Should I have as few internal links as possible?
-
On most pages of my site i have a Quick Links section, which gives x3 cross sales links to other products, a newsletter sign up link, link to Blog, x4 links from images to surveys, newsletters, feedback etc.
Will these links be hurting my optimal SEO juice between pages, should the number of internal links be kept to a minimum?
My site is www.over50choices.co.uk if that helps.
Thanks
Ash -
That sounds like a good compromise solution to just show the main pages reducing the links substantially whilst maintaining an effective customer experience
Thanks Oli
Ash
-
I would agree with Takeshi that in this instance, a mega menu may not be the best option.
Contextual navigation is really what you should be after. That is a bit of a buzzword though, so I'll explain what I mean in more detail. In simple terms, contextual navigation means only showing navigational elements that you can deduce a user is interested in. This works both ways, in that you also shouldn't 'jump the gun' and show them links just in case they may want them..
To use an example from your site - if we hover over 'money'. There are 6 main sections, and all of the sub-pages from each of these sections also have links on the hover menu.
If you would like to move more towards the SEO side of the trade-off, why not remove the sub-page links? This would drastically reduce the number of internal links that appear on every page.
At a quick glance, the nav menu would go from several hundred links, down to 37. I feel there would only be a minimal loss in navigability doing this, because you also have a contextually based side bar menu. Some people believe that mega -menu's are worse for navigability, because it overloads the user with choice. Again I think that labelling something as good or bad (it is all situational), but depending on your situation and point of view it may even improve things!
An even bigger step towards the SEO side of the trade-off would be to remove the drop down menu entirely, and use 'hub pages'. For example, by this I mean that the actual 'Funeral Planning' page would be the primary method of navigating through to the 6 main sections. This would mean that the top nav consisted of only 7 links. Remember though, that depending on your goals, this may be a little too far in the SEO direction because it would make navigation a little more complex (a user would have to click a couple of times before getting to the desired section).
Use your knowledge of the big picture of the business to decide what is best - a slightly better navigation vs more tightly controlled link juice!
Oli
-
I'm personally not a fan of mega menus (this article explains why), but I think it can be OK on the homepage. It becomes more problematic on the inner pages, however. If someone is in the "Energy" section of your site, they don't need to be able to get to every page of the "Funeral Planning" section. So if you can make the menus more contextual based on what section of the site the user is on, that will provide the best experience for users, preserve link equity, and improve topic relevance.
-
Hi Oli thanks for your answer.
With the site only 6 months old and looking for as much help with rankings i wonder whether i should ditch the mega menu in favour of more google juice?
With only c300 pages & 6 core categories, navigation is easily accessible from the top nav.
I agree its a balance!
Thanks
Ash
-
Hi Takeshi thanks for your response.
For our site of our size ie c300 pages do you think that the "mega menu" is not necessary and will help improve juice flow throughout the site?
Thanks
Ash
-
Yes, try to reduce the number of links you have on all your pages while maintaining a good user experience. Contextual navigation is a great way to achieve this. For example, if someone is exploring the "Energy" section of your site, then they probably don't need 50 links about "Funeral Planning".
Try to keep the links in the nav relevant to the section of the site they are on, while providing access to the top level categories if the user wants to visit a different section. This will reduce the number of links on the page, and also improve the keyword relevance of each of the individual categories.
-
This is an interesting question, and one that I looked into fairly recently.
A simplistic answer to your question would be that yes, more internal links will distribute link juice across your site much more evenly, like so: Home page (100%) -> 25 internal links (4% each). As opposed to something like: Home page (100%) -> 4 internal links (25% each).
However, to truly answer this question there is a bit more detail involved.
As with most things in web design, there is a trade-off. For example, take a concept like the mega-menu navigation you are currently using (i.e. a menu with loads of links in a drop down). There is an argument to say that mega-menu's are solid from a usability point of view, most particularly for e-commerce sites. This is because there is a vast amount of products to sift through, and getting to the one you want in as few clicks as possible is quite important.
The trade-off for using a mega-menu, in my opinion, is that it is quite poor in terms of link juice optimisation. This is because the Google algorithmn 'sees' the links from every single drop down as a live internal link - regardless of the hover effect.
In your 'funeral planning' drop down alone, there are 53 internal links that appear on every page. Essentially, every page on your website is linking to every other page, so the link juice is spread evenly. At a guess you have at least 300 internal links on the home page, which would translate to 0.33% of link juice per page.
- Please note this is a massive over simplification, because the algorithmn weights the links differently due to position. See #5 here on the following link (also bear in mind the date of the article!): http://moz.com/blog/10-illustrations-on-search-engines-valuation-of-links
- Also, a portion of link juice is 'lost' when passed, to prevent an infinite loop. An estimate is that a page only passes 85% around 85% of its total. Saying 100% means simpler maths to illustrate the point above
Now this is not to say that mega menus are a bad idea, it is just a trade-off in favour of Ux over internal link optimisation. In these situations you need to think what is best for your own specific situation.
Hope that helps
Oli
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Will link juice still be passed if you have the same links in multiple, outreach articles?
