Should I Use A Local Hosting Center?
-
This question spawns from a comment I read in another post, but has anyone seen success switching from a hosting provider like bluehost, hostgator, etc to a local one in their area? Right now, we use Bluehost, but if there is a benefit to using one in Tampa, I'm all for it....before I do, I just want to see what the consensus is.
Thanks,
Ruben
-
Will do! Thanks.
-
If you want to shoot me an email at lesley@dh42.com I took a look at your site, there are other suggestions I would think would be more beneficial than getting a closer host and would pay off greater.
-
Ruben,
It does, but it is to a degree. There are multiple factors to take into consideration with improving speed to help with rankings. The first one is that Google uses some 200 ranking factors, speed from what I have researched is graduated. Like say all sites that load under 2 seconds get a full score, then sites that load 2-5 seconds get a half score, ect. The numbers are just made up, but that is what I have imagined is how things happen.
Also, you have to take into consideration that you might be moving the site geographically further from the location of googles crawling bot, which might make it seem slower for google.
Then there is the point also, that you might convert more because your site seems quicker to local users.
Is the site itself already optimized for speed? What are the normal page load times from something like pingdom?
-
It's definitely helpful. I'm hesitant to leave Bluehost, because even though it was a little rocky in the beginning, I've received excellent tech support there. Fortunately, I probably will never need to call anyone at Saturday night 4 am, but for a web company, I can definitely see that option as a plus.
My biggest concern is actually weighing the pluses of SEO (which apparently, there aren't any or not much) vs quality tech support. I fear a local host provider may not really being there, so i appreciate the feedback. I'm glad to see my concern is at least based in something.
Thanks,
Ruben
-
Leslie,
I was under the impression that increasing speed helps your rankings? And, yes, we are hosted in Provo. Btw, you probably don't remember this, but months ago you helped me out a lot when I asked which hosting company to go with. You gave me excellent feedback about the pros and cons of the big players. We did eventually decide to go with Bluehost over Web Hosting Buzz (though that was mainly because the BH salesman "misinformed" me about some of their services, but that's another story). I just wanted to say thanks; you're input now and then is extremely appreciated.
- Ruben
-
I would shoot geographically close, most cities are not going to find top level data centers in their city and that is really what it comes down to. One thing to keep in mind too, is that just because a company is local it does not mean their data center is local. One that I would recommend is Web Hosting Buzz, they use a tier 3.5 data center in Atlanta. Which is more than likely geographically closer than what you are using. I am guess since you are using Bluehost you are in the Provo data center, which has had a ton of problems in the last couple of years.
One thing I would mention too is I would stay away from hosts that use data centers located in Florida for the reason of hurricanes. I know one big consideration in data center placement is natural disasters, and it would seem more likely down there.
SEO benefits, not really, but you should see a speed increase, assuming you are hosted in Provo.
-
Hey Ruben,
Like FCBM stated, there is no difference besides cost. I know you are a law firm, so that may not be an issue, but as web company, we get asked all the time about hosting and where clients can save money. A TON of money. Many smaller businesses don't need a managed service provider "watching over" their server environment. They just need a website that will load fast and be up 99.9999999% of the time.
We host with GoDaddy and have not had 1 issue in over 4 years, even when they had that huge takedown a couple years back. I can call them on a Saturday night 4am and speak with someone in Arizona or their other US based call center if I need, which I can't say the same for HostGator or BlueHost or many others, especially a local host provider.
Hope this was helpful! Good luck! - Patrick
-
Hosting is an interesting thing. Most local hosting services are better because they provide some "service" but the reality is they usually cost more just because they don't have economies of scale. From a localized standpoint having a "local" host really doesn't affect rankings.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Using https: Beyond the standard seo metrics
Hi All, I've been doing quite a bit of browsing around the topic of utilising https vs http when constructing urls and I wanted to know if anybody has research on the customer perception of a site where all urls are https. We originally used rel canonical tags to inform the browsers that the http and https were the same but we are considering stepping this up to having the http pages redirect to the https and I'm wondering how customers may react if they know that all pages are https. Anybody have insights on possible outcomes? Thanks, Tom
Search Behavior | | Tmon0 -
Local SERPs Question - Phone Call or Click?
