Understanding why our new page doesn't rank. Internal link structure to blame? + understand canonical pages more.
-
Hi guys. Sorry it's an essay...BUT, i think a lot of you will find this an interesting question.
This question is in 2 (related) parts, and I imagine it would be an 'advanced' SEO question. Hoping you guys can help bring some real insight Always amazed at the quality for this forum/ community.
**Context... **
We had a duplicate content issue caused by this page and it's product permutations, so we placed canonical tags on all the product permutations to solve it. Worked a treat.
However, we now have more **product ranges. **We now sell Diaries, Notebooks & Music books, which are clearly different from one another. So...we've placed canonical tags on all the product permutations leading back to the 'parent' theme.
In other words, all the diary permutations 'lead back' to the diary page. All the notebooks permutations 'lead back' to the main notebook page. So on and so forth.
Make sense so far?
Context end.....
Issue.
Amazingly our Diary page outranks our notebook pagefor the search term 'Design your own Notebook'. The notebook page is well optimised for this search term, and the diary page avoids the word 'notebook' altogether (so no keyword cannibalisation going on).
Possible reason?
Our Diary page has a vast amount of internal links to it throughout our site. The notebook page has only a few. Could this be the issue? If so, what reading/ blogs/ content/ tools would you recommend to help understand and solve this problem? i.e) Better understanding internal link structure for SEO.
2nd part of the question (in the context of internal linking for SEO).
When there are internal links to a page with a conical tag does that 'count' towards the 'parent page', or simply towards that specific page?
I really hope that makes sense. If it's clear as mud just shout.
Isaac.
EDIT: All pages in question have been indexed since we added these changes to the site.
-
Ok yes. Thank you! All makes sense.
Long term we'd love to have people landing on the notebook page for the appropriate search term. It would make a nicer customer journey, and the user would feel like they were 'in the right place'.
But short term as you say, we'll focus on what's ranking and go with that momentum.
Thanks again!
Isaac.
-
Google definitely sees "design your own notebook" and "design your own diary" as two different searches, but Google looks at the "intent" behind a search, not just the keywords behind the search. The "intent" for the "design your own notebook" and "design your own diary" are very similar, both are related to getting a type of custom designed book that you can write in (the Knowledge Graph video discusses this).
Though your diary page may not have any external links pointing to it that's not the only thing google's Algorithm looks for. Maybe your diary page has more user data showing a positive experience behind it? Maybe your link structure has identified it as more important than your notebook page? There really could be a lot of reasons why it's identifying the diary page as better than your notebook page.
I used Moz's Open Site Explorer tool and took a quick look at your different pages and I found that your diary page has a page authority of 21 and your notebook page has a page authority of 1 (which is automatically given no matter what). So there's quite a bit of difference as far as Moz is concerned (and you can pretty confidently say "as far as Google is concerned") between which should be shown.
From a pure marketing perspective (I'm going to take off the SEO hat and just talk about driving results now), you want to look at the end goal. If I was in your shoes, I wouldn't forget about your notebook page (I'd definitely keep working on helping it rank better) but I would focus most of my efforts on maximizing the potential of your page that's ranking. Focus on conversion optimization, get yourself some gold stars using schema/reviews, work on getting more links to that page. It's about using the current momentum you instead of stopping and trying to start from scratch.
Hopefully that helps!
-Jacob
-
Canonical answer makes perfect sense.... thank you so much!
Can I just clarify something?
What do you mean by the diary page has more authority than the notebook page? From back links? Or from internal link structure? (I didn't think we had any back links to these pages you see).
I'm personally convinced that Google sees 'design your own notebook' and 'design your own diary' as significantly different searches. 2 reasons. The huge difference in the SERP results for those two searches, and, that they belong to different groups in Ad words.
One problem I've identified is that we do technically have a keyword cannibalisation issues. We have the word notebook in the 'Diary - Notebook' drop down.
