search and browsing this forum. I'm concerned that I will not be able to fix these 30K issues as I do have access to maintain this database... and just by looking at it you can tell it was built in 2005 and hasn't been updated from an SEO perspective since. Any suggestions?
Moz Pro | | mlothamer0 -
What impact has external links reported as http503
Hello I have 72 external broken links who are reported with a http 503 status. When I ask the owner of that site, he confirmed he has removed it from GA by using this status. My question is. Does this have an impact for the quality of my site? The site is available, there is no delay when you open the link. Thank you for your support. br
Moz Pro | | kjerstibakke
Kjersti Bakke0 -
Two PR 5 websites, but little to no link data in OSE. How??
As the title states - We've recently developed two sites for clients - within the last 4 months or so. With the Google PR update, both sites are sitting as PR 5 sites. I've tried to have a look in the OSE for the backlink profile of both websites, but I see nothing. Even Majestic SEO's fresh index doesn't provide much info. The DA of each site is 11-16. I would really love to see what's generating the link juice to these sites. Any ideas? The two sites are: https://bfore.co.za
Moz Pro | | Mark.RedGiant
http://ictjournalafrica.net0 -
Why does the csv export from OSE only include 25 of the 90+ links?
In OpenSiteExplorer, I clicked "Download CSV" for a report on backlinks from one domain to another. The online visualization in OSE showed 93 external inbound links from site A to site B. When I opened the report, there are only 25 linking pages listed. How do I download the full list?
Moz Pro | | DanielH0 -
Inbound Links Report Problem
While looking over my competitors inbound link report, they have a reported 5K inbound links. The first 20 listed inbound domains are things like UPS, and other sites that when I look at them, and the source file has no link to their domain at all??? So are they using some kind of Black Hat technique, or is SEOMoz not reporting properly? Help please.
Moz Pro | | WBConsulting0 -
Latest OSE Update - Strange Numbers and Links
Hey everyone. I just checked our website in OSE with the latest update and noticed some strange numbers. The number of linking domains skyrocketed from 300 to 785 which definitely caught me off guard. Like all good SEOers I work hard to get links, but in a typical month I usually get between 40 and 50. To suddenly jump up by over 300 seems odd. Digging deeper, I noticed that some of the incoming link domains could be considered less than trustworthy (pages filled with links), while others I couldn't find at all on the page in question. I also never ever asked for any of these links, nor did anyone on my team. Should I be worried? I've heard of websites who purposely gain bad links to their competitors in order to penalize them. Is there an easy way to find out if this is going on? Could this possibly be a problem with OSE and just reporting non-existant links? Thanks for your feedback! Andrew BTW, the website in question is www.gooverseas.com
Moz Pro | | dunklea0 -
Why doesn't the BBB / Trustlink.org links show up in the Link Analysis?
I am curious why one of my client's main competitors (www.allbayhardwood.com) shows links from the Better Business Bureau and Trustlink.org (associated with BBB) but links from those sources do not show up for his domain (www.sanjosehardwoodfloors.com). He has been a BBB Acredited Business since 12/2010 and on file with them for probably as long as they have had the online version, which seems like plenty of time for the link to have been picked up. BBB has a very nice domain authority and it would be great to see these links show up. (they don't show up in webmaster tools either) Is there something I am missing? Thanks in advance guys and gals! (I know the site has other SEO issues - just getting started on pounding everything out.)
Moz Pro | | SnoBaer0 -
Why am I not seeing an increase in external followed links?
Ive been getting some really good links pointing to my domain as of lately, and they appear to be followed links. yet the number of external followed links shown in my seomoz tool bar does not want to budge! nor do these links show up in site explorer! Is there a delay in the toolbars response-time? or could it be something else? Thanks
Moz Pro | | ambisuite0