We are developing high quality, unique content and sending them out to bloggers to for guest posts. In these articles we have links to 2 to 3 sites. While the links are completely relevant, each article points to the same 2 to 3 sites. The link text varies slightly from article to article, but the linked-to site/URLs remain the same. We have read that it is best to have 2 to 3 external links, not all pointing to the same site. We have followed this rule, but the 2 to 3 external sites are the same sites on the other articles. I'm having a hard time explaining this, so I hope this makes sense. My concern is, will Google see this as a pattern and link juice won't be passed to the linked-to URLs, or worst penalize all/some of the sites being linked to or linked from? Someone I spoke to had suggest that my "link scheme" describes a "link wheel" and the site(s) will be penalized by Penguin. Is there any truth to this statement?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Cutopia0 -
Is it OK that the root didn't have any internal links?
Hi guys; In a website with more than 20,000 indexed pages, Is it normally that homepage (root) didn't have any internal links, while other important pages have enough internal links? Consider that in a top menu in header of all pages, I added homepage link, so the home page link repeated on all indexed pages, but google didn't count it and the website technology is angular js thank you for helping me
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | cafegardesh0 -
Social Links through Link Shortners. Does it count?
We use link shortner services like Bitly, Goo.gl, etc. Does the post used while making use of such link shortner services counts as a social signal. Or should we post the complete website url pointing to each page while posting on social sites. Secondly, should we write a new description while posting on Social sites or just copy paste a few lines of original posts?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | welcomecure0 -
Lower quality new domain link vs higher quality repeat domain link
First time poster here with a dilemma that head scratching and spreadsheets can't solve! I'm trying to work out whether to focus on getting links from new domains or to nurture relationships with the bigger sites in our business and get more links. Of the two links below which does the community here think would be more valuable a signal to Google? Both would be links from within relevant text/post copy. Link 1. Site DA 30. No links currently from this domain. Link 2. Site DA 60. Many links over last 12 months already from this domain. I suspect link 1 but given the enormous disparity in ranking power am I correct?! Thanks for any considered opinions out there! Matthew
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mat20150 -
Unpaid Followed Links & Canonical Links from Syndicated Content
I have a user of our syndicated content linking to our detailed source content. The content is being used across a set of related sites and driving good quality traffic. The issue is how they link and what it looks like. We have tens of thousands of new links showing up from more than a dozen domains, hundreds of sub-domains, but all coming from the same IP. The growth rate is exponential. The implementation was supposed to have canonical tags so Google could properly interpret the owner and not have duplicate syndicated content potentially outranking the source. The canonical are links are missing and the links to us are followed. While the links are not paid for, it looks bad to me. I have asked the vendor to no-follow the links and implement the agreed upon canonical tag. We have no warnings from Google, but I want to head that off and do the right thing. Is this the right approach? What would do and what would you you do while waiting on the site owner to make the fixes to reduce the possibility of penguin/google concerns? Blair
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BlairKuhnen0 -
What type of links should be followed and nofollowed internally?
We have submitted our sitemap.xml to search engines so now that they have that should we use a nofollow attribute on the sitemap.html? Do we even need a sitemap.html? For other links on the site such as: Contact us About Us Locations and other phrases that we are not trying to rank for should we set these to nofollow?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SEODinosaur0 -
Dark Matter Links
From 2007 - 2004 I worked for Sprint in several positions with my last one being a Corporate Account Manager for fortune 1000 customers. In 2004 I left Sprint after the Nextel merger and created an eCommerce site called thesprintstore.net as a Sprint Nextel preferred partner. I used my inner working knowledge of Sprint to my wonderful advantage and began making 3x my original salary. My desire for more business turned to greed and I began leaking information that consumers loved i.e. phone release dates, price points, warehouse stock levels and tricks of the trade. This garnered me thousands of links from big sites (had no idea at the time) and eventually my site was issued a Cease and Desist order from Sprint's Corporate Headquarters. I recently realized one evening that I had a GEM of a domain with powerful backlinks that I could redirect to my current site TECHeGO.com [staff removed hyperlink]. (Some of the back links are from Engaget, Engaget Mobile, Rimmarkable and even one from Sprint.) The redirection has been in place for months now and I have confirmed that all that sweet Link Nectar is flowing through! I have found it interesting, however, that my back link and referral domain count have never increased leading me to believe that in doing a 301 Redirect existing links become what can only be described as 'Dark Matter Links' i.e. the links are there, simply invisible. Dark Matter Definition: dark matter is matter that is inferred to exist from gravitational effects on visible matter and background radiation, but is undetectable by emitted or scatteredelectromagnetic radiation. Dark Matter Links: dark matter links are visible links that have passed through a 301 redirect which are now inferred to exist but are no longer visible by crawlers? Is there a better definition that could be applied to the term 'Dark Matter Links'?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TECHeGO1 -
Site Wide Internal Navigation links
Hello all, All our category pages www.pitchcare.com/shop are linked to from every product page via the sidebar navigation. Which results in every category page having over 1700 links with the same anchor text. I have noticed that the category pages dont appear to be ranked when they most definately should be. For example http://www.pitchcare.com/shop/moss-control/index.html is not ranked for the term "moss control" instead another of our deeper pages is ranked on page 1. Reading a previous SEO MOZ article · Excessive Internal Anchor Text Linking / Manipulation Can Trip An Automated Penalty on Google
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | toddyC
I recently had my second run-in with a penalty at Google that appears to punish sites for excessive internal linking with "optimized" (or "keyword stuffed anchor text") links. When the links were removed (in both cases, they were found in the footer of the website sitewide), the rankings were restored immediately following Google's next crawl, indicating a fully automated filter (rather than a manual penalty requiring a re-consideration request). Do you think we may have triggered a penalty? If so what would be the best way to tackle this? Could we add no follows on the product pages? Cheers Todd0