Link Profile - What is Good or Bad?
-
How can I tell (using Moz tools) which links are okay or not? Looking at them, some are clearly just for rank, but are they worth my effort in removing them? And, if I remove a bunch of links suddenly, will Google penalize me? And how do I know if my link profile is to blame?
My site was ranking pretty well in June and has steadily fallen around 4-5 spots across all of my keywords. Some of my competitors without as good of DA, PA and links are outranking me.
-
Thank you for sharing your resources with the community!
-
Never used the siteexplorer tool, but it probably provides very similar data. The Moz toolbar has worked fine for me.
-
This is very helpful! Thank you!
Also, I didn't know about the Moz tool bar, so I need to get that too! I've been using the siteexplorer tool.
-
I took a look at the links you posted. I'm not sure of what your business is, so I can't comment on relevance.
Some of these links hopefully popped up naturally, though if you had a previous SEO firm doing work, some of them might have come via that channel.
http://www.mobileresources.net/mobi/Night_Shark_Fishing_Florida/ is definitely a directory.
I used the Moz bar to show me it has a Page Authority of 1, and a domain authority of 25, so I would email the webmaster and ask them to "nofollow" the link or remove it, if not relevant to your business. Because of the low ranking, if it were my website, I wouldn't worry about it hurting my rankings by having it removed/nofollow.
On http://drama.academia.edu/LelaRanson I would leave this one. It has high DA value of 85 and at least on the surface looks like good content.
http://jeremyrymill.tumblr.com/post/93825362281/the-canaveral-circus
I personally wouldn't worry about stuff on Tumblr, as many social networks automatically nofollow all tags. Here you can see some of the links on the page are nofollow.
The post <a <span="" class="html-attribute-name">rel</a><a <span="" class="html-attribute-name">="nofollow" href="</a>http://ift.tt/1v4ezED">The Canaveral Circus appeared first on <a <span="" class="html-attribute-name">rel</a><a <span="" class="html-attribute-name">="nofollow" href="</a>http://ift.tt/1oFpDCf">Florida Fishing Stories.
Since you don't have a penalty, I honestly wouldn't spend lots of time getting rid of bad links as long as you believe no one on your end sought them out to begin with, like a former SEO. Focus more on continuing to build relevant links and content locally people want to link to. Easier said than done I know. But theoretically if Google hasn't taken a manual action of any sort out on your website, your issue lies with competitors simply optimizing more effectively, not "bad links."
-
There are so many links that I never requested. They are weird search type directory websites, I never requested. Here is an example.
http://www.mobileresources.net/mobi/Night_Shark_Fishing_Florida/
There are also some that I'm pretty sure my previous SEO put up like this one:
http://drama.academia.edu/LelaRanson
And this looks like scraped or reblogged content... how in the world do I control this? Or do I want it?
http://jeremyrymill.tumblr.com/post/93825362281/the-canaveral-circus
-
Very thoughtful response, thank you I will dig through all of this!
-
Hello CalicoKitty,
I've been dealing with something somewhat similar for my website (slight drop in rankings, but in my case it includes a targeted penalty, not sitewide thank goodness!) If I were you I'd definitely look at your backlinks. I've disavowed and asked for a bunch of mine removed.
Since you don't have a penalty but are losing some rankings, here are some references that have helped me decide which links are worth keeping (along with everything else that goes along with trying to get rid of a penalty).
