Normal that Home Page Generating Less than 4% Of Organic Traffic?
-
Greetings MOZ Community:
My firm operates www.nyc-officespace-leader.com, a commercial real estate brokerage in New York City.
Prior to the first Penguin update in April 2012, our home page used to receive about 10% or 600 of total organic visits. After the first Penguin was launched by Google organic traffic to the home dropped to maybe 5% or 200 visits per month.
Since May of this year, it appears we have been penalized by Penguin 4.0 and are attempting to recover. Now our home page only generates about 140 organic visits per month, or less than 4% of organic traffic.
Our home enjoyed good conversion rate, so this drop in traffic is a real loss.
Does this very low level of traffic to the home page indicate something abnormal? Dropping from 10% to less than 4% is a major decline. Should we take specific steps regarding the home page like enhancing the content?
Thanks, Alan
-
Hi Moosa:
Actually we were hit by Penguin in April 2012, and then by Panda 4.0 (for thin content) in late May of this year.
Regarding the Penguin issue, we identified bad links, requested removal and filed a disavow with Google listing the domains that refused to remove links. We are also re-writing as much content as possible. In terms of creating links, I have been instructed that the best way to do so is to create high quality onsite content that others will link to. So I am hoping we are on the right track.
But getting back to my original question, I don't know why the home page has been punished disproportionately.
Thanks, Alan
-
Interesting question.
The "Home" was removed from the top menu in June. Now the logo on the upper left of the header on every page still links to the home page. But is this sufficient? Did we kill valuable links by removing the "Home" item in the top menu?
The body text in the hundreds of pages does not have may links. Would it be useful to add text links on those pages back to the home page?
Thanks, Alan
-
Do you have links back to your homepage on all of your pages?
-
If you are not sure that this action is actually a penguin attack or not then you probably should get in to your analytics and see on what dates your website receives a major dip in rankings and compare it with the algo updates… if you see the similarities in dates you probably are a victim of it.
You can also check your Google webmaster tool to see if you receive any manual action penalty in GWT.
If you are sure this is a penguin attack and not panda or any other update then it is most probably because of the links that point back to your site. Here are some of the ideas that you should consider as important.
- Audit your website links and see which of them harmful links are. You can use software like Link Risk and Link Detox to see how many harmful links you have in your link profile.
- Remove as many bad links as possible
- Re develop your content (if possible)
- Create new good and high quality links that points back to the site.
- Submit a disavow file
Crate new content and link on continuous basis. This will take a bit of time for your website to start receiving that organic traffic back but continuous effort will take you to that point again.
Hope this helps!
-
Thanks, Searchbuzz!!!
That is interesting!!
We have focused updating the user interface and have done so about 6 times this year. As a result we have reduced the amount of new content (blog posts, updates of static pages).
So if I now focus on upgrading and adding content, this should result in a bounce up??
Thanks,
Alan -
Hi SilverDoor:
Thanks for your feedback!!
In April an SEO firm requested removal of links from 120 low quality domains. Some voluntarily removed links and we filed a disavow with Google for the rest.
We have not looked at internal link structure. In fact the site does not use many text links.
Would it make sense to create text links when relevant from other URLs and point them to home page?
Content on the home page could be improved and I intend to rewrite it.
In your experience, what is the normal percentage of new organic inquiries that the home page should generate? 5%, 10%??? That will at least provide some guideline on what is normal.
Thanks,
Alan
-
Hi Alan,
Sorry to hear that this has happened.
The first thing I suggest you do is some detailed analysis of your homepage.
Here are the things I propose you look into:
- The overall link profile, including internal and external links. Take all relevant action to remove any external links which may be detrimental to your rankings (e.g. comment spamming, directories etc). Also, look at how many internal links point to the homepage. Internal links tell search engines which pages you deem to be the most important.
- Look at the on-page content. Is it unique, high-quality, relevant content which provides value to the user? If not then change it.
- Ensure that all basic SEO elements are implemented and fully optimised. All metadata, H-tags, strong tagging etc.
Obviously, the most important thing to do before you make any changes is to benchmark all current stats (rankings, traffic etc.). That way, you will be able to efficiently measure the impact of any changes you make.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks
SilverDoor
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What to do when your home page an index for a series of pages.
I have created an index stack. My home page is http://www.southernwhitewater.com The home page is the index itself and the 1st page http://www.southernwhitewater.com/nz-adventure-tours-whitewater-river-rafting-hunting-fishing My home page (if your look at it through moz bat for chrome bar} incorporates all the pages in the index. Is this Bad? I would prefer to index each page separately. As per my site index in the footer What is the best way to optimize all these pages individually and still have the customers arrive at the top to a picture. rel= canonical? Any help would be great!! http://www.southernwhitewater.com
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | VelocityWebsites0 -
My organic traffic has died!! Why?
Hi there, I have recently updated this website, as in new design, new URL structure, the works. The old site before I introduced the new site was doing well, as in up and down around 2 000 visitors a day. The site sort of started to go a bit down the slightest bit just before we launched the new site on the same domain but nothing of any concern. We 301ed all the old URLs to their corresponding URL structure as to keep most of the link juice from the old site, however with the new site going live the begining of this month June 2014, till now the site has dropped off to just 200 per day. I have been searching high and low for an answer and have been comming up blank. Why could this have happened, what did I do incorrectly? www.zulu.org.za
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ProsperoDigital0 -
Better UX or more Dedicated Pages (and page views)?
