Competitors in directories according to OSE, should I submit for the same?
-
Hey Mozers!
I have just began my link building process, firstly creating unique and quality content and looking at my competitors. I have found that much of my competitors are in listed in many directories. Some are paid and some are not. I noticed the paid ones had higher DA which seems appealing, however I'm stuck to think wether or not it is relevant to my site and if my audience will go there to search my services. But then I'm thinking well if my competitors are there then why is it so? etc
Does anyone know if this is something I should look at? My site has been live since november last year and we only have 1 backlink at the moment according to moz...We are on the writing wagon to filter our content and make sure were writing good engaging content however I'm seeing this obviously not the only way. I have also read the beginners guide to backlinks via moz and researched and read other interesting ways, including blogger outreach within my niche.
Any advice around this approach?
-
Thats so much Daniel! A directory approached me the other day to tell me how much traffic I would get if I listed in their astrology category and that they receive so much traffic to that category a month looking for my services. If i listed there they would give me a 20% discount taking it to around $400 a year. So I was sitting here thinking is it the more expensive the more human-edited and non-generic the directory is?
I also read their guidelines and they consisted of quiet a lot. For eg: they don't list websites with spam content, broken links etc
Thanks for the information regarding the manual outreach, I will take a look into the buzzstream as iv seen this floating around but didn't quiet understand the actual intent behind it, now that im looking into link building it all makes sense.
What do you think of SEO agencies that offer to build your backlinks? I'm a little skeptic around it but in saying that not my place to comment as i have not been there yet. I have had an seo guy work with me in the beginning who i found out was giving me all sorts of nonesense advice after discovering moz.
cheers
-
I wouldn't hold out for dmoz to approve your submission. It's really the only generic web directory still worth submitting to these days but it can take months before you get approved. If and when it does get added though, it's certainly worth the 2 minutes it takes to submit.
Manual outreach is just a way to contact people directly whether that be bloggers, journalists and editors, contributing articles to industry websites etc. You can reach out by email but I find that contacting people via LinkedIn and Twitter has a much better success rate. Here is a good article to introduce you to the topic - http://www.buzzstream.com/blog/essential-guide-effective-link-building-outreach.html - which also features Moz's own Follerwonk tool.
When I say about directories which are not human-edited, I mean directories which don't even have an approval process and therefore allows anyone to "build a link" straight away. You will normally be able to spot this in a directory's "submission guidelines" and they will normally be the directories which require a small fee upwards of $50.
-
great, thanks for that John, will do and see how I go
-
The first thing is a bit tragic and may be frowned up - you need to set up a female address sarah@brandname.com. I find if you ask for a link as a male you receive a low response rate. If the email comes from a female - then the response rate is reasonable. A personal choice.
However that is for generic link building.
Of the 75 URL's you have collected I would create a strategy for each one - they are that important! A phone call, begging, swapping services - whatever you need to do.. it is actually good fun, you will meet some great people. If you get a chance drop into their office. Do free psychic readings... whatever it takes.
Each of those links has great SEO value. The reality is it is just hard work but play to your strengths you know what they are.
-
Hey John,
Wow again you have such great information to share!
I like your recommendation for the first 75 URL's that appear in the SERP. My main keyword is "psychic readings" I know some competitors who definitely won't, but your idea of looking into the pages that are not is a great idea.
I have 3 top level domains co.nz (NZ) com.au (AUS) and .com (USA) but I'm really pushing for the Australia and USA, as after running PPC, NZ was pretty dead.
So I will gather these domains. I do have a question, how would you go about approaching some of the 75 pages?
Thanks so much again for your awesome advice.
Cheers
-
Awesome advice Alick300, again will def look into spam score
-
Wow thanks so much Daniel, you bet this helped me so much! I have submitted to dmoz, but I don't know if I have been approved as I have not heard anything back... Do you know how to get in touch with them at all?
What is manual outreach? I know what blogger outreach is and I'm trying my first ~ using some of Rands tips.
How can you tell if directories are not human edited? I'm assuming that you can take control over the listing or have some form of control over the listing, rather then filling out a form?
Thanks again for your insights
-
I will not comment on the directories discussion as the boys have canvassed it well.
