Disavowing Links: Over-optimized Anchor Text
-
If a site has been effected by Penguin, and the main issue is over-optimized anchor text. Would the disavow file take care of this?
If there is a no-follow added to the link when Google next crawls the site, wouldn't you still have the optimized anchor text in your profile?
-
No manual action. I have seen some fluctuation in rankings, and I am trying to figure out if it is Penguin related.
Thanks for the help.
-
How do you know the main issue is over-optimized anchor text? Did you get a manual action notification in GWT or is this effect your assumption? This would be an important distinction because you'd get some good info from the GWT team about what happened to your site. Some sites take a temporary hit after new algorithm updates, so if this just happened I'd give it a little time before making drastic changes to your site.
It's unclear whether it's your site that's hosting the links or if other site(s) are linking to yours. Follow Googles guidelines about linking https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/2648487?hl=en and read up on how and why to disavow backlinks here https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/2648487?hl=en. Being honest to yourself is the best policy here, so if you're taking or paying money for these links, you or your associates should use the nofollow attribute according to Google's guidelines. You can learn more about anchor text here on MOZ http://moz.com/learn/seo/anchor-text. It's believed that links with the nofollow attribute won't pass PageRank, so the anchor text of such links won't hurt or help with search engines but may be valuable to your readers. More about how to use the nofollow attribute here https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/96569?hl=en.
Now if you actually got notified of a manual action, then you'll need to submit a reconsideration request in GWT. We don't have enough information here on how Google will deal with your site on the next crawl, but I would recommend a consistent, site-wide approach to SEO rather than just changing a few links you think might be hurting you.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is my website is over optimized for ON page SEO?
The keyword for the page is “locksmith Logan” based in: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Is webpage over used main keyword 'Logan locksmith' and what other areas are for improvement.
Technical SEO | | bondhoward0 -
Navigation links tagged as H3
I'm reviewing a website that has used the H3 tag in the Navigation Menu. I've not seen that before and first thought is it is a dodgy. Tags should relate to content on the page not link to another page. As a result of using H3 in Nav the ratio of content wrapped in Heading tags vs body content is quite high. My recommendation is to remove H3 tag from Nav but having searched Moz and not finding an article to verify that recommendation thought I'd ask the question.
Technical SEO | | NicDale0 -
Too Many On-Page Links on a Blog
I have a question about the number of on-page links on a page and the implications on how we're viewed by search engines. After SEOmoz crawls our website, we consistently get notifications that some of our pages have "Too Many On-Page Links." These are always limited to pages on our blog, and largely a function of our tag cloud (~ 30 links) plus categories (10 links) plus popular posts (5 links). These all display on every blog post in the sidebar. How significant a problem is this? And, if you think it is a significant problem, what would you suggest to remedy the problem? Here's a link to our blog in case it helps: http://wiredimpact.com/blog/ The above page currently is listed as having 138 links. Any advice is much appreciated. Thanks so much. David
Technical SEO | | WiredImpact0 -
Site links show spam
Hi folks, I'm working on a website that runs on WordPress and was not updated by the owner, this has resulted in a malware injection and now when you search the companies name in Google, the site links appear with words like Viagra, et al. I've seen this a number of times, so I went through the code and have removed all the malware. I presume I now have to wait for Google to recrawl the website and update the site links? Is there anything else I should be doing to speed up the process? Thank you 🙂
Technical SEO | | ChristopherM0 -
How does your crawler treat ajax links?
Hello! It looks like the seomoz crawler (and google) follows ajax links. Is this normal behavior? We have implemented the canonical element and that seems to resolve most of the duplicate content issues. Anything else we can do? Example: Krom
Technical SEO | | AJPro0 -
Tracking Links Tool
I think someone may be trying to harm my site by adding spammy links so I want to track the links going to my site on a daily basis. Any tool suggestions? Majestic SEO is great for getting an overall picture of my links, but is not updated daily. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | theLotter0 -
Optimize flash site
Hello, How can we optimize a site like this - http://www.ziba.com.au/ . The whole site is in flash. What are the alternatives ?
Technical SEO | | seoug_20050 -
Should I have a 'more' button for links?
I have a website that has a page for each town. rather than listing all the towns with a link to each, I want to show only the most popular towns and have a 'more' button that shows all of them when you click it. I know that the search engine can always see the full list of links and even though the visitor can't this doesn't go against Google guidelines because there is no deception involved, the more button is quite clear. However, my colleague is concerned that this is 'making life hard' for the search engines and so the pages are less likely to be indexed. I disagree. Is he right to worry about this??
Technical SEO | | mascotmike0