Hi, I'm building a new e-commerce site and I'm conflicting about what to do in my category pages. If we take for example a computer store.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeytzNet
I have a category of laptops and inside there are filters by brand (Samsung, HP, etc.). I have two options - either having the brand choice open a new dedicated page -
i.e. Samsung-Laptops.aspx or simply do a JQuery filter which gives a better and faster user experience (immediate, animated and with no refresh). **Which should I use? (or does it depend on the keyword it might target)? **
Samsung laptops / dell laptops / hp laptops - are a great keyword on there own! By the way, splitting Laptops.aspx to many sub category physical pages might also help by providing the site with many actual pages dealing with laptops altogether.0 -
I have removed over 2000+ pages but Google still says i have 3000+ pages indexed
Good Afternoon, I run a office equipment website called top4office.co.uk. My predecessor decided that he would make an exact copy of the content on our existing site top4office.com and place it on the top4office.co.uk domain which included over 2k of thin pages. Since coming in i have hired a copywriter who has rewritten all the important content and I have removed over 2k pages of thin pages. I have set up 301's and blocked the thin pages using robots.txt and then used Google's removal tool to remove the pages from the index which was successfully done. But, although they were removed and can now longer be found in Google, when i use site:top4office.co.uk i still have over 3k of indexed pages (Originally i had 3700). Does anyone have any ideas why this is happening and more importantly how i can fix it? Our ranking on this site is woeful in comparison to what it was in 2011. I have a deadline and was wondering how quickly, in your opinion, do you think all these changes will impact my SERPs rankings? Look forward to your responses!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | apogeecorp0 -
Any value to shoehorning less applicable rich snippets into a page?
I've been wondering something about rich snippets for a while. I can plainly see how rich snippets and micro-data stuff can be super helpful for pages that feature things like event schedules, recipes, specific products with reviews, and articles written by influential authors. But is it worth trying to force micro-data into pages that don't readily lend themselves to the established rich snippet archetypes? For example, say I was making a website for a carpet cleaning service. The company provides a service, rather than selling a tangible product, so there aren't individual items of which to tag pictures and reviews. The company doesn't hold any kind of events, so the scheduling stuff doesn't apply. The company doesn't necessarily present itself with any one person as the "face of the company", so there isn't anyone to tag as the "author" of the content. And obviously (I hope), people should not be eating/drinking carpet detergents, so recipes wouldn't work. Given these restrictions, is it of any value to use any of the more generic micro-data structures like "thing" (http://schema.org/Thing) or "intangible" (http://schema.org/Intangible) to mark up stuff like "this is a picture of a carpet that we cleaned, but you can't actually buy from us"? Or are the rich snippets more of an "if your content fits with one of Google's promoted use cases, that's great, but otherwise don't bother" situations? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BrianAlpert780 -
Duplicate WordPress Home Page Issue
I have an issue where I've created a site, (www.tntperformance805.com), using WordPress as a CMS. I enabled the option to use a static page as the home page, and created that page as /home. Well, now the issue that exists is that Google is indexing both www.tntperformance805.com, and www.tntperformance805.com/home/. I've already setup a 301 redirect, pointing /home/ to the main domain, and even have rel=canonical set up automatically, pointing every page to the www version of that particular page. However, Google Webmaster Tools is still reporting the pages as having duplicate page titles and descriptions. I've even had the page removed from Google's cache and index. I'm assuming Google is not considering the 301 redirect, even though it's setup properly. Should I add rel="canonical" href="http://www.tntperformance805.com" /> to the body of the /home/ post, to ensure that it is giving credit to the main domain? I am assuming the page is only redirecting to , as that's the www version, but I thought the 301 redirect would enforce that the search engines should give all credit to the main domain. Thanks in advance for the help everyone. I look forward to some insightful feedback. Best Regards, Matt Dimock
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | National-Positions0 -
Landing page indexed and ranking in less then 24 hours
Hi, I got a landing page which went up last night about 11pm. Its been indexed and ranked since then. Its a EMD and has about 600 words of unqiue content. It currently sits on page 9 for what I would say is a non competitive term (the top result is not an EMD and has 10 backlinks from the same site, which has no PR). Now my question is this: Would you say that page 9 is the given position Google thinks this website should sit at? Or because its so new could I very much expect some more movement? Basically up the rankings? Cheers
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | activitysuper0 -
Google replacing subpages in index with home page?
Hi! I run a backlink building company. Recently, we had a customer who had us build targeted backlinks to certain subpages on his site. Then something really bizarre happened...all of a sudden, their subpages that were indexed in Google (the ones we were building links to) disappeared from the index, to be replaced with their home page. They haven't lost their rank, per se--it's just now their home page instead of their subpages. At this point, we are tracking literally thousands of keywords for our link building customers, and we've never run into this issue before. Have you ever run into it? If so, what's the best way to handle it from an SEO company perspective? They have a sitemap.xml and their GWT account reports no crawl errors, so it doesn't seem to be a site issue.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ownlocal0