Question about landing pages
-
I currently have a service based website with landing pages for surrounding towns. For example the keywords targeting and url for the town are "service+town+state". I recently noticed that I am not showing up at all for "service+zip" even though I have the zips included in all the landing pages. I was told if I made more landing pages dedicated to zip I would risk killing the rank on other landing pages.
Would it be advisable to make another totally different website that focuses on just the "service+zip" landing pages. The name of the page would be the same the company obviously but the phone numbers and content would be different along with domain url.
Any advice or suggestions are welcome. Thanks.
-
Hi There! Not quite sure I'm following your thought here. What would you be keeping the NAP off of? I understood that your original idea was to build out separate landing pages for zip codes or build a separate website. I'm recommending against either approach. Having 2 authoritative websites (with the same business name) would potentially be confusing to both humans and bots, and building out landing pages on your original site just for zip codes sounds like it might lead to thin or duplicate content, and could even fall under Google's new doorway pages update.
If you want to optimize for zip codes, my best recommendation is to find an way to work this into your existing site and existing city landing pages (as in my Monterey example). I can't think of any other approach I'd be comfortable recommending.
Hope this helps!
-
thanks for the info guys. I decided to just open another business lol. Happy Easter.
-
If you keep the name address and phone number off the radar then you're also retarding the new websites ability to rank in that new area. When it comes to rankings for geo-targeted services the NAP details are a huge piece of the ranking puzzle. Even a very weak website with a legitimate localised address that has been verified has a much better chance of ranking for those 'area service keywords' than a strong website with no locality credentials.
With regards to keeping the business name the same, I'm quite positive that won't work either. If anything, that will cause inconsistency with your main website's NAP listings, and could potentially hurt the rankings of your real website. Starting a new website also puts at least another 60 days of waiting before you're able to achieve strong solid rankings for that area. Within the next 60 days you could build some brilliant links and perform a ton of on-site optimisation to your current site.
Getting those other service area pages to rank from your real website also has the added bonus of increasing the overall authority of your real website. Yes it's tough to rank those new suburb pages, but it'll be even harder to do it from a new website that isn't even real.
-
would it be safe to keep the nap off the radar and different. The only thing that would be the same is literally the name of the business.
-
Hey There!
I am in complete agreement with Richard that building a new website to optimize for zip codes would be overkill - and could actually lead to ranking issues for your business if your complete or partial NAP is appearing on more than one website.For SABs, including zip codes in optimization can be challenging. You want to avoid ever adding big blocks of zip codes to the site, as Google has explicitly stated in their webmaster guidelines that they consider this to be a spammy practice. How naturally you can talk about zip codes may depend somewhat on the business model. For example, if you do landscaping in Monterey, CA., a quick lookup shows me that you could be working in 4 different zip codes. So, let's say you have a landing page on the site for Monterey. You could write project descriptions (with photos, videos, testimonials, etc.) on this page, and the text could include something like, "Here's a zen garden we created in the 93940 zip code area of Monterey." Or, "Here's a butterfly garden we created for the beautiful monarchs that pass through the 93499 zip code area of town every year." If your services are on the creative side, you can be creative in showcasing your work, too, but if you are a plumber, it just may not seem very natural to write, "Here's a sink we unclogged in the 93940 zip code neighborhood." Seems like a bit of a stretch.
-
Hello Spartan22, yes Google seems to be cracking down harder on this as time goes on and making it more and more difficult to rank for suburbs and areas where your business isn't physically located.
I definitely wouldn't build a whole new site unless you can associate that site with a business address that can be validated using Google (+) places and have a completely different phone number on the site, and also brand it differently using a different business name. Building a new site without disguising it as a completely new stand-alone business is exactly what Google don't want you to do.
It's much better just to build landing pages as you're already doing. Just take a closer look at your landing pages on-site Seo elements and make sure they're up to scratch. Make sure your keyword density is quite low and all of the heading tags are relevant to the keyword you're trying to rank for.
Recently I've also found that a site's standalone orphan pages that aren't connected to your main menu can really have a negative effect. It's not always optimal to have a menu item called service areas with all of the areas you service as a drop-down menu. When you cut your service area landing pages off from the rest of the website because they're not linked into the main menu or they don't have any other contextual links pointing the to them throughout the site you'll really notice that those pages will struggle to rank. Each area landing page still needs its own inbound links pointing to it too.
