Severe rank drop due to overwritten robots.txt
-
Hi,
Last week we made a change to drupal core for an update to our website. We accidentally overwrote our good robots.txt that blocked hundreds of pages with the default drupal robots.txt. Several hours after that happened (and we didn't catch the mistake) our rankings dropped from mostly first, second place in Google organic to bottom and mid first page.
Basically I believe we flooded the index with very low quality pages at once and threw a red flag and we got de-ranked.
We have since fixed the robots.txt and have been re-crawled but have not seen a return in rank.
Would this be a safe assumption of what happened? I haven't seen any other sites getting hit in the retail vertical yet in regards to any Panda 2.3 type of update.
Will we see a return in our results anytime soon?
Thanks,
Justin
-
Your present approach is correct. Ensure all these pages are tagged as noindex for now. Remove the block from robots.txt and let Google and Bing crawl these pages.
I would suggest waiting until you are confident all the pages were removed from Google's index, then check Yahoo and Bing. If you decide that robots.txt is the best decision for your company, then you can replace the disallows after confirming your site is no longer affected by these pages.
I would also suggest that, going forward, you ensure any new pages on your site that you do not wish to index always include the appropriate meta tag. If this issue happens again then you will have a layer of protection in place.
-
We're pretty confident thus far that we have flooded the index with about 15,000 low rank URLs all at once. This has happened once in the past a few years back but we didn't flood their index, they were newer pages at the time in which were low quality and could have been seen as spam since there was no real content but adsense so we removed them with a disallow in robots.
We are adding the meta no-index to all of these pages. You're saying we should remove the disallow in robots.txt so googlebot can crawl these pages and see the meta-noindex?
We are a very large site and we're crawled often. We're a PR7 site and MOZrank DA is 79/100. We have dropped from 82.
We're hoping these URLs will be removed quickly, I don't think there is a way of removing 15k links in GWMT without setting off flags also.
-
There is no easy answer for how long it will take.
If your theory about the ranking drop being caused by these pages being added is correct, then as these pages are removed from Google's index, your site should improve. The timeline depends on the size of your site, your site's DA, the PA and links for these particular pages, etc.
If it was my site I would mark the calendar for August 1st to review the issue. I would check all the pages which were mistakenly indexed to be certain they were removed. After, I would check the rankings.
-
Hi Ryan,
Thanks for your response. Actually you are correct. We have found some of the pages that should be no follows still indexed. We are now going to use the noindex, follow meta tags on these pages because we can't afford to have theses pages indexed as they are particularly for clients/users only and are very low quality and have been flagged before.
Now, how long until we see our rank move back? Thats the real big question.
Thanks so much for your help.
Justin
-
That's a great answer Ryan... I wonder, just out of curiosity, if it wouldn't hurt to look at the cached version of the pages if they're indexed? I'd be curious to know if the date they were cached is right near when the robots.txt was changed? I know it wouldn't alter his course of action, but might add further confirmation that this caused the problem?
-
Justin,
Based on the information you provided it's not possible to determine if the robots.txt file was part of the issue. You need to investigate the matter further. Using Google enter a query in an attempt to find some of the previously blocked content. For example, let's assume your site is about SEO but you shared a blog article about your movie review of the latest Harry Potter movie. You may have used robots.txt to block that article because it is unrelated to your site's focus. Perform a search for "Harry Potter insite:mysite.com" replacing mysite.com with your main web address. If the search returns your article, then you know the content was indexed. Try this approach for several of your previously blocked areas of the website.
If you find this content in SERPs, then you need to have it removed. The best thing to do is add the "noindex, follow" tags to all these pages, then remove the block from your robots.txt file.
The problem is that with the block in place on your robots.txt file, Google cannot see the new meta tag and does not know to remove the content from it's index.
One last item to mention. Google does have a URL removal tool but that would not be appropriate in this instance. That tool is designed to remove a page which causes direct damage by being in the index. Trade secrets or other confidential information can be removed with this tool.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
I have two robots.txt pages for www and non-www version. Will that be a problem?
There are two robots.txt pages. One for www version and another for non-www version though I have moved to the non-www version.
Technical SEO | | ramb0 -
Robots.txt vs. meta noindex, follow
Hi guys, I wander what your opinion is concerning exclution via the robots.txt file.