On link building the first suggestion or step I recommend is to capture the first 75 URL's that appear in the SERP for the most important keyword you are targeting. Then strategize how to get a link to each of the URL's - yes some are competitors so they are no good. Many are not competitors. Links from these pages have high SEO value. Be relentless in pursuit of these websites for backlinks.
After I have maximised my efforts on the aforesaid I then look elsewhere.
Good luck, let me know if you need any help.
-
Hi Justin,
I would just like to add to the above responses, that you should be careful copying a competitors' backlink profile. These directory links could be something of the past that they put in several years ago when it worked. They could very well since have been disavowed; there's no way to know that.
There might still be some value to get from directories, but I wouldn't just get in one because my competitors are there. If they are human edited and are niche relevant (dmoz.org being the exception) then go for it. If not, then I would take a long hard look at whether or not it is worth it to go there.
-
Hi Justin,
Many SEO experts thinks that links from directories are generally low quality links and they don't want to submit in directories.
In this case my simple question is If directory links didn’t work then why Google deindex few hundreds directories in 2012 ?
Links from the right directories can still do wonders for your site. So you should check spam score of those directories and if spam score is & directory is relevant to your website you can go for it.
Thanks
-
Hi Edward,
With your competitors seemingly not having the most up-to-date or high quality link profile, this provides you with a massive opportunity! Where they have links from generic directories, you can earn links from high authority websites which are relevant to your niche.
It's always good to analyse and compare competitors' link profiles; I would only use this process to find a few main directories within your niche (free or paid) and bear in mind that they could also bring some referral traffic if the directories are popular. Otherwise, stay away from:
- generic directories (organic and paid) except for dmoz.org
- any directories which are not "human-edited" ie, there is a no editorial control of which sites go into the directories
You said that you have been actively writing content. Producing content is great but you need to promote it if it is going to earn links. The best way I have found to earn the most authoritative links is via manual outreach, in which blogger outreach could be included of course. Contact the editors and webmasters of sites within your niche (but certainly try to think creatively to find opportunities which are outside your niche too), show them some examples of that great content you've been producing and ask them about the opportunity to create some exclusive content for them or even to collaborate on a piece of content together.
Hope that helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Competitor Inbound Links Increase from 175K to 1 million in 1 month, how?
Hi all, I was recently doing some competitive analysis on external links/DA and came across something peculiar. A competitor of ours had their external links go from 175,179 in August to 1,141,365 in September. I've attached a screenshot showing the increase. The competitors domain authority also increased from 82 to 89 in the same time span. Has anyone else come across such a large link increase in such a short period of time, while also being rewarded for it? Obviously at first glance it seemed extremely black hat and unnatural, but I would love to be proven wrong. Thanks! Cw5tN
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | mstpeter0 -
Competitor Black Hat Link Building?
Hello big-brained Moz folks, We recently used Open Site Explorer to compile a list of inbound linking domains to one of our clients, alongside domains linking to a major competitor. This competitor, APBSpeakers.com, is dominating the search results with many #1 rankings for highly competitive phrases, even though their onsite SEO is downright weak. This competitor also has exponentially more links(602k vs. 2.4k) and way more content(indexed pages) reported than any of their competitors, which seems physically impossible to me. Linking root domains are shown as 667 compared to 170 for our client, who has been in business for 10+ years. Taking matters a step further, linking domains for this competitor include such authoritative domains as: Cnn.com TheGuardian.com PBS.org HuffingtonPost.com LATimes.com Time.com CBSNews.com NBCNews.com Princeton.edu People.com Sure, I can see getting a few high profile linking domains but the above seems HIGHLY suspicious to me. Upon further review, I searched CNN, The Guardian and PBS for all variations of this competitors name and domain name and found no immediate mentions of their name. I smell a rat and I suspect APB is using some sort behind-the-scenes programming to make these "links" happen, but I have no idea how. If this isn't the case, they must have a dedicated PR person with EXTREMELY strong connections to secure this links, but even this seems like a stretch. It's conceivable that APB is posting comments on all of the above sites, along with links, however, I was under the impression that all such posts were NoFollow and carried no link juice. Also, paid advertisements on the above sites should be NoFollow as well, right? Anyway, we're trying to get to the bottom of this issue and determine what's going on. If you have any thoughts or words of wisdom to help us compete with these seemingly Black Hat SEO tactics, I'd sure love to hear from you. Thanks for your help. I appreciate it very much. Eric
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | EricFish0 -
Google is giving one of my competitors a quasi page 1 monopoly, how can I complain?
