Should I have as few internal links as possible?
-
On most pages of my site i have a Quick Links section, which gives x3 cross sales links to other products, a newsletter sign up link, link to Blog, x4 links from images to surveys, newsletters, feedback etc.
Will these links be hurting my optimal SEO juice between pages, should the number of internal links be kept to a minimum?
My site is www.over50choices.co.uk if that helps.
Thanks
Ash -
That sounds like a good compromise solution to just show the main pages reducing the links substantially whilst maintaining an effective customer experience
Thanks Oli
Ash
-
I would agree with Takeshi that in this instance, a mega menu may not be the best option.
Contextual navigation is really what you should be after. That is a bit of a buzzword though, so I'll explain what I mean in more detail. In simple terms, contextual navigation means only showing navigational elements that you can deduce a user is interested in. This works both ways, in that you also shouldn't 'jump the gun' and show them links just in case they may want them..
To use an example from your site - if we hover over 'money'. There are 6 main sections, and all of the sub-pages from each of these sections also have links on the hover menu.
If you would like to move more towards the SEO side of the trade-off, why not remove the sub-page links? This would drastically reduce the number of internal links that appear on every page.
At a quick glance, the nav menu would go from several hundred links, down to 37. I feel there would only be a minimal loss in navigability doing this, because you also have a contextually based side bar menu. Some people believe that mega -menu's are worse for navigability, because it overloads the user with choice. Again I think that labelling something as good or bad (it is all situational), but depending on your situation and point of view it may even improve things!
An even bigger step towards the SEO side of the trade-off would be to remove the drop down menu entirely, and use 'hub pages'. For example, by this I mean that the actual 'Funeral Planning' page would be the primary method of navigating through to the 6 main sections. This would mean that the top nav consisted of only 7 links. Remember though, that depending on your goals, this may be a little too far in the SEO direction because it would make navigation a little more complex (a user would have to click a couple of times before getting to the desired section).
Use your knowledge of the big picture of the business to decide what is best - a slightly better navigation vs more tightly controlled link juice!
Oli
-
I'm personally not a fan of mega menus (this article explains why), but I think it can be OK on the homepage. It becomes more problematic on the inner pages, however. If someone is in the "Energy" section of your site, they don't need to be able to get to every page of the "Funeral Planning" section. So if you can make the menus more contextual based on what section of the site the user is on, that will provide the best experience for users, preserve link equity, and improve topic relevance.
-
Hi Oli thanks for your answer.
With the site only 6 months old and looking for as much help with rankings i wonder whether i should ditch the mega menu in favour of more google juice?
With only c300 pages & 6 core categories, navigation is easily accessible from the top nav.
I agree its a balance!
Thanks
Ash
-
Hi Takeshi thanks for your response.
For our site of our size ie c300 pages do you think that the "mega menu" is not necessary and will help improve juice flow throughout the site?
Thanks
Ash
-
Yes, try to reduce the number of links you have on all your pages while maintaining a good user experience. Contextual navigation is a great way to achieve this. For example, if someone is exploring the "Energy" section of your site, then they probably don't need 50 links about "Funeral Planning".
Try to keep the links in the nav relevant to the section of the site they are on, while providing access to the top level categories if the user wants to visit a different section. This will reduce the number of links on the page, and also improve the keyword relevance of each of the individual categories.
-
This is an interesting question, and one that I looked into fairly recently.
A simplistic answer to your question would be that yes, more internal links will distribute link juice across your site much more evenly, like so: Home page (100%) -> 25 internal links (4% each). As opposed to something like: Home page (100%) -> 4 internal links (25% each).
However, to truly answer this question there is a bit more detail involved.
As with most things in web design, there is a trade-off. For example, take a concept like the mega-menu navigation you are currently using (i.e. a menu with loads of links in a drop down). There is an argument to say that mega-menu's are solid from a usability point of view, most particularly for e-commerce sites. This is because there is a vast amount of products to sift through, and getting to the one you want in as few clicks as possible is quite important.
The trade-off for using a mega-menu, in my opinion, is that it is quite poor in terms of link juice optimisation. This is because the Google algorithmn 'sees' the links from every single drop down as a live internal link - regardless of the hover effect.
In your 'funeral planning' drop down alone, there are 53 internal links that appear on every page. Essentially, every page on your website is linking to every other page, so the link juice is spread evenly. At a guess you have at least 300 internal links on the home page, which would translate to 0.33% of link juice per page.
- Please note this is a massive over simplification, because the algorithmn weights the links differently due to position. See #5 here on the following link (also bear in mind the date of the article!): http://moz.com/blog/10-illustrations-on-search-engines-valuation-of-links
- Also, a portion of link juice is 'lost' when passed, to prevent an infinite loop. An estimate is that a page only passes 85% around 85% of its total. Saying 100% means simpler maths to illustrate the point above
Now this is not to say that mega menus are a bad idea, it is just a trade-off in favour of Ux over internal link optimisation. In these situations you need to think what is best for your own specific situation.
Hope that helps
Oli
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Over-optimizing Internal Linking: Is this real and, if so, what's the happy medium?
