Duplicate pages or note? Variations just due to language changes?
-
I have some pages marked as duplicates, so I want to do what I can to solve the issues concerned.
One issue concerns duplicates where the page content is indeed the same except for the language that the content is offered in.
The URL for example of the documentation page of the site, in English is as follows:
http://www.domain.com/support/documentationWe then have the same content in German, French, Russian using the following URLs.
http://www.domain.com/de/support/documentation
http://www.domain.com/fr/support/documentation
http://www.domain.com/ru/support/documentationEach page has links to PDFs which are all in fact in English so the links to the docs are the same. Moz is flagging up all these pages as being duplicate content (which it is when translated back into English, but is not if you just consider that they are using completely different languages!)
Has anyone any thoughts on how to solve this? Or is this something not to worry about / disregard?
Many thanks
Simon
-
Ryan - thank you too for taking the time to respond.
Had a quick peek at the blog you noted - going to go back and read it v-e-r-y slowly!
Ditto, many thanks re the webconfs link - plenty of fun tools to try out there. Am sure it will all deepen my learning / confusion!Thanks again!
-
Don - thank you so much for responding
I think you may well have identified the issue too! The documentation page is the same in each case - has a table with e.g. 4 columns and 20 or so rows - and I guess much of the structural content of the pages, irrespective of the linguistic variations of the text shown on screen, is the same.
Will look closer at this.
Assuming this is the case - the next logical questions would be: Does it matter in terms of SEO? Or is it a kind of 'false positive' which can be noted but ignored? What could I do about it anyway? I guess the answer is implied in your answer above: change the template for each language?
Allied to this, is the fact that since the site is 'growing' with multiple language versions, the problem seen with this sample page will potentially be replicated all over the site. Again, the big question is about the effect on SEO. Web pages are scoring well for brand terms and other important words, and while there are new phrases and words to focus on, I am unsure whether correcting these is to prevent strict penalties or simply to make already-decent rankings as good as they can be.
Thanks in advance for any further points you care to make.
-
Hi Simon. Don has given you some good guidance. Here's a recent Moz Dev Blog post on the subject: https://moz.com/devblog/near-duplicate-detection/. Note their images explaining much of what Don described. Two pages having enough shared phrases (because of the header, footer, nav, etc) can trigger the duplicate warning. While the latter part of the dev blog post certainly gets technical, it should explain why you might be getting duplicate content warnings even further if that's your bent.
Since each tool is a bit different you can also check your pages with other tools, such as: http://www.webconfs.com. Cheers!
-
Hi Simon,
Okay so crawlers can crawl PDF's unless they are encrypted / encoded. However since they link to the PDF that shouldn't be the issue.Ref: googleblog
How much content are on these pages? I ask because when there is thin content you may find that the template itself is causing the duplication problem, unless of course you are using different templates for each language as well.
Take for example a page that reads.
en: The woman eats frozen fruit daily.
de: Die Frau isst gefrorenes Gemüse jegen tag.
es: La mujer come las verduras congeladas diariaNow surround each of those pages with a header content, footer content, right / left column content same images same alt tags and the deviation of content is so small it is not noticed.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Purchased domain with links - redirect page by page or entire domain?
Hi, I purchased an old domain with a lot of links that I'm redirecting to my site. I want all of their links to redirect to the same page on my site so I can approach this two different ways: Entire site
Technical SEO | | ninel_P
1.) RedirectMatch 301 ^(.*)$ http://www.xyz.com or Page by page
2). Redirect 301 /retiredpage.html http://www.xyz.com/newpage.html Is there a better option I should go with in regards to SEO effectiveness? Thanks in advance!0 -
Duplicate Content on a Page Due to Responsive Version
What are the implications if a web designer codes the content of the site twice into the page in order to make the site responsive? I can't add the url I'm afraid but the H1 and the content appear twice in the code in order to produce both a responsive version and a desktop version. This is a Wordpress site. Is Google clever enough to distinguish between the 2 versions and treat them individually? Or will Google really think that the content has been repeated on the same page?
Technical SEO | | Wagada0 -
My blog homepage deindexed, other pages indexing, still traffic not changed.
