Competitor outranking us despite all SEO metrics in our favour
-
Hi,
We are trying to outrank a competitor of ours on Google for around 100 terms that we are both clearly targetting. Our competitor currently 'wins' in the SERPS around 70% of the time, often ranking in the top 3 positions.
The problem is, we are absolutely convinced that all onsite and offsite SEO metrics we are monitoring would suggest that our content should almost always place higher than theirs.
Here is what I know:
- All pages on both websites are rated 'A' by the Moz on-page-grader tool for the phrases we are targetting, with virtually no tech issues to be addressed on either site
- Our domain authority is 10 points higher than theirs
- Neither of us have external links to the relevant pages on our sites (although we are working on some for ours)
- Our Page Authority is considerably higher on average - often by 10 points or more
- We have considerably more linking route domains, from better sites. Also many more total external links
- The HTML title and H1 headings of our pages contain the target phrases at the beginning - our competitors are the same. Although they often ONLY include the target phrases in their title, wheras in our title they might only take up 1/3 of the total characters
- We have images optimised for the target phrases on our pages. As do they.
- We use the target phrases roughly the same number of times in our copy text, as do they
I have totally run out of ideas now for further optimising our site/pages to consistently rank better for these target phrases, although maybe these are a couple of factors that could be having an impact on the rankings:
- The structure of their website is perhaps optimised more for these target phrases - our site is much bigger, so perhaps our 100 pages are given less relevance on our site than their 100 pages? - but surely our stronger page authority would suggest otherwise?
- Perhaps Google is using page engagement statistics to determine that their site is 'betteer' than ours in terms of user appeal and engagment?
Can anyone think of something that I might have missed? Is there another major ranking factor I have perhaps neglected in my research?
I know link building strategies are a good way to approach this in the long run, but we are currently just concerned about why we are not already ranking better when clearly they are not undertaking any link building strategies of their own.
Any help or pointers here would be enormously appreciated.
Thanks
Lou
-
Thanks again to both of you for the pointers.
I just need to get stuck into this now I think. Even delving into just a coupled of the points raised by you has thrown up severel potentially very important areas for me to look to improve.
As a starting point I am going to stop obsessing over those heading SEO metrics that seem to have taken over my life.
Lou
-
EGOL,
Thank you for emphasizing the quality (helpfulness/human value). I only briefly mentioned it in my response, yet it really does need to be a top priority.
-
Lou,
"I just wanted to throw a few factors out there in order to encourage a response like yours - packed full of useful next steps for me to evalaute this further."
THAT is priceless
Pagination:
Loading all content on one page and using a "more" button to "reveal" it, is not a best practice. Individual pages need to exist for individual sub-topic based content. This is especially true since it now appears that Google, while indexing content initially hidden to users, is likely giving less value to that hidden content than content immediately seen.
Pagination is important IF it is executed properly. If you have tens of thousands of results in paginated lists, is that one paginated group, or are they split out into separate groups based on similarity of content? If it's all just one massive group, that's likely another problem to look into, since pagination is meant to be used to say "these pages all contain links to other content where the entire group comprises very similar content around one primary topic".
Internal linking should always point more to main category page destinations than individual pieces of content. It would be unnatural from a usability perspective to link more to individual pieces of content, and thus it would be bad for SEO.
5,000 or so average crawl errors - what is causing those? Are they 404s? Were they previously valid pages? If so, those typically need to not generate 404 but instead be a direct 301 to a highly relevant live page (and where internal links within the site are updated accordingly).
So many more issues to consider...
-
Any help or pointers here would be enormously appreciated.
You are really focused on metrics. Those metrics are good for two things (my opinion, certainly minority opinion here): 1) entertainment value; 2) diverting productive time away from the real work of running a website.
Perhaps Google is using page engagement statistics to determine that their site is 'betteer' than ours in terms of user appeal and engagment?
That is right. Announced here ten years ago. Take all of the time that you spend on metrics and links and start putting it into improving the website. Have the courage to divorce yourself from these metrics for a year. Get engaged in different battles... beating their articles, beating their images, beating their deals, beating their service. Then look at your improved website and how many visitors are engaging it at a higher level.
You still have to pay attention to the technical and usability details explained by Alan, but if you are making genuine improvements in your website, that make it more competitive on the basis of content and benefits to visitors then your metrics will advance on their own.
-
Hi Alan,
Thaks very much for offering your thoughts on this. Really useful comments.
You're right in that I had very much over simplified my analysis of the issue. I just wanted to throw a few factors out there in order to encourage a response like yours - packed full of useful next steps for me to evalaute this further.
On of the points you raised was 'crawl efficeincy; and on further investigation I noticed that we have an awful lot of pagination on our website which users use to browse through our articles (we have 10's of thousands). However the competitor site tends to have all results on one page along with a 'show more' button. Might this be a good place to start? Looking at the cache dates of some of the results in Google, it certainly looks like the competitor pages are being crawled more often.
I also noticed from Google webmaster tools that our internal links report shows that we are giving great prominence to many of our category landing pages, rather than the article pages themselves. Does this sound like an area worh investigating?
5000 or so average crawl errors probably also isn't helping. Particularly given that we seem to only get around 6000 or so page crawled per day. Again, I;m guessing this is worth a lot of attention.
Duplicate page titles also seem to be an issue, so there is certainly lots for me to look at here.