I've been noticing exactly the same thing lately. I have created some of the best pages in that niche for that area and continue to see these service area landing pages floundering around at the bottom of page 1 and even on page 2, despite them being twice as good as any other landing page in the niche, and despite them being on an established website with half decent authority.
The major difference I've noticed is that the sites that have all of the area landing pages incorporated into the menu always perform much better than the sites that only have these landing pages in the site's sitemap. It'd be interesting to know whether I can access your site's area service pages via your main menu? Hope that helps a little.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
.com and .co.uk tld question
My client has a site at mysite.com. They serve both US and UK customers. They have the..co.uk tld correctly redirecting to it. The client is asking if they should have two websites - .com for US customers and .- co.uk for UK customers. Any recommendations?
Local Website Optimization | | digitalmarketingneoscape0 -
Question about partial duplicate content on location landing pages of multilocation business
Hi everyone, I am a psychologist in private practice in Colorado and I recently went from one location to 2 locations. I'm currently updating my website to better accommodate the second location. I also plan continued expansion in the future, so there will be more and more locations as time goes on. As a result, I am making my websites current homepage non-location specific and creating location landing pages as I have seen written about in many places. My question is: I know that location landing pages should have unique content, and I have plenty of this, but how much content is it also okay to have be duplicate across the location landing pages and the homepage? For instance, here is the current draft of the new homepage (these are not live yet): http://www.effectivetherapysolutions.com/dev/ And here are the drafts of the location landing pages: http://www.effectivetherapysolutions.com/dev/denver-office http://www.effectivetherapysolutions.com/dev/colorado-springs-office And for reference, here is the current homepage that is actually live for my single Denver location: http://www.effectivetherapysolutions.com/ As you can see, the location landing pages have the following sections of unique content: Therapist picture at the top testimonial quotes (the one on the homepage is the only thing I have I framed in this block from crawl so that it appears as unique content on the Denver page) therapist bios GMB listing driving directions and hours and I also haven't added these yet, but we will also have unique client success stories and appropriately tagged images of the offices So that's plenty of unique content on the pages, but I also have the following sections of content that are identical or nearly identical to what I have on the homepage: Intro paragraph blue and green "adult" and child/teen" boxes under the intro paragraph "our treatment really works" section "types of anxiety we treat" section Is that okay or is that too much duplicate content? The reason I have it that way is that my website has been very successful for years at converting site visitors into paying clients, and I don't want to lose aspects of the page that I know work when people land on it. And now that I am optimizing the location landing pages to be where people end up instead of the homepage, I want them to still see all of that content that I know is effective at conversion. If people on here do think it is too much, one possible solution is to turn parts of it into pictures or put them into I-frames on the location pages so Google doesn't crawl those parts of the location pages, but leave them normal on the homepage so it still gets crawled on there. I've seen a lot written about not having duplicate content on location landing pages for this type of website, but everything I've read seems to refer to entire pages being copied with just the location names changed, which is not what I'm doing, hence my question. Thanks everyone!
Local Website Optimization | | gremmy90 -
Are local business directories worth the effort? Eg. White pages, Yell.com, Local.com?
Hi Guys, Im new to Moz and very keen to do SEO right without upsetting Mr. Google too much. Are local business directories worth the effort? Its a laborious job, but happy to do it, if its effective and won't be considered spammy by Google? Thanks
Local Website Optimization | | Fetseun0 -
Multiple My Business pages affecting local SEO?
Hey Moz! We have a situation with a dentist firm with multiple doctors at the same address. They have two locations for their dental offices, and each of the dentists operate at both offices. The issue: Each doctor insists on having their own by business page for each location and i'm afraid this is hurting their local SEO. We've been tracking keywords by week and we've seen some big fluctuations in ratings and i'm looking into why this is happening. The office in location 1 has it's own Google My Business page and the three dentists have their own my business page set up at the exact same address. The office in location 2 has it's own Google My Business page as well and the three dentists have their own my business page there also. This leads the two addresses of the main offices having multiple My Business pages at the same address competing against eachother since they are all are registered with similar names and specialties. Could this be hurting our local SEO? Thanks! -Z
Local Website Optimization | | zacgarrison_700 -
Landing page, or redirect? Looking for feedback.
