How to use robots.txt to block areas on page?
-
Hi,
Across the categories/product pages on out site there are archives/shipping info section and the texts are always the same. Would this be treated as duplicated content and harmful for seo?
How can I alter robots.txt to tell google not to crawl those particular text
Thanks for any advice!
-
Thanks for the info above. I think I'll find out if I can cut the text and try to put popup link.
-
Hi Laura
I have not used lazy loading except with images, however I did some reading around and it might be a solution. There is a large section in Google Webmasters that talks about how to make AJAX readable by a crawler/bot so obviously it is not normally readable (Google Webmaster on AJAX crawling).
The other option is to provide a summary on the product page for shipping info and link to a larger shipping info page (as suggested earlier) and get it to open on a new page/tab. At least this keeps the product page open too.
(Note good UX practice recommends you tell the user they will open a new page if they click on the link - this could be as simple as using the anchor text: "More Detailed Shipping Information (opens new page)".
cheers
Neil
-
Here is a tip that I use for my clients and I would recommend. Most CMS / Ecommerce platforms allow for you to put a category description in the page. But, what they do is when the page paginates is they use the same category description and just different products on the page (some use a querystring on the url, others use a shebang, others use other things).
What I recommend to my clients to escape any thin content issues is to point the canonical url of all of the paginated pages back to the 1st category page. At the same time I will add a noindex, follow tag to the header of the paginated pages. This is counter to what a lot of people do I think, but the reason I do it is because of thin content. Also you don't want your page 3 results cannibalizing your main category landing page results. Since no CMS that I know of lets you specify different category descriptions for each pagination of a category it seems like the only real choice. It also makes it where you do not really need to add rel=next and rel=previous to the paginated pages too.
-
Thanks, the info above is quite detailed.
We are not a shipping company those text are just to ensure visitors accordingly. The shipping info is quite long as we want to prompt as mush as we could to avoid customer leaving current page to search.
-
Hi Laura
I am not sure that you can use robots.txt to prevent a search engine bot from crawling a part of a page. Robots.txt is usually used to exclude a whole page.
The effect of the duplicate content on your search engine optimisation depends in part on how extensive is the duplication. In many cases it seems that Google won't penalise the duplicate content (it understands that some content will of necessity be duplicated) - see this video by Matt Cutts from Google.
Duplicate Content is Small (Short Paragraph)
From your question it sounds like you are talking about part of page and it sounds like a relatively small part - I assume you are not a shipping company so the shipping info would be a small part of the page.
In which case it may not affect your search engine optimisation at all (assuming you are not trying to rank for the shipping info).
As long as the content on the rest of the page is unique or different from other pages on the site.
Duplicate Content is Large (but not a page)
If the shipping info is substantial (say a couple of paragraphs or half the content on the page) then Google suggests you create a separate page with the substantial info on it and use a brief summary on other pages with a link to the separate page:
- Minimize boilerplate repetition: For instance, instead of including lengthy copyright text on the bottom of every page, include a very brief summary and then link to a page with more details. In addition, you can use the Parameter Handling tool to specify how you would like Google to treat URL parameters.
(from Google Webmaster: Duplicate Content)
Duplicated Pages
Much of the discussion about duplicated content is more about whole pages of duplicated content. The risk with these pages are that search engines may not know which to rank (or more to the point rank the one you don't want to rank). This is where you might use a rel=canonical tag or a 301 redirect to direct or hint to the search engine which page to use.
Moz has a good article on Duplicate Content.
All the best
Neil
-
Hiya,
First off the main answer is here - http://moz.com/learn/seo/robotstxt
an alternative solution might be use of the canonical tag meaning you're getting all the link juice rather than letting it fall off the radar. I wouldn't be overly worried about duplicate content its not a big bad wolf that will annihilate your website.
Best idea if you're worried about duplicate content is the canonical tag it has the benefit of keeping link juice where as the robots tends to mean you loose some link juice. One thing to remember those is the canonical tag means the pages will not be indexed (same as robots tag in the end) so if they are ranking (or getting page views) something to remember.
hope that helps.
Good luck.
