Is there a way to map your on-page SEO changes with the organic growth?
-
Hi Mozzers,
I was just wondering if there's a way we can map our on-page SEO changes with the increase/decrease in organic traffic. For instance, I introduced brand pages' link the product page breadcrumbs and suddenly organic traffic for my brand pages increase from X to 2X in 1 couple of weeks. Now, this can be because of this breadcrumb change purely or because of some algorithm update or may be, bots started finding the content interesting and hence, started ranking them up (in case the brand pages were launched recently).
So, you can't say which change should be mapped to what increase/decrease in organic traffic. Or, is there a way to map this?
-
Thank you so much Sir Alan. Really appreciate your reply
-
I'm only going to add to all of these great responses by saying this:
1. Even if you make a change today, it does NOT mean you will be able to know EXACTLY when that change is acknowledged by Google. This is especially true on larger sites. It can take days, weeks, even months for Google to properly recrawl the entire site (even when they crawl every day, some of those URIs were just crawled the day before or three days ago, while only a portion of today's crawl will be other, not as recently crawled URIs). And then it can take weeks for all of Google's algorithms to catch up. Along the way, those algorithms may even evaluate only a PARTIAL understanding of the change (while waiting for Googlebot to get to all the other pages).
2. One additional suggestion is to look at in-page analytics within Google Analytics, or a 3rd party click tracking tool to get a better idea of whether people are even clicking on a given link on-page. Just be careful in setting up 3rd party click tracking - do it poorly, and you can cause massive duplicate URL problems. And in-page analytics in GA often aggregates all clicks on all of the individual links on a single page where several point to one common destination URI.
-
Oh wow! Will connect with you on Twitter to understand about the same which can help me plan it better. Hope you won't mind sharing the way your architected your internal tracking tool
-
Yeah I am an Analytic Junkie and I have incorporated my own analytics I built that helps me compare with GA at the same time that helps me dive deeper into the numbers and gives me a more detailed overview of behavior on my pages as well as users.
It's cool
-
Hi Linda,
Yeah! High time to start exploring GA annotations. Needless to say, will definitely post here once I'll be able to find/build a good solution for the same
-
Hi Cesar Bielich,
Thank you so much for the well descriptive explanation, will start exploring GA annotations right away.
Yes, I can code and planning to work on internal analytics system to track these granular pieces but it'll take time to implement such powerful system when you've 10 million + pages and hence, its not a P0 right now. We have integrated GTM as well, and tracking some of these values to some extent. But, as you correctly mentioned that none of these things can be directly mapped to any increase/decrease in organic traffic, I should definitely think about prioritizing my project to understand the correlation between my changes and the organic traffic which can be an awesome asset to understand these things.
-
Hi Nitin,
We found that using Fruition (actually a penalty checker) was pretty useful as well. It overlays all Google updates and SERP changes on your Analytics data. And of course: use annotations in Analytics.
If you figure out a great way to do this, please let me know!
Kind regards,
Linda Hogenes
-
Hello Nitin,
Honestly I think there is no one solution fit for all in this situation. Let’s say you tweak your home page title and rankings get up by 2 positions this never means that this is a standard solution and things might not work the same way for other website.
Even if you test one thing at a time to see how your changes are impacting results, you cannot control the environment completely. Let’s say you fix all 404s on your website and panda roll out on similar dates so you cannot exactly say that if this change in result is because of fixing 404 pages or because of the panda update.
I think it’s very difficult to say exactly what is impacting how much on results but you can do some test and come to a point that few factors has a less weight as compare to others within the industry.
Just a thought!
-
Well there are a few factors you have to consider with this and unfortunately there is no definitive way to determine this with Google, but with patience, over time you can see the benefits from your changes and track them.
When it comes to algorithmic changes there is practically no way to monitor that. Google has told us time and time again that they make many changes constantly (almost daily and up to 500 to 600 changes a year) to their algorithm to make it smarter so you have to consider that. Tracking changes to on-page SEO with specific algorithmic changes will pretty much be impossible, BUT it's not impossible if you track it correctly. Remember that your users will give you all the information you need to determine if your changes are working, and the more your users are happy the more they will share and spread the news so that will eventually evolve into shares and backlinks.
Tracking on-page SEO changes to organic traffic
This one is simpler than you think as long as you know how to do it correctly. One of the best tools for this is Google Analytics. Here are a few things you can do.
- Google Analytics provides annotations for you to create markers when you make changes on your site. You can then track the changes you made with the annotation and see the difference in traffic.
- Track changes with "compare to" option when selecting dates that help you see the differences in traffic from the previous period. For instance if you made a change on November 1st. Use the compare tool and track the previous week of traffic to that date range and see if you can see an increase in organic traffic.
