Old domain still being crawled despite 301s to new domain
-
Hi there,
We switched from the domain X.com to Y.com in late 2013 and for the most part, the transition was successful. We were able to 301 most of our content over without too much trouble.
But when when I do a site:X.com in Google, I still see about 6240 URLs of X listed. But if you click on a link, you get 301d to Y. Maybe Google has not re-crawled those X pages to know of the 301 to Y, right? The home page of X.com is shown in the site:X.com results. But if I look at the cached version, the cached description will say :This is Google's cache of Y.com. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on July 31, 2014."
So, Google has freshly crawled the page. It does know of the 301 to Y and is showing that page's content. But the X.com home page still shows up on site:X.com. How is the domain for X showing rather than Y when even Google's cache is showing the page content and URL for Y?
There are some other similar examples. For instance, you would see a deep URL for X, but just looking at the <title>in the SERP, you can see it has crawled the Y equivalent. Clicking on the link gives you a 301 to the Y equivalent. The cached version of the deep URL to X also shows the content of Y.</p> <p>Any suggestions on how to fix this or if it's a problem. I'm concerned that some SEO equity is still being sequestered in the old domain.</p> <p>Thanks,</p> <p>Stephen</p></title>
-
Hey Stephen,
Did you ever solve this? I'm experiencing the exact same issues you've described above, so I'm curious if you ever figured it out.
Thanks.
-
If using a PHP CMS you will have a page # eg ?P123 this will make it so you can collect all of the old pages and have them redirect to the new ones perfectly.
Turn off all catching frist
A close friend of mine and I did this on his site which is quite large he got 30,000 URLs that were not pointing from his old domain to his new domain simply by adding the code below. If running WordPress and Nginx follow the steps below if you need to modify them so they correspond with your page format use
http://danielmiessler.com/blog/redirect-archives-pages/
Check out Yoast
https://yoast.com/wp-content/permalink-helper.php
&
https://yoast.com/change-wordpress-permalink-structure/
Sorry for being MIA,
Tom
-
Hi Matt, thanks for the reply. I can give this a test.
The puzzling thing here is that Google has re-crawled those old page URLs at the old domain. It is getting 301 re-directed to the new URL. The content that Google has cached for the old URL is from the new URL and has the new URL listed as the source of the cached page.
Stephen
-
Force a recrawl by pinging the pages.
Get as complete a list as possible of the pages that are indexed. Then submit them to PingFarm, 247pinger and RankonTop.
We had 2500+ pages indexed from an old development server and this removed almost all of them in 2-3 weeks.
-
Hi David, you can see my responses to these questions in my reply to Thomas. But the URLs from old X.com are being 301d correctly to y.com. For the vast majority of duplicate listings shown for site:x.com, you can click on them and they get 301d to y.com and the cached version of a page in site:x.com shows y.com content and even the y.com URL in the cached description.
-
I am going to assume the 301 redirects are working when you click on them?
Hi Thomas,
Yes, the 301s work and confirmed with http headers
_You need to go into Google Webmaster tools and tell Google that you have moved from domain A to domain B this will make Google bot crawl both sites vigorously looking for 301 redirects. _
The migration was before my time, but I think that this was done. If I try to use the change of address on the old site, X.com, I just get a "There is no change of address pending for your site." message with no control options (conversely, if I tried to do the same thing for the current Y.com, it would give me the full list of instructions on how to migrate my site.)
I want to be certain that you did not 301 redirect domain to domain and not page to page. So if site X has homepage, about page, whatever page, and site Y would contain the exact same pages or equivalent pages that you would have already 301 redirected page 2 page not just point the domain at the other domain is that right?
The 301s are at a page level at X.com to the same equivalent page at Y.com. The majority of pages have migrated over without obvious problems. But it's a little disturbing to see new pages of y.com which have never been part of x.com somehow make it into a site:x.com query and listed with an x.com domain to start the URL.
