Multiple Countries, Same Language: Receiving Duplicate Page & Content Errors
-
Hello!
I have a site that serves three English-speaking countries, and is using subfolders for each country version:
- United Kingdom: https://site.com/uk/
- Canada: https://site.com/ca/
- United States & other English-speaking countries: https://site.com/en/
The site displayed is dependent on where the user is located, and users can also change the country version by using a drop-down flag navigation element in the navigation bar. If a user switches versions using the flag, the first URL of the new language version includes a language parameter in the URL, like:
In the Moz crawl diagnostics report, this site is getting dinged for lots of duplicate content because the crawler is finding both versions of each country's site, with and without the language parameter.
However, the site has rel="canonical" tags set up on both URL versions and none of the URLs containing the "?language=" parameter are getting indexed.
So...my questions:
1. Are the Duplicate Title and Content errors found by the Moz crawl diagnostic really an issue?
2. If they are, how can I best clean this up?
Additional notes: the site currently has no sitemaps (XML or HTML), and is not yet using the hreflang tag. I intend to create sitemaps for each country version, like:
- .com/en/sitemap.xml
- .com/ca/sitemap.xml
- .com/uk/sitemap.xml
I thought about putting a 'nofollow' tag on the flag navigation element, but since no sitemaps are in place I didn't want to accidentally cut off crawler access to alternate versions.
Thanks for your help!
-
Yep, given your resource constraints, I'd focus on translations for now. If you ever get to a point that there is something bigger than price differentiating your content, then you can think about geo-targeting. You will need the resources to differentiate the content though.
Right now, my recommendation is to drop the country specific content and just offer English for now. Your content can rank for any English speaking search, regardless of country. However, if the terms people use in the US, UK and Canada differ that much, you can "translate" the content (en-us, en-gb, en-au) and use the HREFLANG tag.
For price changes, that's tricker, but do you offer the price in search results via schema? Does it show up? If not, then you can use cookies to set the prices dependent on the country the person chooses (try not to use IP address, and if you do, make people confirm the setting).
For now, focus your time and efforts getting the flow right for the user. Only worry about HREFLANG if your English content needs to be differentiated for term usage. Then focus your efforts on getting those upcoming translations right. When that is ready, then really use HREFLANG.
Hope that helps!
-
Hi Kate,
Nifty quiz and flowchart! Thanks for sharing it. All the countries targeted are English-speaking, though further expansion to non-English speaking countries is planned for 2015. Here are the answers to the questions:
1. Does your business/product/content change in different countries?
A: Not really. 90% of the products are available in all three countries, and only one country is currently lacking the remaining 10%, and it will start selling those products there in 2015.
2. Would it make sense to an international visitor to see different site content? (ex. currency, localization, etc.)
A: Currency - yes. Otherwise, not really.
3. Do you have the resources to differentiate the content?
A: Not currently. This is a set of branded products, and the product descriptions use extensive "on-brand" language.
4. Are there multiple official languages for any of these countries?
A: Yes, Canada's official languages are English and French. There is no French version currently available.
5. Do you plan on offering the site content in all official languages?
A: Next six months - no. Late 2015 - maybe.
Going through the quiz, if I answer:
1. No, 2. Yes, 3. No
This is the recommendation:
Your International Strategy is:
Translate Only
- Don’t machine translate, while manual translation is costly, it’s the best for your goals.
- Put your HREFLANG in XML sitemaps.
- Use the Language Meta tag for Bing translation targeting.
- Don’t use a ccTLD. That is for Geo-Targeting only.
Aside from the manual translation portion, do you think #2 and #3 are still the best solutions for this situation?
Thanks for your help!
-
Hi!
This is a tough one because I can't tell if you mean to be geo-targeting or translate. It's not a one or the other thing, but it usually is when you are just targeting english speaking countries. Can you do me a favor and go to http://www.katemorris.com/issg/ and go through the questions there? Let me know what the "answer" is for your situation and I'll help you get to the right solution.
But in short, yes, the duplicate content is a real issue with or without the lang parameter.
Let me know!
-
Oh this is a tough one. The problem is that no matter the tags and language, the content is the same. It is reflecting duplicate content because it is duplicate content. Duplicate content within your site is serious, especially if you are trying to target keywords on those pages.
