Should I remove 'local' landing pages? Could these be the cause of traffic drop (duplicate content)?
-
I have a site that has most of it's traffic from reasonably competitive keywords each with their own landing page. In order to gain more traffic I also created landing pages for counties in the UK and then towns within each county. Each county has around 12 towns landing pages within the county. This has meant I've added around 200 extra pages to my site in order to try and generate more traffic from long tail keywords.
I think this may have caused an issue in that it's impossible for me to create unique content for each town/country and therefore I took a 'shortcut' buy creating unique content for each county and used the same content for the towns within it meaning I have lots of pages with the same content just slightly different page titles with a variation on town name. I've duplicated this over about 15 counties meaning I have around 200 pages with only about 15 actual unique pages within them.
I think this may actually be harming my site. These pages have been indexed for about a year an I noticed about 6 months ago a drop in traffic by about 50%. Having looked at my analytics this town and county pages actually only account for about 10% of traffic.
My question is should I remove these pages and by doing so should I expect an increase in traffic again?
-
Yea I found a folder and in it was not just the towns from that county but folders for each county which were also up a folder level (where they should be). I don't use PPC for the Top 10 site listed in my profile. I use it for the site I've had the issue with here (a separate site not listed in my my profile). It's a white label site but I'm struggling to make the PPC profitable to be honest. Any tips appreciated!
-
Typically, I counsel moving slowly on changes rather than quickly. With that, I would remove the duplication you mention and then watch it for a while. Then begin removing the duped pages county/city.
Now, when you say a subdirectory on your server which duplicated the whole site, I will assume you are clear that is what you were doing. I suggest being sure that was what was happening. Also, I still recommend checking the links given the timing and severity of the drop you saw. You did not see a Panda type drop over time. You saw a dramatic drop at a fixed point.
As to the PPC, the question was different. I know a lot about the dating vertical as I did lead brokerage years ago in that industry when there were a lot more players. My concern, given the top ten variety of site, was that if you are doing any markets where your client is also doing PPC, you risk getting your entire site in a ton of trouble. I sensed you might not be as seasoned as some others and it can be a real problem to recover from.
LMK if I can assist.
Robert
-
I do use PPC but no index my PPC pages.
-
Thanks Robert. I've just found out to my horror whilst browsing files on my server that within one off my subdirectory folders was an entire copy of my site meaning every single page was duplicated! I'm not a pro web designer/SEO and looks like I've made an expensive mistake!
I definitely need to remove the folder I've found which duplicated the entire site but do you think I should also remove the county/town pages as a precaution or leave them and hope it was the error I've just found that was causing the problem?
-
SamCUK
You are harming your site (who knows how much) and given your topic I do not think you are going to get as laser like (longtail is a laser) as you want. The first question when I see "landing pages" is are you also doing PPC using this technique? If your drop was in and around October of 2013 (8 months) it is more likely the drop is due to links (penguin) especially given the timing and severity.
As to your question on will traffic return if you remove the pages, there is no answer available other than trying it. If you are concerned, pick out some of the pages with known traffic loss and return to where you were before with 20 or 30% of them. Check it over 30, 60, and 90 days. But, also check your link profile.
Best,
-
Yeah unfortunately there is no easy answer to this :o(. If there is no traffic then 404 would be cool. But if you have a few winners in the lot then I would build those out (build a new unique page and create rich content) and 301 them.
-
Thanks for your reply. I don't have the time to write significantly different content for these pages and I don't think the amount of traffic available for these long tail keywords warrants it. (I was just after an easy win which clear doesn't exist!) If I remove these pages perhaps it will give a boost to my main pages as any penalty should be removed by the algorithm? Would you agree? I could probably make up the 10% loss in traffic I'd get by removing the pages by at the same time receiving a traffic boost to my main pages due to any penalty being removed.
Should I 301 all the pages if I remove them? If so where to as I understand redirecting to the home page is not the best thing to do? There are very few links pointing to these pages so should I just let them 404? Won't they eventually be removed from the index?
-
Yea I have seen this before. You need to put some more work into describing each page to distinguish a difference to search engines. If a bulk of the pages on your site have the same basic content it could cause trouble. At a minimum your Counties should be very different from the sub city pages. Also if nobody is really searching for the Counties and Your Service I would eliminate that page. Also if you change anything don't forget your 301's.
-
Hi,
No the text is identical for each town within a county so 'Lincolnshire' and all the towns within it have the same text (except for the town name) but another county such as 'Suffolk' will have completely different text (however the towns within Suffolk all share the same text as the parent county).
The site is structured like:
/lincolnshire/
/lincolnshire/lincoln
/lincolnshire/grimsby
etc....
These pages account for less than 10% of my traffic but I think could be causing me more harm than good.
-
Does each page have significantly different content describing the geographic areas? Also how did you structure the content? Are the towns sub indexed behind the counties?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is minor duplicate content on my website okay?