So just to recap, site:x.com shows long-tail pages that clearly belong to site:y.com and were never part of x.com. The <title>of some of the site:x.com pages. for instance, are definitely from y.com pages. For some reason, Google is associating these pages with the x.com domain.</p> <p>If you click on the cached version of a listing for site:x.com, the cached version will show the content and URL of Y.com/foo in the cached description header. Clicking on the actual link gets you 301d from X.com/foo to Y.com/foo. Both events indicate that the 301 is working and that Google is recognizing the 301.</p> <p>I don't know if this impacting our SERPs or not. If I do a very page-specific search for "blue widgets A, B, and C in Montana" for a page that is indexed in both site:x.com and site:y.com, you only see y.com's page which is expected behavior. You don't see x.com in the SERPs for that specific query. It's only if you do site:x.com "blue widgets A, B, and C in Montana" do you see the duplicate listing. But again, clicking on the URL that is shown results in a 301 to the proper y.com page.</p> <p>I can dig deeper with my developers, check logs, etc. But it's weird. It's almost like Google sees a URL for y.com and indexes that URL for x.com and y.com even though it knows that y.com is the dominant or real page (evidenced by cached data info). Everytime I click on an site:x.com link, I get 301 redirected properly to the y.com equivalent.</p></title>
-
Did you keep the page URL structure the same on the new site? If so, you can do a simple htaccess rule that will forwards all traffic from one domain, to the corresponding pages on the other domain. If not, then you will have to go through and check each one manually.
Have all the steps been covered? Did you resubmit a new sitemap? Specify in "fetch as Google" that all the new pages on the new site be crawled? If you are using a CMS, did you check to see if multiple versions of a certain page exist, and forget to redirect those?
Lastly, even though you still see references to the old domain, do the 301 redirects work? Once clicked do they send a user to the new domain?
-
I am going to assume the 301 redirects are working when you click on them?
Going on that assumption and please correct me if I am wrong. You need to go into Google Webmaster tools and tell Google that you have moved from domain A to domain B this will make Google bot crawl both sites vigorously looking for 301 redirects. Basically any changes that have occurred when the first crawl is completed after approximately 90 days tell Google to crawl it again. You have a fairly large site based on the amount of links you are discussing. You need to get Google to find everything. That is the best way to tell Google that you are changing domains.
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/55281
Two references I would use. Each contains a lot of good information.
https://support.google.com/webmasters/topic/6033102?hl=en&ref_topic=6029673
&
http://moz.com/community/q/how-to-keep-old-url-juice-during-site-switch
"But when I do a site:X.com in Google, I still see about 6240 URLs of X listed. But if you click on a link, you get 301d to Y. Maybe Google has not re-crawled those X pages to know of the 301 to Y, right? The home page of X.com is shown in the site:X.com results. But if I look at the cached version, the cached description will say :This is Google's cache of Y.com. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on July 31, 2014."
I want to be certain that you did not 301 redirect domain to domain and not page to page. So if site X has homepage, about page, whatever page, and site Y would contain the exact same pages or equivalent pages that you would have already 301 redirected page 2 page not just point the domain at the other domain is that right?
I hope this helps,
Thomas
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Do Google Penalties Always Follow a Redirects to New Domains?
I have a couple sites that were penalized by Google for hosting content that made Google look bad. After a major newspaper showcased what was going on they suddenly took a major hit as if someone at Google flipped a switch and told their system not to rank the content for anything other than their brand names. The article made Google look bad because the newspaper highlighted a lot of unverified user generated accusations the reporters assumed not to be true in the context of "these accusations are mostly false, but they still show up on the first page when people search Google." I was thinking one way to fight this would simply be to host the content at a different domain, but I am concerned about the new domain being penalized as well. I don't want to completely shut down all of the original sites because some of them have brand recognition. The oldest domain is 12 years old with backlinks from several news outlets which is why the content ranked so well, but after the penalty that is only the case on Bing. I've read various articles about this tactic. Some say that you will almost always pass the penalty to the new domain if you do a 301 redirect, but the penalties at issue in those articles were for things like buying links or other black hat tactics. This is somewhat different in that I wasn't doing anything black hat, they just decided not to let the site rank for political reasons. I was hoping that maybe that type of penalty wouldn't follow it, but right now I am leaning towards simply creating a second site to syndicate articles. It will need to attribute the articles to their sources though, so they will need either no followed links or possibly a redirection script that bots cannot follow. I would really like it if I could simply change the first site to its .net or .org equivalent and 301 everything though.
