Are followed links from these high authority domains any good?
-
Hi Mozzers, I have a link building question, in 2 parts.
-
I am in the UK. We have a large local directory network over here which involves some high authority national news domains. Basically, you get a citation for free but if you go "featured" as well as the benefit of being returned top for keyword searches in the directories, buried under a tab on your page are deep links to your website, and they are followed. What are the risks/benefits of this?
-
Are followed links from other high authority domains like Visual.ly and Behance worth it? They are easy to get and I've always believed an easy link usually isn't a good link.
Thanks in advance!
-
-
Didnt want to say on a public forum after the MBG fiasco. Look for us on social media and we can chat more
-
What are these sites you refer to in regards to being the biggest "networks"?
Is it Scoot?
Thanks
-
Hi Tom, Thanks for a quick response!
Yeah you probably do know the directories I mean as it's one of the biggest "networks" over here, although there are only 5 domains, they are all strong to powerful in metrics. You have echoed my thoughts on "going paid", so I guess my gut instinct is correct and we need to weigh up the risk vs benefits factors on this. And the same again for the "easy links".
I never dreamed that one day I could be debating links from domains like these, but lately it feels like link building has become a game of russian roulette with websites!
-
Hi there
Algorithmically, the directory link you are talking about (I think I know which one you mean) could very well pass on a good amount of link equity. This is presuming that the site hasn't its strength penalised by one of the Penguin updates - and we know in the past that Google has targeted directory sites for quality reasons. I'm not sure this directory would fall under that category, as it is local, moderated and business related.
However, you need to ask the question: "How natural does this look?". Going "featured" is screaming out going "paid" and we know what Google's opinion of paying for links. So you're running a risk here that it is pretty blatant. Depending on your strategy, it might be one you choose to take or not, but if you're trying to keep things squeaky clean I would avoid it.
The same really for visually and behance. You're quite right in your assessment that an easy link isn't a good link, probably because the domains have had their authority diminished (no matter what the stats say) due to it being so easy to get a link there, and again it is possibly one to avoid as it may be seen as low quality by Google. I've seen sites perform well with these links in their profile en masse, so algorithmically they could work, but again you're taking a pretty significant risk there.
Hope his helps.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Links
Hi, im wondering if links that is not exact anchor links gives any boost for rankings? Example if lets say somebody links to my site http://domain.com/category/article with anchor: domainname or url link.
Link Building | | Rob_I0 -
Is are Scoopon type sites a good place to get a link?
We have noticed that our competitors have links with equality from sites like this: http://www.groupon.com.au/ Scoopon type sites like this can be an effective way to generate sales for a business, I'm just wondering if these types of sites also have added value for SEO as sites like these do have a strong Domain Authority? Any thoughts on this subject would be most appreciated. Thanks!
Link Building | | Gavo0 -
Linking Root Domains www and non-www
I just ran our site through Open Site Explorer. If I run the non-www version I get 30 root domains, if I run www I get 177. Is it wise to try and contact those sites using the non-www version and ask them to update the links to www version? Will that make much of a difference?
Link Building | | Amueller0 -
Domain authority through blogs
So, I was looking at my competiton, and noticed that they have 4 times the amount of link that my page has. I noticed that they made a blog on almost every free blog hosting available (like webs.com, jimdo.com, .weebly.com...) And every blog has a high domain authority (and poor content) with links to their page. Is this helping with their domain authority? Should i do if for my page too? Thank, M.
Link Building | | Spletnafuzija0 -
Competitiors high Pinterest page authority doesnt make sense to me
I have seen that a competitor has a link from Pinterest as does the site I am promoting but the competitors page authority on their Pinterest page is 51 versus mine at just 1. Have checked the backlinks to their Pinterest page and there are 156 sitewide links all from the competitors own domain which has DA of 17. Their Pinterest page wasn't published that long ago, has 2 followers and just a handful of pins. Could I get some help to understand what could be the cause of this higher page authority please?
Link Building | | Clicksjim0 -
What does it mean by followed links?
I don't understand what SEOmoz report means when it shows I have no followed links OR linking root domains. What does this mean and how can I fix it?
Link Building | | CapitolShine0 -
Root domain registered in search engines, inbound links to www sub-domain. A problem?
I just discovered that our site is registered with the major search engines without the "www" sub domain. Both domains resolve directly to our site, which I need to get corrected. I had planned to have the root (honestabe.com) forwarded to the sub (www.honestabe.com). However, I then found that the sub-domain is not listed with the search engines. Of course, naturally almost all of our inbound links include www. Does Google differentiate between links with and without the sub-domain? In other words, if I forward the www address to the root, will I still get the SEO benefit of those inbound links using www? I'm trying to figure out how to approach this. I'm hoping someone is going to make me feel really stupid for asking this and say it's no big deal. However, I have a feeling this could be a mess.
Link Building | | honestabejosh0