I Mistakenly uploaded Disavow File to Non WWW version of Webiste in Webmaster Tools...is this a Problem???
-
Hey guys and gals,
I need some advice on this please. I recently had someone perform a negative S.E.O campaign on my site and I was inundated with 13,000 + spammy links pointing to my website and I had to perform a Disavow in Google Webmaster Tools but for some reason, it is showing that I uploaded the Disavow text file to the Non WWW version of the website but the WWW version of my website is the preferred domain and I have all NON WWW queries being 301 redirected to www.pcmedicsoncall.com
My question is should I correct this and upload the Disavow text to the preferred domain in Google Webmaster Tools???
Please advise on how I should proceed with this situation....
Thank you.
Cam
-
TAGFEE stands for our core values of Transparent, Authentic, Generous, Fun, Empathetic, and Exceptional. I perhaps should have instead linked to our Community Etiquette page at http://moz.com/community/blog-disclaimer.
In short, let's keep this Q&A discussion related to the question -- what to do when the disavow file is uploaded to the non-www version of a domain instead of the www version in GWT.
-
If you don't mind me asking what is TAGFEE? Google are a bunch of tyrants that indiscriminately kill off legitimate small business and are accountable to no one for anything that they do and you are asking me to be politically correct when making reference towards Google? Why?
I would say that this is the majority of the problem with what is going on. Everyone agrees just to agree because it's google and I see a lot of highly intelligent people having technical conversations about these super imposed games of hop scotch backwards that google inflicts upon all of us and yet no one says or does anything. I believe that would make those who participate part of the problem not part of the solution wouldn't you agree?
If anything, people need to start voicing their true opinions and feelings about what is going on and all of us should come together and put an end to this crap once and for all!!! GOOGLE IS A DICTATOR that is trying to disassemble the internet and make a 2 classification system of masters and slaves. Which side of the fence do you think you will be banished to when this comes to pass?
Sorry but I have my view points based on analyzing data for the past 6 years now and I apologize if you do not agree with my view points on what is what.
Thank you for reading.
Cam
-
[moderator hat on]
Just a quick reminder, this is Moz, and we ask that you be TAGFEE in your tone. No need to invoke Godwin's Law in Q&A. Thanks!
[moderator hat off]
-
Thank you so much for your response Mark I truly appreciate your insight through your experience with having done this numerous times.
I had done some searching earlier and saw that people were saying it was not wise to delete a disavow file so...I just figured that I would go with the logical approach and just submit one for the www version of my site.
Thanks again for sharing your experience Mark and believe me, it's comforting to know that what I did by submitting the disavow file to the www version is not going to hinder or hurt me.
Why is GOOGLE such a bunch of Nazi Douche Bags anymore?....Oh yeah...MONEY... I guess 64 Billion a year is not satisfactory enough....I really despise GOOGLE with a passion these days and wish someone would get rid of this company!!!!
-
I upload disavows to both versions - so I would simply say add it to the www one as well.
(I've submitted a LOT of disavows - this has never been a problem.)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Following urls should be add in disavow file or not
Hey Moz Friends, Should I include following spam link urls in disavow file or not? OR Will Google handle automatically? These type I have thousands urls. =>>>web-seek.org/the_worlds_most_visited_web_pages_42.html<<<=
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Rajesh.Prajapati
=>>>web-seek.net/the_worlds_most_visited_web_pages_42.html<<<=
=>>>websearching.net/the_worlds_most_visited_web_pages_42/
=>>>websearch.pl/the_worlds_most_visited_web_pages_42.html<<<=
=>>>web-search.net/the_worlds_most_visited_web_pages_42/
=>>>web-pages.org/the_worlds_most_visited_web_pages_42/
=>>>web-page.org/the_worlds_most_visited_web_pages_42.html<<<=
=>>>the-world.net/the_worlds_most_visited_web_pages_42.html<<<=
=>>>the-internet.tv/the_worlds_most_visited_web_pages_42.html<<<=
=>>>the-internet.in/the_worlds_most_visited_web_pages_42.html<<<=
=>>>the-globe.tv/the_worlds_most_visited_web_pages_42/
=>>>theglobe.sk/the_worlds_most_visited_web_pages_42.html<<<=
=>>>theglobe.ru/the_worlds_most_visited_web_pages_42.html<<<=
=>>>theglobe.pl/the_worlds_most_visited_web_pages_42.html<<<= Hope you will give any solution. Waiting for your positive response.0 -
Are links on sites that require PAD files good or bad for SEO?
I want to list our product on a number of sites that require PAD files such as Software Informer and Softpedia. Is this a good idea from an SEO perspective to have links on these pages?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | SnapComms0 -
Is it worth disavowing entire affiliate network?
