Canonicals in crawling reports
-
The crawling reports gives info about several meta data missing, what about the lack of a canonical tag? This would be nice too... and images without alt tag (or empty).
-
Thanks!
-
excellent points there CleaverPHD just to point our screaming frog is free up to a 500 URLs -great if you want to give it a go before a purchase
-
As Chris points out, if you do not have a canonical link, the crawl points that out. You may need to download the CSV file and open in excel to see what you want to see. There is a column titled "Rel Canonical" and if you have a FALSE response, there was no canonical found and TRUE for versa vice. I find the CSV much more more helpful than what is shown on the web page and PDF report. The new interface has the CSV link at the bottom left of the page and the PDF at the top right. It used to be both were top right (which makes more sense to me) and so it may be a little confusing if you were used to where things you to be.
Just for reference, the canonical tag is not required on a page, and in fact if you DO have one on a page you have to be careful with it. Google considers a canonical link as the same as a 301 redirect (without moving the user). So, if you had a canonical in place and it is pointed to the wrong page, this could have major negative consequences to your site. This is why there is a alert in your Moz crawl if you have a canonical link on a page due to the potential of it causing issues.
You may have the canonicals properly implemented for given pages, but Moz cannot detect if your canonical is achieving the end that you are setting out to accomplish.
Case in point for me. I use the canonical to self technique on a lot of pages to correct for some indexing issues on a site I manage. I get thousands of the "you have a canonical link on this page" alerts from Moz. I ignore them as I know that they are supposed to be there. What I have to do is to import the crawl into excel and then add a column with an EXACT function to make sure that the page url is matching the canonical url (i.e. the canonical link points to the page it sits on). (http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/excel-help/exact-function-HP010062564.aspx) If the EXACT function returns true, I know that my canonical to self links are implemented properly. This is a simple way that I use the CSV file from Moz as a canonical verification tool. If there are pages with canonicals that do not point to self, the EXACT function then shows false for those pages and gives me a short list to manually check from there.
Now that I think about it, I will put this suggestion into Moz as a way to make the canonical information in the crawl more useful. They could show FALSE if canonical is missing, TRUE if it is present and SELF if the canonical points to itself. Would at least be a bit more actionable.
As an aside, if you really want a better crawl report, I would use the Screaming Frog Spider tool
http://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/
It can also help you find all the other things you mention, it is not as user friendly as the Moz spider, but it has more options. You have to pay for it, but I would bet 99% of people would say the cost is worth it.
Cheers!
-
Hiya,
If a page doesn't have a canonical tag and it need's one it would be a duplicate page, Moz currently does point that out for you. The on page grader can help you with many of the alt tag problems too.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Crawl Test is now On-Demand Crawl!
If you've been with Moz a while, you may have used our old Crawl Test tool. A year ago we launched an all new, campaign-based Site Crawl (with an entirely rebuild crawl engine), but Crawl Test fell into disrepair and we haven't had a solid tool for crawling non-campaign domains. I'm happy to announce that we've just launched an all new On-Demand Crawl, built on the new Site Crawl engine, with a UI that's focused on quick insights. Moz Pro Standard tier customers can run up to 5 crawls per month at 3,000 page per crawl (crawls are saved for 90 days), with per-month limits increasing at higher levels. Most On-Demand Crawls should run in a few minutes, making the tool perfect to get quick insights for sales meetings, vetting prospects, or analyzing competitors. We've written up a sample case study or logged-in customers can go directly to On-Demand Crawl. Try it out -- we'd love to hear your use cases (either here or in the blog post comments).
Moz Bar | | Dr-Pete6 -
How does a non-traditional TLD impact Moz's crawl test?
I have a client who moved from a .com to .academy domain 6 months ago, and their current crawl tests are coming back with a universal page authority of 1, along with 0 indexed backlinks. The previous version of the site had an average page authority of 35-40, the site architecture and content are nearly identical, and there are no other errors or red flags in the crawl report that would hold back their organic rankings. In fact, looking at the site's analytics account, I can see dozens of sites that provide current and properly functioning backlinks, non of which are listed on the crawl test. So the question is - is Moz currently unable to properly crawl a .academy (or any other non-traditional TLD) site, or is there some deeper issue with the site's SEO that I'm not seeing? Thanks!
Moz Bar | | ThinkAOR1 -
We Launched a new site and Rogerbot is still reporting on links/errors from the old site, is there a way to clear those out?
We are mostly a Branding agency, and have not put a lot of effort into SEO for ourselves... SEO tends to take a backseat to design most of the time, making it a little difficult for me at times when it comes to SEO. We recently launched a new site, http://Roninadv.com/ and the developer and I have done quite a bit of work to make it work well for Google. I was really looking forward to a new crawl report from Roger, but alas, It's like Roger crawled the old site? The new site has been up since last Monday. Is there a way to clear out the old errors? Do I just need to give roger more time?
Moz Bar | | PaulRonin0 -
Moz Crawl Showing Duplicate Content But It's Not?!
Unfortunately I can't give out the URL, but here's the deal... I have two URL's which have completely different content on them but are being crawled as duplicate content. Any Idea how that would happen? I'm not seeing any errors in WMT's. Has anyone seen this before? Is the duplicate content reporting based on a % of the page content matching as the same?
Moz Bar | | Swarm-SEO0 -
Comparing details of current on-page grade reports with previous reports
Hi Whilst i've set up reporting for on-page grader when it comes through on report it just shows any changes in grade and rank, what i also want to look at is changes in the detail/components of current report compared to previous reports, is this possible historically (over the previous reporting periods) ? There doesn't seem to be any kind of archive that i can find to previously carried out on-page grade report ? Cheers Dan
Moz Bar | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Moz not crawling opencart product pages
hi, i have waited for over 2 weeks now and the crawler only got 8 pages, and is not getting all the open cart pages and products. any idea of what can be wrong? im using joomla 2.5.11 and mijoshop 2.0.5 (which uses opencart 1.5.5.1). thanks
Moz Bar | | marlvass10 -
Ranking report in Pro Campaign Not Accurate?
I have been running ranking reports on my pro seomoz account for a couple of years now. I recently added a lot more keywords to my list. Unfortunately there now seems to be a problem. It shows that many of my keywords have dropped out of (and climbed in) the top 50 when they actually haven't. I think it's just missing the keyword out and assuming that it dropped. I'd prefer it said "Not checked". Anyone else with a similar problem? or ideally a solution at my end... Thanks all!
Moz Bar | | trickshotric0