Shouldn’t Google always rank a website for its own unique, exact +10 word content such as a whole sentence?
-
Hello fellow SEO's,
I'm working with a new client who owns a property related website in the UK.
Recently (May onwards) they have experienced significant drops in nearly all non domain/brand related rankings. From page 1 to +5 or worse.Please see the attached webmaster tools traffic graph.
The 13th of June seemed to have the biggest drop (UK Panda update???)When we copy and paste individual +20 word sentences from within top level content Google does bring up exact results, the content is indexed but the clients site nearly always appears at the bottom of SERP's.
Even very new or small, 3-4 page domains that have clearly all copied all of their content are out ranking the original content on the clients site. As I'm sure know, this is very annoying for the client!
And this even happens when Google’s cache date (that appears next to the results) for the clients content is clearly older then the other results!
The only major activity was the client utilising Google optimiser which redirects traffic to various test pages. These tests finished in June.
Details about the clients website:
- Domain has been around for 4+ years
- The website doesn't have a huge amount of content, around 40 pages. I would consider 50% original, 20% thin and 30% duplicate (working on fixing this)
- There haven’t been any signicant sitewide or page changes.
- Webmaster tools show nothing abnormal or any errors messages (some duplicate meta/title tags that are being fixed)
- All the pages of the site are indexed by Google
- Domain/page authority is above average for the niche (around 45 in for the domain in OSE)
- There are no ads of any kind on the site
- There are no special scripts or anything fancy that could cause problems
I can't seem to figure it out, I know the site can be improved but such a severe drop where even very weak domains are out ranking suggests a penalty of some sort?
Can anyone help me out here?
-
Thanks for the reply Chris.
UPDATE FROM GOOGLE REONSIDERATION REQUEST
I got a response back from Google after submitting a reconsideration request (they got back to me in 4 days!). Basically there is no manual penalty in place, thus I'm assuming its the new algorithms from panda.
But this still puzzles me as the clients website is outranked by even the most basic 4-5 page weak authority websites and subdomain 2.0 properties for its own 20+ word exact match content!
Answering your questions:
The website ranks no.1 for all of its domain searchesThe bounce rate is up and down, from 50>70%, really depends on the source of traffic a paid search brings in some high bouncing traffic (but at cheap costs).
The avg time on the website is around 1-2mins.
There is no active social sharing activity at all on the website except youtube. (However I would say 60% of the ranking competition are in a similar boat)
In terms of links, OSE doesnt indicate a big drop in links or anything.
Steps I've taken to address the issues you mentioned and other considerations:
Redesigned website from the ground up (SEO friendly IA)
Conversion optimisation (UX design + usability) on every page
Rejigged every single page with new content (rewriting from scratch)
Strong focus on best practice keyword targeting in content/headings/internal linking
Added 15+ new relevant, unique pages
New XML Sitemap + created html sitemapSo far no improvement has been seen but Google HAS indexed the new pages within 3-4 days. Should I expect significant changes when the next Panda update comes out?
The next steps are to add social sharing and an activity plan for Facebook/Twitter, add a blog, continue to focus on good content with some potential viral programs.
The only areas I am not 100% sure about are the more technical sides such as server hosting/index issue.
If anyone would like to take a look at the site I can provide the url privately.
Thankyou
Hash
-
That sounds like a sticky wicket! I would look at the following factors that might be panda related:
- How is the bounce rate on the site?
- What about time on site? under 2-3 minutes on average could be a problem
(make sure to look at both of those for the non-paid search advanced segment) - Try to compare tweets and FB shares with that of your competitors
- Do a site:domain.com search- is the homepage not the #1 result? that may indicate a panda penalty.
- If you were an impartial human rating the site for spaminess and usability, would you say that it is offensive or potentially off-putting in any way? The basic theory of panda is applying the feedback of search-graders in an algorithmic way. - Have any significant links to the site gone missing recently? This is REALLY hard to tell if it is a new client... If it isn't Panda related this is probably the #1 factor
I hope that is a decent jumping off point. It could be a lot of things.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I document rankings from an Incognito Window?
Mozzers, what are your thoughts on documenting SEO results from an incognito window? Does anyone have any articles they can recommend that talk about this subject? Is it better to document results from the normal window or from an incognito window?
Algorithm Updates | | TaylorRHawkins1 -
Do back-links to non indexed sub-domains / sub-directories considered by Google as website backlinks and pass Pagerank to website?
Hi, If some noindexed links on our website or sub-domain got some backlinks, will that backlinks pass Pagerank / linkjuice to website? Will they be considered as backlinks to website by Google? Here is a statement from Matt cutts for the question. My question is same as below with answer? Eric Enge: Can a NoIndex page accumulate PageRank? Matt Cutts: A NoIndex page can accumulate PageRank, because the links are still followed outwards from a NoIndex page. Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Google has indexed some of our old posts. What took so long and will we lose rank for their brevity?
Hi, We just had a few of our old blog posts indexed by Google. There are short formed posts, and I want to make sure we're not going to get dinged by Google for their length. Can you advise?https://www.policygenius.com/blog/guaranteed-issue
Algorithm Updates | | francoisdelame0 -
A continuation drop in rankings
Hi All, We used to rank highly for the keyword 'Magazine Subscriptions' and after the past few months and have started to slowly go down the ranking. Recently we have spiked from #46 to #60 over the last few weeks. Anyone have any ideas on what could of caused this? Our website is: http://goo.gl/KnBkT9 We have kept updated the same as we have done with PRs, backlinks etc etc
Algorithm Updates | | DavidPatrick0 -
Falling Ranking
Hello until recently I was ranking quite well for a certain keyword and now week by week I am dropping in ranking. How do I fix this or find out how my competitors are getting higher than me Thanks Linda
Algorithm Updates | | invitationsforless0 -
Do images count as duplicate content.
Hi We have a site called buypropertyanywhere. We sell properties all over the world but at times we use the same images of complexes. Would Google see this as copying from each other therefore duplicate content. Thanks in advance
Algorithm Updates | | Feily0 -
Difference in which pages Google is ranking?
Over the past two weeks I've noticed that Google has decided to change which pages on our site rank for specific keywords. The thing is, this is for keywords that the homepage was already ranking for. Due to our workload, we've made no changes to the site, and I'm not tracking any additional backlinks. Certainly there are no new deep links to these pages. In SEOmoz dashboard (and via tools/manual checking with a proxy) of the 24 terms we have first page ranking for, 9 of them are marked "new to top 50". These are terms we were already ranking for. Google just appears to have switched out the homepage for other pages. I've noticed this across a couple of client sites, too, though none to the extent that I'm seeing on our own. Certainly this isn't a bad thing, as the deeper pages ranking means that they're landing on the content they want first, and I can work to up the conversion rates. It's just caught me by surprise. Anyone else noticing similar changes?
Algorithm Updates | | BedeFahey1 -
Do we have a timeline of google, bing updates
I thought it would be handy if we had a timeline with dates of any updates to the algo's.
Algorithm Updates | | AlanMosley
Does one exists here at SEOMoz or elsewhere.
Thanks3