Personalization software and SEO
-
Hi guys,
I'm just testing a personalization software in our website, basically changing the "location" text depending on the user's IP.
I can see in my software that when the Google bot comes to our site the personalization software triggers an action changing the location based text to "California". Can this make Google understand that our website targets only users in California and thereof hurt our rankings in other locations nationwide?
I'll appreciate your opinions.
-
So Mr King, would it be reasonable to say that personalizing all locations but California would keep us out of trouble?
Thanks Mike!
-
Thanks for your insights Dirk.
-
Hi Ana,
Just to clarify - if you redirect based on ip to a location based url like /newyork you can still have a link on the page going to the other locations like /sandiego - so Google can access all these pages & index them. This is not possible it the scenario you mentioned.
Not sure how old the article from unbounce is, but Google bot is able to interpret javascript (to a certain extent). Using javascript won't change the problem - as long as you have only one page that adapts automatically to the ip location you will be unable show all versions of the page to Google - it will help your Californian branch, but hurt all the others.
rgds,
Dirk
-
This is great Dirk - thanks so much for your insight as always!
-
Hi Patrick,
If the question would have been about country targeting I guess your answer would have been correct. As mentioned in the article however, the lowest level of geolocation is country. As the question was about locations "nationwide" I would conclude based on this article that at this point of time Google is unable to detect geo-targeted content based on region or city.
Even for countries I think it's a risky business - as the article doesn't indicate if this "local" bots visit the sites with the same frequency & depth as the normal ones, and they don't clearly indicate which country ip's are used.
It's a different story for languages - because you can indicate in the HTTP header that the content is depending on the user's language. A similar case is the dynamic serving for mobile (https://developers.google.com/webmasters/mobile-sites/mobile-seo/configurations/dynamic-serving?hl=en) - here you can indicate that the content is changing based on the user agent.
As far as I know, there is no way to indicate in the HTTP header that the content is varying based on ip address.
rgds,
Dirk
-
Hi both,
Thanks a lot for your ideas and suggestions. No doubt it's a tough subject. I don't really understand Google's position about this, on one hand they want you to provide a better user experience (what can be done through personalization) and on the other hand they don't seem to be providing reasonable solutions to potential SEO drawbacks.
Dirk, referencing this line of yours "What you could do is automatically redirect the user to the appropriate page based on ip - but still have the other pages accessible via normal links", don't you think if the user is directly redirected to the "location based-page" then the Google bot coming from California (as an example) will also be redirected to it and then understand that the website is targeting California?
I read something at Unbounce regarding dynamic text replacement that caught my attention http://documentation.unbounce.com/hc/en-us/articles/203661004-Dynamic-Text-Replacement-pro-
They say “It's always been possible with Unbounce to do text replacement using a little bit of JavaScript, but unfortunately the bots and crawlers that Google (and other ad networks) use to validate your landing page quality don't read Javascript.”
If the fact that the bots cannot read Javascript is true maybe using Javascript for small personalization actions such as changing the location-based text maybe the solution. I wonder if this follows google guidelines or not.
Again I'll appreciate your answers; I'll go through all the links and information and keep investigating. I really need to find some technically supported facts.
Thank again. Ana
-
Hi Dirk
Thanks for the corrections and examples here. I appreciate it and learned something new here myself.
Out of curiosity, what do you make of the following: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6144055?hl=en
After reading your explanation, and Google's suggestion in bold and red here, I understand the importance of your recommendation. I was just wondering your thoughts on this particular article and what you make of it.
Thanks so much again and well done!
-
Hi,
I don't really agree with the answer of Patrick. Depending on the level of personalisation you apply, it can hurt your rankings for locations outside California (our eventual other ip locations for Google bot).
As an example - you manage a chain of Chinese restaurants spread around the country and you have the domain mychineserestaurant.com.
If users accesses the site directly in New York, he will see the address, picture, phone number etc. from the New York restaurant. Googlebot however will never see this content - the bot will only be able to access the content from your branch in Los Angeles. While this is great for the user experience, there is no way to show Google the other locations, as you are obliged to show the bot the same content as normal human users, and hence show the information based on the ip of the bot.
The example of Groupon given by Patrick is not exactly the same - they personalise the homepage based on your ip - but if you search for Groupon New York you go to http://www.groupon.com/local/new-york-city
What you could do is automatically redirect the user to the appropriate page based on ip - but still have the other pages accessible via normal links. In the example above - accessing the site in New York I would go by default to mychineserestaurant.com/newyork but with the option to change the location. This way Google bot would be able to crawl all the locations. It's also the advice coming from Matt Cutts: https://www.mattcutts.com/blog/give-each-store-a-url/
If the personalisation is only minor (example only the local address on the homepage) and if you already have targeted pages for each location it should not really be a problem.