- You can "compare to" in the same way with more specific setting and see which pages on your site (or ones you made changes to) increased or decreased after you made your changes. Just run the "compare to" scenario the same in Google Analytics, but do it in Behavior > Site Content > All Pages and see which pages increased in traffic from your on-page changes.
When making these changes remember to use Google Analytics and track specific organic changes in traffic by going to Acquisition > All Traffic > Source/Medium and then click on your search engine of choice (I'm assuming Google of course). Or when tracking other changes use different dimensions and metrics to track the organic traffic.
Can you code?
Depending if you are using wordpress or built your site from scratch knowing how to include some code on your site to track your changes helps tremendously.
For instance you can add some code to help you determine how many users are clicking on your breadcrumbs links and see if that help creates more organic traffic. PHP is great for this. Instead of having the links on your breadcrumbs sending the user to the exact page, have it go to a script that logs that click in a database so that you can see how many users are clicking on your breadcrumbs links and which ones, then send them to the desired page. Over a few weeks you will see which clicks are the most effective.
If you need some help you can private message me here at Moz and I can show you what I mean. I have been a web developer for over 15 years and I am a Analytic junkie so I can show you some things
Hope that helps
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Solved How to solve orphan pages on a job board
Working on a website that has a job board, and over 4000 active job ads. All of these ads are listed on a single "job board" page, and don’t obviously all load at the same time. They are not linked to from anywhere else, so all tools are listing all of these job ad pages as orphans. How much of a red flag are these orphan pages? Do sites like Indeed have this same issue? Their job ads are completely dynamic, how are these pages then indexed? We use Google’s Search API to handle any expired jobs, so they are not the issue. It’s the active, but orphaned pages we are looking to solve. The site is hosted on WordPress. What is the best way to solve this issue? Just create a job category page and link to each individual job ad from there? Any simpler and perhaps more obvious solutions? What does the website structure need to be like for the problem to be solved? Would appreciate any advice you can share!
Reporting & Analytics | | Michael_M2 -
Big drop in organic traffic after moving the website-should we still do 301 redirects?
Hi,
Reporting & Analytics | | martin1970
We have a website that got redesigned with new urls in Jan 31, 2018. Since then our SEO traffic has gone down big time and to never recover. We did not do any 301 redirects back then (very stupid I know but I was not in charge then). So my question is would it be beneficial to 301 redirect old urls that were once ranked but now have all 404 errors or is it too late to do these 301 to gain any benefits? If a page that was once ranked and then have a 404 error, how long does google keep that 404 page in their database? I have heard information saying that although the page is a 404 it may still be indexed in their backend for some time and then it completely drops off all together. If so do you know how long time they would keep those 404 in their database? The old urls may have had good backlinks pointed to them because the organic traffic was good back then. So I wonder if doing 301 right now would help send some link juice over to the new urls? Or would this be a complete waste of time? Cheers Martin1 -
Is Google's Knowledge Graph stealing sessions from the organic channel?
Does Google count it as an organic session in Google Analytics when a searcher clicks on the "get directions", "call" or even "website" from Google's Knowledge Graph. Are the articles that prove or disprove this question? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | SearchOpt0 -
Tracking Organic Traffic and Conversions from multiple TLDs with Google Tag Manager
Hello Guys, I want to track traffic / conversions from different domains (basically same brand - but a lot of different TLD's). The "problem" is that the main conversion which I want to track always happens on the .com TLD and all other TLD's link to there. The problem is, that now the traffic always counts as Referral Traffic, even after setting up cross domain tracking over the google tag manager... So example: Sessions begins on example.co.uk/landing-page11 after User searched on it on google. He decides to buy the product and therefore moves to example.com for the checkout process. No I will have the conversion in my google analytics under referral with example.co.uk. --> but I want to have it under organic, and not under referral. How I can manage this? Thanks for you Help!
Reporting & Analytics | | _Heiko_0 -
I want to take down some pages, how do I inform google?
