H1 tags and keywords for subpages, is it best practice to reuse the keywords?
-
So let's say I have a parent page for shoes, and I have subpages for dress shoes, work shoes, play shoes, then inside each of those pages I have dress shoe cleaning, dress shoe repair, same for work and play shoes.
Would it be ok to use h1 tags like this:
Shoes > Dress Shoes > Dress Shoe Cleaning
Dress Shoe Repair
Work Shoes > Work Shoe Cleaning
Work Shoe Repair
Play Shoes > Play Shoe Cleaning
Play Shoe Repair
Would these be considered duplicate h1 tags since cleaning and repair are used for each subpage? In certain niche companies, it's rather difficult to use synonyms for keywords.
Or is it ok to just keep things simple and use Shoes > Dress Shoes > Cleaning and so on? Especially since we have urls and breadcrumbs that are structured nicely using keywords, for this example both breadcrumbs and urls read like sitename.com/shoes/dress-shoes/cleaning.
Any advice?
-
No problem, happy to help.
If you actually sell the various types of shoes as well and the repairs/cleaning are almost a side-service then yes, your original example is ok since the "dress shoes" nav item would presumably take you to a landing page about dress shoes.
Unless you're getting a large volume of targetted searches for things like "dress shoe repairs", I'd probably just have "Repairs" and "Cleaning" as their own top-level nav items that lead to a single landing page each that covers all 3 types of shoes.
This would be sufficient for the more general terms like "shoe repairs".
The nav would look more like:
Shoes | Boots | Sandals | Shoe Cleaning | Repairs
With the relevant drop-downs under the first 3 items only.
-
Thanks for this, it's been rather helpful, although the example I gave for shoes was just an example. The site currently I'm working on is all about products, and as a benefit to our users we've created further info pages for each product about cleaning and repair. As much as I do see your reasoning for structure to be Services > items It's strongly a focus to have the products be at the forefront of this and the info about the products such as cleaning / repair inside as a subpage, since they wouldn't mind ranking for each product as well ranking for the cleaning and the repair of each of those products as well.
So with this extra bit of info, would you recommend the structure from your comment still?
The way we're doing things on the redesign is, still sticking to the shoe example, if we sold shoes, boots and sandals, and someone went to dress shoe cleaning, we'd structure like: site.com/shoes/dress-shoes/cleaning
A more generic way for this same issue ( without the shoe example ) for cleaning information section for a particular product:
site.com/parent-category(Big keyword)/(secondary big keyword)subcategory-item/(longtail for info related pages)subcategory items cleaning
-
Search engines do quite a good job of understanding what your site/pages/content is about these days so forcing the exact-match everywhere isn't really necessary. Rather than focussing on the H1s for the minute, I think a revision of your nav/site structure may be a better solution; apologies for going almost immediately off topic but it does still answer your question.
A great nav is going to be as "flat" as practical and designed to take the user from page-load to conversion in as fewer steps as possible.
Likewise, if these are core services that you offer, the closer those pages are to the top of your nav the better, no need to bury them several layers deep and miss out on some of that internal strength.
You'll know your target audience better than me but I'd be more inclined to structure it like this:
Shoe Cleaning
Dress Shoes
Work Shoes
Play ShoesShoe Repair
Dress Shoes
Work Shoes
Play ShoesIn most cases you'd even be better off dropping the "shoes" from these sub-items but a menu item of "dress" or "work" is a little confusing in this context.
