Schema.org problems (still)
-
Hey Mozzers,
I've been working at this for a while now, and I can't figure out why the rich snippet data is not getting pulled for our reviews and product rating. I've included a sample URL where we have reduced the schema.org markup:
http://www.tripcentral.ca/vacations-packages_00_03_JN_gran-bahia-principe-coba.html
| } |
Any thoughts? I was told not to list multiple reviews, so I took them out. But it's still not being picked up in the SERPs, and we would really like the star rating data to appear.
Any useful advice would be appreciated!
-
I haven't had any trouble using JSON-LD for organizations and people. I have only used in-line product schema so far for products. You could try adding the in-line markup if you haven't already, and leaving the JSON-LD script up.
-
I've corrected the brackets with our dev, but it's still not pulling up.
Here is the change we made to the code:
| "@context": "http://schema.org", |
| | "@type": "BreadcrumbList", |
| | "itemListElement": [ |
| | { |
| | "@type": "ListItem", |
| | "position": 1, |
| | "item": { |
| | "@id": "http://www.tripcentral.ca", |
| | "name": "Home" |
| | } |
| | },{ |
| | "@type": "ListItem", |
| | "position": 2, |
| | "item": { |
| | "@id": "http://www.tripcentral.ca/vacations-packages_index.html", |
| | "name": "Vacations Packages" |
| | } |
| | },{ |
| | "@type": "ListItem", |
| | "position": 3, |
| | "item": { |
| | "@id": "http://www.tripcentral.ca/vacations-packages_mexico.html", |
| | "name": "Mexico" |
| | } |
| | },{ |
| | "@type": "ListItem", |
| | "position": 4, |
| | "item": { |
| | "@id": "http://www.tripcentral.ca/vacations-packages_mayan-riviera-maya.html", |
| | "name": "Mayan Riviera-Maya" |
| | } |
| | }] |
| | } |I went through with the dev team and its passing the testing tool.
Is there anything else I could be missing?
-
Are you including the itemprop="aggregateRating" itemscope="" itemtype="http://schema.org/AggregateRating" somewhere else?
Also, I think with products you need to wrap it all in a div with itemtype="http://schema.org/Product"
-
Could it be because we are using JSON that the rich snippet data is not being pulled?
-
Right now I am just focusing on getting the product rating up. Here is the code I am going to try:
Dreams Tulum
A beautiful resort, dream weddings and amazing staff.
Hotel rating:
5 out of
5 with
8 ratingsI am trying to go to the basics here- I think this looks correct?
-
Have a look at: https://developers.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool/
Your page only has "hotel, product, and breadcrumb list", this should help you: https://developers.google.com/structured-data/rich-snippets/reviews
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why is a canonicalized URL still in index?
Hi Mozers, We recently canonicalized a few thousand URLs but when I search for these pages using the site: operator I can see that they are all still in Google's index. Why is that? Is it reasonable to expect that they would be taken out of the index? Or should we only expect that they won't rank as high as the canonical URLs? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | yaelslater0 -
Referral Spam (trafficmonetize.org, 4webmasters.org, etc)
So, we've been plagued with pretty much ALL of our clients from traffic from spammy websites, and even a porn site or two. Here are a few examples: 4webmasters Floatingsharebuttons Trafficmonetize.org 100dollarseo We are seeing our websites negatively impacted by this. How could this be happening?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Digalign0 -
Too Many External Links A Problem
Client is thinking of adding a directory to an eCommerce site which users would find useful. It would help users find other services and vendors that are specific to the niche of products this site is selling. My only concern is it would create a number of external links to other sites. Even though they're related, would this diminish our standing with Google search?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | alrockn0 -
Negative seo problem
Hello, Someone attacked our website with negative SEO and our website fell drastically. If i use bing webmaster tools link explorer i see dozens and dozens spam links but if open a link i don't find this link in that website. Is it possible that someone added the links and then remove thouse links when we got hit? Or is it possible to hide the links that they don't show up on webpage but they are still there? How can i use Google disavow links tool if there is no links in thouse websites but Bing link explorer shows spam domains pointing to our website. BR, T
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | otsinguturundus0 -
Schema Training
What is the best way to familiarize myself with schema and updating it on the website. I know it is important and I understand the concept. It's the implementation and actual mark-up that I struggle with. Are there certifications or courses I could take that would teach me implementation techniques? Is there a blog or person I should follow that is awesome at explaining it?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | In-House-SEO-Team0 -
All Thin Content removed and duplicate content replaced. But still no success?
Good morning, Over the last three months i have gone about replacing and removing all the duplicate content (1000+ page) from our site top4office.co.uk. Now it been just under 2 months since we made all the changes and we still are not showing any improvements in the SERPS. Can anyone tell me why we aren't making any progress or spot something we are not doing correctly? Another problem is that although we have removed 3000+ pages using the removal tool searching site:top4office.co.uk still shows 2800 pages indexed (before there was 3500). Look forward to your responses!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | apogeecorp0 -
Think I may have found a problem with site. Can you confirm my suspicions?
So I've been wracking my brain about a problem. I had posted earlier about our degrading rank that we haven't been able to arrest. I thought we were doing everything right. Many years ago we had a program that would allow other stores in our niche use our site as a storefront if they couldn't deal with setting up their own site. They would have their own homepage with their own domain but all links from that page would go to our site to avoid duplicate content issues (before I knew about canonical meta tags or before they existed, I don't remember). I just realize that we had dozens of these domains pointing to our site without nofollow meta tags. Is it possible that this pattern looked like we were trying to game Google and have been penalized as some kind of link farm since Panda? I've added nofollow meta tags to these domains. If we were being penalized for this, should this fix the problem?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | IanTheScot0 -
Nuanced duplicate content problem.
Hi guys, I am working on a recently rebuilt website, which has some duplicate content issues that are more nuanced than usual. I have a plan of action (which I will describe further), so please let me know if it's a valid plan or if I am missing something. Situation: The client is targeting two types of users: business leads (Type A) and potential employees (Type B), so for each of their 22 locations, they have 2 pages - one speaking to Type A and another to Type B. Type A location page contains a description of the location. In terms of importance, Type A location pages are secondary because to the Type A user, locations are not of primary importance. Type B location page contains the same description of the location plus additional lifestyle description. These pages carry more importance, since they are attempting to attract applicants to work in specific places. So I am planning to rank these pages eventually for a combination of Location Name + Keyword. Plan: New content is not an option at this point, so I am planning to set up canonical tags on both location Types and make Type B, the canonical URL, since it carries more importance and more SEO potential. The main nuance is that while Type A and Type B location pages contain some of the same content (about 75%-80%), they are not exactly the same. That is why I am not 100% sure that I should canonicalize them, but still most of the wording on the page is identical, so... Any professional opinion would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | naymark.biz0