The quick and dirty rule of thumb I use (in addition to using the Moz Bar to also gauge the value of a link) is do I think this website is genuinely built for real people who might find what I'm talking about or selling useful. If it's on the fence, I generally leave it (especially since you don't have a current penalty) but if you know in your gut it doesn't seem helpful at all, and is built more for the search engines and looks like a junk page, then you're probably looking at a bad link.Identifying Link Penalties, 2012: http://moz.com/blog/identifying-link-penalties-in-2012He does a nice job of comparing a good link profile with one that has a lot of bad links. (Essentially the same anchor text.)You can find a lot of good articles on the subject by Mozer Marie Hayne. She also wrote an excellent book on the topic available here. http://www.unnaturallinksrecovery.com. It walks you through every kind of link you might run across. The ebook is about $100 though, so I personally wouldn't buy it if I don't have a penalty on my website. That said, I bought it and I'm not sure how I would have ever worked through my penalty without her step-by-step assistance in the book.http://moz.com/community/users/308135In depth look at quality guidelines.http://moz.com/ugc/what-is-an-unnatural-link-an-in-depth-look-at-the-google-quality-guidelinesMy answered question on which links to remove, which Marie weighed in on:http://moz.com/community/q/manual-action-when-requesting-links-be-removed-how-important-to-google-is-the-address-you-re-sending-the-requests-from#reply_256531How to conduct a link audit:http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2207168/How-to-Conduct-a-Link-Audithttp://searchenginewatch.com/article/2330944/7-Things-You-May-Not-Know-About-Googles-Disavow-Tool - Mariehttp://moz.com/community/q/is-this-negative-seo-should-i-disavow-these-links
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7WK3s693oI&list=UU3jmlL2rHbipq_2tDd5zDRA
-
Your metrics looks great! - and it seems to me like that's not the problem.
Its hard to say what the reason might be for the drop in rankings without future knowledge about the problem.
What about Google business page? Does your competitors have one? and are the located in more then one place? seems wierd that your local results are going up and the rest of them are dropping in pos. - I would definitely look into that as well.
When you say that some of your links looks like they are "clearly just for ranking" that sets of an alarm imo. If I was you I would take a closer look at your link profile and really take into consideration what might help the site in the future and what might harm the site.
If you have great content and you work on the trust - I am sure you will be reward and be back on the top in no time.
-
To be honest, I have only concentrated on my on-page optimization since about this time last year. Working on creating content that would be naturally shared. We post to FB, Google+, Pinterest, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and a blog. I've worked on building our FB following and G+. We get a lot of +1s now. The only thing I have NOT done lately is anything with links. It seems I was hit by the latest Google update because that is when the majority of drop happened. It happened between 10/3 and 10/28. I lost 30 positions across my tracked keywords. Since then I have lost 2 more positions, but not gained any. Any ideas what might have happened in that update?
My site has way more content than my competitors... not in a spammy way, but in a useful way. I look at my competitors pages by viewing the source and they don't even look like they have done any on-site optimization. Their sites haven't changed much in the last few years. I'm not sure if they pay for SEO or not.
I don't have a manual penalty, I've checked.
My average pages per visit is 6 and the average time is 3 min. Average bounce rate is 25%. Average CTR is 9%. Those metrics don't look too shabby to me... although, I guess I don't know what my competitors metrics are.
I do use Google Adwords and that has been my saving grace... my ad still appears in position 1-2.
Oh, and my local search has improved some... it didn't drop at all.
-
One way to find out if a link is "good" or "bad" is to make a search for the site on google. If the Website is not listed in the top that would be a clear sign that this place is not the right one to get a link from (old method).
About "effort in removing them" If the link potentially can hurt you in the long run it should be worth your time to remove the link
Google will not penalize you for doing "the right thing". In reality your are doing the work they have been doing for ages. By removing the links you are practically telling google "I don't want those links to count for anything"
About rankings keep in mind that factors like "time on site", "bouncerate", CTR and lots of other stuff comes into account.
If I was you I would take a step back, have a look at the on page optimization and usability of the pages that you want to rank well, and then look at your competitors and see what they are doing different or better. Do they have more rich data? more deeplink into the page?
-
Google will not penalize you for removing links, although your rankings may drop if you remove links that are helping you rank.
But keep in mind that links that are helping you rank today, could end up causing a penalty tomorrow. If your links are spammy, Google will eventually catch up, it's just a question of when. To be safe, you should remove blatantly spammy links.
Keep in mind that there are hundreds of ranking signals. Just because Moz is reporting that your PA/DA is better than the competition does't mean you _should _be outranking them.
Some traits of bad links:
- The link's anchor text exactly matches your target keywords (eg. "Miami Auto Repair Shop")
- The link is on a website that is unrelated to yours and likely has little traffic/readership
- You paid to have the link placed
- You "submitted" an article to get the link posted
- You control the site that the link is on
- The link is in a link farm/directory (a site/page with a bunch of links that are intended only to impact SEO)
Hope this helps! I'm happy to give you my input on specific examples if you have them.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Disavowing links and disavow tool
Hello, I have had a look on webmaster tools and Moz and can see lots of bad links on Moz only. I am thinking whether to disavow them and was wondering if you could you let me know if it is possible to have a look at your current disavow file? I do not currently know what links were included the previous time. Is there a way to check if there are any links in the file at all? I thought I would raise this question as there is a lot of negative info about the disavow tool.