Technical SEO | | PostAlmostAnything0 -
Site hacked in Jan. Redeveloped new site. Still not ranking. Should we change domain?
Our top ranking site in the UK was hacked at the end of 2014. http://www.ultimatefloorsanding.co.uk/ The site was the subject of a manual spam action from Google. After several unsuccessful attempts to clean it up, using Securi.net and reinstating old versions of the site, changing passwords etc. we took the decision to redevelop the site. We also changed hosting provider as we had received absolutely no support from them whatsoever in resolving the issue. So far we have: Removed the old website files off the server Developed a new website having implemented 301's for all the old URL's (except the spam ones) Submitted a reconsideration request for the manual spam action, which was accepted. Disavowed all the spammy inbound links through Webmaster Tools Implemented custom URL parameters through Google to not index the SPAM URLs ( which were using parameters) Our organic traffic is down by 63% compared to last year, and we are not ranking for most of our target keywords any longer. Is there anything that I am missing in the actions I have taken so far? We were advised that at this stage changing domain and starting again might be the way to go. However the current domain has been used by us since 2007, so it would be a big call. Any advice is appreciated, thanks. Sue - http://www.ultimatefloorsanding.co.uk/
Technical SEO | | galwaygirl0 -
Country Specific Domain
Guyz, we are new startups and have one very simple question regarding domain name. Should we use example.com or example.com.au ? Our Goal initially would be to target customer from Australia and gradually go global. So if we opt for .com.au we may have an edge in terms of local SEO in the beginning but lose out in the long run. What is the best way to tackle this? Thanks
Technical SEO | | WayneRooney0 -
Country Specific Domains
Is there any type of "best practice" for country level domains? I run a TLD .com, and have a few country specific domains (.co.uk, .eu, ...). Right now, I'm not doing anything with them. Previously, I had them redirected to the main .com, but didn't want to anger the Google gods with any type of duplicate content, redirects, or anything of that nature. Any suggestions on how to best utalize these domains?
Technical SEO | | ShippingContainer0 -
New domain
Hi, I have a domain with no keywords on it, and I´ve been using it for years. Now I bought another domain with the keyword on it. I whant to work on seo for the second domain, with the keyword. What is the better way to work this out? 301? Duplicate de site? redirect in another way?
Technical SEO | | mgfarte0 -
Sub Domains
Hi,,, Okay we have 1 main site , a few years back we went down the road of sub domains and generated about 10. They have page rank and age but we wish to move them back to the main web site. What is the correct or best way to achieve this. 1 copy all content to the main web site creating dup pages and then use a redirects from the sub pages to the new dup pages on the main domain... or 2 write new content on the main domain for the subdomain pages and redirect to the new content. Problem with 2 is the amount of work involved...
Technical SEO | | NotThatFast0 -
Too many 301s?
Hi there, If there is a website that has accidently generated say 1,000 pages of duplicate content, would the seo be hurt if all those pages were re-directed to the origional source of the content? There are no plans to re-write the 1,000 duplicate pages, they are already cached and indexed by Google. I thought about canonical tags but as they have some traffic and a little seo value i thought 301 re-direct would be more appropiate to the relevant pages? I am also right in thinking you would be able to remove the 301 in the .htaccess file once the index has updated? Also once removed the 301 - i could use those urls later from scratch if i wanted? Any info much appreciated.
Technical SEO | | pauledwards0 -
Domain Forwarding and SEO
I have looked around and only saw older and contradicting responses to this question but what effect does having a domain with VALUABLE-KEYWORD.com forward to MAINSITE.com or COMMON-MISSPELLING.com forward to MAINSITE.com in terms of SEO and is it considered spammy or looked down upon
Technical SEO | | treytt0