Technical SEO | | AdenaSEO
Do you advise to keep using this? For example: User-agent: *
Disallow: /sale/*
Disallow: /cart/*
Disallow: /search/
Disallow: /account/
Disallow: /wishlist/* Or do you prefer using the meta tag 'noindex, follow' instead?
I keep hearing different suggestions.
I'm just curious what your opinion / suggestion is. Regards,
Tom Vledder0 -
Detailed ranking question for the pros
Hi Community, We've been struggling with the search engine ranking of our SEO optimised homepage for a number of months. I'm going to provide an overview of the page stats in hope that somebody might have a suggestion as to what the problem might be or where we should be focusing our efforts. I have also provided the stats of our main competitor as I have no idea why they are ranking so high based on the stats provided: URL in question: https://mysite.com On Page Grade for our targeted keyword: A Domain authority: 36 Page authority: 45 Root Doman Links: 57 Total Links: 634 SE Ranking: #17 Competitor URL in question: https://competitorsite.com On Page Grade for same targeted keyword: A Domain authority: 32 Page authority: 43 Root Doman Links: 28 Total Links: 919 SE Ranking: #1 Another strange this about our homepage is that a second tier page on our site is actually ranking higher in the search ranking for the Targeted Keyword (#9), even though this page has not been optimised and has an On Page Grade of F. Does anybody have any suggestions of what we might be overlooking or what the issue here might be? -JF
Technical SEO | | ERpro0 -
Redirect effecting ranking?
I manage the SEO for several different regions which are also based on the same site e.g. example.com/au, example.com/us The /us site has pretty good rankings and changes I'm making to the site are having an impact. The /au site has really bad rankings, even though much of the content is the same. (The /uk site is also awful but we had an issue with 4,500 duplicate pages which were only resolved last week). Crawl diagnostics are only showing 1 major error for a 404 response, I'm receiving a domain authority of 43 and A grade page ranking for some of our targeted keywords. I could believe that this isn't necessarily going to get us a top 10 rating but I would have thought we would be in the top 50, especially for branded keywords. Could the lack of ranking be to do with how our domain redirects? If you go to example.com.au you are taken to the home page rather than being redirected to example.com/au. Once you head to an internal page the URL changes to example.com/au/page
Technical SEO | | ahyde0 -
Robots.txt & Mobile Site
Background - Our mobile site is on the same domain as our main site. We use a folder approach for our mobile site abc.com/m/home.html We are re-directing traffic to our mobile site vie device detection and re-direction exists for a handful of pages of our site ie most of our pages do not redirect the user to a mobile equivalent page. Issue – Our mobile pages are being indexed in desktop Google searches Input Required – How should we modify our robots.txt so that the desktop google index does not index our mobile pages/urls User-agent: Googlebot-Mobile Disallow: /m User-agent: `YahooSeeker/M1A1-R2D2` Disallow: /m User-agent: `MSNBOT_Mobile` Disallow: /m Many thanks
Technical SEO | | CeeC-Blogger0 -
Rank tracker and Rankings report differs
Hi all Is this normal? I have set up a campaign for a site. Tracking a variety of keywords. For one of them, which is a quite important keyword I've been working on I've moved down one step in my rankings report. This is first of all weird because my on page optimization went from grade c to a, and even weirder beacuse if I run Rank Tracker tool on the keyword and the URL I see that I've moved up 6 steps, to 15 in Google. Kinda makes it hard to grasp if I'm on the right path or not! (I've checked and they are both results on google.dk, same URL and same keyword - exact)
Technical SEO | | Budskab0 -
Should search pages be disallowed in robots.txt?
The SEOmoz crawler picks up "search" pages on a site as having duplicate page titles, which of course they do. Does that mean I should put a "Disallow: /search" tag in my robots.txt? When I put the URL's into Google, they aren't coming up in any SERPS, so I would assume everything's ok. I try to abide by the SEOmoz crawl errors as much as possible, that's why I'm asking. Any thoughts would be helpful. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | MichaelWeisbaum0 -
Mobile site: robots.txt best practices
If there are canonical tags pointing to the web version of each mobile page, what should a robots.txt file for a mobile site have?
Technical SEO | | bonnierSEO0