Out side of removing these words, is there anything else we should look at on site to help the notebook page rank for appropriate search terms? Or would you suggest optimising the diary page for both notebook and diaries terms? Perhaps as a more short term solution?
Again, thank you for your response. This is such an empowering place
Isaac.
-
Answer to why diary page is showing up instead of notebook:
I would say that the reason your diary page is showing up in the SERPS (even when people are searching for "notebooks") is because the keywords "notebook" and "diary" are part of the same Knowledge Graph and can sometimes be synonyms.
Beyond this your http://www.toaddiaries.co.uk/design-your-own/diaries page seems to have more authority then your notebook page, so it really is "cannibalizing" the "notebook" keyword. It's not a horrible thing to happen, we have the same thing occurring with our website (our "lawn mowing" page cannibalizes our "lawn care" page). Because the "intent" can be very similar for the two keywords our conversion rate doesn't suffer, I'd assume the same (or something similar) for yours.
Answer to the canonical tag/internal linking situation:
When you place a canonical tag on a page you're directing google's crawlers to identify it the same as the page it's pointing to. So if Google's algorithm is identifying your internal linking as a positive it will count towards the page your canonical tag is pointing to. Here's a pretty solid article on it (link).
Hopefully that helps.
-Jacob
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google ranking content for phrases that don't exist on-page
I am experiencing an issue with negative keywords, but the “negative” keyword in question isn’t truly negative and is required within the content – the problem is that Google is ranking pages for inaccurate phrases that don’t exist on the page. To explain, this product page (as one of many examples) - https://www.scamblermusic.com/albums/royalty-free-rock-music/ - is optimised for “Royalty free rock music” and it gets a Moz grade of 100. “Royalty free” is the most accurate description of the music (I optimised for “royalty free” instead of “royalty-free” (including a hyphen) because of improved search volume), and there is just one reference to the term “copyrighted” towards the foot of the page – this term is relevant because I need to make the point that the music is licensed, not sold, and the licensee pays for the right to use the music but does not own it (as it remains copyrighted). It turns out however that I appear to need to treat “copyrighted” almost as a negative term because Google isn’t accurately ranking the content. Despite excellent optimisation for “Royalty free rock music” and only one single reference of “copyrighted” within the copy, I am seeing this page (and other album genres) wrongly rank for the following search terms: “free rock music”
On-Page Optimization | | JCN-SBWD
“Copyright free rock music"
“Uncopyrighted rock music”
“Non copyrighted rock music” I understand that pages might rank for “free rock music” because it is part of the “Royalty free rock music” optimisation, what I can’t get my head around is why the page (and similar product pages) are ranking for “Copyright free”, “Uncopyrighted music” and “Non copyrighted music”. “Uncopyrighted” and “Non copyrighted” don’t exist anywhere within the copy or source code – why would Google consider it helpful to rank a page for a search term that doesn’t exist as a complete phrase within the content? By the same logic the page should also wrongly rank for “Skylark rock music” or “Pretzel rock music” as the words “Skylark” and “Pretzel” also feature just once within the content and therefore should generate completely inaccurate results too. To me this demonstrates just how poor Google is when it comes to understanding relevant content and optimization - it's taking part of an optimized term and combining it with just one other single-use word and then inappropriately ranking the page for that completely made up phrase. It’s one thing to misinterpret one reference of the term “copyrighted” and something else entirely to rank a page for completely made up terms such as “Uncopyrighted” and “Non copyrighted”. It almost makes me think that I’ve got a better chance of accurately ranking content if I buy a goat, shove a cigar up its backside, and sacrifice it in the name of the great god Google! Any advice (about wrongly attributed negative keywords, not goat sacrifice ) would be most welcome.0 -
Combining products - edit existing product page or 301 redirect to new page?
We want to combine existing products - e.g. 'hand lotion' and 'body lotion' will become 'hand & body lotion'. As such, we'll need to combine the two product pages into one. What would be the best route to take in terms of SEO to do this? My initial reaction is to create a new product page and then 301 or 302 redirect the old products to the new product page depending on if the change is permanent or temporary. Would you agree? Or am I missing something?