I have a client who recently experienced a boost in local organic rankings. They were appearing towards the bottom of the local (maps) results (with their phone number & address listed) for their main target keywords. After this ranking boost, they are now positioned higher in the SERPs, in the traditional organic section. It seems as though this boost in rankings has actually caused a slight DECREASE in organic search traffic to their website. My theory is that when they were listed in the Google+ Local section of Google, some people must have been calling directly from the SERPs instead of actually clicking through to their website. Due to the issues involved with organic call tracking, it's obviously difficult to measure the actual impact of strong Google+ Local rankings. So, I'm on a mission to find some reliable data on this. For my own peace of mind and that of my client. Does anybody know of any research conducted that analyses the % of local searches that result in a phone call directly from the local SERPs without actually clicking through to a business' website or Google+ page? In know this is a tricky one (and probably harder to ascertain on desktop than mobile) but any advice would be much appreciated. Thanks!
Search Behavior | | Dave_Eddy0 -
How come some local 7 pack listings link to site and some link to the G+ page?
Does anyone know how to fix this issue? Even though a site profile has had the website added to it Google continues to link the main "title tag" link to the G+ page and not the actual website domain. Thanks for any info in advance! https://www.google.com/#sclient=psy-ab&q=dog+sitting+in+rockaway&oq=dog+sitting+in+rockaway&gs_l=hp.3..0i22i30l4.14871.16189.1.16397.8.8.0.0.0.0.296.2042.2-7.7.0...0.0...1c.1.15.psy-ab.Y1db0jo77V0&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.47244034,d.bmk&fp=722b460c2153b7be&biw=1920&bih=910
Search Behavior | | irvingw0 -
Local vs Global Search Results Yield Very Different Rankings Lately
When I monitor my website's rankings, I always do it from Canada (direct connection) and from the USA (using a VPN in Arizona). I've been monitoring rankings this way for the last 3 years. Most of the time, I got similar results (-5 / +5) from both location. My website is a ".com" and targets an international audience. Lately (is it since Panda 22?), I've seen dramatic differences in rankings from both locations. Some keywords will rank in the top 10 on Google.com (from the USA) while they will appear on page 3, 4, 5 and even lower on Google.ca (from Canada). The thing is, the top 10 results on Google.ca are not even from canadian websites. Fact of the matter, there are even some results from India websites (.in) in the top 10! I understand that Google.ca will give advantage to websites from Canada (or targeting the canadian market / .ca domain name) over international / US websites but there's never been such a huge difference in rankings until lately. Has anybody else experienced this? What are your thoughts?
Search Behavior | | sbrault740 -
Mechanical turk, should I use USA workers?
I have testing out MT to try to influence Bings auto suggestions. Should I only use USA workers, or will world wide workers have the same effect?
Search Behavior | | KristopherWho0 -
Pro/Cons of JUST using Google Analytics
I find myself in a situation where I am having to defend why purely relying on just Google Analytics for site data i.e. exit pages, keywords, bounce rate etc... is not good practise. So I thought/wondered if other people have come up against this. What are the Pro and Cons for ONLY using Google Analytics for your site data....
Search Behavior | | JohnW-UK0 -
How to target local searches?
How do I start to target a national audiences? I currently get most of my hits from The US and Australia? But I see no reason why I don't get vies in Canada and The UK.
Search Behavior | | Stefan-Thorpe0 -
Would you say it is more bennificial to seperate keywords in the title tag tag of a page using a common ( keyword , keyword | Domain.com) or using a hyphen as SEOmoz best practices reccommends (keyword - keyword | domain.com)?
Title tag best practices according to seomoz is the following keyowrd - keyword | brand.com but I have seen some interesting results from using a comma as to a hyphen to seperate keywords as reccomended and wanted to know which method is more crawler friendly.
Search Behavior | | JHSpecialty0