To be honest - it's rather my own opinion than something which is supported by hard facts.
Hope this helps,
Dirk
-
Hi there
Don't worry about this, it shouldn't be an issue. One thing you can do is target your website in Webmaster Tools if you're looking to target specific regions.
Amazon and Groupon have personalization happening on their sites as well - but that doesn't effect their ratings.
I would also take a look at:
SEO in the Personalization AgeLet me know if this helps at all!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
DoesHurt SEO
Hey guys, I've read mixed reviews on this. Does anyone have an answer to whether or not hiding h1 text ( ) negatively effects SEO in 2018. Thanks for the help!
Technical SEO | | Jason-Reid0 -
SEO Problems with Loading to a Subfolder?
A client has a single page app website that shows https://example.com/example when you visit https://example.com . I don't think this is a redirect; I think it's a URL rewrite. My questions: Is this setup common with single page apps? What are the SEO benefits or drawbacks of having a domain's homepage load, rewrite, or redirect to a subfolder?
Technical SEO | | Kevin_P0 -
CSS user select and any potential affect on SEO
Hi everyone and thank you in advance for your helpful comments. We have a client who is concerned about copying of content from their site because it has happened a few times in the last few years. We have explained that the content is essentially publicly available and that using the CSS selector user-select to prevent selection of text will really only prevent the technically limited users from working out how to get the text. He is happy that it will at least stop some people. So the question is would there be any way that this would have an affect on SEO? We would make an assumption that it doesnt but putting it out there for some feedback. Cheers Eddie
Technical SEO | | vital_hike0 -
Badges & SEO
Hello, Moz Community! We're working on creating an affiliate badge for events that make our best-of list and we're wondering: if every event website embedded the badge (could be as many as 70), would having the same image hosting URL for each one raise concerns with Google? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | EveryActionHQ0 -
Website redesign: impact on SEO rankings?
Hi We're redesigning a website for a client whose SEO rankings are fairly strong, and are driving a good volume of enquiries through their website. We would like to do our best to ensure the redesign has a minimal impact on the rankings but aren't sure if there's anything in particular we should be doing to avert a severe dip in results. The content will be similar on many pages, with the major updates being from 2013 products to the 2014 suite. Layouts and images will, of course be updated, and we're going to do our best to keep the inbound links going to the correct place - any advice here would be much appreciated, too. We'd be really grateful for any suggestions for how to avoid a ranking disaster, and any major pitfalls we should look out for. Many thanks.
Technical SEO | | Kal-SEO0 -
Update page for better SEO score?
Hi, Is it important to update a page sometimes to score better in SEO?
Technical SEO | | parfumerienl
Or if i make a page and never change it, it would be good enough.0 -
SEO quandary advice needed
I'm in a bind, I've been working on my SEO for a while now and have finally landed on the top page for [fishing kayak reviews] in Google US. The problem is it's not the page I want to be ranked! I've recently updated my reviews component to a more robust system but the url is slightly different. Looking currently [Reviews without Images] http://www.yakangler.com/fishing-kayak-reviews is ranking in Google but I would like [Reviews with Images] http://www.yakangler.com/fishing-kayak-review to rank instead. What would be the best solution for this problem? Adjust the url for [Reviews with Images] so it take the place of [Reviews without Images]? Do you think I will get any negative impacts from this?
Technical SEO | | mr_w0 -
When to SEO optimize a blog post?
Hi there, Here's our situation: there are two people working on the blog. person 1) writes the posts person 2) SEO optimizes the posts I know this is not ideal but it's the best we can do and it's a whole lot better than no blog. 🙂 I'm the fellow optimizing the posts. I've found that my best SEO efforts usually slightly undermine the readability of these posts -- not in an extreme way, I'm not going overboard with keywords or anything. Rather, things like a sexy & enticing article heading may have to be dummed down for search engines... Because of this dumming down, I like to wait a couple of weeks to SEO optimize our posts, the logic being that we get the best of both worlds: a happy regular readership on topic articles that are clearly described for (and aligned to the terms used by) our search engine visitors What I'm wondering is, Generally: can you see any problems with this setup? would you do it differently? Specifically: does Google (et al) punish this sort of backwards re-writing? and, does it somehow amount to less SEO mojo when done retroactively? Thanks so much for your time! Best, Jon
Technical SEO | | JonAmar0