On-Page Optimization | | SwankyApple1 -
Is it urgent to have fewer than 100 internal links on a webpage?
Hi, Our website is set up so that our top menu is on every page, which means every page is going to have around the same amount of internal links (225-ish). Is this an issue that needs to be fixed for our pages to rank, or is it only a recommendation that doesn't really impact SEO that much? If it is the only issue listed for a particular page, is there another reason that page might not be ranking even though it has a 99 score? Or is because of having 225 internal links? I have many product pages on my website that have a 99 score on the Page Optimization with the only recommendation being an info that says not to have too many internal links. My understanding is that internal links are defined as any URL on a page pointing to another part of the same root domain/site. So, for example, my page: https://www.twowayradiosfor.com/Motorola-CP185-p/cp185-lkp.htm has 225 internal links in the source code for that page: Where do I go to fix this issue if I need to get to below 100 internal links? Do I erase the links, or set up a no-follow tag? I appreciate any help or guidance. Thank you! Austin
On-Page Optimization | | AllChargedUp2 -
Which page will rank higher, my main article or the sub article linking from it?
Hi all, Can you help me figure this one out? I'm currently creating content for my website and I very badly want to know which page will rank higher in Google, my main article that has some keywords that are and links to my sub-article, or my sub-article which is optimized for those keywords? I will demonstrate with an example since I'm not sure my question is clear: If I have an article that talks about different kinds of candy and it links to a sub-article that will elaborate on specific candies like a mint candy ,which page will rank for mint candies. Until today I believed that if my sub-article which is linked from my main-article will rank for mint candies since it gets the support from my main article.Lately when experimenting this I found my thoughts to be wrong. Can anyone help me with this one?Any insights? Thanks, Leebi
On-Page Optimization | | Leebi0 -
Ecommerce internal search results pages
I'm working on a ecommerce site that allows product search results pages to be sorted a variety of ways (best selling, newest, by price). Each of these search filters creates a new url i.e. /all/best/1 and /all/best/2; /all/new/1 and /all/new/2; etc. These search results pages have been indexed and the site is receiving enough organic traffic from these pages that I don't want to add noindex,follow to them. I am planning on implementing rel=prev,rel=next for each filter, but I'm concerned about duplicate content considering I can't create unique meta data for each page. Should I canonical all pages to the first search results page without filters applied? Or any other ideas on how I should proceed?
On-Page Optimization | | ang0 -
Duplicate Page Titles? I thought this was good structure....
I have several warnings for duplicate page title.... I thought that I had good structure, but I guess I am doing something wrong. On my website (http://www.farnorthkennel.com), I am getting duplicate page errors for pages like this: http://www.farnorthkennel.com/german-shepherd-puppies-the-girls/hazel
On-Page Optimization | | Joshlaska
and
http://www.farnorthkennel.com/german-shepherd-puppies-the-girls/emerald I thought that this sort of structure was a good idea since the end page is different. Should each page be set up right after the original domain name? I'm new at this....0 -
Drop in Internal Links to Root
This morning I noticed in Google Webmaster Tools that my internal links to my root domain (Home Page), dropped from 428,000 to 58,000. It appears that this could be my header or footer links back to the home page that Google is not showing any more. My programmers claim they have not made any changes over the last 30 days. My rankings and traffic are normal. Any cause for concern?
On-Page Optimization | | tdawson090 -
If I have too many on-page links can I reduce it with nofollow tags or do the links have to be removed?
On my site I have a top nav drop down menu but once visitors go to one particularly large subsection, that menu is repeated on the left for easier viewing. As a result, I shoot over 100 links on page. Can I put nofollow or noindex tags on the left side links and reduce my "official" on-page links count or do I have to actually eliminate some of the links? Thanks, Oak
On-Page Optimization | | CSA-2316710