Canonicals in crawling reports
-
The crawling reports gives info about several meta data missing, what about the lack of a canonical tag? This would be nice too... and images without alt tag (or empty).
-
Thanks!
-
excellent points there CleaverPHD just to point our screaming frog is free up to a 500 URLs -great if you want to give it a go before a purchase
-
As Chris points out, if you do not have a canonical link, the crawl points that out. You may need to download the CSV file and open in excel to see what you want to see. There is a column titled "Rel Canonical" and if you have a FALSE response, there was no canonical found and TRUE for versa vice. I find the CSV much more more helpful than what is shown on the web page and PDF report. The new interface has the CSV link at the bottom left of the page and the PDF at the top right. It used to be both were top right (which makes more sense to me) and so it may be a little confusing if you were used to where things you to be.
Just for reference, the canonical tag is not required on a page, and in fact if you DO have one on a page you have to be careful with it. Google considers a canonical link as the same as a 301 redirect (without moving the user). So, if you had a canonical in place and it is pointed to the wrong page, this could have major negative consequences to your site. This is why there is a alert in your Moz crawl if you have a canonical link on a page due to the potential of it causing issues.
You may have the canonicals properly implemented for given pages, but Moz cannot detect if your canonical is achieving the end that you are setting out to accomplish.
Case in point for me. I use the canonical to self technique on a lot of pages to correct for some indexing issues on a site I manage. I get thousands of the "you have a canonical link on this page" alerts from Moz. I ignore them as I know that they are supposed to be there. What I have to do is to import the crawl into excel and then add a column with an EXACT function to make sure that the page url is matching the canonical url (i.e. the canonical link points to the page it sits on). (http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/excel-help/exact-function-HP010062564.aspx) If the EXACT function returns true, I know that my canonical to self links are implemented properly. This is a simple way that I use the CSV file from Moz as a canonical verification tool. If there are pages with canonicals that do not point to self, the EXACT function then shows false for those pages and gives me a short list to manually check from there.
Now that I think about it, I will put this suggestion into Moz as a way to make the canonical information in the crawl more useful. They could show FALSE if canonical is missing, TRUE if it is present and SELF if the canonical points to itself. Would at least be a bit more actionable.
As an aside, if you really want a better crawl report, I would use the Screaming Frog Spider tool
http://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/
It can also help you find all the other things you mention, it is not as user friendly as the Moz spider, but it has more options. You have to pay for it, but I would bet 99% of people would say the cost is worth it.
Cheers!
-
Hiya,
If a page doesn't have a canonical tag and it need's one it would be a duplicate page, Moz currently does point that out for you. The on page grader can help you with many of the alt tag problems too.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Crawl Test is now On-Demand Crawl!
If you've been with Moz a while, you may have used our old Crawl Test tool. A year ago we launched an all new, campaign-based Site Crawl (with an entirely rebuild crawl engine), but Crawl Test fell into disrepair and we haven't had a solid tool for crawling non-campaign domains. I'm happy to announce that we've just launched an all new On-Demand Crawl, built on the new Site Crawl engine, with a UI that's focused on quick insights. Moz Pro Standard tier customers can run up to 5 crawls per month at 3,000 page per crawl (crawls are saved for 90 days), with per-month limits increasing at higher levels. Most On-Demand Crawls should run in a few minutes, making the tool perfect to get quick insights for sales meetings, vetting prospects, or analyzing competitors. We've written up a sample case study or logged-in customers can go directly to On-Demand Crawl. Try it out -- we'd love to hear your use cases (either here or in the blog post comments).
Moz Bar | | Dr-Pete6 -
How can i fix? some information is wrong on the report.
https://moz.com/researchtools/ose/spam-analysis/flags?subdomain=bassinotary.com hi please advice. please see the link to my spam report. some information is wrong. like no email address or social profile link found I have already had links on that page and email and address and schema.org is in place. please help thanks.
Moz Bar | | grbassi0 -
In the Moz Site Crawl, what does "External Links" mean?
I thought I knew what it meant but am finding instances where the value in the column, "Linking Root Domains" is greater than the value in the column, "External Links?" Thanks!
Moz Bar | | Edward_Sturm1 -
Different Errors Running 2 Crawls on Effectively the Same Setup
Our developers are moving away from utilising robots.txt files due to security risks, so e have been in the process of removing them from sites. However we, and our clients still want to run Moz crawl reports as they can highlight useful information. The two sites in question sit on the same server with the same settings (in fact running on the same Magento install). We do not have a robots.txt files present (they 404), and as per Chiaryn's response here https://moz.com/community/q/without-robots-txt-no-crawling this should work fine? However for www.iconiclights.co.uk we got: 902 : Network errors prevented crawler from contacting server for page. While for www.valuelights.co.uk we got: 612 : Page banned by error response for robots.txt. These crawls were both run recently, and there was no robots.txt present. Not to mention, they are on the same setup/server etc as mentioned. Now, we have just tested this, by uploading a blank robots.txt file to see if it changed anything - but we get exactly the same errors. I have had a look, but can't find anything that really matches this on here - help would really be appreciated! Thanks!
Moz Bar | | I-COM0 -
Internal Links Count in Crawl Report
My understanding of the 'Internal Links' results in a moz crawl report is that it represents the number of links on the given page that link to other pages on the same site.Assuming this is a correct assumption: We recently ran a crawl report on www.phase1tech.com. Some of the pages are coming back with a large amount of 'internal links'. These 2 pages for example are showing 800 internal links: http://www.phase1tech.com/Upcoming-Events
Moz Bar | | AISEO
http://www.phase1tech.com/Contact Then there are a number of pages coming back with 705 Internal Links, including: http://www.phase1tech.com/Dalsa-CameraLink-Cameras
http://www.phase1tech.com/Hitachi-CameraLink-Cameras At best there are approximately 70-80 links on these pages. Where are these large counts coming from? Is there a means to see what the links being reported on are? At the same time the 'Too Many On-Page Links' indicates 'No' for some pages with a high number of links, and 'Yes' for pages with a low number of links. For example: http://www.phase1tech.com/Baumer-SX-Series
Too Many On-Page Links: Yes
Internal Links: 2
What's up with that?0 -
Full SERP Analysis Report Complete ?
Hi I asked for two Full SERP Analysis Report and of course I received an email notification about that. My question is why you don't include a direct link to download the report in the email ? I wasn't able to find any report ... I have also a problem with keyword ranking of one campaign (9rayti.Com), it has not been updated since November 8 ! Adam
Moz Bar | | adamito0 -
Download a PDF report of keywords by vists
I am in the process of downloading a keyword ranking report for a specific campaign. I organize the keywords by visit and when i download in PDF format (which is the format I need) it organizes back to alphatical order. Please help!
Moz Bar | | accpar0 -
Why isn't seo moz properly crawling my site?
In my campaign results, only 2 pages have been crawled, when there are many more. Also, when I do the on-page evaluation for my homepage and the main keyword, I get a grade of F, with a ton of errors that my page actually does not have. It's as if SEO moz is having trouble crawling through my site. Any ideas on this?
Moz Bar | | diplomajim0