I have heard a lot about having a solid internal linking structure so that Google can easily discover pages and understand your page hierarchies and correlations and equity can be passed. Often, it's mentioned that it's good to have optimized anchor text, but not too optimized. You hear a lot of warnings about how over-optimization can be perceived as spammy: https://neilpatel.com/blog/avoid-over-optimizing/ But you also see posts and news like this saying that the internal link over-optimization warnings are unfounded or outdated:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SearchStan
https://www.seroundtable.com/google-no-internal-linking-overoptimization-penalty-27092.html So what's the tea? Is internal linking overoptimization a myth? If it's true, what's the tipping point? Does it have to be super invasive and keyword stuffy to negatively impact rankings? Or does simple light optimization of internal links on every page trigger this?1 -
Internal Link Quantity Advisable Limit
We have a group of category-like pages that have a lot of authority. We're interested in adding more internal links on these pages in kind of a "Popular Discussions" sidebar format (these are forum pages). These pages already have about 90 internal and 5 external pointing links on them. About how many new links would you add to give those newly-linked-to pages a little boost? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945010 -
How many back links a day?
I am the owner of a very small business who can not afford a decent SEO company. So I am doing my SEO myself. I am producing good amount of content. But at the same time I am way behind my competition in back linking. Can you please let me know as a rule of thumb, how many external do-follow links a day I should make to be on the safe side? Thanks all
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AlirezaHamidian0 -
Not sure if I should disavow these links or not
I am on the marketing team for CandyGalaxy.com we are an online candy store that specializes in bulk candy for events. Were just about a year and a half old and i'm running into some SEO strategy road blocks lately. When we started the company we used an oversee's seo company. For the first few months results were great then things took a massive dive as google began rolling out updates early and mid last year. After that point we started taking things in house and have been trying to create content and begin content marketing. We launched a blog @ blog.candygalaxy.com and also launched and educational resource at candybuffet101.com - However the question i'm up against now is what to do with those bad old links? Are they actually hurting us? Or just neutral? I'm also trying to decided what to do about the links in my footer? We put those there because those are truly our most popular products and we wanted customers to have easy access, but are those links potentially harmful? I'm questioning these issues because I feel like there is something holding back some of my pages from ranking. For example "blue candy" is a very popular section of our website. We have worked on a lot of content for the blog related to blue candy, made videos, photo shoots ect. We have customer reviews on page and unique category content. According to open site explorer our DA and PA are around the range of most of the sites in the 8-12 serp position. But we have more social activity then all but the top 2-3 spots. However the page almost impossible to find via search. Its not in the first 300 results and surely the page is more relevant then an entry about quilts.. Similar situations like this have led me to think that maybe there is a technical underlying issues that I have not addressed. ? The content is definitely there because if i type in a line from the content directly to google it is the first result. So the site seems indexed properly.. Would love to hear any feedback from similar experiences or ideas. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Jonathan_Murrell0 -
Do I even bother to remove links
Hi, I'm noticing increasing numbers of scraped directory links pointing back to the websites I manage. Much of this info appears to be scraped from a well known (and respected) directory. I don't build links to an of the websites I manage - and none have more than 200 linking root domains currently - not that many. The problem is I focus on quality links and the scraped links are incredibly weak on the whole. Diluting the quality links. I've noticed a certain paranoia in the SEO community about removing / disavowing links, and yet I'm tempted to ignore the rubbish (unless part of a major negative SEO push) and just get on with the job, focusing on quality content that drives natural links, and social media work.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | McTaggart0 -
Linking to bad sites
Hi, I just have a quick question. Is it very negative to link to "bad" sites, such as online pharmacies, dating, adult sites, that sort of stuff? How much does linking to a "bad" site negatively affect a "good" site? Thank you.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | salvyy0 -
Fading Text Links Look Like Spammy Hidden Links to a g-bot?
Ah, Hello Mozzers, it's been a while since I was here. Wanted to run something by you... I'm looking to incorporate some fading text using Javascript onto a site homepage using the method described here; http://blog.thomascsherman.com/2009/08/text-slideshow-or-any-content-with-fades/ so, my question is; does anyone think that Google might see this text as a possible dark hat SEO anchor text manipulation (similar to hidden links)? The text will contain various links (4 or 5) that will cycle through one another, fading in and out, but to a bot the text may appear initially invisible, like so; style="display: none;"><a href="">Link Here</a> All links will be internal. My gut instinct is that I'm just being stupid here, but I wanted to stay on the side of caution with this one! Thanks for your time 🙂 http://blog.thomascsherman.com/2009/08/text-slideshow-or-any-content-with-fades
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | PeterAlexLeigh0 -
Google, Links and Javascript
So today I was taking a look at http://www.seomoz.org/top500 page and saw that the AddThis page is currently at the position 19. I think the main reason for that is because their plugin create, through javascript, linkbacks to their page where their share buttons reside. So any page with AddThis installed would easily have 4/5 linbacks to their site, creating that huge amount of linkbacks they have. Ok, that pretty much shows that Google doesn´t care if the link is created in the HTML (on the backend) or through Javascript (frontend). But heres the catch. If someones create a free plugin for wordpress/drupal or any other huge cms platform out there with a feature that linkbacks to the page of the creator of the plugin (thats pretty common, I know) but instead of inserting the link in the plugin source code they put it somewhere else, wich then is loaded with a javascript code (exactly how AddThis works). This would allow the owner of the plugin to change the link showed at anytime he wants. The main reason for that would be, dont know, an URL address update for his blog or businness or something. However that could easily be used to link to whatever tha hell the owner of the plugin wants to. What your thoughts about this, I think this could be easily classified as White or Black hat depending on what the owners do. However, would google think the same way about it?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bemcapaz0