Hi, When you search for "business plan software" on google.co.uk, 7 of the 11 first results are results from 1 company selling 2 products, see below: #1. Government site (related to "business plan" but not to "business plan software")
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | tbps
#2. Product 1 from Palo Alto Software (livePlan)
#3. bplan.co.uk: content site of Palo Alto Software (relevant to "business plan" but only relevant to "business plan software" because it is featuring and linking to their Product 1 and Product 2 sites)
#4. Same site as #3 but different url
#5. Palo Alto Software Product 2 (Business Plan Pro) page on Palo Alto Software .co.uk corporate site
#6. Same result as #5 but different url (the features page)
#7. Palo Alto Software Product 2 (Business Plan Pro) local site
#8, #9 and #10 are ok
#11. Same as #3 but the .com version instead of the .co.uk This seems wrong to me as it creates an illusion of choice for the customer (especially because they use different sites) whereas in reality the results are showcasing only 2 products. Only 1 of Palo Alto Software's competitors is present on page 1 of the search results (the rest of them are on page 2 and page 3). Did some of you experience a similar issue in a different sector? What would be the best way to point it out to Google? Thanks in advance Guillaume0 -
Help figuring out if certain paid directories are worth it
The person in my position previously had quite a few paid directories our site was listed on. What is the best resources you guys have used or know of to figure out which ones are good to keep? For instance one that is up for renewal this week is site-sift.com. I know the person previous to me did some not so ethical stuff and I'm trying to clean up messes. Any advice on directories would be much appreciated.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | inhouseninja0 -
Are directory listings still appropriate in 2013? Aren't they old-style SEO and Penguin-worthy?
We have been reviewing our off-page SEO strategy for clients and as part of that process, we are looking at a number of superb info-graphics on the subject. I see that some of current ones still list "Directories" as being part of their off-page strategy. Aren't these directories mainly there for link-building purposes and provide Users no real benefit? I don't think I've ever seen a directory that I would use, apart for SEO research. Surely Google's Penguin algorithm would see directories in the same way and give them less value, or even penalise websites that use them to try to boost page rank? If I were to list my websites on directories it wouldn't be to share my lovely content with people that use directories to find great sites, it would be to sneakily build page rank. Am I missing the point? Thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Crumpled_Dog
Scott0 -
Is widgetbait no longer valid at all according to the new quality guidelines?
Google recently updated their quality guidelines. I found this example of something that was against the guidelines very interesting: "Links embedded in widgets that are distributed across various sites, for example:
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | MarieHaynes
Visitors to this page: 1,472
car insurance" So, what do you think? Are the links against the guidelines? Or the fact that the link is using an anchor texted keyword? I personally don't see the problem with producing a great widget and putting a link on the bottom saying, "Provided by example.com", but then again it's sort of a self made link. On the other hand it's not completely self made because a webmaster has to like the widget enough to embed it. Thoughts?1 -
Check For Bad Directory Backlinks For Free
I used http://deletebacklinks.com/ yesterday to search 7 of the directories they have access to for searching bad links. I found one of my sites had links on these directories and I was able to remove them for fairly reasonable price. Thought this is a good tool to do a free quick check for any bad linkbacks on deindexed directories. I know this may be a small portion but every little bit helps.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | TheSEODR0 -
Understanding competitors link building tactics (possibly black hat stuff that seems to work)
So checking out the backlinks on a competitor’s page for a term I’m looking to work on, a page they rank pretty well for, I can’t but happen to note the kinds of sites that grant this company – who are well known in their field – its successes. Many of the links to this page I’m interested in appear within short articles on blogs, really bad Wordpress blogs that are certainly just for SEO use. My questions are: Where do people usually source these blogs which typically contain material on a range of different topics? Are these probably paid links? How do they get so much content out there, albeit similar content, to so many of the hastily cobbled efforts? Would that be an agency with connections or a blogging community site? How can any search engine lend credibility to my competitor’s links when the article below has nonsense for penis enlargement stuff. Seriously?!? How are they not being penalised? It’s frustrating because these aren’t the tactics I want to employ but they seems to offer success, but also, if your link is in an article that followed by another on penis pills, how I can take Google seriously in its stated aim of making things this prone to manipulation.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Martin_S0