Hello! Today when I check my blog site search on Google, I can't see my blog home page. Though all my posts and pages are still on the Google results. Today I published a test post, then it also indexed by the Google less than 3 minutes. Still I can't see any traffic changes. 10th of April (yesterday) when I perform a site search (site:mydomain.com), I saw my site on the Google search result. Today I installed the Ulitmate SEO plug-in and deactivated WordPress SEO plug-in. After a few hours I saw this issue. (I'm not saying this is the issue, I just mentioned it). In addition to that I never used any black hat SEO methods to improve my ranking. my site:- http://goo.gl/6mvQT Any help really appreciate!
Technical SEO | | Godad0 -
If a permanent redirect is supposed to transfer SEO from the old page to the new page, why has my domain authority been impacted?
For example, we redirected our old domain to a new one (leaving no duplicate content on the old domain) and saw a 40% decrease in domain authority. Isn't a permanent redirect supposed to transfer link authority to the place it is redirecting to? Did I do something wrong?
Technical SEO | | BlueLinkERP0 -
Two different page authority ranks for the same page
I happened to notice that trophycentral.com and www.trophycentral.com have two different page ranks even though there is a 301 redirect. Should I be concerned? http://trophycentral.com Page Authority: 47 Domain Authority: 42 http://www.trophycentral.com Page Authority: 51 Domain Authority: 42 Thanks!
Technical SEO | | trophycentraltrophiesandawards0 -
How do I eliminate duplicate url, duplicate title issues using Joomla CMS?
We have a site using Joomla CMS, integrated with Jreviews and Jomsocial. Utilizing ACE SEF to generate Dynamic URL structure. Our issue is that we are recieving multiple instances of duplicate url's and duplicate titles due to the way joomla is working with jreviews for all our 7,000+ business listings. Site is already ranked for many broad/national keywords, concerned that our state and local rankings are limited by these errors. How can we prevent this from happening without re-writing the entire website?
Technical SEO | | mdmcn0 -
Catch 22 on duplicate page titles
Hi all, I'm quite new to the SEO space so I apologise if all the information below isn't technically perfect. I ran the SEOmoz pro tool for the first time a month ago (fantastic tool). It picked up a wealth of errors on our site that we are now working on. the problem: we use dynamic pages to display job listings pulled from our database that have picked up many duplicate page titles and content. For example: _Landing page: _http://www.arm.co.uk/jobs/it-contract-jobs/sec=itcontractjobs _Page 2: _http://www.arm.co.uk/jobs/1/-/-/2/itcontractjobs-/9999/2 _Page 3: _http://www.arm.co.uk/jobs/1/-/-/2/itcontractjobs-/9999/3 Following the results of the Moz tool we have now 'no indexed' and 'no followed' the dynamic pages and the errors have dramatically dropped, great! However, on reflection we generate quite a lot of traffic to individual job's listed on our website. By no following the pages we have restricted passing on any 'juice' to these pages, and by no indexing we may be taking them out of Googles index completely. These dynamic pages and individual job listings do generate a lot of traffic to our website via organic search. We do submit the site index to Google that should index the individual jobs that way. So, the question is (I hope this is making sense), are the gains of reducing errors picked up in the moz tool (to improve the overall site performance) likely to outweigh the traffic generated on these dynamically generated pages by being indexed and followed by Google. Ultimately we would like the static landing pages to retain a stronger page rank. Any guidance is very much appreciated. Best Regards,
Technical SEO | | ARMofficial
Sam.0 -
Canonical tag in preferred and duplicate page
Hi, I have a super spiffy (not) CMS that tends to create some pages at the root level of the site (not where I want it) i.e. www.site.com/page.htm as well as the desired location i.e. www.site.com/category/keyword/page.htm . Now obviously a canonical tag inserted into the URL at the undesired location would be the best option, however the source code is exactly the same for both pages (can’t change this) i.e. if I put the canonical tag that reads www.site.com/category/keyword/page.htm"/> it will appear in the head section of both pages, the desired URL and the non desired URL. Will a canonical tag inserted into the head section of a the preferred URL directing the search engine spiders pretty much to itself cause more grieft than the solution it offers re duplicate content ? Marc
Technical SEO | | NRMA0