Thanks again
Lou
-
You are asking some very challenging questions, and using some very limited metric comparisons to try to figure it all out. SEO is not so easy. If it was, many sites would be in a continual state of leap-frog as they out-do each other in similar ways.
Here are just a few questions / considerations to add to your process:
1. Regardless of the number of instances of one or more keywords on a page, what is the total volume of highly relevant content on a given page? How helpful is that information in answering questions your specific target visitors are needing to have answered? How helpful is it in being able to allow visitors to achieve a goal they came to your site to achieve?
2. How well organized is your content in regard to very similar pages being grouped together in both navigation and URL structure? Since my reading of your question implies the competitor site is much more "tight" in its singular focus, this is a critical factor for your site to evaluate.
3. If their site is much more 'tight' in it's singular focus, how much is dilution a factor on the other pages of your site regarding topical focus and goal intent? If there is any serious dilution happening, you'd likely need even more content within that section you are comparing, to overcome that site's strength in refined singular focus.
4. What technical issues may exist on your site that you may not have considered? Crawl efficiency, page processing speed, canonical or duplicate content confusion? There are many other questions I could list with just this one consideration. Even if the competitor site has some worse signals among these, if any of yours are problematic enough, that alone can be a contributing factor.
5. How much higher is the quality of the inbound link footprint for your competitor in comparison to your inbound links footprint? Just having more links isn't at all a valid consideration if you don't dig deep into the quality issue? If they have 10% of the inbound link volume, yet half or most of their inbound links are from very highly authoritative sites and you have less of those, that is another massive consideration.
Those are just starting point considerations.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Url-delimiter vs. SEO
Hi all, Our customer is building a new homepage. Therefore, they use pages, which are generated out of a special module. Like a blog-page out of the blog-module (not only for blogs, also for lightboxes). For that, the programmer is using an url-delimiter for his url-parsing. The url-delimiter is for example a /b/ or /s/. The url would look like this: www.test.ch/de/blog/b/an-article www.test.ch/de/s/management-coaching Does the url-delimiter (/b/ or /s/ in the url) have a negative influence on SEO? Should we remove the /b/ or /s/ for a better seo-performance Thank you in advance for your feedback. Greetings. Samuel
Moz Pro | | brunoe10 -
Competitor Ranks Highly Despite LOTS of Duplication
One of my Moz campaigns tracks my main competitor. I can't get over the fact that this competitor continues to rank well despite having thousands of duplication issues while I currently have less than 10. Our websites are similar both structurally and product-wise. The two images attached include OSE comparisons for the keyword "kraft envelopes". My competitor ranks #2 for the term, while I rank #9. I don't get why! And again, looking from a top-level perspective, MOZ shows that my competitor's website is full of duplication issues and other problems while my site is healthy as a horse. All responses are greatly appreciated. QmSlfET.jpg 9CDny60.jpg
Moz Pro | | jampaper0 -
Does anyone have an SEO strategic plan template for a beginning SEOmoz'r?
I'm fairly new to the SEO world and am going to be creating an SEO strategic plan for my boss (with his help). I was wondering if anyone had any recommendations on a template to use, outline to follow, must have's/don't need, etc. Anything you're willing to share would be greatly appreciated!
Moz Pro | | kyle21ct0 -
In alt tag of a image can we use #hashtag or domain.com ? Is that good SEO or not allowed ?
Some of the Google Search shows a title has a hashtag of an article, which contain keyword and while tweeting them, the title which has a hashtag automatically very good used for getting traffic to the blog. And other one, can we use the hash tag inside the alt attribute ? Or our domain name with .com in it. Like Google.com or #Google ?
Moz Pro | | Esaky0 -
On-Page SEO Fixes - Are They Relative?
So, I'm implementing on-page fixes for a site that my company runs SEO services for (www.ShadeTreePowersports.com). However, I was wondering if there was a way to rank a pages' SEO quality, in general? As of now, it seems like the only way your recommendations can be consumed and altered is on a keyword basis. However, this seems be the reason I have a good amount of my F-Grades. Since my website sells powersports apparel and accessories, we cover a variety of applicable (but different) keywords like 'Motorcycle parts' or 'snow tubes,' because we sell so many different types of products. But, when I look at my F-Grades - SEOMoz is telling me my homepage is ranking poorly for a multitude of those pertinent keywords - but only because my page isn't catered specifically to each of them (IE: 'Snowmobile Parts' - 'Water Sport Apparel') But, with so many different types of products, catering to a specific one is impossible and would be detrimental. Is there a way to see how a page ranks, without factoring in those keywords? Or a better way that I can use these recommendations more efficiently? Thanks guys!
Moz Pro | | BrandLabs0 -
How to add more competitors
I've used SEOmoz in the past but it's been some time now. Currently in the demo phase and testing out many of the features again, I'm curious whether I can add more competitors above the 3 I entered when setting up my campaign?
Moz Pro | | Cuker0 -
How can a competitor show no internal links?
I'm comparing metrics between my site and competitors. Statistics on Site Explorer show that one competitor has no internal links. How is that possible? http://screencast.com/t/P9WX7R9hpdD Thanks for your insight. P9WX7R9hpdD
Moz Pro | | addventures0 -
All seo reports
I want to find out what all the report's correct definition and when I see improving or going down what does it mean for eg. Organic search report? Keywords? or non-paid keywords?
Moz Pro | | ITWEBTEAM0