If we have a section of our site that we have branded separately from the rest of the site, does it make sense to provide a landing page on our current, high authority site that has content and links off to the separate site, or would just a domain.com/keyword redirect to the page be a better route? Does it matter? I have an idea, but I'd like to get feedback on this. We are a newspaper, http://billingsgazette.com and we have an auto branded site called http://montanawheelsforyou.com. The URL and branding is fubar. We're wondering if we can increase the ranking if we swapped out the http://billingsgazette.com/autos from a redirect to http://montanawheelsforyou.com to a landing page with content and a link to http://montanawheelsforyou.com.
Local Website Optimization | | rachaelpracht0 -
Improve my on-page SEO
Hello, I am a photographer based in the UK, I have recently increased my prices, so SEO has become more important then ever as I need to target additional cities and wedding venues. I am looking for suggestions on ways I can ethically improve my websites on-page SEO and regional landing pages. I am running out of ideas, so any suggestions would be welcome. Do you think search engines will see these regional pages as low quality spammy pages are they not advised! If so how can I target other cities with out paying for PPC. Home page Additional Issues Is the 404 server script any good? I also have an issue, with old deleted wordpress pages, redirecting them even though there are no redirects set up in SEO yoast. I am not sure the server script on the shared hosting for 404 errors is any good, does anyone have any experience with this. For example this page returns the 404 page, however the header status is 200. http://www.robertsail.co.uk/derby-wedding-photographers-2/ If I moved to a dedicated server would this help me out.
Local Website Optimization | | Roboto19701 -
Company Knowledge Box Questions
I've been keeping track of changes in my company's Knowledge Box, and it's been responding in completely unpredictable ways. We are currently in the middle of a site redesign -- the current site has not received any SEO attention in a while, apart from two major edits: 1. Adding the social media schema (which Google has not picked up -- we did this close to two months ago). 2. Citation cleanup through Moz Local and BrightLocal What I've noticed about the Knowledge Box is that it would show up for the query "Now Media Group" if and only if the location was set for San Diego, CA, which is where we're based. Now, it will only show up for the query "Now Media Group San Diego." My first question: If the location setting is already set for San Diego, why would Google need the additional qualifier to show the Knowledge Box? Any theories? My second question: Is our local SEO efforts hurting our online presence? We don't provide services locally, except to a handful of clients. We have clients throughout the United States and Canada. It'd be nice if our Knowledge Box showed up regardless of where someone is searching our brand name from. The reason I point at local SEO specifically is because I've noticed that an ex-client of ours has a knowledge box no matter where you search from, and she has no local SEO whatsoever -- the Box shows the address: Douglass, KS. Is our local SEO sending Google mixed signals and affecting when/where the Knowledge Box shows up? Thank you!
Local Website Optimization | | nowmedia10 -
Duplicate content question for multiple sites under one brand
I would like to get some opinions on the best way to handle duplicate / similar content that is on our company website and local facility level sites. Our company website is our flagship website that contains all of our service offerings, and we use this site to complete nationally for our SEO efforts. We then have around 100 localized facility level sites for the different locations we operate that we use to rank for local SEO. There is enough of a difference between these locations that it was decided (long ago before me) that there would be a separate website for each. There is however, much duplicate content across all these sites due to the service offerings being roughly the same. Every website has it's own unique domain name, but I believe they are all on the same C-block. I'm thinking of going with 1 of 2 options and wanted to get some opinions on which would be best. 1 - Keep the services content identical across the company website and all facility sites, and use the rel=canonical tag on all the facility sites to reference the company website. My only concern here is if this would drastically hurt local SEO for the facility sites. 2 - Create two unique sets of services content. Use one set on the company website. And use the second set on the facility sites, and either live with the duplicate content or try and sprinkle in enough local geographic content to create some differential between the facility sites. Or if there are other suggestions on a better way to handle this, I would love to hear any other thoughts as well. Thanks!
Local Website Optimization | | KHCreative0