The hreflang tags should help you be able to display languages without using so many duplicate pages. I don't have much experience with that tag, but my advice would be to look into it further to help with your duplicate content issue. No following the duplicate pages will ultimately effect their rankings, so that probably isn't the best thing to do.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Canonical tag on webstore products to avoid Duplicate Page Content ?
Hi, I would like to have an opinion on what how we are planning to solve the issue with Duplicate Page Contents that MOZ PRO is showing us. MOZ Pro is showing us a lot of pages with duplicate content as High Priority Issue. Mainly the problem is with products which have very few differences between them, e.g. pink bike model X and red bike model X. So we decided to implement a canonical tag on these products, and the pink bike model X will now have a canonical pointing to the red bike model X. So hopefully we will be ranking higher with our red bike model X and our pink bike model X will disapear from the index. Am I right ? Is it a good practice, since we will loose long tails indexes? I check each canonical in the Search Console, and we have extremely few searched for "pink bike model X" most of searches are "bike model X". Thank you in advance for your opinion. Isabelle
Moz Pro | | isabelledylag0 -
Duplicate content - Product Categories
Dears, I've use "Site Crawl" tool to find any SEO warnings, and I found 991 duplicated content. The problem is that the pages are not duplicated its all products category pages, please check this exmaple: This page: https://www.jobedu.com/en/shop/category/prints/Postcards/na/all-colors/all-size and this page: https://www.jobedu.com/en/shop/category/Accessories/keychain/na/all-colors/all-size It said its duplicated, and it's 991 pages! How to fix this this? what I can do?
Moz Pro | | jobedu0 -
Are AMP pages affecting mobile search visibility?
Hello fellow Mozzers. I've recently seen a fairly hefty drop in search visibility on Google mobile, from 12.8% to 4.1%. Desktop visibility is unaffected. The same search visibility drop is echoed in SEMRush. However, Google Analytics shows that our site traffic from mobile hasn't changed. The only thing I can think of is that we recently launched AMP pages. I know Google sometimes caches AMPs so they’re served off google domains. Could that mean that the cached version of the page is ranking rather than our own? That would explain the drop in visibility but stable traffic I think?! What other explanation could it be? Many thanks in advance, Kit
Moz Pro | | KitSmith0 -
Duplicate title on Crawl
Ok, this should hopefully be a simple one. Not sure if this is a Moz crawl issue of redirect issue. Moz is reporting duplicate title for www.site.co.uk , site.co.uk and www.site.co.uk/home.aspx is this a canonical change or a moz setting I need to get this number lower.
Moz Pro | | smartcow0 -
On-page grader question
Hi there, Getting to know the Pro tools and can't find an answer to this. Can someone explain for me please? Using on page grader, I found a couple pages with an F. I scrolled downWTO where it shows the keyword phrases and under each, the URL. Clicking on the first keyword "Building site alarms"it tells me off essentially for not optimising the page for that term. The URL is "construction site security systems" which are different to building site alarms which also have their own page. I don't understand why is Moz associating this keyword with this page? I certainly haven't told it to. Please he
Moz Pro | | DaddySmurf0 -
Canonical URLs and Duplicate Page Content
My website (doctor directory) is getting a lot of duplicate page content & duplicate page title warnings from SEOmoz. The pages that are getting the warnings are doctors profiles which can be accessed at three different URLs. Problem is this should be handled by the canonical tag on the pages. So example below, all three open the same page: https://www.arzttermine.de/arzt/dr-sara-danesh/ https://www.arzttermine.de/arzt/dr-sara-danesh/gkv https://www.arzttermine.de/arzt/dr-sara-danesh/pkv Here's our canonical tag (on line 34): rel="canonical" href="http://www.arzttermine.de/arzt/dr-sara-danesh" /> So why is SEO moz crawling the page? We are getting hundreds of errors from this - and yet Google doesn't have any of the duplicate URLs indexed...
Moz Pro | | thomashillard0 -
On Page Optimization Reports - Huh?
I've been working hard to use this EXCELLENT tool for optimize some of what I consider my most important pages . . . But the automatic tool that pulls pages and grades them (the "summary" of the "on page" report) . . . I don't get it. It only graded three of my pages, and I don't understand how it chose what keywords to grade it for? I'm just very confused. I don't understand how it chose the pages to grade, not the words it chose to grade it against. 😞
Moz Pro | | damon12120