Too Many Links?
-
Search Term is Indianapolis Wedding Photographers.
Site is http://www.tallandsmallphotography.com/
Their metrics are through the roof compared to everyone else's. They've dropped from 27 in May to 40 Now. 'A' Grade on-site optimization.
Either there's too many links, or there's some bad links involved... I don't know which it is...
-
I liked your article. You had a lot of really good points. I think that a lot of non-SEO savvy people are still trying to build links by leaving comments, so it's good to advise people not to do that!
I still think you should go looking for Panda issues for this particular client though. Yes, it's good to get rid of the unnatural links. But, if Penguin was the only issue for this site then you really should have seen your drop at the time of a Penguin update and there was no Penguin update in May of 2014.
-
And... as it turns out, I was part of the problem. I had a DoFollow directory on my site that people could use for a little Blog Love action.
There was also a thread on a photography group that has been going on since 2009, that I encouraged people to use over the years.I've written a blog post here http://flauntyoursite.com/jig-is-up/ denouncing the practice. I have a bit of clout in the photography communities, so hopefully this spreads out there.
Marie, if you wouldn't mind reading this and letting me know if there's anything you think should be added, I'd appreciate it.
I let people down big time. I hope the word can get out there and fix this thing.
-
Thanks Marie,
I will shoot you an email. Most of my clients are photographers (I do custom website design as well as SEO), so if this is something that's happening more and more, it'd be good to have a solution for them.
-
Thanks very much for the recommendation EGOL.
William, I have seen a lot of photographers that have been affected by Penguin. With that being said, your backlink profile doesn't look typical of most Penguin hit sites that I see. The first thing I'd check is whether you have a manual unnatural linking penalty. This is different than Penguin that is an algorithmic issue and not a manual penalty.
If you've traded links with a lot of other photographers than a manual penalty is possible. To check go to Webmaster Tools then Search Traffic and then Manual Actions.
If you see "no manual webspam actions found" then that's not it.
I see a lot of sites that go on a link pruning crusade when really their problem has nothing to do with links. A lot of these sites have issues with the Panda algorithm which really is not a link based algorithm at all, but rather, deals with on site problems.
If you'd like me to have a more detailed look, feel free to contact me via the email on my Moz profile and I can give you a few options.
-
Marie Haynes.
Check out all of these link penalty articles on SearchEngineWatch. http://searchenginewatch.com/author/2779/marie-haynes
Another list of link penalty articles published here on Moz. http://moz.com/community/users/308135
Her site and book are here. http://www.hiswebmarketing.com/unnatural-links-recovery/
Those are just some of what she has published.
-
Thanks EGOL,
I spent a little time investigating to rule out other issues. I didn't want to rush to a conclusion. But I'm fairly positive we're looking at Penguin now.
Since Penguin isn't really my area of expertise, do you have recommendations for good services that are skilled in determining which links would be causing problems?
Thanks!
-
And EGOL, what is it that bothers you about the links to other sites?
The blog looks like a link factory. Are these being sold? Are they being traded? Simply by volume there will be links in there to other websites that have been penalized by Google. Inbound or outbound links can cause a site to have a problem with Google's Penguin algorithm.
Site-wide links in the footer have been a known method of google manipulation for about ten years. If Prophoto and NetRivet have dozens or hundreds of other sites giving them site-wide links in the footer that could cause a problem. I would get rid of those links if this was my website. They are not necessary. The site will look better without these advertising links.
**Most photographers actually do use commenting as a means to up their DA/PA. **
That statement proves an observation that I have made.
I look at Moz Q&A every day and pay attention to sites that see rankings drops. Photographers are waaayyy overrepresented in the sites that post here with problems. If you do a few searches of Q&A you will find lots of photographers in here cryin' because their sites have great metrics but apparently weak competitors are beating them.
**Most photographers do this as a way to promote vendors that were at the wedding. **
Photographers link to other wedding vendors and other wedding vendors link back to photographers... they do this every week. Over and over for hundreds of weddings. It creates a pattern that is easy to spot and looks like manipulation. They, or their agents, have also spent countless hours finding open photography blogs where they can place a ten word comment and get a link or two.
Their metrics are through the roof compared to everyone else's. They've dropped from 27 in May to 40 Now. 'A' Grade on-site optimization.
This sounds exactly like a site that has been penalized for link spam. Great moz grading, great link metrics, rankings lower than expected in Google.
Just offering what I would do if this was my site. No guarantees.
.
-
Thanks Chris and EGOL,
Most photographers actually do use commenting as a means to up their DA/PA. They occasionally get posts from wedding blogs as features with links back to them. But the majority of the industry uses comments. Plenty of sites have maintained rankings with that link strategy (I'm not saying if it's good/bad or even sustainable over the long term, just saying what has worked for years).
Could this just be a situation where having hundreds of more links than your competitors could cause the problems?Also, are there any tools that you'd recommend that could start to actually figure out if the links truly are bad?
And EGOL, what is it that bothers you about the links to other sites? Most photographers do this as a way to promote vendors that were at the wedding. Reading it I admit it's a bit link heavy in the amount of text they have on each post, but is there anything inherently wrong with 5-10 outbound links on posts?
Thanks guys.
William -
I'm not sure there is such a thing as too many good links, which leaves just the bad-links side of your equation. If by "take a sharp ax to what's currently out there," EGOL means to start disavowing those low quality links, I'd agree. Moz's metrics don't really count spammy stuff against you, which can lead to to believe that your ranking factors are through the roof. It might be good idea to bone-up on your knowledge of link valuations.