I know duplicate content across multiple websites is not a good thing, however I've always wondered about minor duplicate content on your own website. I know its good practice to have unique content on each page but what about the little stuff. For example on our website certain related pages share the same content in a right sidebar. Such as links to pdf leaflets, or "you can read our blog etc" . Is there a minimum number of repeated words required before its flagged as duplicate content? Another example is a customer gave two testimonials for two of our employees - the testimonials were identical other than the employee names - if these were posted on separate pages is it a problem for the site as a whole or for both those individual pages? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | Brabian0 -
How to optimize WordPress Pages with Duplicate Page Content?
I found the non WWW ans WWW duplicate pages URL only, more than thousand pages.
On-Page Optimization | | eigital0 -
Duplicate Content
I'm currently working on a site that sells appliances. Currently, there are thousands of "issues" with this site, many of them dealing with duplicate content. Now, the product pages can be viewed in "List" or "Grid" format. As Lists, they have very little in the way of content. My understanding is that the duplicate content arises from different URLs going to the same site. For instance, the site might have a different URL when told to display 9 items than when told to display 15. This could then be solved by inserting rel = canonical. Is there a way to take a site and get a list of all possible duplicates? This would be much easier than slogging through every iteration of the options and copying down the URLs. Also, is there anything I might be missing in terms of why there is duplicate content? Thank you.
On-Page Optimization | | David_Moceri0 -
Home page or landing page?
Hello, I want to ask a question related to that - Should we put keywords in the home page title if we wish to position another landing page better for particular keywords? I have read in one website about SEO that it's good the main keywords of your website to be positioned in homepage title also. f.e. Let's say we have website about web-design and our company is named Company Ltd. The title of the home page is "Company Ltd. - Web design, SEO, etc" We have also another inner page named "Web design | Company Ltd.". So should we leave the first page name only "Company Ltd." and the landing page's name "Web design | Company Ltd." . I don't know if they both have the same keyword in their title they won't compete with each other.
On-Page Optimization | | HrishikeshKarov0 -
Duplicate content "/"
Hi all, Ran my website through the SEOMOZ campaigns and the crawl diagnostics give me a duplicate error for these urls http://www.mysite.com/cat1/article http://www.mysite.com/cat1/article/ so the url with the "/" is a duplicate of the one without the "/" Can someone point me out to a solution to solve this ? regards, Frederik
On-Page Optimization | | frdrik1230 -
How Should I Fix Duplicate Content in Wordpress Pages
In GWMT i see google found 41 duplicate content in my wordpress blog. I am using Yoast SEO plugin to avoid those type of duplicates but still the problem was stick.. You can check the screenshot here - http://prntscr.com/dxfjq Please help..
On-Page Optimization | | mamuti0 -
Authorship and 50% Drop in Search Traffic
Hi. I had some problems with my content being copied by other sites, and was suggested to claim my pages. Immediately after Google started listing the posts with my photo next to them my traffic picked up slightly but since, over the past few weeks, it has dropped by about 50%! It seems that the average position has declined (as has the CTR) At the same time as claiming authorship I added the post date to my articles which I have now removed. Does anyone have any ideas for me? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | ben10000 -
Avoiding "Duplicate Page Title" and "Duplicate Page Content" - Best Practices?
We have a website with a searchable database of recipes. You can search the database using an online form with dropdown options for: Course (starter, main, salad, etc)
On-Page Optimization | | smaavie
Cooking Method (fry, bake, boil, steam, etc)
Preparation Time (Under 30 min, 30min to 1 hour, Over 1 hour) Here are some examples of how URLs may look when searching for a recipe: find-a-recipe.php?course=starter
find-a-recipe.php?course=main&preperation-time=30min+to+1+hour
find-a-recipe.php?cooking-method=fry&preperation-time=over+1+hour There is also pagination of search results, so the URL could also have the variable "start", e.g. find-a-recipe.php?course=salad&start=30 There can be any combination of these variables, meaning there are hundreds of possible search results URL variations. This all works well on the site, however it gives multiple "Duplicate Page Title" and "Duplicate Page Content" errors when crawled by SEOmoz. I've seached online and found several possible solutions for this, such as: Setting canonical tag Adding these URL variables to Google Webmasters to tell Google to ignore them Change the Title tag in the head dynamically based on what URL variables are present However I am not sure which of these would be best. As far as I can tell the canonical tag should be used when you have the same page available at two seperate URLs, but this isn't the case here as the search results are always different. Adding these URL variables to Google webmasters won't fix the problem in other search engines, and will presumably continue to get these errors in our SEOmoz crawl reports. Changing the title tag each time can lead to very long title tags, and it doesn't address the problem of duplicate page content. I had hoped there would be a standard solution for problems like this, as I imagine others will have come across this before, but I cannot find the ideal solution. Any help would be much appreciated. Kind Regards5