Hey Guys, I'm hoping someone can help - I'm in the midst of a site re-design - whilst one of our biggest reasons for the redesign was to create more space to write valuable content and unique content I have been reading other posts on moz about content auditing. I have come across a few articles in my own blog that are from 250 - 300 words to which the articles seem similar and the traffic is low. I'm wondering while I'm left to consolidate these articles and create a fresh article for each entry that is more in-depth, when I consolidate or delete these pages - do I need to inform google these pages have now been deleted? If so using Wordpress what is the best way to do this? Cheers and would appreciate some advise Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | edward-may0 -
Site relaunch and impact on SEO
I have some tough decisions to make about a web site I run. The site has seen around for 20 years (September 1995, to be precise, is the date listed against the domain). Over the years, the effort I've expanded on the site has come and gone, but I am about to throw a lot of time and effort back into it. The majority of the content on the site is pretty dated, isn't tremendously useful to the audience (since it's pretty old) and the site design and URL architecture isn't particularly SEO-friendly. In addition, I have a database of thousands vendors (for the specific industry this site serves). I don't know if it's a factor any more but 100% of the links there have been populated by the vendors themselves specifically requesting inclusion (through a form we expose on the site). When the request is approved, the vendor link shows up on the appropriate pages for location (state) and segment of the industry. Though the links are all "opt-in" from vendors (we've never one added or imported any ourselves), I am sure this all looks like a terrible link farm to Google! And some vendors have asked us to remove their link for that reason 🙂 One final (very important) point. We have a relationship with a nationwide brand and have four very specific pages related to that brand on our site. Those pages are essential - they are by far the most visited pages and drive virtually all our revenue. The pages were put together with SEO in mind and the look and feel is very different to the rest of the site. The result is, effectively, a site-within-a-site. I need to carefully protect the performance of these pages. To put some rough numbers on this, the site had 475,000 page views over the last year, with about 320,000 of those being to these four pages (by the way, for the rest of the content "something happened" around May 20th of last year - traffic almost doubled overnight - even though there were no changes to our site). We have a Facebook presence and have put a little effort into that recently (increasing fans from about 10,000 last August to nearly 24,000 today, with a net gain of about 2,500 per month currently). I don't have any sense of whether that is a meaningful resource in the big picture. So, that's the background. I want to totally revamp the broader site - much improved design, intentional SEO decisions, far better, current and active content, active social media presence and so on. I am also moving from one CMS to another (the target CMS / Blog platform being WordPress). Part of me wants to do the following: Come up with a better plan for SEO and basically just throw out the old stuff and start again, with the exception of the four vendor pages I mentioned Implement redirection of the old URLs to new content (301s) Just stop exposing the vendor pages (on the basis that many of the links are old/broken and I'm really not getting any benefit from them) Leave the four important pages exactly as they are (URL and content-wise) I am happy to rebuild the content afresh because I have a new plan around that for which I have some confidence. But I have some important questions. If I go with the approach above, is there any value from the old content / URLs that is worth retaining? How sure can I be there is no indirect negative effect on the four important pages? I really need to protect those pages Is throwing away the vendor links simply all good - or could there be some hidden negative I need to know about (given many of the links are broken and go to crappy/small web sites, I'm hoping this is just a simple decision to make) And one more uber-question. I want to take a performance baseline so that I can see where I started as I start making changes and measure performance over time. Beyond the obvious metrics like number of visitors, time per page, page views per visit, etc what metrics would be important to collect from the outset? I am just at the start of this project and it is very important to me. Given the longevity of the site, I don't know if there is much worth retaining for that reason, even if the content changes radically. At a high level I'm trying to decide what questions I need to answer before I set off on this path. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Thanks.
Reporting & Analytics | | MarkWill0 -
SEO Working GREAT! Although Keyword Rankings Only Directing to Home Page.
Since I've become a fellow MOZer I've seen an increase on my sites and proud to say that ALL of my clients have now accomplished 1st page rankings on at least 2 of their top 3 keywords. Yes, I am as stoked as them. Although I am a bit worried because as I rank keywords and test them on Google and engines alike all of our rankings direct to the homepage. I am essentially new to SEO. So as happy as I am to be doing something right I'm worried I'm losing the end user. By having them need to Search our site/menus/blog for the keywords/phrase that got them to us will turn most searchers away. They want the content now. What am I doing wrong? My pages are pretty specific so I never cared to use rel-canonical's...I dont have duplicate content, other than your typical footer/side bar consistent info. So I'm curious where I've gone wrong. Little history on my sites: I Use Joomla 2.5 & 3.x. I manage seo details through sh404seo. I've cleaned all duplicates I can up other than what these dynamic cms generate by just using one. I've done fairly well and all my pages rank A for moz's onpage grader for the keyword optimized around. Any help is appreciate, THANK YOU!
Reporting & Analytics | | Funk-Creative-Media0 -
Duplicate Title Errors on Product Category Pages - The best practice?
I'm getting quite a few 'Duplicate Title Error' on category pages which span over 2 - 3 pages. E.g. http://www.partwell.com/cutting-punches http://www.partwell.com/cutting-punches?page=1 http://www.partwell.com/cutting-punches?page=2 http://www.partwell.com/cutting-punches?page=3 All 4 pages currently have the same title... <title>Steel Cutting Punches</title> I was thinking of adding Page Numbers to the title of each corresponding page, thus making them all unique and clearing the Duplicate Page Title errors. E.g. <title>Steel Cutting Punches</title> <title>Steel Cutting Punches | Page 1 of 3</title> <title>Steel Cutting Punches | Page 2 of 3</title> <title>Steel Cutting Punches | Page 3 of 3</title> Is this the best way to go around it? Or is there another way that I'm not thinking of? Would I need to use the rel=canonical tag to show that the original page is the one I want to be found? Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | bricktech0