-
A lot of the links fit the pattern of the examples below. Google probably sees this and thinks that the only reason these links exist is because someone deliberately spent a lot of time finding a couple hundred photography blog posts where they could type less than ten words and obtain a link, or two, or three. They would call it blog spamming because the links were manufactured - not given on merit.
Three examples....
http://paperphotographs.com/blog/2012/04/02/columbus-senior-portraits-carly-whetstone-park-of-roses/
http://alexmillerweddings.co.uk/blog/benjamin-arrives/
http://www.jackchauvel.com/the-year-that-was-2013/
If this was my site I would get rid of the site-wide footer links to ProPhoto and NetRivet. If they are being paid for their service then linking to them is probably not a requirement. If it is a requirement and I am paying I would leave them simply on principle.
Another thing that bothers me is that the blog posts each have a load of links out to other sites. This, I would think, is unnecessary. I would stop doing this and take a sharp ax to what is currently out there.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Links disappeared
Hi, I am a wedding photographer based in Liverpool. I have been trying to do my own SEO for the last 6 months. I have been hovering around the top of page two for the main search terms for the past few years. I used an SEO company before christmas who got a lot of spammy links which resulted in my site dropping to page 4 of the SERPS. With the help of this forum I managed to locate them and disavow those links, and have tried to do it myself. I have managed to gain a few "featured weddings" on national wedding blogs and wrote a few articles for another wedding blog and also some forum comments. I have also got a few links for example from a wedding band in exchange for some photographs. I have got onto page 1 about 4 times, the best result was at position 6 on page 1 but every time I have slowly dropped out again. I have methodically (once a month) checked for any of the spammy links and updated the disavow list. My competitors have at best old forum comments and the like and on checking their websites with open site explorer are not actively link building at all. I have just checked my Webmaster tools and google is only recognising 51 links. (none of my good wedding blog links are there) I have an external links csv from the 28th June with 602 links on it. I changed my website around May of this year but it is still on the same domain name www.dwliverpoolphotography.co.uk. Can anybody help? Best wishes. David.
Technical SEO | | WallerD0 -
Too many navigational links
Hi there, I have an issue with the amount of internal links on my webpages. Moz campaign manager gives a lot of 'too many on page links' issues. Over 7000.
Technical SEO | | MarcelMoz
I know the importance of a good internal linking structure. 1. Not too many internal links (over approximately 100) is good for flowing through some authority from authoritive pages.
2. Too many internal links can spend all of the 'crawler budget' so the crawlers won't crawl the complete website anymore (right?). This can cause problems with indexing new webpages (right?). This is the situation: The website is a webshop The header contains 6 links, the footer contains 32 links, the homepage contains 42 links, the body content of some category pages contains a variated amount of links from 30 to a maximum of 100 links. Product pages do contain a maximum of 25 links. There is no problem here. Now here's the problem: The website navigation is a dropdown menu that contains 167 links to tier 2. These links are very important for our visitors. They can immediately find the right category/product by it. Removing or shrinking this dropdown is not an option. But the dropdown navigation is causing all of the 'too many on page links' issues. Question: is there a SEO (indexing, PA) problem in this situation which i should solve? What should I solve and how should I solve this? Note: pages have good organic positions and authority. Thanks a lot. Marcel0 -
Penalised due to links?
Hi, Is there a way to tell if a site has been penalised for it's links? Our site dropped last Friday, and we would like to rule out links, as we plan to move the site to our main site and re-direct the links, unless Google would punish the new url due to this. Our old site does not show any warnings for the link, and neither does our Google WM account, the only thing we have to go by is a big drop in SERP. Many thanks. Quime.
Technical SEO | | Quime0 -
External Links Discrepancy
Hello folks Apologies for my ignorance, but a SEO novice here… One of our competitors boasts over 300,000 external links, however when we analysed their links via http://www.opensiteexplorer.org we can only see around 10,000 in there “Number of Domains Linking to this Page” section. Can someone please assist and point out something which I assume is painfully obvious! Cheers, Chris
Technical SEO | | footyfriends0 -
Devalued links or negative affect?
Hi there, I'm looking into an issue with a site that was hit after Penguin was introduced. The site lost 70% of traffic over night. The site in question seemed to have a large number of backlinks with over optimized anchor text which seems to most likely be the reason for drop in rankings. But there is also some links from blog networks here too unfortunately, so my question here really is do Google just devalue these links and discount them from consideration in their ranking algorithm or do the links still count but instead of adding positive affects in SERPs add a negative affect? My reason for this question is I'm trying to determine whether it's worth saving this website or just starting fresh with a new domain. That does bring me to another question, if I have to start fresh on a new domain is it a possibility to reuse the content from the old site? (providing I remove the URLs from Google via Webmaster tools). Any help/advice/answers here would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | jayderby0 -
Is link cloaking bad?
I have a couple of affiliate gaming sites and have been cloaking the links, the reason I do this is to stop have so many external links on my sites. In the robot.txt I tell the bots not to index my cloaked links. Is this bad, or doesnt it really matter? Thanks for your help.
Technical SEO | | jwdesign0 -
301s and Link Juice
So I know that a 301 will pass the majority of link juice to the new site, but if that 301 is taken away what happens?
Technical SEO | | kylesuss0 -
I have pages that are showing up as having too many links, yet they are noindexed.
I've got several pages that have "too many on page links" and the pages mentioned have already been noindexed. Do these pages need to be no followed too? Here's one of the pages: http://digisavvy.com/site-map/. There's several pages like this, most of which are category or tag archives, which I've noindexed... Do I need to nofollow these, too?
Technical SEO | | digisavvy0