The reason I'd suggest doing it this way is to satisfy user intent. I'd expect that most of your users have come to your site looking for one particular thing - either shoe repairs or shoe cleaning. It's entirely likely that if they're getting their shoes repaired, they may also be interested in getting them cleaned at the same time, but they arrive on your site with the intent of gathering information on your repairs so getting these should be as clear as possible.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Keywords and relevancy
Should you always go by the highest relevancy when your choose your keywords sor can you take some keywords with the lowest relevancy possible and will it still help your webpage ? Thank you,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics0 -
Best Practice Approaches to Canonicals vs. Indexing in Google Sitemap vs. No Follow Tags
Hi There, I am working on the following website: https://wave.com.au/ I have become aware that there are different pages that are competing for the same keywords. For example, I just started to update a core, category page - Anaesthetics (https://wave.com.au/job-specialties/anaesthetics/) to focus mainly around the keywords ‘Anaesthetist Jobs’. But I have recognized that there are ongoing landing pages that contain pretty similar content: https://wave.com.au/anaesthetists/ https://wave.com.au/asa/ We want to direct organic traffic to our core pages e.g. (https://wave.com.au/job-specialties/anaesthetics/). This then leads me to have to deal with the duplicate pages with either a canonical link (content manageable) or maybe alternatively adding a no-follow tag or updating the robots.txt. Our resident developer also suggested that it might be good to use Google Index in the sitemap to tell Google that these are of less value? What is the best approach? Should I add a canonical link to the landing pages pointing it to the category page? Or alternatively, should I use the Google Index? Or even another approach? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Wavelength_International0 -
Title Tags in Sitecore are the same as navigation. How do I add keyword phrases without effecting my website's navigation?
I am working on overhauling the on-page SEO for ecommerce website on Sitecore. I've done all my research and I am ready to plug the Title tags and descriptions in. So, if the page on Navigation is 'SHOP' this is in the Title tag box. How do I add my 70 characters of keywords? Thanks. JOE
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | iJoe0 -
Do I use H1 tag for logo or page content?
Should the h1 tag be used for the main page content or the logo? I understand the original method was too H1 the logo with the main search term, does this still hold true or should it be content focused?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoman100 -
The best tool
Hi friends !! I have a huge question . Which is the best tool for SEO? I am using a lot of tools but I would like to know more ways to position my website in the top . I hope that you can help me! Regards , Carlos Zambrana
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CarlosZambrana1 -
Best practice for H1 on site without H1 - Alternative methods?
I have recently set up a mens style blog - the site is made up of articles pulled in from a CMS and I am wanting to keep the design as clean as possible - so no text other than the articles. This makes it hard to get a H1 tag into the page - are there any solutions/alternatives? that would be good for SEO? The site is http://www.iamtheconnoisseur.com/ Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SWD.Advertising0 -
Best way to implement canonical tags on an ecommerce site with many filter options?
What would be the best way to add canonical tags to an ecommerce site with many filter options, for example, http://teacherexpress.scholastic.com? Should I include a canonical tag for all filter options under a category even though the pages don't have the same content? Thanks for reading!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DA20130 -
Rel Alternate tag and canonical tag implementation question
Hello, I have a question about the correct way to implement the canoncial and alternate tags for a site supporting multiple languages and markets. Here's our setup. We have 3 sites, each serving a specific region, and each available in 3 languages. www.example.com : serves the US, default language is English www.example.ca : serves Canada, default language is English www.example.com.mx : serves Mexico, default language is Spanish In addition, each sites can be viewed in English, French or Spanish, by adding a language specific sub-directory prefix ( /fr , /en, /es). The implementation of the alternate tag is fairly straightforward. For the homepage, on www.example.com, it would be: -MX” href=“http://www.example.com.mx/index.html” /> -MX” href=”http://www.example.com.mx/fr/index.html“ />
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Amiee
-MX” href=”http://www.example.com.mx/en/index.html“ />
-US” href=”http://www.example.com/fr/index.html” />
-US” href=”http://www.example.com/es/index.html“ />
-CA” href=”http://www.example.ca/fr/index.html” />
-CA” href=”http://www.example.ca/index.html” />
-CA” href=”http://www.example.ca/es/index.html” /> My question is about the implementation of the canonical tag. Currently, each domain has its own canonical tag, as follows: rel="canonical" href="http://www.example.com/index.html"> <link rel="canonical" href="http: www.example.ca="" index.html"=""></link rel="canonical" href="http:>
<link rel="canonical" href="http: www.example.com.mx="" index.html"=""></link rel="canonical" href="http:> I am now wondering is I should set the canonical tag for all my domains to: <link rel="canonical" href="http: www.example.com="" index.html"=""></link rel="canonical" href="http:> This is what seems to be suggested on this example from the Google help center. http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=189077 What do you think?0