-
Google smart enough to recognize what it is, it won't get you penalized for duplicate content.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Website URL, Robots.txt and Google Search Console (www. vs non www.)
Hi MOZ Community,
Technical SEO | | Badiuzz
I would like to request your kind assistance on domain URLs - www. VS non www. Recently, my team have moved to a new website where a 301 Redirection has been done. Original URL : https://www.example.com.my/ (with www.) New URL : https://example.com.my/ (without www.) Our current robots.txt sitemap : https://www.example.com.my/sitemap.xml (with www.)
Our Google Search Console property : https://www.example.com.my/ (with www.) Question:
1. How/Should I standardize these so that Google crawler can effectively crawl my website?
2. Do I have to change back my website URLs to (with www.) or I just need to update my robots.txt?
3. How can I update my Google Search Console property to reflect accordingly (without www.), because I cannot see the options in the dashboard.
4. Is there any to dos such as Canonicalization needed, or should I wait for Google to automatically detect and change it, especially in GSC property? Really appreciate your kind assistance. Thank you,
Badiuzz0 -
Over 40+ pages have been removed from the indexed and this page has been selected as the google preferred canonical.
Over 40+ pages have been removed from the indexed and this page has been selected as the google preferred canonical. https://studyplaces.com/about-us/ The pages affected by this include: https://studyplaces.com/50-best-college-party-songs-of-all-time-and-why-we-love-them/ https://studyplaces.com/15-best-minors-for-business-majors/ As you can see the content on these pages is totally unrelated to the content on the about-us page. Any ideas why this is happening and how to resolve.
Technical SEO | | pnoddy0 -
Purchased domain with links - redirect page by page or entire domain?
Hi, I purchased an old domain with a lot of links that I'm redirecting to my site. I want all of their links to redirect to the same page on my site so I can approach this two different ways: Entire site
Technical SEO | | ninel_P
1.) RedirectMatch 301 ^(.*)$ http://www.xyz.com or Page by page
2). Redirect 301 /retiredpage.html http://www.xyz.com/newpage.html Is there a better option I should go with in regards to SEO effectiveness? Thanks in advance!0 -
Home Page Ranking Instead of Service Pages
Hi everyone! I've noticed that many of our clients have pages addressing specific queries related to specific services on their websites, but that the Home Page is increasingly showing as the "ranking" page. For example, a plastic surgeon we work with has a page specifically talking about his breast augmentation procedure for Miami, FL but instead of THAT page showing in the search results, Google is using his home page. Noticing this across the board. Any insights? Should we still be optimizing these specific service pages? Should I be spending time trying to make sure Google ranks the page specifically addressing that query because it SHOULD perform better? Thanks for the help. Confused SEO :/, Ricky Shockley
Technical SEO | | RickyShockley0 -
Robots.txt vs. meta noindex, follow
Hi guys, I wander what your opinion is concerning exclution via the robots.txt file.
Technical SEO | | AdenaSEO
Do you advise to keep using this? For example: User-agent: *
Disallow: /sale/*
Disallow: /cart/*
Disallow: /search/
Disallow: /account/
Disallow: /wishlist/* Or do you prefer using the meta tag 'noindex, follow' instead?
I keep hearing different suggestions.
I'm just curious what your opinion / suggestion is. Regards,
Tom Vledder0 -
What does it mean by 'blocked by Meta Robot'? How do I fix this?
When i get my crawl diagnostics, I am getting a blocked by Meta Robot, which means that my page is not being indexed in the search engines... obviously this is a major issue for organic traffic!!! What does it actually mean, and how can i fix it?
Technical SEO | | rolls1230 -
Robots.txt question
What is this robots.txt telling the search engines? User-agent: * Disallow: /stats/
Technical SEO | | DenverKelly0 -
Is it ok to just use the end of the url when using a Rel Cononical Link?
Hi, I am working with an account and the previous SEO used a Rel Canonical link that just uses the end of the url. Instead of the full url When I look it up on the web I see most people are using the full url. Is that the proper way to do it or does is suffice to just use the end of the url? Wanted to check before I take the time to change them all. -Kent
Technical SEO | | KentH0