Question for the pro's (all comments greatly appreciated) and it's doing my head in atmo. Recently, we received a temporary algorithmic penalty on one of our pages, which was originally ranking 12th, now 50+. We found out an affiliate put a site-wide link to our site, using the affiliate ID blablabla. I have taken a look at the exact link and checked the status codes on it, seems as if the link uses a 302 to our page. However, yes, you can argue that 302's d on't pass link juice, but I do believe that if a 302 remains in place for a while - Google will treat it as a 301. My question is: considering that affiliate links are causing us problems, is it worth disavowing the ENTIRE affiliate network? - we have over 100,00 links coming from them, all of which are targeting different pages and using different affiliate tracking ID's. What do you think - I don't want to disavow the site then realise it was actually some-what helping the site.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Brett-S0 -
Is this negative SEO? Should I disavow these links?
We have been doing our own internal link building for the last year and getting nice backlinks. As of the last few days, ahrefs is showing a lot of new links that seem very spammy. We have not hired anyone to do link building for us, and these are all being created on these sites under the same user name. There is a good amount of them popping up, and I fear we will be subjected to a google pentalty for unnatural links if its not addressed. My first question is, am I correct thinking this is negative seo, and not some random sites that picked up our content and is going across their affiliate websites? If so, then should I preemptively disavow all these links? Are there any good ways to stop this? How can I track who is placing these garbage links? Here are some examples of these bad links. I know I can find the webmaster via a whois but I think that really wont get me anywhere, but I could be wrong. Here are some examples of the links that started popping up yesterday and today. http://pligg-cms.info/story.php?title=student-loan-debt-relief
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | DemiGR
http://www.sharklinks.info/story.php?title=-student-loan-consolidation-options
http://factson37.com/story.php?title=student-loan-debt-forgiveness-website
http://social-marker.info/story.php?title=-student-loan-debt-forgiveness
http://makingbookmarks.info/story.php?title=-student-loan-consolidation-options
http://bookmarkingforseo.com/story.php?title=top-student-loan-consolidation-options
http://jadelinks.info/story.php?title=-student-loan-consolidation-options There are quite a bit more and they don't seem to be stopping. All of them look pretty much identical to this. Thoughts?1 -
Tools to check Google Local SEO with suggestions.
Is there any tool for to check website position on Google maps ?? and also what is the way to check that a website is listed on which local directories and on which not listed and to get suggestions for improvements ?? so need Tools to check Google Local SEO with suggestions.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | mnkpso0 -
Can i send a disavow if a detect a spam link
I have detected than one web domain is generating 2400 links to my site should a use a disavow tools, as it is imposible to have contact from webmaster and no response to your emails My web as not been warned or penalized, but i dont like this link, and i want to inform google of that,. If google acepts the disavow file, should i still see on my webmaster tools that web links, or will they desapear thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | maestrosonrisas0 -
Being penalized for unnatural links, determining the issue, and fixing the problem. What to do?
Hi all, A client has been penalised, having received the message in Google Webmasters last week, along with two more yesterday. It seems the penalty is for something specific: “As a result, for this specific incident we are taking very targeted action on the unnatural links instead of your site as a whole“. This is the first time I've had to deal with this so I'll be a bit layman about it The penalty, firstly, seems to be for the old domain, from which there is a re-direct to the current one. This redirect has been in place since Feb 2012 (no link building has been done for the old domain since then). In Webmasters, I have the old and new domains set up separately and the messages are only coming for the old (but affecting the new, obviously). I need to determine if it’s the old or new URL I’m being hit for, or would that even matter? Some questionable links I can see in WM: There is an affiliate for whom WM is showing 154,000 links (all followed) from their individual products listings to the client’s site (as a related product) but they’re linking to the new domain if that matters. Could this affiliate be an issue? There is also Updowner, which has added 2000+ links unbeknownst to me but apparently they are discounted by Google. I see a ton of recent directory submissions - right up until last week - that I am not responsible for. Could that be intentional spam targeting? I did also use a 3<sup>rd</sup> party link building company for Feb, March and April who ‘manually’ submitted the new domain to directories and social bookmarking sites. Could this be issue? For what kind of time-scale are penalties usually imposed - how far back (or how recently) are they penalising for? Ranking were going really well until this happened last Thursday. Will directories with non-followed links effect us negatively - one such one has over 2000 links. What is the most conclusive way to determine which are the poor, penalty-incurring links pointing to us? I know I now have to contact all the dodgy directories the site is now listed on to get links removed, but any and all advice on how to rectify this, along with determining what had gone wrong, will be most appreciated. Cheers, David
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Martin_S0 -
301 redirect from an unwanted non-affiliated domain
Hey everyone, Our site was hit with an unnatural link penalty a few weeks ago, and it looks very much like a malicious link attack. We've never participated in any link schemes or anything resembling black hat link building. In fact, we've barely even done any link building. Reviewing our backlink profile, there are hundreds of links from just a few (very dodgy) domains that we have no control over, and we've have had no luck when contacting webmasters to get them removed. More importantly, we've seen several domains which 301 redirect straight to our domain. We don't know who they are and they're not contactable. I believe that the redirect means they're passing link value from all of their terrible links to us? How can we get the redirects removed, as at worst they're really harming us, and at best, they're adding no value. Thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Sarbs0