Moz Pro | | SEM_at_Lees0 -
Links being reported in Webmaster Tools
Hi Are the Total Links To Your Site, as reported in GWT, purely external inbound links ? Since these links are usually, as far as i can tell, much higher in number than any other link reporting tool and hence, i presume, more accurate, why don't services such as Moz etc include this in reporting ? I know its just a total number and link quality is whats important not quantity, but i would have thought interesting to show in reporting in conjunction with link quality info such as is already reported. Since most backlink reporting tools do show a total but always much much lower than that reported in gwt (i think) All Best Dan
Moz Pro | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Can relative links PLUS multiple hompage versions spell disaster?
I still see internal links to default.asp from every other .asp page even though I have updated most of the relative /default.asp links to www.site.com since I 301 redirected it. I am seeing this in Open Site Explorer for one. (I'm sure my lack of understanding has to do with not quite getting the purpose of default.asp.) Anyways, I am wondering if all the relative links throughout the site pointing to other .asp pages need to be updated to absolute links (so www.site.com/page.asp instead of /page.asp) for me to avoid this problem. Does one even have anything to do with the other?
Moz Pro | | kimmiedawn0 -
Why are inbound links not showing?
I run the site http://www.eurocheapo.com and am finding that many inbound links are not showing up in OSE and on the toolbar. For example, check out this hotel review: http://www.eurocheapo.com/paris/hotel/hotel-esmeralda.html In OSE it shows only 2 links (from 1 domain), which is crazy. It has dozens of inbound links from many different domains (links:http://www.eurocheapo.com/paris/hotel/hotel-esmeralda.html). I notice this all over my site. Pages that we link between are also showing no internal links -- which is easy to disprove. Was there a problem with this crawl? Or is the problem in our code? Many thanks for your help, Tom
Moz Pro | | TomNYC0 -
Re: Competitive Link Comparison
In Competitive Link Comparison Top 5 contenders... why would the landing page have an HTTP Status showing as Blocked by robots.txt when it is not blocked within the robots.txt file and no files are shown as blocked in Google's webmaster tools. Sorr if I've ticked the incorrect topic categories
Moz Pro | | Hornblower0 -
Is anybody else having great difficulty in finding good link opportunities on Open Site Explorer?
I've been using OSE for a while now, and I'm struggling to see any value in it. When I search my competitors link profiles, I find just hundreds and hundreds of crappy reciprocal links, splogs or the like. I have to go through days and days (thousands of links) before I find anything worth using. Is anybody having this sort of problem? Thanks
Moz Pro | | kevinmorley0 -
Should I worry about limiting link count on product listing/category pages?
I've noticed that my link count is high (165ish for some) on my category listing pages. I've been scouring my page to see if there's any way that I can reduce the link count without restricting functionality to the end user. Each product listing on the category page has 5 links currently: A link to the product in the title A link to the product from the image An 'add to compare' link An 'add to cart' link An 'add to wishlist' link When the customer chooses to show 30 products per page, the link tally goes off the scale. So I have two questions: Firstly - is it appropriate to keep link count down in this scenario? To elaborate - is it just inevitable that product listing pages will have lots of links, and should I just assume that Google knows this and forget about these warnings. Secondly - There are two links to the same page (the title and image links to the product page). Does SEOmoz include this in the link count, and more importantly, will Google take heed of these when deciding whether the page is too link-heavy?
Moz Pro | | SimonGreer0 -
What is the best way to analyze all of the outgoing links from a website to determine which links are not beneficial?
I've recently been tasked with the SEO on an old site that was ranking somewhere on page two for desirable keyword phrases. The site was taken completely offline for a few months and started ranking on page one for the same desirable keyword phrases. The site has a lot of link partners and I think that some of the links from the site are going to undesirable pages and I'm looking for the best way to get rid of the links that are hurting the sites rankings.
Moz Pro | | kerrick-955310